Febrile Illness AcuteFI-CARENCT07345286
Clinical Aspects, Management and Surveillance of Febrile Illnesses in DRC
An observational study of Febrile Illness Acute and Biomarkers, run by Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium at 1 site in Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Trial summary
The epidemiology and outcome of febrile illnesses in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is poorly documented. The FIKI² study, a prospective observational study of community-acquired febrile illnesses coordinated by ITM and INRB and conducted at 2 clinical sites from 2021 to 2023, has deepened the knowledge of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 months and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Febrile Illness Acute, Biomarkers, Surveillance
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDemocratic Republic of the Congo
- Study dates
- 20 Jan 2025to 1 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 months and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: patients with febrile illness presenting at the study site
Who may be able to join
- Ongoing fever objectified at presentation, or documented at home or other health center within 24 hours prior to presentation, defined as: axillary or tympanic temperature > 37.5°C, or oral or rectal temperature > 38°C.
- Opportunity for contact between patient (or designated relative) and study team on days 7, 14 and 21.
- Informed consent to participate signed by the patient (adult) or a legally acceptable representative (child or patients whose condition does not allow them to sign informed consent), with the assent of children aged 12 and over, wherever possible.
Who cannot join
- Child less than two months old.
- Hospitalization of > 48h in the last 14 days.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Democratic Republic of the Congo1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Renaissance
Kinshasa
About this study
Official title: Aspects Cliniques, Prise en Charge et Surveillance Des Maladies fébriles en RDC
The epidemiology and outcome of febrile illnesses in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is poorly documented. The FIKI² study, a prospective observational study of community-acquired febrile illnesses coordinated by ITM and INRB and conducted at 2 clinical sites from 2021 to 2023, has deepened the knowledge of clinical presentation, etiology, outcome and profile of inflammatory/infectious biomarkers (white blood cells and C-reactive protein, or CRP).
The management of febrile illnesses remains fraught with clinical challenges. Overuse of antibiotics in primary care remains a reality in the field, and has been observed in several studies, including FIKI². A number of initiatives are underway to address this problem, such as the use of biomarkers, the development of treatment guidelines and electronic decision support systems. The FIKI² study highlighted the potential role of CRP in rationalizing antibiotic use. In parallel, the 'AWARE antibiotic book' was published at the end of 2022 by the WHO, providing recommendations on the choice (or otherwise) of antibiotic therapy for over 30 common clinical infections, in both primary care and hospital settings.
Read more
Based on the results of the FIKI² study, the main aim of the FI-CARE study is to investigate the impact of these new tools (CRP biomarker, AWARE antibiotic book, and electronic decision support systems) on first-line antibiotic use. Secondly, the study will consolidate previous results from FIKI² sites in terms of monitoring the etiologies of community-acquired febrile illnesses (particularly arboviruses); and reinforce this monitoring at new sites (depending on opportunities). This complementary study will also pursue FIKI²'s strategic objectives of strengthening clinical research capacity and consolidating biobanks in the DRC.
FI-CARE is a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study of adults and children presenting to the emergency department or outpatient clinic with community-acquired febrile illness. A laboratory component with sample storage in a biobank is added in a modular fashion according to laboratory and research capacities, epidemiological interest and available funds.
Read the detailed description
The management of febrile illnesses in low resource settings remains fraught with clinical challenges. Overuse of antibiotics in primary care remains a reality in the field, and has been observed in several studies. A number of initiatives are underway to address this problem, such as the use of biomarkers, the development of treatment guidelines and electronic decision support systems. The 'AWARE antibiotic book' was published at the end of 2022 by the WHO, providing recommendations on the choice (or otherwise) of antibiotic therapy for over 30 common clinical infections, in both primary care and hospital settings.
As in most sub-Saharan African countries, very little data is available in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) on the epidemiology, clinical presentation, causes and outcome of febrile illnesses, and research capacity is generally very weak.
