Spinal Cord InjuryHOPENCT07438353
Home-Based Digital Rehabilitation Program Optimized With Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation for Upper Limb Functional Enhancement in Tetraplegia (HOPE): A Safety, Efficacy, and Feasibility Study
A study testing Home-based digital rehabilitation programme with tSCS in people with Spinal Cord Injury and Quadriplegia/Tetraplegia, run by Singapore General Hospital at 1 site in Singapore.
Trial summary
Individuals with chronic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) and tetraplegia commonly experience persistent impairment in upper limb function, leading to reduced independence and quality of life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injury, Quadriplegia/Tetraplegia
- What is being tested?
- Home-based digital rehabilitation programme with tSCS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 9 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSingapore
- Study dates
- Apr 2026to Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant
- Age 21 -75 years;
- Non-progressive cervical SCI/spinal cord dysfunction (traumatic or non-traumatic);
- Duration of SCI/spinal cord dysfunction more than or equal to 12 months;
- ASIA Impairment scale (AIS B, C, or D) with impaired upper limb function;
- At least one hand capable of grasp and pinch, with or without assistive modification;
Show all 15Show fewer
- International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury-Upper Extremity Measurement Scale (ISNCSCI-UEMS) more than or equal to 20;
- Able to maintain an upright sitting position for at least 30 minutes;
- No contraindication for tSCS (e.g., no pacemakers or other implantable stimulators);
- Motivated and able to engage in a daily home-based rehabilitation program;
- Availability of a dedicated care-giver to set up digital home-based therapy program
- Caregiver
- Age 21 -75 years;
- As identified by the patient as the caregiver;
- Willing to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Participant
- Significant or unstable medical co-morbidities including uncontrolled cardiopulmonary disease, severe cognitive impairment, severe dysautonomia, as determined by the investigator;
- Pregnancy;
- History of other neurologic conditions affecting upper limb function, such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, or traumatic brain injury;
- Known history of peripheral neuropathy (diabetic polyneuropathy, entrapment neuropathy, etc);
- Ongoing treatment for cancer;
Show all 12Show fewer
- Skin conditions or active cancerous lesion that limit the application of tSCS electrodes
- Known contraindication for tSCS (pacemakers or other implantable stimulators);
- Prior exposure to tSCS treatment;
- Inability to provide informed consent.
- Caregiver:
- Inability to provide informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Singapore1 site
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore
Jing Chen, MD, +65 65762049, chen.jing@singhealth.com.sg
About this study
Individuals with chronic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) and tetraplegia commonly experience persistent impairment in upper limb function, leading to reduced independence and quality of life. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that has demonstrated potential to improve upper limb strength and function when combined with rehabilitation. However, access to tSCS is limited in Singapore due to cost, regulatory barriers, and the need for frequent outpatient therapy.
This study evaluates the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of a home-based digital rehabilitation program incorporating tSCS delivered using a commercially available neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) device. Using a prospective, open-label single-case experimental design with multiple baselines across participants, individuals with chronic, non-progressive cervical SCI will receive daily home-based tSCS combined with an mobile application-guided upper limb exercise program. Upper limb function, quality of life, feasibility, and safety outcomes will be assessed longitudinally over a 22-week study period.
Read the detailed description
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), resulting from trauma or other causes, is a debilitating condition characterized by damage to the spinal cord. It leads to profound and often irreversible impairments in motor, sensory, and autonomic function, resulting in substantial limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs) and ambulation. These impairments significantly impair quality of life (QoL) and often result in long-term healthcare dependence. Globally, SCI affects approximately 20.6 million individuals, with an estimated 0.9 million new cases reported annually. In Singapore, the prevalence of SCI increased from 5 to 6 per 100,000 in 1990 to an estimated 13 to 15 per 100,000 in 2019. The economic burden is substantial, with annual direct costs related to SCI exceeding US$45 billion in the United States alone.
Among SCI types, incomplete tetraplegia is the most prevalent, accounting for 47.1% of all cases. This is reflected in local data; a study reported 44 new surgically treated SCI cases admitted to Singapore General Hospital (SGH) and Changi General Hospital (CGH) between January 2020 to December 2021, of which 39 were cervical SCI. Another local epidemiology study found that 75% of 55 traumatic SCI cases were tetraplegic.
For individuals with tetraplegia, upper limb function is often severely compromised, significantly limiting independence in daily tasks and impacting overall QoL. Restoration of hand and arm function is regarded as the top rehabilitation priority, considered six times more important than restoring walking ability in this group of population. A survey done by Snoek et al, 77% of 565 individuals with tetraplegia identified improvement in hand function as a key factor in improving their QoL.
