Knee OsteoarthritisHOPE-OANCT07391449
Heart Rate Variability Guided Physical Activity and Exercise Prescription in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis
A study testing HRV-guided home exercise prescription and Traditional Home Exercise in people with Knee Osteoarthritis, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in Hong Kong.
Trial summary
The aim of this trial is to conduct a 12-week randomised controlled trial comparing an HRV-guided home exercise program with traditional home exercise program for individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), followed by 24-week assessment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- HRV-guided home exercise prescription and Traditional Home Exercise
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 240 participants
- Where
- 1 siteHong Kong
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2027to 31 Dec 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants will include adults aged 45 years and older with symptomatic KOA, diagnosed according to the American College of Rheumatology Clinical Criteria for the Classification and Reporting of KOA.
- Mild to moderate KOA (Kellgren Lawrence grade ≤ grade III),
- a body mass index (BMI) ≤ 40 kg/m2, and
- an average knee pain intensity ≥ 3 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale during the past week.
Who cannot join
- presence of neurological disorders;
- nonambulatory status;
- implanted electrical devices;
- systemic inflammatory arthritis (e.g., gout);
- significant cognitive impairment;
- prior hip or knee arthroplasty;
Show all 13Show fewer
- history of trauma or surgical arthroscopy of either knee within the past six months;
- participation in a similar study within the past six months;
- engagement in an exercise programme within the past six months;
- receipt of knee intra-articular injection within the past three months;
- current anticoagulant therapy;
- recent or planned surgery within three months; and
- any medical comorbidities precluding safe participation in exercise.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Hong Kong1 site
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Kowloon
Shahnawaz ANWER, PhD, +85256239232, shah-nawaz.anwer@polyu.edu.hk
Arnold YL Wong, PhD, +852 2766 6741, arnold.wong@polyu.edu.hk
About this study
Official title: Heart Rate Variability Guided Optimization of Physical Activity and Exercise Prescription to Enhance Rehabilitation Outcomes in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis (HOPE-OA Trial)
The aim of this trial is to conduct a 12-week randomised controlled trial comparing an HRV-guided home exercise program with traditional home exercise program for individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), followed by 24-week assessment. The trial employs a validated HRV sensor and the HRV4Training app to record daily HRV measurements, enabling personalized exercise intensity adjustments. Participants with high HRV are prescribed high-intensity exercises, while those with low HRV undertake low-intensity exercises. In contrast, the traditional exercise group follows a standardised program, progressing from low to high intensity over the 12-week period.
The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the effect of HRV-guided exercise on pain and functional disability in patients with KOA using validated outcome measures assessed at baseline, 12 weeks (post-intervention), and 24 weeks. Longitudinal semi-structured qualitative interviews at weeks 12 and 24 will explore participants' experiences and perceived barriers to exercise adherence. A mediation analysis will elucidate the physiological mechanisms underlying the efficacy of HRV-guided exercise. Secondary objectives include comparing HRV-guided and traditional home exercise programme in terms of exercise adherence, quality of life, sleep quality, self-efficacy, patient satisfaction, physical performance, balance, muscle strength, and lower limb biomechanics. Exploratory aims involve evaluating long-term effects (up to 24 weeks), examining associations between baseline HRV profiles and key outcomes, and determining the cost-effectiveness of HRV-guided exercise relative to traditional programme. The trial employs a robust methodological design, applying mixed-effects models and an intention-to-treat approach for data analysis.
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Being tested
- HRV-guided home exercise prescription, Traditional Home Exercise
- Keywords
- Knee osteoarthritis, HRV, Physical activity, Home exercise, Rehabilitation
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HRV-guided home exercise prescriptionBehavioural
Participants in this group will follow the same exercise structure as the traditional home exercise group; however, their exercise program will be individualised according to daily HRV profiles. Exercise sessions will be performed three times per week for 12 weeks (36 sessions). All participants will conduct HRV measurements, starting one week before the intervention and continuing until its completion. HRV will be measured each morning immediately after awakening and bladder voiding, with participants remaining in the supine position for 5 minutes. The validated smartphone application, "HRV4Training" (http://www.hrv4training.com/) will be used to record HRV data [31]. The analysis provides the root mean square of successive differences between R-R intervals (root mean square successive differences [rMSSD]), derived via photoplethysmography. A 7-day rolling average (Ln rMSSD7d) will be computed, and HRV parameters will be calculated.