FIKI² was a bi-centric observational study of febrile illnesses conducted between March 29, 2021 and October 9, 2023 at two newly established research sites in the DRC: (i) the pediatric emergency department of the Hôpital Général de Référence de Kinshasa (HGRK) - now the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Renaissance (CHUR) - , and (ii) the emergency and outpatient department of the Hôpital Général de Référence (HGR) of the Institut Médical Evangélique (IME) in Kimpese.
The study prospectively recruited patients presenting with fever and collected data on clinical and laboratory characteristics at the time of consultation and during a three-week follow-up period. The study included the routine performance of a thick smear and/or RDT for malaria, in line with routine care, as well as the performance of an RDT for dengue and the measurement of CRP, hemoglobin, white blood cell count and differentiation as study laboratory procedures.
The study was also integrated for part of its duration into a blood culture surveillance project (protocol approved in Belgium and DRC). Blood samples were also collected for long-term storage and secondary research during the second phase of the study for consenting patients.
The conduct of the study was integrated with research and clinical capacity building, focusing on clinical assessment and CRP evaluation in the management process, in order to reduce antibiotic overuse.
The study provided important insights into the clinical presentation of febrile illnesses, and confirmed the significant impact of malaria on CRP levels, as well as its discriminating value in cases of undifferentiated fever and non-malarial respiratory tract infection. It highlighted a relatively high frequency of fever-associated bacteremia in ambulatory patients (of unclear clinical significance). The study confirmed high rates of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. While FIKI² was not an interventional study, it was observed that the implementation of CRP was progressively associated with a marked reduction in antibiotic use (especially in cases of undifferentiated fever and non-malarial respiratory tract infection with normal CRP levels), once this test was integrated into the reasoning of the investigating clinicians.
FI-CARE study is a new study that extends the FIKI² study in terms of consolidating epidemiological and etiological research, but has as new objectives to measure the impact of CRP and the AWaRe guide on clinical management (reduction in antibiotic prescribing) AND to integrate effective surveillance of febrile illnesses with epidemic potential into primary care. Similar data collection tools as the FIKI² study will allow comparative analyses between the 2 studies.
In the first instance, the study takes place at the known site of the pediatric emergency department of the 'Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Renaissance de Kinshasa' (CHUR, formerly HGRK). Other sites may be added in the future, depending on epidemiological interest, research capacity and available funding (compatible with the principle of FA5 funds as seed money that can be used to attract further funding). The study is conceptualized as a modular one, with different levels of research depending on the research capacity and level of funding available at the sites involved:
- Descriptive clinical characterization, focusing on systematic evaluation of tools to improve management (syndromic approach with CRP, AWaRe antibiotic book, or new electronic support systems), and surveillance (relevance of clinical case definitions).
- Analysis of inflammatory biomarkers: C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cells and their differentiation using different types of point-of-care (POC) equipment: portable analyzers and RDTs.
- Etiological investigation of specific febrile illnesses
- Blood culture surveillance: as part of a project to improve antibiotic resistance surveillance and clinical management (protocol approved in DRC and Belgium).
- Evaluation of arboviral pathogens using multiplex diagnostic tools: complementary to surveillance objectives. These analyses will be carried out on stored samples.
- Storage of well-documented samples with clinical data, enabling subsequent development and evaluation of diagnostic and surveillance platforms, and other secondary post-hoc research. Future analyses may include transcriptional profiling of peripheral blood to search for early biomarkers to distinguish bacterial from viral infections.