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as a promising neuromodulation technique for improving neurological function after SCI. SCS delivers electrical impulses to activate afferent fibers, enhancing interneuronal connections between sensory afferents and motor neurons, enhancing motor neuron excitability, and promoting communication between spinal network. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS), a non-invasive form of SCS, has gained significant attention, with numerous studies examining its effectiveness in improving motor function following SCI. tSCS typically involves the application of active electrodes over the cervical spinal region (C3/4 and C6/7) and return electrodes over the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), and it is combined with in-clinic rehabilitation or home-based exercise to enhance its therapeutic effect. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that tSCS significantly improves upper limb function in individuals with chronic tetraplegia. For instance, the Up-LIFT trial enrolled 60 participants with nonprogressive incomplete cervical SCI. After 12-20 sessions of tSCS therapy, 72% of participants demonstrated improvements greater than the minimally important difference for both strength and functional domains. Notably, the tSCS demonstrated a favorable safety profile, even for home use.
To address these gaps, a commercially available neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) devices, such as HSA-approved NeuroTrac® MultiTENS, offer a potential alternative. These devices can deliver similar stimulation parameters at a fraction of the cost. Despite differences in stimulation parameters such as pulse width and carrier frequency, the NeuroTrac® MultiTENS has demonstrated a profile that appears safe and effective in managing SCI-related complications .
This prospective, open-label study investigates a home-based rehabilitation program by repurposing a commercially available, HSA-approved neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) device to deliver tSCS. The intervention integrates daily tSCS with a structured, mobile application-guided upper limb exercise program delivered through an AI-enabled digital platform that provides instructional content, real-time movement feedback, and adherence monitoring. Caregivers assist participants with device setup and therapy execution following standardized training.
The study employs a single-case experimental design with multiple baselines across participants. A total of 9 to 30 individuals with chronic, non-progressive cervical SCI (AIS B, C, or D) and impaired upper limb function will be enrolled and randomized into three groups. Each group will begin the intervention after a different baseline duration, allowing participants to serve as their own controls. All participants will complete a total study duration of 22 weeks, with the intervention lasting between 6 and 18 weeks depending on group assignment.
The primary outcome is upper limb function, assessed using the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP), measured every two weeks throughout the study. Secondary outcomes include upper extremity motor strength, quality of life, and goal attainment. Feasibility outcomes include adherence to the home-based program and participant and caregiver acceptability. Safety outcomes include monitoring and documentation of all adverse events related to tSCS and home-based therapy.
The results of this study will provide early evidence on the safety, feasibility, and potential efficacy of a scalable, home-based neuromodulation rehabilitation model using commercially available technology for individuals with tetraplegia.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury, Quadriplegia/Tetraplegia
- Being tested
- Home-based digital rehabilitation programme with tSCS
- Keywords
- Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, Tetraplegia, Telerehabilitation, Rehabilitation Technology, Digital Rehabilitation, Home-Based Rehabilitation, Neuromodulation, Spinal Cord Injury
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries, Quadriplegia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Home-based digital rehabilitation programme with tSCSDevice
Home-based digital rehabilitation programme with tSCS introduced at staggered time points following varying duration of baseline usual care
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 (intervention at end of Week 4) | Other | Intervention begins at the end of week 4 and continues for 18 weeks till week 22 Receives: Device: Home-based digital rehabilitation programme with tSCS |
| Group 2 (intervention at end of Week 10) | Other | Intervention begins at the end of week 10 and continues for 12 weeks till week 22 Receives: Device: Home-based digital rehabilitation programme with tSCS |
| Group 3(intervention at end of Week 16) | Other | Intervention begins at the end of week 16 and continues for 6 weeks till week 22 Receives: Device: Home-based digital rehabilitation programme with tSCS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Upper limb function
Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP), from a scale of 0 to 3 or 0 to 5, where a higher number indicate better outcome.
Measured: Every 2 weeks for total 22 weeks to collect up to 12 data points
Secondary outcomes (6)
Upper limb strength
Upper Extremity Measurement Scale, from a scale of 0 to 2 or 0 to 5, where a higher number indicate better outcome.
Measured: Every 2 weeks for total 22 weeks to collect up to 12 data points
Quality of Life (QoL)
EQ-5D-5L, where there are 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems
Measured: Every 2 weeks for total 22 weeks to collect up to 12 data points
Rehabilitation goals achievement
Goal attainment scale (GAS), which measures whether a goal was achieved or not (yes or no) and to what extent (yes = much better, a little better, as expected, no = partially achieved, same as baseline, worse)
Measured: Before Week 0 and after the end of Week 22
Participants and care givers feedback on the appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility of the programme
In-depth interviews to explore the perspectives of patient and caregiver participating in the program.
