Hip FractureNCT07443046
Regional Muscle Balance and Hip Fracture Patterns
An observational study of Hip Fracture and Sarcopenia, run by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Hip fractures are common in older adults and are often associated with muscle loss and frailty. While many studies focus on overall muscle reduction (sarcopenia), the role of regional muscle balance around the hip remains unclear. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hip Fracture, Sarcopenia, Muscle
- How many people
- 79 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2024to 1 Jul 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Older adults aged 60 years and older presenting with hip fractures after low-energy falls were prospectively enrolled. Participants were evaluated in a tertiary care orthopedic trauma center, and fracture types were classified as femoral neck fracture or intertrochanteric femur fracture. All participants underwent standardized clinical assessment and CT-based muscle measurements at admission.
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥60 years
- Presentation with hip fracture following a low-energy fall
- Availability of pelvic computed tomography (CT) imaging at admission
- Ability to provide written informed consen
Who cannot join
- Pathological fractures
- Active malignancy
- Subtrochanteric fractures (≥5 cm distal to the lesser trochanter)
- High-energy trauma
- Neuromuscular disorders affecting muscle morphology
- Inflammatory systemic diseases
- Hemiparesis secondary to cerebrovascular events
- Refusal to participate in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Ankara Bilkent City Hospital
Ankara, Çankaya, 06800
About this study
Official title: Regional Muscle Balance Rather Than Global Sarcopenia Is Associated With Hip Fracture Patterns: A Prospective CT-Based Comparative Study
Hip fractures are common in older adults and are often associated with muscle loss and frailty. While many studies focus on overall muscle reduction (sarcopenia), the role of regional muscle balance around the hip remains unclear. This prospective observational study aims to evaluate whether differences in muscle distribution, particularly between the gluteus medius and psoas muscles measured using computed tomography (CT), are associated with different hip fracture patterns. The study also investigates the potential effects of socioeconomic status, nutritional risk, and comorbidity burden on fracture configuration. Understanding how regional muscle characteristics relate to hip fracture types may provide new insight into biomechanical mechanisms and support future prevention and rehabilitation strategies for older adults.
Read the detailed description
Hip fractures represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the aging population and are frequently associated with sarcopenia and frailty. Although previous studies have primarily focused on global muscle mass reduction, the biomechanical relevance of regional muscle distribution surrounding the hip joint has not been sufficiently investigated. This prospective observational study evaluates the association between regional muscle balance and hip fracture patterns in older adults using CT-based muscle measurements.
Participants aged 60 years and older presenting with hip fractures following low-energy falls were included. Demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, nutritional risk assessed by the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), and comorbidity burden measured by the Charlson Comorbidity Index were recorded. Cross-sectional muscle areas, including total skeletal muscle, bilateral psoas muscle, and gluteus medius muscle, were measured on standardized CT images. The gluteus-to-psoas ratio was calculated to assess regional muscle distribution.
The primary objective of the study is to determine whether CT-based regional muscle characteristics are associated with hip fracture configuration, specifically intertrochanteric and femoral neck fractures. Secondary objectives include evaluating the potential influence of nutritional and socioeconomic factors on fracture patterns. Findings from this study may improve understanding of hip fracture biomechanics and contribute to future risk stratification and individualized rehabilitation approaches.
- Conditions
- Hip Fracture, Sarcopenia, Muscle, Frailty
- Keywords
- Regional Muscle Balance, Gluteus Medius, Psoas Muscle, CT-Based Muscle Measurement, Hip Fracture Pattern, Geriatric Fracture, Musculoskeletal Biomechanics
- Medical subject headings
- Hip Fractures, Sarcopenia, Frailty
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Femoral Neck Fracture (FNF) | Older adults (≥60 years) with hip fracture classified as femoral neck fracture after low-energy fall; CT-based muscle measurements and clinical variables were assessed. | |
| Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture (ITFF) | Older adults (≥60 years) with hip fracture classified as intertrochanteric femur fracture after low-energy fall; CT-based muscle measurements and clinical variables were assessed. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hip Fracture Pattern
Fracture configuration classified based on radiographic evaluation at hospital admission.
Measured: Baseline (at admission)
Secondary outcomes (8)
Gluteus-to-Psoas Ratio
CT-derived ratio of gluteus medius area to total psoas muscle area.
Measured: Baseline
Total Psoas Muscle Area
Cross-sectional area measured on CT at L3 level.
Measured: Baseline
Gluteus Medius Muscle Area
Cross-sectional area measured at inferior sacroiliac joint level.
Measured: Baseline
Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass Index (ASMI)
Appendicular skeletal muscle mass index calculated from CT-based cross-sectional muscle area normalized to height squared (cm²/m²).
Lower values indicate reduced skeletal muscle mass consistent with sarcopenia. There is no fixed theoretical maximum value; values depend on individual body composition. Higher values reflect greater muscle mass.
