External Oblique Intercostal BlockNCT07377877
External Oblique Intercostal Block vs Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
A study testing Ultrasound-Guided External Oblique Intercostal Block and Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in people with External Oblique Intercostal Block and Erector Spina Plan Block, run by Karabuk University at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effects of the external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) and the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on postoperative analgesia in adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- External Oblique Intercostal Block, Erector Spina Plan Block, Pain Management
- What is being tested?
- Ultrasound-Guided External Oblique Intercostal Block and Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2026to 15 Apr 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age between 18 and 80 years
- Scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- Classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
- Ability to understand and operate a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device
- Provision of written informed consent
Who cannot join
- History of chronic opioid use for more than four weeks prior to surgery
- Presence of pre-existing chronic pain conditions, such as migraine or fibromyalgia
- History of alcohol or substance abuse
- Known hypersensitivity or allergy to local anesthetics or opioids
- Presence of severe organ dysfunction, including clinically significant hepatic or renal disease
- Any contraindication to regional anesthesia
Show all 9Show fewer
- Severe psychiatric disorders impairing patient cooperation or the ability to reliably assess pain (e.g., psychosis, dementia)
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Presence of hematological disorders
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
Karabuk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Karabük, 78200
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Samsun City Hospital
Samsun, 55200
About this study
Official title: Ultrasound-Guided External Oblique Intercostal Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study
This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effects of the external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) and the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on postoperative analgesia in adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Both EOIB and ESPB are ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques currently used in clinical practice to improve postoperative pain control as part of multimodal analgesia strategies.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common minimally invasive surgical procedure; however, patients may still experience postoperative pain that can increase opioid consumption and delay recovery. Identifying the most effective regional anesthesia technique may improve postoperative analgesia and patient recovery.
In this study, eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive either bilateral EOIB or bilateral ESPB in addition to standardized general anesthesia and postoperative patient-controlled analgesia. Postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, quality of recovery, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and block-related complications will be evaluated during the first 24 hours after surgery. The study aims to provide comparative clinical evidence regarding the analgesic effectiveness of these two regional anesthesia techniques.
Read the detailed description
This study is designed as a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial aiming to evaluate and compare the postoperative analgesic outcomes of two ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques, external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB), in adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.EOIB and ESPB are ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques that have been described for postoperative analgesia in upper abdominal surgery. In this study, the regional analgesic technique to be administered will be determined by randomization, while all other aspects of perioperative care will follow standard institutional practice. Except for the randomized allocation of the regional block technique, the research team will not alter routine anesthetic management.
The primary objective of the study is to compare cumulative intravenous morphine consumption during the first 24 hours after surgery between patients receiving EOIB and those receiving ESPB. Secondary objectives include assessment of postoperative pain scores at rest and during movement, quality of recovery, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), intraoperative opioid consumption, rescue analgesic requirements, block-related complications, and opioid-related adverse effects.
Clinical Routine and Analgesic Protocol
All patients will be managed according to the standard multimodal analgesia protocol routinely used in the general surgery operating rooms of the participating institutions. Preoperatively, standard ASA monitoring will be applied, intravenous access will be established, and perioperative fluid management will be provided according to institutional practice. Mild sedation will be administered using intravenous midazolam at a dose of 0.02 mg/kg. Supplemental oxygen will be delivered via nasal cannula during block performance.
General anesthesia will be induced and maintained using routinely applied anesthetic agents. Intraoperative opioid administration will be titrated according to hemodynamic parameters to maintain mean arterial pressure and heart rate within acceptable limits, and total intraoperative opioid consumption will be recorded.
Postoperatively, all patients will receive intravenous paracetamol and intravenous tramadol as part of routine analgesic care. Intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) will be provided to all patients using standardized settings, including a 1 mg bolus dose, a 10-minute lockout interval, and a 4-hour limit of 20 mg. Rescue analgesia will consist of intravenous tramadol infusion when pain remains uncontrolled (NRS ≥4), followed by intravenous morphine if necessary, according to the predefined protocol.
Block Techniques (Performed as Part of Study Protocol)
EOIB Group:
Patients allocated to the EOIB group will receive bilateral ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal block approximately 45 minutes before surgery. With the patient in the supine position, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed longitudinally along the anterior midaxillary line. Using an in-plane approach, a block needle will be advanced into the fascial plane deep to the external oblique muscle. A total volume of 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered bilaterally. The block will be performed by experienced anesthesiologists.