Measured: After the end of Week 22
Home therapy adherence
Usage data from mobile application (duration of therapy and accuracy of performance)
Measured: Every 2 weeks for total 22 weeks to collect up to 12 data points
Safety monitoring
All adverse events (autonomic dysreflexia, skin irritation, back pain, muscle soreness, fatigue, spasms etc)
Measured: Every 2 weeks for total 22 weeks to collect up to 12 data points
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Feb 2026
- Study startApr 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study design adopts a prospective, open-label study utilizing a single-case experimental design (SCED). Based on this design, a three-tiered, six-phase, multiple-baseline design forms the minimum requirement. Participants will be randomly assigned to any of the three arms with different time of commencement of the intervention. All 3 groups will be on baseline usual care for the first 4 weeks (no specific intervention from this study). A caregiver who will be assisting to administer the home-based program will be recruited alongside each participant.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Singapore General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07438353
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025-1489
- Acronym
- HOPE
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 15 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 27 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Home-Based Digital Rehabilitation Program Optimized With Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation for Upper Limb Functional Enhancement in Tetraplegia (HOPE): A Safety, Efficacy, and Feasibility Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07438353
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HOPE / 2025-1489
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury, Quadriplegia/Tetraplegia
- Keywords
- Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, Tetraplegia, Telerehabilitation, Rehabilitation Technology, Digital Rehabilitation, Home-Based Rehabilitation, Neuromodulation, Spinal Cord Injury
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Singapore General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Individuals with chronic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) and tetraplegia commonly experience persistent impairment in upper limb function, leading to reduced independence and quality of life. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that has demonstrated potential to improve upper limb strength and function when combined with rehabilitation. However, access to tSCS is limited in Singapore due to cost, regulatory barriers, and the need for frequent outpatient therapy.
This study evaluates the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of a home-based digital rehabilitation program incorporating tSCS delivered using a commercially available neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) device. Using a prospective, open-label single-case experimental design with multiple baselines across participants, individuals with chronic, non-progressive cervical SCI will receive daily home-based tSCS combined with an mobile application-guided upper limb exercise program. Upper limb function, quality of life, feasibility, and safety outcomes will be assessed longitudinally over a 22-week study period.
Detailed description
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), resulting from trauma or other causes, is a debilitating condition characterized by damage to the spinal cord. It leads to profound and often irreversible impairments in motor, sensory, and autonomic function, resulting in substantial limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs) and ambulation. These impairments significantly impair quality of life (QoL) and often result in long-term healthcare dependence. Globally, SCI affects approximately 20.6 million individuals, with an estimated 0.9 million new cases reported annually. In Singapore, the prevalence of SCI increased from 5 to 6 per 100,000 in 1990 to an estimated 13 to 15 per 100,000 in 2019. The economic burden is substantial, with annual direct costs related to SCI exceeding US$45 billion in the United States alone.
Among SCI types, incomplete tetraplegia is the most prevalent, accounting for 47.1% of all cases. This is reflected in local data; a study reported 44 new surgically treated SCI cases admitted to Singapore General Hospital (SGH) and Changi General Hospital (CGH) between January 2020 to December 2021, of which 39 were cervical SCI. Another local epidemiology study found that 75% of 55 traumatic SCI cases were tetraplegic.
For individuals with tetraplegia, upper limb function is often severely compromised, significantly limiting independence in daily tasks and impacting overall QoL. Restoration of hand and arm function is regarded as the top rehabilitation priority, considered six times more important than restoring walking ability in this group of population. A survey done by Snoek et al, 77% of 565 individuals with tetraplegia identified improvement in hand function as a key factor in improving their QoL.
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as a promising neuromodulation technique for improving neurological function after SCI. SCS delivers electrical impulses to activate afferent fibers, enhancing interneuronal connections between sensory afferents and motor neurons, enhancing motor neuron excitability, and promoting communication between spinal network. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS), a non-invasive form of SCS, has gained significant attention, with numerous studies examining its effectiveness in improving motor function following SCI. tSCS typically involves the application of active electrodes over the cervical spinal region (C3/4 and C6/7) and return electrodes over the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), and it is combined with in-clinic rehabilitation or home-based exercise to enhance its therapeutic effect. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that tSCS significantly improves upper limb function in individuals with chronic tetraplegia. For instance, the Up-LIFT trial enrolled 60 participants with nonprogressive incomplete cervical SCI. After 12-20 sessions of tSCS therapy, 72% of participants demonstrated improvements greater than the minimally important difference for both strength and functional domains. Notably, the tSCS demonstrated a favorable safety profile, even for home use.
To address these gaps, a commercially available neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) devices, such as HSA-approved NeuroTrac® MultiTENS, offer a potential alternative. These devices can deliver similar stimulation parameters at a fraction of the cost. Despite differences in stimulation parameters such as pulse width and carrier frequency, the NeuroTrac® MultiTENS has demonstrated a profile that appears safe and effective in managing SCI-related complications .