Traditional Home ExerciseBehavioural
Participants in this group will measure their HRV daily as described in the next section; however, these HRV measurements will not be used to guide their exercise prescription. Instead, participants will follow a standardized home exercise programme, conducted three sessions per week for 12 weeks (36 sessions). Each session will include a 5-10-minute warm-up, a main exercise component comprising aerobic, strengthening, and stretching exercises (e.g., stretching of lower extremity muscles including knee extensors, knee flexors, and calf), and a 5-minute cooldown [27-29]. The warm-up phase will comprise mobility exercises designed to activate the lower extremity muscles, particularly the quadriceps and hamstrings, while the cool-down will incorporate stretching the muscle groups engaged during the session.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HRV guided home exercise | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: HRV-guided home exercise prescription |
| Traditional home exercise | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Traditional Home Exercise |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Knee pain
Assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale. Higher scores mean more discomfort. The WOMAC pain subscale include five items for pain (scores range from 0 to 20).
Measured: change from pre- to post-treatment (12 weeks)
Physical Function
Assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale. Higher scores mean more difficulty with daily tasks. The WOMAC function subscale include 17 items for functional restriction (scores range from 0 to 68).
Measured: Change from pre- to post-treatment (12 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (15)
Healthcare resource utilisation
Client service recipient inventory (CSRI) will utilised to assess healthcare resource utilisation.
Measured: week 12 and week 24
Quality adjusted life year (QALY)
Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) will serve as outcome metric for economic evaluation, derived from the 5-level EuroQol instrument (EQ-5D-5L). Unadjusted mean costs and cost differences between HRV-G and TRD-G exercise groups will be examined for aggregate and disaggregated cost components, including intervention costs, healthcare service use, and pharmaceutical expenditures. Total cost differences (ΔC) and effect differences (ΔE) will be estimated, adjusting for baseline demographic and health characteristics. Responses from the EQ-5D-5L will be converted into utility scores, which will then be used to calculate QALY changes over the study period. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) will be computed using the formula ICER = ΔC/ΔE.
Measured: week 12 and week 24
Knee pain
Assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale. Higher scores mean more discomfort. The WOMAC pain subscale include five items for pain (scores range from 0 to 20).
Measured: changes from baseline to week 24
Physical function
Assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale. Higher scores mean more difficulty with daily tasks. The WOMAC function subscale include 17 items for functional restriction (scores range from 0 to 68).
Measured: changes from baseline to week 24
Arthritis self-efficacy scale (ASES)
The Arthritis self-efficacy scale (ASES) consists of 20 items that assess a patient's confidence in controlling pain, physical function, and other disease-related factors. The scale has three parts: pain management, function, and other symptoms like fatigue. Each question asks the respondent to rate their self-efficacy on a scale from 10 to 100, with 10 meaning "very uncertain" and 100 meaning "very certain" about their capacity to do particular tasks or deal with symptoms. Therapists give the questionnaire to patients and tell them to think about how confident they usually feel during the past week when they answer. To get subscale scores, the scores in each domain are added together. Higher scores indicate greater perceived self-efficacy.
Measured: Baseline, week 12, week 24
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) used to measure the quality and patterns of sleep in adults. It identify sleep quality between "poor" and "good" sleep by utilizing seven domains: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction. A lower PSQI score indicates better sleep quality, with scores of ≤5 considered good and ≥5 indicating poor sleep quality.