Study procedures are as follows:
- prospective recruitment of patients presenting with fever
- data collection on clinical and laboratory characteristics at the time of consultation and during a three-week follow-up period
- blood sampling at inclusion for routine analyses, performance of a thick smear and/or RDT for malaria, in line with routine care, as well as measurement of CRP, hemoglobin, white blood cell count and differentiation as study laboratory procedures; and for sample storage
- biobanking of relevant samples (plasma and full blood treated with DNA/RNA shield) for arboviral multiplex PCR and secondary analyses
- Conditions
- Febrile Illness Acute, Biomarkers, Surveillance
- Keywords
- febrile illness, CRP, biomarkers, surveillance, clinical characteristics, Subsaharan Africa, malaria
- Medical subject headings
- Malaria
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| patients with febrile illness | Patients with febrile illness matching inclusion/exclusion criteria presenting at emergency department or outpatient clinic. At this moment one site has been selected. Other sites might be added in the future given rise to other cohorts of febrile patients |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Describe and compare the use of antibiotics for patients with community-acquired febrile illness with different types of support
Describe and compare the use of antibiotics for patients with community-acquired febrile illness with different types of support that can be used throughout the study to guide patient management (e.g. algorithm combining presenting syndrome with CRP results; etiological approach based on the WHO clinical guide (AWARE antibiotic book) or other; or any new electronic decision-making support). Endpoints:
Frequency of antibiotics and class of antibiotics used with different types of support
Measured: at enrollment
Describe the appropriateness of antibiotics for patients with community-acquired febrile illness with different types of support
Describe the appropriateness of antibiotics for patients with community-acquired febrile illness with different types of support that can be used throughout the study to guide patient management (e.g. algorithm combining presenting syndrome with CRP results; etiological approach based on the WHO clinical guide (AWARE antibiotic book) or other; or any new electronic decision-making support). Endpoints:
- Appropriateness of antibiotic use (according to local clinical guidelines if available or WHO)
Measured: at enrollment
Describe and compare adherence to different types of support used
Describe and compare adherence to the tools used to guide patient management (syndromic algorithm; AWARE antibiotic book or other etiological guide; or an electronic decision support). Endpoints:
- frequency of adherence to recommendations
Measured: at enrollment
Describe reasons for non-adherence to different types of support used
Describe reasons for non-adherence to the tools used to guide patient management (syndromic algorithm; AWARE antibiotic book or other etiological guide; or an electronic decision support). Endpoints:
- frequency of reasons for non-adherence
Measured: at enrollment
Describe clinical presentation of febrile illnesses in the DRC.
endpoints:
- Frequency of specific symptoms
Measured: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
Describe laboratory presentation of febrile illnesses in the DRC.
endpoints:
- Frequency of laboratory deviations
Measured: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
Describe severity of febrile illnesses in the DRC.
endpoints:
- frequency of presence of severity criteria
Measured: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
Describe etiology of febrile illnesses in the DRC.
endpoints:
- Frequency of specific and syndromic diagnoses
Measured: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
Evaluate the frequency of hospital admissions for febrile illnesses in the DRC.
endpoints:
- Proportion of patients with a primary or secondary hospital admission
Measured: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
Evaluate the frequency of secondary visits for febrile illnesses in the DRC.
endpoints:
- Proportion of patients with secondary visits
Measured: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
Describe outcome of febrile illnesses in the DRC.
endpoints:
- Proportion of participants resolved, unresolved and dead by day 21
Measured: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
Secondary outcomes (3)
Describe the biomarker profile (CRP, white blood cell count with differentiation) at inclusion of patients with febrile illnesses, and its correlation with specific and syndromic diagnoses and outcome.
endpoint: White blood cell and CRP levels at baseline overall and for different patient categories (specific diagnosis and outcomes)
Measured: at inclusion
Evaluate the field accuracy of clinical case definitions currently used for national surveillance of the epidemic-prone subgroup.
Endpoint:
proportion of cases meeting one of the case definitions for diseases under surveillance correlated with final diagnosis
Measured: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
Evaluate the timeliness of reporting for diseases under national surveillance, of the epidemic-prone subgroup.
Endpoint:
proportion of diseases under national surveillance, of the epidemic-prone subgroup reported to health authorities in time.