This prospective, open-label study investigates a home-based rehabilitation program by repurposing a commercially available, HSA-approved neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) device to deliver tSCS. The intervention integrates daily tSCS with a structured, mobile application-guided upper limb exercise program delivered through an AI-enabled digital platform that provides instructional content, real-time movement feedback, and adherence monitoring. Caregivers assist participants with device setup and therapy execution following standardized training.
The study employs a single-case experimental design with multiple baselines across participants. A total of 9 to 30 individuals with chronic, non-progressive cervical SCI (AIS B, C, or D) and impaired upper limb function will be enrolled and randomized into three groups. Each group will begin the intervention after a different baseline duration, allowing participants to serve as their own controls. All participants will complete a total study duration of 22 weeks, with the intervention lasting between 6 and 18 weeks depending on group assignment.
The primary outcome is upper limb function, assessed using the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP), measured every two weeks throughout the study. Secondary outcomes include upper extremity motor strength, quality of life, and goal attainment. Feasibility outcomes include adherence to the home-based program and participant and caregiver acceptability. Safety outcomes include monitoring and documentation of all adverse events related to tSCS and home-based therapy.
The results of this study will provide early evidence on the safety, feasibility, and potential efficacy of a scalable, home-based neuromodulation rehabilitation model using commercially available technology for individuals with tetraplegia.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- This study design adopts a prospective, open-label study utilizing a single-case experimental design (SCED). Based on this design, a three-tiered, six-phase, multiple-baseline design forms the minimum requirement. Participants will be randomly assigned to any of the three arms with different time of commencement of the intervention. All 3 groups will be on baseline usual care for the first 4 weeks (no specific intervention from this study). A caregiver who will be assisting to administer the home-based program will be recruited alongside each participant.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 (intervention at end of Week 4) | Other | Device: Home-based digital rehabilitation programme with tSCSIntervention begins at the end of week 4 and continues for 18 weeks till week 22 |
| Group 2 (intervention at end of Week 10) | Other | Device: Home-based digital rehabilitation programme with tSCSIntervention begins at the end of week 10 and continues for 12 weeks till week 22 |
| Group 3(intervention at end of Week 16) | Other | Device: Home-based digital rehabilitation programme with tSCSIntervention begins at the end of week 16 and continues for 6 weeks till week 22 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Participant
- Age 21 -75 years;
- Non-progressive cervical SCI/spinal cord dysfunction (traumatic or non-traumatic);
- Duration of SCI/spinal cord dysfunction more than or equal to 12 months;
- ASIA Impairment scale (AIS B, C, or D) with impaired upper limb function;
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Participant
- Significant or unstable medical co-morbidities including uncontrolled cardiopulmonary disease, severe cognitive impairment, severe dysautonomia, as determined by the investigator;
- Pregnancy;
- History of other neurologic conditions affecting upper limb function, such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, or traumatic brain injury;
- Known history of peripheral neuropathy (diabetic polyneuropathy, entrapment neuropathy, etc);
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Home-based digital rehabilitation programme with tSCSHome-based digital rehabilitation programme with tSCS introduced at staggered time points following varying duration of baseline usual care | Device | Group 1 (intervention at end of Week 4), Group 2 (intervention at end of Week 10), Group 3(intervention at end of Week 16) |
Primary outcome
Upper limb function
Time frame: Every 2 weeks for total 22 weeks to collect up to 12 data points
Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP), from a scale of 0 to 3 or 0 to 5, where a higher number indicate better outcome.
6 secondary outcomes
Upper limb strength
Time frame: Every 2 weeks for total 22 weeks to collect up to 12 data points
Quality of Life (QoL)
Time frame: Every 2 weeks for total 22 weeks to collect up to 12 data points
Rehabilitation goals achievement
Time frame: Before Week 0 and after the end of Week 22
Participants and care givers feedback on the appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility of the programme
Time frame: After the end of Week 22
Home therapy adherence
Time frame: Every 2 weeks for total 22 weeks to collect up to 12 data points
Safety monitoring
Time frame: Every 2 weeks for total 22 weeks to collect up to 12 data points
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Feb 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
Efficacy of rTMS Treatment After Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, Myelopathy
Enrolling by invitation
NeuroSuitUp: Neurorehabilitation Through Synergistic Man-machine Interfaces
Spinal Cord Injuries
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Recovery and Safety After Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation in People With Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
RecruitingPhase 2
Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy as an Additional Treatment for Spasticity Secondary to Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury, Spasticity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Home-based digital rehabilitation programme with tSCS in people with Spinal Cord Injury and Quadriplegia/Tetraplegia, run by Singapore General Hospital at 1 site in Singapore.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jing Chen, MD (+6565762049, chen.jing@singhealth.com.sg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Upper limb function (time frame: Every 2 weeks for total 22 weeks to collect up to 12 data points). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2026.