Measured: Baseline, week 12, week 24
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD)
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD) is a widely used self-report scale designed to measure depressive symptoms in the general population, consisting of 20 items that assess how often individuals have experienced specific symptoms over the past week. The score is the sum of the 20 questions. Possible range is 0-60. A score of 16 points or more is considered depressed.
Measured: Baseline, week 12, week 24
Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)
The Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) is a self-reported valid, reliable, and responsive outcome measure for patients with back, neck, knee and upper extremity problems. It has also been shown to have a high test-retest reliability in both generic lower back pain and knee dysfunction issues. It is also clinically responsive to changes over time with chronic pain patients. Patients are asked to identify up to five important activities they are unable to perform or are having difficulty with as a result of their problem eg putting socks on, shopping. Patients are asked to rate their current level of difficulty associated with each activity on an 11-point scale from 0 (unable to perform) to 10 (able to perform at prior level). Higher the score better the function.
Measured: Baseline, week 12, week 24
30 second chair stand test (30sCST)
The 30 second chair stand test (30sCST) requires participants to rise fully from a seated position in an unarmed, straight-backed chair (seat height: 45 cm) and return to a seated position until fully seated. The total number of chair-stand repetitions performed within a 30-s interval will be recorded. Participants will engage in two slow-paced practice repetitions prior to formal testing to ensure comprehension.
Measured: changes from baseline to week 12
40-m fast-paced walk test (40MFPW)
The 40-m fast-paced walk test (40MFPW) requires participants to walk as quickly and safely as possible along a 10-m walkway, turning around a cone positioned 2 m beyond each end of the walkway, resulting in a total distance of 40 m. Participants may utilize a walking aid if necessary, and the duration for task completion will be documented [22].
Measured: changes from baseline to week 12
Stair-climbing test (SCT)
The stair-climbing test (SCT) will require participants to ascend and descend nine stairs, each with a step height of 20 cm, as quickly as possible while ensuring safety. A handrail will be provided for participants who wish to utilize it or require walking aids. The duration for participants to complete the ascending and descending tasks will be recorded.
Measured: changes from baseline to week 12
Gait analysis
Motion capture system will be utilized for gait assessment.
Measured: changes from baseline to week 12
Quadriceps and Hamstring muscle strength
An isokinetic dynamometry will be used for the assessment of Quadriceps and Hamstring muscle strength
Measured: changes from baseline to week 12
Single and double leg standing balance
Bertec balance system will be used for the assessment of Single and double leg standing balance.
Measured: changes from baseline to week 12
Heart rate variability (HRV)
All participants will conduct HRV measurements, starting one week before the intervention and continuing until its completion. HRV will be measured each morning immediately after awakening and bladder voiding, with participants remaining in the supine position for 5 minutes. The validated smartphone application, "HRV4Training" (http://www.hrv4training.com/) will be used to record HRV data [31]. The analysis provides the root mean square of successive differences between R-R intervals (root mean square successive differences [rMSSD]), derived via photoplethysmography. The rMSSD is preferred for its reliability over other HRV indices. To normalise data distribution, HRV values will be log-transformed using the natural logarithm (Ln) before statistical analysis. A 7-day rolling average (Ln rMSSD7d) will be computed, and HRV parameters will be calculated during both the familiarization period and on a weekly basis throughout the experimental phase.
Measured: Daily
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2026
- Study start1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (35)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Knee OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Shahnawaz Anwer, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
- Investigators
- Shanawaz Anwer, PhD, Principal investigator, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07391449
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HSEARS20251219004
- Acronym
- HOPE-OA
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 12 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Anonymised individual participant data that underlie the results reported in publication(s).
Publications
37. Saldaña J. Longitudinal qualitative research: analyzing change through time. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC; 2003 May 16.
36. Plano Clark VL, Schumacher K, West C, Edrington J, Dunn LB, Harzstark A, Melisko M, Rabow MW, Swift PS, Miaskowski C. Practices for embedding an interpretive qualitative approach within a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2013 Jul;7(3):219-42.
