Nursing StudentsNCT07349862
Flipped Learning in Nursing Education
A study testing ChatGPT-Based Flıpped Learning Model and Traditional Flıpped Learning Model in people with Nursing Students and Education, run by Namik Kemal University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This study aims to examine the effects of cancer screening training, conducted using a ChatGPT-based flipped learning model, on knowledge, learning motivation, and class participation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 35 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Nursing Students, Education, Flipped Education Model
- What is being tested?
- ChatGPT-Based Flıpped Learning Model and Traditional Flıpped Learning Model
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2025to 15 Feb 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 35 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Students who have taken courses in fundamentals of nursing, internal medicine nursing, physiology, pathology, and computer science, but have not taken a course in oncology nursing,
- Third-year students,
- Those who have voluntarily agreed to participate in the study.
Who cannot join
- Students who were not third-year students,
- Those who had not taken one of the following courses: fundamentals of nursing, internal medicine nursing, physiology, pathology, computer science, oncology nursing,
- Those who did not volunteer to participate in the research were excluded from the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Tekirdag Namık Kemal University
Tekirdağ, Suleymanpasa, 59030
About this study
Official title: THE IMPACT OF CANCER SCREENING TRAINING, CONDUCTED USING A CHATGPT-SUPPORTED FLIPPED LEARNING MODEL, ON NURSING STUDENTS' ACADEMIC KNOWLEDGE, LEARNING MOTIVATION, AND CLASSROOM ENGAGEMENT
This study aims to examine the effects of cancer screening training, conducted using a ChatGPT-based flipped learning model, on knowledge, learning motivation, and class participation.
Read the detailed description
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 46 intervention and 46 control groups. In the study, a training program based on traditional flipped learning and a ChatGPT-based flipped learning model for cancer screenings is applied. Data will be collected using the Knowledge Form, Cancer Screening Knowledge Scale, Higher Education Learning Motivation Scale, and Class Participation Scale.
- Conditions
- Nursing Students, Education, Flipped Education Model
- Being tested
- ChatGPT-Based Flıpped Learning Model, Traditional Flıpped Learning Model
- Keywords
- learning motivation, classroom engagement, flipped learning, ChatGPT
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ChatGPT-Based Flıpped Learning ModelOther
Training group based on ChatGPT-based flipped learning model
Traditional Flıpped Learning ModelOther
Training group based on traditional flipped learning model
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group- ChatGPT Flipped Learning | Experimental | ChatGPT-Based Flıpped Learnıng Model Receives: Other: ChatGPT-Based Flıpped Learning Model |
| Control Group- Traditioanl Flipped Learning | Placebo comparator | Traditional Flıpped Learnıng Model Receives: Other: Traditional Flıpped Learning Model |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cancer Screening Knowledge Scale
This scale consists of 25 items and 3 sub-dimensions. The sub-dimensions are not specifically named. The first sub-dimension contains 10 items (items 8, 17-23, 25, 28), the second sub-dimension contains 9 items (items 4, 5, 7, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 27), and the third sub-dimension contains 6 items (items 1-3, 9, 11, 24). The scale is a three-point rating scale. The scale is answered on a scale of 1 to 3, with "1: True, 2: False, 3: I don't know". When calculating the scale score, "True" answers are worth 1 point, and "False" and "I don't know" answers are worth 0 points. The lowest possible score on the scale is 0, and the highest is 25. When calculating the scale score, the three items with negative connotations (Items 2, 11, 24) should be reverse-coded. The order of the items on the scale is not important; researchers may use a mixed order. There is no cutoff point for the scale score.
Measured: 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Learning Motivation Scale in Higher Education
The scale consisting of 23 items on a 3-point Likert scale, participants are given scores of Disagree (1), Don't Know (2), and Agree (3) for each question in the Learning Motivation Scale in Higher Education. The lowest possible score is 23 and the highest is 69. In the reliability studies of the scale, the Cronbach alpha coefficient of the learning objectives sub-dimension was calculated as 0.83, the avoidance objectives sub-dimension as 0.87, and the approach objectives sub-dimension as 0.82.