Measured: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jan 2026
- Study start20 Jan 2025
- Primary completion1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Febrile Illness AcuteStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Emmanuel Bottieau, PhD, Principal investigator, ITM
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07345286
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1822/24
- Acronym
- FI-CARE
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 9 May 2025
- Last updated
- 15 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Anonymized study data will be supplemented by metadata and documentation, such as the study protocol, annotated CRFs and other information such as codes, which together constitute a dataset, but will not include any direct identifiers.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Aspects Cliniques, Prise en Charge et Surveillance Des Maladies fébriles en RDC
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07345286
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FI-CARE / 1822/24
- Conditions
- Febrile Illness Acute, Biomarkers, Surveillance
- Keywords
- febrile illness, CRP, biomarkers, surveillance, clinical characteristics, Subsaharan Africa, malaria
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Institute of Tropical Medicine, BelgiumUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The epidemiology and outcome of febrile illnesses in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is poorly documented. The FIKI² study, a prospective observational study of community-acquired febrile illnesses coordinated by ITM and INRB and conducted at 2 clinical sites from 2021 to 2023, has deepened the knowledge of clinical presentation, etiology, outcome and profile of inflammatory/infectious biomarkers (white blood cells and C-reactive protein, or CRP).
The management of febrile illnesses remains fraught with clinical challenges. Overuse of antibiotics in primary care remains a reality in the field, and has been observed in several studies, including FIKI². A number of initiatives are underway to address this problem, such as the use of biomarkers, the development of treatment guidelines and electronic decision support systems. The FIKI² study highlighted the potential role of CRP in rationalizing antibiotic use. In parallel, the 'AWARE antibiotic book' was published at the end of 2022 by the WHO, providing recommendations on the choice (or otherwise) of antibiotic therapy for over 30 common clinical infections, in both primary care and hospital settings.
Based on the results of the FIKI² study, the main aim of the FI-CARE study is to investigate the impact of these new tools (CRP biomarker, AWARE antibiotic book, and electronic decision support systems) on first-line antibiotic use. Secondly, the study will consolidate previous results from FIKI² sites in terms of monitoring the etiologies of community-acquired febrile illnesses (particularly arboviruses); and reinforce this monitoring at new sites (depending on opportunities). This complementary study will also pursue FIKI²'s strategic objectives of strengthening clinical research capacity and consolidating biobanks in the DRC.
FI-CARE is a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study of adults and children presenting to the emergency department or outpatient clinic with community-acquired febrile illness. A laboratory component with sample storage in a biobank is added in a modular fashion according to laboratory and research capacities, epidemiological interest and available funds.
Detailed description
The management of febrile illnesses in low resource settings remains fraught with clinical challenges. Overuse of antibiotics in primary care remains a reality in the field, and has been observed in several studies. A number of initiatives are underway to address this problem, such as the use of biomarkers, the development of treatment guidelines and electronic decision support systems. The 'AWARE antibiotic book' was published at the end of 2022 by the WHO, providing recommendations on the choice (or otherwise) of antibiotic therapy for over 30 common clinical infections, in both primary care and hospital settings.
As in most sub-Saharan African countries, very little data is available in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) on the epidemiology, clinical presentation, causes and outcome of febrile illnesses, and research capacity is generally very weak.
FIKI² was a bi-centric observational study of febrile illnesses conducted between March 29, 2021 and October 9, 2023 at two newly established research sites in the DRC: (i) the pediatric emergency department of the Hôpital Général de Référence de Kinshasa (HGRK) - now the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Renaissance (CHUR) - , and (ii) the emergency and outpatient department of the Hôpital Général de Référence (HGR) of the Institut Médical Evangélique (IME) in Kimpese.
The study prospectively recruited patients presenting with fever and collected data on clinical and laboratory characteristics at the time of consultation and during a three-week follow-up period. The study included the routine performance of a thick smear and/or RDT for malaria, in line with routine care, as well as the performance of an RDT for dengue and the measurement of CRP, hemoglobin, white blood cell count and differentiation as study laboratory procedures.
The study was also integrated for part of its duration into a blood culture surveillance project (protocol approved in Belgium and DRC). Blood samples were also collected for long-term storage and secondary research during the second phase of the study for consenting patients.
The conduct of the study was integrated with research and clinical capacity building, focusing on clinical assessment and CRP evaluation in the management process, in order to reduce antibiotic overuse.