35. Winser SJ, Pang M, Whitney S, Chan AY, Chen C. Cost and effectiveness of Dual-task training on balance and fall risk in individuals with cerebellar ataxia: A randomized controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2024 Jun 1;123:e113.
34. LaFlair GT, Egbert J, Plonsky L. A practical guide to bootstrapping descriptive statistics, correlations, t tests, and ANOVAs. Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. 2015 Jul 3;46.
33. Lewis JR. The system usability scale: past, present, and future. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2018 Jul 3;34(7):577-90.
Vesterinen V, Hakkinen K, Laine T, Hynynen E, Mikkola J, Nummela A. Predictors of individual adaptation to high-volume or high-intensity endurance training in recreational endurance runners. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 Aug;26(8):885-93. doi: 10.1111/sms.12530. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
PubMed 26247789Plews DJ, Scott B, Altini M, Wood M, Kilding AE, Laursen PB. Comparison of Heart-Rate-Variability Recording With Smartphone Photoplethysmography, Polar H7 Chest Strap, and Electrocardiography. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Nov 1;12(10):1324-1328. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0668. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
PubMed 2829072030. Williams N. The Borg rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale. Occupational medicine. 2017 Jul 1;67(5):404-5.
Alghadir AH, Anwer S, Sarkar B, Paul AK, Anwar D. Effect of 6-week retro or forward walking program on pain, functional disability, quadriceps muscle strength, and performance in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial (retro-walking trial). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Apr 9;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2537-9.
PubMed 30967128Anwer S, Alghadir A, Brismee JM. Effect of Home Exercise Program in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2016 Jan-Mar;39(1):38-48. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000045.
PubMed 25695471Anwer S, Alghadir A. Effect of isometric quadriceps exercise on muscle strength, pain, and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 May;26(5):745-8. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.745. Epub 2014 May 29.
PubMed 24926143Rizvi MR, Sharma A, Hasan S, Ahmad F, Asad MR, Iqbal A, Alghadir AH. Exploring the impact of integrated polyvagal exercises and knee reinforcement in females with grade II knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 3;13(1):18964. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45908-4.
PubMed 37923783Williams A, van Dongen JM, Kamper SJ, O'Brien KM, Wolfenden L, Yoong SL, Hodder RK, Lee H, Robson EK, Haskins R, Rissel C, Wiggers J, Williams CM. Economic evaluation of a healthy lifestyle intervention for chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pain. 2019 Mar;23(3):621-634. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1334. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
PubMed 30379386Jackson D, McCrone P, Mosweu I, Siegert R, Turner-Stokes L. Service use and costs for people with long-term neurological conditions in the first year following discharge from in-patient neuro-rehabilitation: a longitudinal cohort study. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 17;9(11):e113056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113056. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25401992Joudeh AA, Alghadir AH, Zafar H, Elwatidy SM, Tse C, Anwer S. Effect of quadriceps and calf muscles fatigue on standing balance in healthy young adult males. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2018 Jun 1;18(2):248-254.
PubMed 29855447
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Heart Rate Variability Guided Optimization of Physical Activity and Exercise Prescription to Enhance Rehabilitation Outcomes in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis (HOPE-OA Trial)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07391449
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HOPE-OA / HSEARS20251219004
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Keywords
- Knee osteoarthritis, HRV, Physical activity, Home exercise, Rehabilitation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this trial is to conduct a 12-week randomised controlled trial comparing an HRV-guided home exercise program with traditional home exercise program for individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), followed by 24-week assessment. The trial employs a validated HRV sensor and the HRV4Training app to record daily HRV measurements, enabling personalized exercise intensity adjustments. Participants with high HRV are prescribed high-intensity exercises, while those with low HRV undertake low-intensity exercises. In contrast, the traditional exercise group follows a standardised program, progressing from low to high intensity over the 12-week period.