Minimum: 0 Maximum: Not predefined (continuous variable)
Measured: Baseline
Psoas Muscle Index (PMI)
Height-adjusted psoas muscle cross-sectional area (cm²/m²) measured at the L3 vertebral level on CT imaging.
Lower values indicate lower muscle mass and potential sarcopenia. Higher values reflect greater psoas muscle mass.
Minimum: 0 Maximum: Not predefined (continuous variable)
Measured: Baseline
Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI)
The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a nutritional risk assessment score calculated using serum albumin levels and the ratio of actual to ideal body weight.
Higher scores indicate better nutritional status, whereas lower scores indicate increased nutritional risk.
Minimum: Theoretical minimum approximately 0 Maximum: Not predefined (typically >100 in well-nourished individuals)
Higher score = better nutritional status Lower score = worse outcome (higher nutritional risk)
Measured: Baseline
Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)
The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is a weighted score used to predict mortality risk based on comorbid conditions. Age-adjusted CCI includes additional points based on age.
Higher scores indicate greater comorbidity burden and higher predicted mortality risk.
Minimum: 0 Maximum: Not fixed (depends on number of comorbidities)
Higher score = worse health status Lower score = better health status
Measured: Baseline
Socioeconomic Status (Income Level and Residence)
Income category and residence classification (urban/rural).
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Mar 2026
- Study start1 Jul 2024
- Primary completion1 Jul 2025
- Study completion1 Jul 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hip FractureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ankara City Hospital BilkentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 79 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Omer Faruk Naldoven, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07443046
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TABED 2-24-273
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 3 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Wang L, Yang M, Ge Y, Liu Y, Su Y, Guo Z, Huang P, Geng J, Wang G, Blake GM, He B, Yin L, Cheng X, Wu X, Engelke K, Vlug AG. Muscle size and density are independently associated with death after hip fracture: A prospective cohort study. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2023 Aug;14(4):1824-1835. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13261. Epub 2023 May 19.
PubMed 37208980Guven S, Naldoven OF, Alkan H, Erdogan Y, Cepni S, Veizi E. Laterally Protruded Cephalomedullary Nail Lag Screws are a Source of Consistent Thigh Pain After Pertrochanteric Fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2024 Jun 1;38(6):320-326. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002803.
PubMed 38470134Kim KH, Lee JH, Lim EJ. Weak psoas and spine extensors potentially predispose to hip fracture. Hip Int. 2021 May;31(3):430-434. doi: 10.1177/1120700020904337. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
PubMed 31997667Veizi BGY, Imeri V, Naldoven OF, Guven S. Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity: Their association with postoperative outcomes in patients with hip fractures. J Hosp Med. 2025 Aug;20(8):816-823. doi: 10.1002/jhm.70007. Epub 2025 Feb 16.
PubMed 39956950Yerli M, Yuce A, Ayaz MB, Bayraktar TO, Erkurt N, Dedeoglu SS, Imren Y, Gurbuz H. Effect of psoas and gluteus medius muscles attenuation on hip fracture type. Hip Int. 2023 Sep;33(5):952-957. doi: 10.1177/11207000221101169. Epub 2022 Jun 5.
PubMed 35658691
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Regional Muscle Balance Rather Than Global Sarcopenia Is Associated With Hip Fracture Patterns: A Prospective CT-Based Comparative Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07443046
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TABED 2-24-273
- Conditions
- Hip Fracture, Sarcopenia, Muscle, Frailty
- Keywords
- Regional Muscle Balance, Gluteus Medius, Psoas Muscle, CT-Based Muscle Measurement, Hip Fracture Pattern, Geriatric Fracture, Musculoskeletal Biomechanics
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 79 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ankara City Hospital BilkentUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hip fractures are common in older adults and are often associated with muscle loss and frailty. While many studies focus on overall muscle reduction (sarcopenia), the role of regional muscle balance around the hip remains unclear. This prospective observational study aims to evaluate whether differences in muscle distribution, particularly between the gluteus medius and psoas muscles measured using computed tomography (CT), are associated with different hip fracture patterns. The study also investigates the potential effects of socioeconomic status, nutritional risk, and comorbidity burden on fracture configuration. Understanding how regional muscle characteristics relate to hip fracture types may provide new insight into biomechanical mechanisms and support future prevention and rehabilitation strategies for older adults.
Detailed description
Hip fractures represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the aging population and are frequently associated with sarcopenia and frailty. Although previous studies have primarily focused on global muscle mass reduction, the biomechanical relevance of regional muscle distribution surrounding the hip joint has not been sufficiently investigated. This prospective observational study evaluates the association between regional muscle balance and hip fracture patterns in older adults using CT-based muscle measurements.