The study provided important insights into the clinical presentation of febrile illnesses, and confirmed the significant impact of malaria on CRP levels, as well as its discriminating value in cases of undifferentiated fever and non-malarial respiratory tract infection. It highlighted a relatively high frequency of fever-associated bacteremia in ambulatory patients (of unclear clinical significance). The study confirmed high rates of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. While FIKI² was not an interventional study, it was observed that the implementation of CRP was progressively associated with a marked reduction in antibiotic use (especially in cases of undifferentiated fever and non-malarial respiratory tract infection with normal CRP levels), once this test was integrated into the reasoning of the investigating clinicians.
FI-CARE study is a new study that extends the FIKI² study in terms of consolidating epidemiological and etiological research, but has as new objectives to measure the impact of CRP and the AWaRe guide on clinical management (reduction in antibiotic prescribing) AND to integrate effective surveillance of febrile illnesses with epidemic potential into primary care. Similar data collection tools as the FIKI² study will allow comparative analyses between the 2 studies.
In the first instance, the study takes place at the known site of the pediatric emergency department of the 'Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Renaissance de Kinshasa' (CHUR, formerly HGRK). Other sites may be added in the future, depending on epidemiological interest, research capacity and available funding (compatible with the principle of FA5 funds as seed money that can be used to attract further funding). The study is conceptualized as a modular one, with different levels of research depending on the research capacity and level of funding available at the sites involved:
- Descriptive clinical characterization, focusing on systematic evaluation of tools to improve management (syndromic approach with CRP, AWaRe antibiotic book, or new electronic support systems), and surveillance (relevance of clinical case definitions).
- Analysis of inflammatory biomarkers: C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cells and their differentiation using different types of point-of-care (POC) equipment: portable analyzers and RDTs.
- Etiological investigation of specific febrile illnesses
- Blood culture surveillance: as part of a project to improve antibiotic resistance surveillance and clinical management (protocol approved in DRC and Belgium).
- Evaluation of arboviral pathogens using multiplex diagnostic tools: complementary to surveillance objectives. These analyses will be carried out on stored samples.
- Storage of well-documented samples with clinical data, enabling subsequent development and evaluation of diagnostic and surveillance platforms, and other secondary post-hoc research. Future analyses may include transcriptional profiling of peripheral blood to search for early biomarkers to distinguish bacterial from viral infections.
Study procedures are as follows:
- prospective recruitment of patients presenting with fever
- data collection on clinical and laboratory characteristics at the time of consultation and during a three-week follow-up period
- blood sampling at inclusion for routine analyses, performance of a thick smear and/or RDT for malaria, in line with routine care, as well as measurement of CRP, hemoglobin, white blood cell count and differentiation as study laboratory procedures; and for sample storage
- biobanking of relevant samples (plasma and full blood treated with DNA/RNA shield) for arboviral multiplex PCR and secondary analyses
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| patients with febrile illness | – | –Patients with febrile illness matching inclusion/exclusion criteria presenting at emergency department or outpatient clinic. At this moment one site has been selected. Other sites might be added in the future given rise to other cohorts of febrile patients |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 months and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- patients with febrile illness presenting at the study site
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Ongoing fever objectified at presentation, or documented at home or other health center within 24 hours prior to presentation, defined as: axillary or tympanic temperature > 37.5°C, or oral or rectal temperature > 38°C.
- Opportunity for contact between patient (or designated relative) and study team on days 7, 14 and 21.
- Informed consent to participate signed by the patient (adult) or a legally acceptable representative (child or patients whose condition does not allow them to sign informed consent), with the assent of children aged 12 and over, wherever possible.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Child less than two months old.