The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the effect of HRV-guided exercise on pain and functional disability in patients with KOA using validated outcome measures assessed at baseline, 12 weeks (post-intervention), and 24 weeks. Longitudinal semi-structured qualitative interviews at weeks 12 and 24 will explore participants' experiences and perceived barriers to exercise adherence. A mediation analysis will elucidate the physiological mechanisms underlying the efficacy of HRV-guided exercise. Secondary objectives include comparing HRV-guided and traditional home exercise programme in terms of exercise adherence, quality of life, sleep quality, self-efficacy, patient satisfaction, physical performance, balance, muscle strength, and lower limb biomechanics. Exploratory aims involve evaluating long-term effects (up to 24 weeks), examining associations between baseline HRV profiles and key outcomes, and determining the cost-effectiveness of HRV-guided exercise relative to traditional programme. The trial employs a robust methodological design, applying mixed-effects models and an intention-to-treat approach for data analysis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HRV guided home exercise | Experimental | Behavioral: HRV-guided home exercise prescription |
| Traditional home exercise | Active comparator | Behavioral: Traditional Home Exercise |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Participants will include adults aged 45 years and older with symptomatic KOA, diagnosed according to the American College of Rheumatology Clinical Criteria for the Classification and Reporting of KOA.
- Mild to moderate KOA (Kellgren Lawrence grade ≤ grade III),
- a body mass index (BMI) ≤ 40 kg/m2, and
- an average knee pain intensity ≥ 3 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale during the past week.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- presence of neurological disorders;
- nonambulatory status;
- implanted electrical devices;
- systemic inflammatory arthritis (e.g., gout);
- significant cognitive impairment;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HRV-guided home exercise prescriptionParticipants in this group will follow the same exercise structure as the traditional home exercise group; however, their exercise program will be individualised according to daily HRV profiles. Exercise sessions will be performed three times per week for 12 weeks (36 sessions). All participants will conduct HRV measurements, starting one week before the intervention and continuing until its completion. HRV will be measured each morning immediately after awakening and bladder voiding, with participants remaining in the supine position for 5 minutes. The validated smartphone application, "HRV4Training" (http://www.hrv4training.com/) will be used to record HRV data [31]. The analysis provides the root mean square of successive differences between R-R intervals (root mean square successive differences [rMSSD]), derived via photoplethysmography. A 7-day rolling average (Ln rMSSD7d) will be computed, and HRV parameters will be calculated. | Behavioural | HRV guided home exercise |
| Traditional Home ExerciseParticipants in this group will measure their HRV daily as described in the next section; however, these HRV measurements will not be used to guide their exercise prescription. Instead, participants will follow a standardized home exercise programme, conducted three sessions per week for 12 weeks (36 sessions). Each session will include a 5-10-minute warm-up, a main exercise component comprising aerobic, strengthening, and stretching exercises (e.g., stretching of lower extremity muscles including knee extensors, knee flexors, and calf), and a 5-minute cooldown [27-29]. The warm-up phase will comprise mobility exercises designed to activate the lower extremity muscles, particularly the quadriceps and hamstrings, while the cool-down will incorporate stretching the muscle groups engaged during the session. | Behavioural | Traditional home exercise |
Primary outcome
Knee pain
Time frame: change from pre- to post-treatment (12 weeks)
Assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale. Higher scores mean more discomfort. The WOMAC pain subscale include five items for pain (scores range from 0 to 20).
Physical Function
Time frame: Change from pre- to post-treatment (12 weeks)
Assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale. Higher scores mean more difficulty with daily tasks. The WOMAC function subscale include 17 items for functional restriction (scores range from 0 to 68).
