AzTrials
AzTrials

DysphagiaNCT07415785

NMES Plus Conventional Therapy for Stroke Dysphagia

A study testing neuromuscular electrical stimulation and traditional dysphagia therapy in people with Dysphagia and Stroke, run by Chiayi Christian Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) combined with traditional dysphagia therapy (TDT) in acute/subacute stroke patients with dysphagia. Methods: We design a randomized controlled trial to conduct this study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Dysphagia, Stroke
What is being tested?
neuromuscular electrical stimulation and traditional dysphagia therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
25 Sep 2023to 29 Jul 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Acute or subacute stroke;
  • Presence of dysphagia;
  • Receiving tube feeding;
  • Age between 20 and 80 years;
  • Able to understand and follow simple instructions with prompts, and able to respond to questions either verbally or through gestures.

Who cannot join

  • Pre-existing dysphagia prior to the current stroke;
  • Other neurological diseases (e.g., dementia);
  • Unstable cardiopulmonary function;
  • Severe psychiatric disorders;
  • Head and neck cancer, history of surgical tissue removal, or radiation therapy;
  • Prior participation in swallowing training before this study;
  • Presence of implanted electronic devices (e.g., pacemakers, cochlear implants);
  • Impaired consciousness.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • Chiayi Christian Hospital

    Chiayi City

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Plus Conventional Dysphagia Therapy in Acute and Subacute Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) combined with traditional dysphagia therapy (TDT) in acute/subacute stroke patients with dysphagia.

Methods: We design a randomized controlled trial to conduct this study. A total of 100 participants with stroke-induced dysphagia are included and randomly assigned to two groups: NMES+TDT and sham NMES+TDT. Participants receive a two-week training protocol, 5 times a week, with each session lasting 30 minutes. Clinical outcomes are recorded at baseline and at 1-, 2-, and 4-week follow-up visits. These outcomes include the Function Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10), and Swallowing-Related Quality of Life (Taiwan version).

Expected results: We hope that the effectiveness of NMES in treating stroke-induced dysphagia can be clarified. This information can be provided when treating patients with stroke-induced dysphagia.

Conditions
Dysphagia, Stroke
Being tested
neuromuscular electrical stimulation, traditional dysphagia therapy
Medical subject headings
Deglutition Disorders, Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • neuromuscular electrical stimulationOther

    This intervention is distinguished from other clinical interventions by the combination of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) with conventional dysphagia therapy in acute and subacute stroke patients. Unlike studies that employ either NMES or traditional therapy alone, this protocol integrates both approaches to potentially enhance swallowing function through simultaneous neuromuscular activation and task-specific swallowing exercises.

  • traditional dysphagia therapyOther

    traditional dysphagia therapy

Study groups in NCT07415785
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Sham neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with traditional dysphagia therapyExperimentalTraditional dysphagia therapy combined with sham neuromuscular electrical stimulation electrical, in which stimulation intensity was set at the minimum level (1 mA), with a frequency of 80 Hz and a pulse duration of 700 μs.
Receives: Other: traditional dysphagia therapy
neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with traditional dysphagia therapyExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: neuromuscular electrical stimulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Functional Oral Intake

    Swallowing function was assessed using the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), an ordinal scale that reflects the functional level of oral intake in patients with dysphagia.

    Measured: The time frame included four assessment points: at baseline, after 1 week of treatment, after 2 weeks of treatment, and at a 2-week follow-up.

  2. Swallowing function assessment

    Swallowing function was assessed using the self-administered Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10, Chinese version).

    Measured: The time frame included four assessment points: at baseline, after 1 week of treatment, after 2 weeks of treatment, and at a 2-week follow-up.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Swallowing quality of life

    This questionnaire is designed to investigate the impact of dysphagia caused by various conditions on quality of life and is applicable to all populations with swallowing difficulties. The Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) consists of 44 items across 11 domains, including: burden, eating duration, eating desire, symptom frequency, food selection, communication, fear, mental health, social functioning, fatigue, and sleep.

    Measured: The time frame included four assessment points: at baseline, after 1 week of treatment, after 2 weeks of treatment, and at a 2-week follow-up.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Feb 2026
  2. Study start25 Sep 2023
  3. Primary completion29 Jul 2025
  4. Study completion29 Jul 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07415785
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB2023055
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
10 Feb 2026
Last updated
17 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing neuromuscular electrical stimulation and traditional dysphagia therapy in people with Dysphagia and Stroke, run by Chiayi Christian Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Functional Oral Intake (time frame: The time frame included four assessment points: at baseline, after 1 week of treatment, after 2 weeks of treatment, and at a 2-week follow-up.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in