- Hospitalization of > 48h in the last 14 days.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Describe and compare the use of antibiotics for patients with community-acquired febrile illness with different types of support
Time frame: at enrollment
Describe and compare the use of antibiotics for patients with community-acquired febrile illness with different types of support that can be used throughout the study to guide patient management (e.g. algorithm combining presenting syndrome with CRP results; etiological approach based on the WHO clinical guide (AWARE antibiotic book) or other; or any new electronic decision-making support). Endpoints: Frequency of antibiotics and class of antibiotics used with different types of support
Describe the appropriateness of antibiotics for patients with community-acquired febrile illness with different types of support
Time frame: at enrollment
Describe the appropriateness of antibiotics for patients with community-acquired febrile illness with different types of support that can be used throughout the study to guide patient management (e.g. algorithm combining presenting syndrome with CRP results; etiological approach based on the WHO clinical guide (AWARE antibiotic book) or other; or any new electronic decision-making support). Endpoints: - Appropriateness of antibiotic use (according to local clinical guidelines if available or WHO)
Describe and compare adherence to different types of support used
Time frame: at enrollment
Describe and compare adherence to the tools used to guide patient management (syndromic algorithm; AWARE antibiotic book or other etiological guide; or an electronic decision support). Endpoints: - frequency of adherence to recommendations
Describe reasons for non-adherence to different types of support used
Time frame: at enrollment
Describe reasons for non-adherence to the tools used to guide patient management (syndromic algorithm; AWARE antibiotic book or other etiological guide; or an electronic decision support). Endpoints: - frequency of reasons for non-adherence
Describe clinical presentation of febrile illnesses in the DRC.
Time frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
endpoints: - Frequency of specific symptoms
Describe laboratory presentation of febrile illnesses in the DRC.
Time frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
endpoints: - Frequency of laboratory deviations
Describe severity of febrile illnesses in the DRC.
Time frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
endpoints: - frequency of presence of severity criteria
Describe etiology of febrile illnesses in the DRC.
Time frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
endpoints: - Frequency of specific and syndromic diagnoses
Evaluate the frequency of hospital admissions for febrile illnesses in the DRC.
Time frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
endpoints: - Proportion of patients with a primary or secondary hospital admission
Evaluate the frequency of secondary visits for febrile illnesses in the DRC.
Time frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
endpoints: - Proportion of patients with secondary visits
Describe outcome of febrile illnesses in the DRC.
Time frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
endpoints: - Proportion of participants resolved, unresolved and dead by day 21
3 secondary outcomes
Describe the biomarker profile (CRP, white blood cell count with differentiation) at inclusion of patients with febrile illnesses, and its correlation with specific and syndromic diagnoses and outcome.
Time frame: at inclusion
Evaluate the field accuracy of clinical case definitions currently used for national surveillance of the epidemic-prone subgroup.
Time frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
Evaluate the timeliness of reporting for diseases under national surveillance, of the epidemic-prone subgroup.
Time frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Anonymized study data will be supplemented by metadata and documentation, such as the study protocol, annotated CRFs and other information such as codes, which together constitute a dataset, but will not include any direct identifiers.
Related trials for Febrile Illness Acute
RecruitingObservational study
Febrile Infants Swedish Study
Febrile Illness Acute, Meningitis, Bacterial
RecruitingPhase 4
Immunogenicity and Safety PCV-20 of the Vaccine Administered During an Acute Febrile Illness in Adults
Acute Febrile Illness, Pneumococcal Infections
RecruitingObservational study
Causes and Outcomes of Febrile Illness in Health Facilities in Rural South and Southeast Asia
Acute Febrile Illness
RecruitingObservational study
The Fever Clinic Acute Respiratory Cohort
Acute Respiratory Infections, Febrile Illnesses
RecruitingObservational study
Transcriptomic Responses for the Identification of Pathogens
Enteric Fever, Acute Febrile Illness
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Emmanuel Bottieau, PhD principal investigator
ITM
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Febrile Illness Acute and Biomarkers, run by Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium at 1 site in Democratic Republic of the Congo.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Democratic Republic of the Congo. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Emmanuel Bottieau, PhD (+3232476450, ebottieau@itg.be), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Describe and compare the use of antibiotics for patients with community-acquired febrile illness with different types of support (time frame: at enrollment). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jan 2026.