15 secondary outcomes
Healthcare resource utilisation
Time frame: week 12 and week 24
Quality adjusted life year (QALY)
Time frame: week 12 and week 24
Knee pain
Time frame: changes from baseline to week 24
Physical function
Time frame: changes from baseline to week 24
Arthritis self-efficacy scale (ASES)
Time frame: Baseline, week 12, week 24
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time frame: Baseline, week 12, week 24
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD)
Time frame: Baseline, week 12, week 24
Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)
Time frame: Baseline, week 12, week 24
30 second chair stand test (30sCST)
Time frame: changes from baseline to week 12
40-m fast-paced walk test (40MFPW)
Time frame: changes from baseline to week 12
Stair-climbing test (SCT)
Time frame: changes from baseline to week 12
Gait analysis
Time frame: changes from baseline to week 12
Quadriceps and Hamstring muscle strength
Time frame: changes from baseline to week 12
Single and double leg standing balance
Time frame: changes from baseline to week 12
Heart rate variability (HRV)
Time frame: Daily
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Feb 2026.
- Background37. Saldaña J. Longitudinal qualitative research: analyzing change through time. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC; 2003 May 16.
- Background36. Plano Clark VL, Schumacher K, West C, Edrington J, Dunn LB, Harzstark A, Melisko M, Rabow MW, Swift PS, Miaskowski C. Practices for embedding an interpretive qualitative approach within a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2013 Jul;7(3):219-42.
- Background35. Winser SJ, Pang M, Whitney S, Chan AY, Chen C. Cost and effectiveness of Dual-task training on balance and fall risk in individuals with cerebellar ataxia: A randomized controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2024 Jun 1;123:e113.
- Background34. LaFlair GT, Egbert J, Plonsky L. A practical guide to bootstrapping descriptive statistics, correlations, t tests, and ANOVAs. Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. 2015 Jul 3;46.
- Background33. Lewis JR. The system usability scale: past, present, and future. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2018 Jul 3;34(7):577-90.
- Background: PubMed 26247789Vesterinen V, Hakkinen K, Laine T, Hynynen E, Mikkola J, Nummela A. Predictors of individual adaptation to high-volume or high-intensity endurance training in recreational endurance runners. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 Aug;26(8):885-93. doi: 10.1111/sms.12530. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
- Background: PubMed 28290720Plews DJ, Scott B, Altini M, Wood M, Kilding AE, Laursen PB. Comparison of Heart-Rate-Variability Recording With Smartphone Photoplethysmography, Polar H7 Chest Strap, and Electrocardiography. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Nov 1;12(10):1324-1328. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0668. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
- Background30. Williams N. The Borg rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale. Occupational medicine. 2017 Jul 1;67(5):404-5.
- Background: PubMed 30967128Alghadir AH, Anwer S, Sarkar B, Paul AK, Anwar D. Effect of 6-week retro or forward walking program on pain, functional disability, quadriceps muscle strength, and performance in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial (retro-walking trial). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Apr 9;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2537-9.
- Background: PubMed 25695471Anwer S, Alghadir A, Brismee JM. Effect of Home Exercise Program in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2016 Jan-Mar;39(1):38-48. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000045.
- Background: PubMed 24926143Anwer S, Alghadir A. Effect of isometric quadriceps exercise on muscle strength, pain, and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 May;26(5):745-8. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.745. Epub 2014 May 29.
- Background: PubMed 37923783Rizvi MR, Sharma A, Hasan S, Ahmad F, Asad MR, Iqbal A, Alghadir AH. Exploring the impact of integrated polyvagal exercises and knee reinforcement in females with grade II knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 3;13(1):18964. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45908-4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Anonymised individual participant data that underlie the results reported in publication(s).
Related trials for Knee Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Factors Linked to Worsening Over Time in People With Early-stage Knee Osteoarthritis and Those With Prior Proven Acute Knee Injury.
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Shanawaz Anwer, PhD principal investigator
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing HRV-guided home exercise prescription and Traditional Home Exercise in people with Knee Osteoarthritis, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in Hong Kong.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Shanawaz Anwer, PhD (+85256239232, shah-nawaz.anwer@polyu.edu.hk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Knee pain (time frame: change from pre- to post-treatment (12 weeks)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07391449, which also lists 35 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2026.