ESPB Group:
Patients allocated to the ESPB group will receive bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block approximately 45 minutes before surgery. With the patient in the sitting position, following skin disinfection and sterile preparation, a convex ultrasound probe will be placed in a sagittal orientation approximately 2-3 cm lateral to the T7 spinous process. Using an in-plane approach, the needle will be advanced into the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle. A total volume of 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered bilaterally, with sonographic confirmation of cranial and caudal spread.
Postoperative Assessment
Postoperative pain will be assessed using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) at rest and during movement (deep breathing or coughing) at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after surgery. PONV will be evaluated using a verbal descriptive scale, and antiemetic treatment will be administered as needed according to institutional protocols.
Quality of recovery and patient satisfaction will be assessed using the Turkish version of the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire at 24 hours postoperatively. Intraoperative opioid consumption, time to first PCA demand, rescue analgesic requirements, block-related complications (including pneumothorax, hematoma, vascular puncture, epidural spread, intrathecal injection, and local anesthetic systemic toxicity), and opioid-related side effects such as nausea, sedation, and respiratory depression will be recorded.
Dermatomal sensory block distribution will be assessed using a pinprick test with a 27-gauge needle 30 minutes after block application.
All data will be collected by trained personnel blinded to group allocation. Due to the low-risk nature of the interventions and the short follow-up period, no independent data monitoring committee has been established.
- Being tested
- Ultrasound-Guided External Oblique Intercostal Block, Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block
- Keywords
- External Oblique Intercostal Block, Erector Spinae Plane Block, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block
- Medical subject headings
- Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ultrasound-Guided External Oblique Intercostal BlockProcedure or surgery
Bilateral ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal block performed approximately 45 minutes before surgery. A total of 60 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (30 mL per side) is injected into the fascial plane deep to the external oblique muscle.
Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane BlockProcedure or surgery
Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block performed approximately 45 minutes before surgery. A total of 60 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (30 mL per side) is injected into the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle at the thoracic level under ultrasound guidance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group EOIB | Active comparator | Patients allocated to the EOIB group will be transferred to the regional anesthesia area and monitored approximately 45 minutes before surgery. With the patient in the supine position, bilateral ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) will be performed. A total volume of 60 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (30 mL per side) will be injected. General anesthesia will then be administered according to standard practice. In the postoperative period, additional analgesia will be provided using intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound-Guided External Oblique Intercostal Block |
| Group ESPB | Active comparator | Patients allocated to the ESPB group will be transferred to the regional anesthesia area and monitored approximately 45 minutes before surgery. With the patient in the supine position, bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) will be performed. A total volume of 60 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (30 mL per side) will be injected. General anesthesia will then be administered according to standard practice. In the postoperative period, additional analgesia will be provided using intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
24-hour cumulative opioid consumption
Total opioid consumption within the first 24 hours, including PCA-administered morphine and rescue analgesics converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME).
Measured: postoperative day 1
Secondary outcomes (9)
12-hour cumulative opioid consumption
Total opioid consumption within the first 12 hours, including PCA-administered morphine and rescue analgesics converted to MME.
Measured: postoperative 12th hour
Postoperative pain scores (NRS at rest)
Pain status at rest will be assessed by numeric rating scale (NRS) score at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after surgery. In addition, the time until the first analgesic requirement will be recorded. The NRS is an 11-point numeric scale that ranges from 0 to 10.
Measured: postoperative day 1
Postoperative pain scores (NRS during activity)
Pain status during activity will be assessed by numeric rating scale (NRS) score at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after surgery. In addition, the time until the first analgesic requirement will be recorded. The NRS is an 11-point numeric scale that ranges from 0 to 10.
Measured: postoperative day 1
Patient-reported quality of recovery (QoR-15 score)
Quality of recovery will be assessed using the validated 15-item Quality of Recovery questionnaire (QoR-15). Each item is scored on an 11-point numeric scale (0-10), resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better postoperative recovery.
Measured: postoperative day 1
Postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence (PONV)
The severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) will be assessed using a descriptive verbal rating scale at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after extubation. If a score of 3 or more, ondansetron 4 mg IV will be administered and will repeat after 8 hours if required (The PONV scale is 0 = no nausea; 1 = slight nausea; 2 = moderate nausea; 3 = vomiting once; and 4 = vomiting more than once).
Measured: Postoperative day 1
Time to first PCA analgesic demand
Time at which the first analgesic is requested
Measured: Postoperative day 1
Number of patients requiring rescue analgesia
The number of patients requiring rescue analgesia due to inadequate postoperative pain control (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] ≥4) despite standard analgesic management
Measured: Postoperative day 1
Block-related complications
Incidence of complications such as bleeding, hematoma, or local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST)
Measured: Postoperative day 7
Opioid-related adverse effects
Presence of itching, sedation, fatigue, or respiratory depression related to opioid use.