Measured: 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jan 2026
- Study start1 Dec 2025
- Primary completion30 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Feb 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Nursing StudentsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Namik Kemal University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dilek Erden, Namik Kemal University
- Investigators
- DİLEK ERDEN, Principal investigator, Namik Kemal University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07349862
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DERDEN-4
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 20 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: I can share it with researchers who request it for reasonable reasons.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- THE IMPACT OF CANCER SCREENING TRAINING, CONDUCTED USING A CHATGPT-SUPPORTED FLIPPED LEARNING MODEL, ON NURSING STUDENTS' ACADEMIC KNOWLEDGE, LEARNING MOTIVATION, AND CLASSROOM ENGAGEMENT
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07349862
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DERDEN-4
- Conditions
- Nursing Students, Education, Flipped Education Model
- Keywords
- learning motivation, classroom engagement, flipped learning, ChatGPT
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Namik Kemal UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Feb 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to examine the effects of cancer screening training, conducted using a ChatGPT-based flipped learning model, on knowledge, learning motivation, and class participation.
Detailed description
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 46 intervention and 46 control groups. In the study, a training program based on traditional flipped learning and a ChatGPT-based flipped learning model for cancer screenings is applied. Data will be collected using the Knowledge Form, Cancer Screening Knowledge Scale, Higher Education Learning Motivation Scale, and Class Participation Scale.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group- ChatGPT Flipped Learning | Experimental | Other: ChatGPT-Based Flıpped Learning ModelChatGPT-Based Flıpped Learnıng Model |
| Control Group- Traditioanl Flipped Learning | Placebo comparator | Other: Traditional Flıpped Learning ModelTraditional Flıpped Learnıng Model |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 35 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Students who have taken courses in fundamentals of nursing, internal medicine nursing, physiology, pathology, and computer science, but have not taken a course in oncology nursing,
- Third-year students,
- Those who have voluntarily agreed to participate in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Students who were not third-year students,
- Those who had not taken one of the following courses: fundamentals of nursing, internal medicine nursing, physiology, pathology, computer science, oncology nursing,
- Those who did not volunteer to participate in the research were excluded from the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT-Based Flıpped Learning ModelTraining group based on ChatGPT-based flipped learning model | Other | Intervention group- ChatGPT Flipped Learning |
| Traditional Flıpped Learning ModelTraining group based on traditional flipped learning model | Other | Control Group- Traditioanl Flipped Learning |
Primary outcome
Cancer Screening Knowledge Scale
Time frame: 4 weeks
This scale consists of 25 items and 3 sub-dimensions. The sub-dimensions are not specifically named. The first sub-dimension contains 10 items (items 8, 17-23, 25, 28), the second sub-dimension contains 9 items (items 4, 5, 7, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 27), and the third sub-dimension contains 6 items (items 1-3, 9, 11, 24). The scale is a three-point rating scale. The scale is answered on a scale of 1 to 3, with "1: True, 2: False, 3: I don't know". When calculating the scale score, "True" answers are worth 1 point, and "False" and "I don't know" answers are worth 0 points. The lowest possible score on the scale is 0, and the highest is 25. When calculating the scale score, the three items with negative connotations (Items 2, 11, 24) should be reverse-coded. The order of the items on the scale is not important; researchers may use a mixed order. There is no cutoff point for the scale score.
1 secondary outcome
Learning Motivation Scale in Higher Education
Time frame: 4 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. I can share it with researchers who request it for reasonable reasons.
Related trials for Nursing Students
Active, not recruiting
AI-Assisted Child Health Podcast Education for Nursing Students
Nursing Education
Not yet recruiting
AI-Driven Video Avatars vs. Customized GPTs: Professional English Learning Among Nursing Students
Artifical Intelligence, Generative Artificial Intelligence
Active, not recruiting
Enhancing Male Nursing Students' Competence in Maternity Care: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Egypt
Maternity Nursing, Obstetric Nursing
Recruiting
AI Simulation to Reduce Stigma and Enhance Psychiatric Readiness in Nursing Students
Mental Illness Stigma, Psychiatric Nursing
Not yet recruiting
Chronic Pain Assessment Via AI-Powered Game
Chronic Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
DİLEK ERDEN principal investigator
Namik Kemal University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ChatGPT-Based Flıpped Learning Model and Traditional Flıpped Learning Model in people with Nursing Students and Education, run by Namik Kemal University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cancer Screening Knowledge Scale (time frame: 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jan 2026.