Measured: Postoperative day 7
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jan 2026
- Study start1 Jan 2026
- Primary completion1 Apr 2026
- Study completion15 Apr 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for External Oblique Intercostal BlockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either external oblique intercostal block or erector spinae plane block, and outcomes will be compared between two parallel intervention groups.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Karabuk University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Elif Sarikaya Ozel, Karabuk University
- Investigators
- Elif Sarikaya Ozel, M.D., Principal investigator, Karabuk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07377877
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EOIBESP2026
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 15 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared outside the study team, as the dataset contains sensitive clinical information and data sharing was not included in the original informed consent. Data will be used solely for the purposes of the current study and related scientific publications, in accordance with institutional policies and ethical regulations.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ultrasound-Guided External Oblique Intercostal Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07377877
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EOIBESP2026
- Keywords
- External Oblique Intercostal Block, Erector Spinae Plane Block, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Karabuk UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Apr 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effects of the external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) and the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on postoperative analgesia in adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Both EOIB and ESPB are ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques currently used in clinical practice to improve postoperative pain control as part of multimodal analgesia strategies.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common minimally invasive surgical procedure; however, patients may still experience postoperative pain that can increase opioid consumption and delay recovery. Identifying the most effective regional anesthesia technique may improve postoperative analgesia and patient recovery.
In this study, eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive either bilateral EOIB or bilateral ESPB in addition to standardized general anesthesia and postoperative patient-controlled analgesia. Postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, quality of recovery, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and block-related complications will be evaluated during the first 24 hours after surgery. The study aims to provide comparative clinical evidence regarding the analgesic effectiveness of these two regional anesthesia techniques.
Detailed description
This study is designed as a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial aiming to evaluate and compare the postoperative analgesic outcomes of two ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques, external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB), in adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.EOIB and ESPB are ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques that have been described for postoperative analgesia in upper abdominal surgery. In this study, the regional analgesic technique to be administered will be determined by randomization, while all other aspects of perioperative care will follow standard institutional practice. Except for the randomized allocation of the regional block technique, the research team will not alter routine anesthetic management.
The primary objective of the study is to compare cumulative intravenous morphine consumption during the first 24 hours after surgery between patients receiving EOIB and those receiving ESPB. Secondary objectives include assessment of postoperative pain scores at rest and during movement, quality of recovery, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), intraoperative opioid consumption, rescue analgesic requirements, block-related complications, and opioid-related adverse effects.
Clinical Routine and Analgesic Protocol
All patients will be managed according to the standard multimodal analgesia protocol routinely used in the general surgery operating rooms of the participating institutions. Preoperatively, standard ASA monitoring will be applied, intravenous access will be established, and perioperative fluid management will be provided according to institutional practice. Mild sedation will be administered using intravenous midazolam at a dose of 0.02 mg/kg. Supplemental oxygen will be delivered via nasal cannula during block performance.
General anesthesia will be induced and maintained using routinely applied anesthetic agents. Intraoperative opioid administration will be titrated according to hemodynamic parameters to maintain mean arterial pressure and heart rate within acceptable limits, and total intraoperative opioid consumption will be recorded.
Postoperatively, all patients will receive intravenous paracetamol and intravenous tramadol as part of routine analgesic care. Intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) will be provided to all patients using standardized settings, including a 1 mg bolus dose, a 10-minute lockout interval, and a 4-hour limit of 20 mg. Rescue analgesia will consist of intravenous tramadol infusion when pain remains uncontrolled (NRS ≥4), followed by intravenous morphine if necessary, according to the predefined protocol.
Block Techniques (Performed as Part of Study Protocol)
EOIB Group:
Patients allocated to the EOIB group will receive bilateral ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal block approximately 45 minutes before surgery. With the patient in the supine position, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed longitudinally along the anterior midaxillary line. Using an in-plane approach, a block needle will be advanced into the fascial plane deep to the external oblique muscle. A total volume of 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered bilaterally. The block will be performed by experienced anesthesiologists.
ESPB Group:
Patients allocated to the ESPB group will receive bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block approximately 45 minutes before surgery. With the patient in the sitting position, following skin disinfection and sterile preparation, a convex ultrasound probe will be placed in a sagittal orientation approximately 2-3 cm lateral to the T7 spinous process. Using an in-plane approach, the needle will be advanced into the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle. A total volume of 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered bilaterally, with sonographic confirmation of cranial and caudal spread.
Postoperative Assessment
Postoperative pain will be assessed using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) at rest and during movement (deep breathing or coughing) at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after surgery. PONV will be evaluated using a verbal descriptive scale, and antiemetic treatment will be administered as needed according to institutional protocols.
Quality of recovery and patient satisfaction will be assessed using the Turkish version of the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire at 24 hours postoperatively. Intraoperative opioid consumption, time to first PCA demand, rescue analgesic requirements, block-related complications (including pneumothorax, hematoma, vascular puncture, epidural spread, intrathecal injection, and local anesthetic systemic toxicity), and opioid-related side effects such as nausea, sedation, and respiratory depression will be recorded.
Dermatomal sensory block distribution will be assessed using a pinprick test with a 27-gauge needle 30 minutes after block application.
All data will be collected by trained personnel blinded to group allocation. Due to the low-risk nature of the interventions and the short follow-up period, no independent data monitoring committee has been established.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either external oblique intercostal block or erector spinae plane block, and outcomes will be compared between two parallel intervention groups.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group EOIB | Active comparator | Procedure: Ultrasound-Guided External Oblique Intercostal BlockPatients allocated to the EOIB group will be transferred to the regional anesthesia area and monitored approximately 45 minutes before surgery. With the patient in the supine position, bilateral ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) will be performed. A total volume of 60 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (30 mL per side) will be injected. General anesthesia will then be administered according to standard practice. In the postoperative period, additional analgesia will be provided using intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). |
| Group ESPB | Active comparator | Procedure: Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane BlockPatients allocated to the ESPB group will be transferred to the regional anesthesia area and monitored approximately 45 minutes before surgery. With the patient in the supine position, bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) will be performed. A total volume of 60 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (30 mL per side) will be injected. General anesthesia will then be administered according to standard practice. In the postoperative period, additional analgesia will be provided using intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age between 18 and 80 years
- Scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- Classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
- Ability to understand and operate a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device
- Provision of written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- History of chronic opioid use for more than four weeks prior to surgery
- Presence of pre-existing chronic pain conditions, such as migraine or fibromyalgia
- History of alcohol or substance abuse
- Known hypersensitivity or allergy to local anesthetics or opioids
- Presence of severe organ dysfunction, including clinically significant hepatic or renal disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound-Guided External Oblique Intercostal BlockBilateral ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal block performed approximately 45 minutes before surgery. A total of 60 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (30 mL per side) is injected into the fascial plane deep to the external oblique muscle. | Procedure or surgery | Group EOIB |
| Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane BlockBilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block performed approximately 45 minutes before surgery. A total of 60 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (30 mL per side) is injected into the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle at the thoracic level under ultrasound guidance. | Procedure or surgery | Group ESPB |
Primary outcome
24-hour cumulative opioid consumption
Time frame: postoperative day 1
Total opioid consumption within the first 24 hours, including PCA-administered morphine and rescue analgesics converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME).
9 secondary outcomes
12-hour cumulative opioid consumption
Time frame: postoperative 12th hour
Postoperative pain scores (NRS at rest)
Time frame: postoperative day 1
Postoperative pain scores (NRS during activity)
Time frame: postoperative day 1
Patient-reported quality of recovery (QoR-15 score)
Time frame: postoperative day 1
Postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence (PONV)
Time frame: Postoperative day 1
Time to first PCA analgesic demand
Time frame: Postoperative day 1
Number of patients requiring rescue analgesia
Time frame: Postoperative day 1
Block-related complications
Time frame: Postoperative day 7
Opioid-related adverse effects
Time frame: Postoperative day 7
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared outside the study team, as the dataset contains sensitive clinical information and data sharing was not included in the original informed consent. Data will be used solely for the purposes of the current study and related scientific publications, in accordance with institutional policies and ethical regulations.
Related trials for External Oblique Intercostal Block
Recruiting
Recto-Intercostal Fascial Plane and External Oblique Intercostal Blocks for Pain in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomyin Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Postoperative Pain, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
Recruiting
Comparative Effects of ESP Block and EOIP Block on Postoperative Respiratory Recovery Following Liver Resection
Liver Resection, Upper Abdominal Surgeries
Recruiting
Modified External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Open Nephrectomy
Postoperative Pain, Open Nephrectomy
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block Versus Port-site Local Anesthetic Infiltration for Postoperative Analgesia and Pulmonary Function After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
Recruiting
External Oblique Intercostal Block With or Without Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion for Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Gastric Bypass Surgery
Obese Patients
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Elif Sarikaya Ozel, M.D. principal investigator
Karabuk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ultrasound-Guided External Oblique Intercostal Block and Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in people with External Oblique Intercostal Block and Erector Spina Plan Block, run by Karabuk University at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
24-hour cumulative opioid consumption (time frame: postoperative day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2026.