Participants aged 60 years and older presenting with hip fractures following low-energy falls were included. Demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, nutritional risk assessed by the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), and comorbidity burden measured by the Charlson Comorbidity Index were recorded. Cross-sectional muscle areas, including total skeletal muscle, bilateral psoas muscle, and gluteus medius muscle, were measured on standardized CT images. The gluteus-to-psoas ratio was calculated to assess regional muscle distribution.
The primary objective of the study is to determine whether CT-based regional muscle characteristics are associated with hip fracture configuration, specifically intertrochanteric and femoral neck fractures. Secondary objectives include evaluating the potential influence of nutritional and socioeconomic factors on fracture patterns. Findings from this study may improve understanding of hip fracture biomechanics and contribute to future risk stratification and individualized rehabilitation approaches.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Femoral Neck Fracture (FNF) | – | –Older adults (≥60 years) with hip fracture classified as femoral neck fracture after low-energy fall; CT-based muscle measurements and clinical variables were assessed. |
| Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture (ITFF) | – | –Older adults (≥60 years) with hip fracture classified as intertrochanteric femur fracture after low-energy fall; CT-based muscle measurements and clinical variables were assessed. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Older adults aged 60 years and older presenting with hip fractures after low-energy falls were prospectively enrolled. Participants were evaluated in a tertiary care orthopedic trauma center, and fracture types were classified as femoral neck fracture or intertrochanteric femur fracture. All participants underwent standardized clinical assessment and CT-based muscle measurements at admission.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age ≥60 years
- Presentation with hip fracture following a low-energy fall
- Availability of pelvic computed tomography (CT) imaging at admission
- Ability to provide written informed consen
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Pathological fractures
- Active malignancy
- Subtrochanteric fractures (≥5 cm distal to the lesser trochanter)
- High-energy trauma
- Neuromuscular disorders affecting muscle morphology
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Hip Fracture Pattern
Time frame: Baseline (at admission)
Fracture configuration classified based on radiographic evaluation at hospital admission.
8 secondary outcomes
Gluteus-to-Psoas Ratio
Time frame: Baseline
Total Psoas Muscle Area
Time frame: Baseline
Gluteus Medius Muscle Area
Time frame: Baseline
Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass Index (ASMI)
Time frame: Baseline
Psoas Muscle Index (PMI)
Time frame: Baseline
Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI)
Time frame: Baseline
Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)
Time frame: Baseline
Socioeconomic Status (Income Level and Residence)
Time frame: Baseline
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Mar 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 37208980Wang L, Yang M, Ge Y, Liu Y, Su Y, Guo Z, Huang P, Geng J, Wang G, Blake GM, He B, Yin L, Cheng X, Wu X, Engelke K, Vlug AG. Muscle size and density are independently associated with death after hip fracture: A prospective cohort study. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2023 Aug;14(4):1824-1835. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13261. Epub 2023 May 19.
- Results publication: PubMed 38470134Guven S, Naldoven OF, Alkan H, Erdogan Y, Cepni S, Veizi E. Laterally Protruded Cephalomedullary Nail Lag Screws are a Source of Consistent Thigh Pain After Pertrochanteric Fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2024 Jun 1;38(6):320-326. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002803.
- Results publication: PubMed 31997667Kim KH, Lee JH, Lim EJ. Weak psoas and spine extensors potentially predispose to hip fracture. Hip Int. 2021 May;31(3):430-434. doi: 10.1177/1120700020904337. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 39956950Veizi BGY, Imeri V, Naldoven OF, Guven S. Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity: Their association with postoperative outcomes in patients with hip fractures. J Hosp Med. 2025 Aug;20(8):816-823. doi: 10.1002/jhm.70007. Epub 2025 Feb 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 35658691Yerli M, Yuce A, Ayaz MB, Bayraktar TO, Erkurt N, Dedeoglu SS, Imren Y, Gurbuz H. Effect of psoas and gluteus medius muscles attenuation on hip fracture type. Hip Int. 2023 Sep;33(5):952-957. doi: 10.1177/11207000221101169. Epub 2022 Jun 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hip Fracture
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Ondansetron on the Incidence of Spinal Anaesthesia-Induced Hypotension in Elderly Patients Undergoing Fracture Hip Surgery
Spinal Anaesthesia Induced Hypotension
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus PENG Block for Hip Fracture Surgery
Femur Neck Fracture, Hip Fractures
Active, not recruiting
Lumbar-Sacral Plexus Block vs Fascia Iliaca Block Plus Low-Dose Spinal Anesthesia for Femoral Neck Fracture Surgery
Femoral Neck Fractures, Nerve Block
RecruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence of SI-BONE's iFuse TORQ TNT Advancing Treatment of Pelvic Ring Fractures
Fracture; Pelvic, Insufficiency Fractures
Not yet recruiting
A Decision Support Tool for Common Surgical Fixations of Hip Fractures
Hip Fracture Surgeries, High Risk Population of Hip Fractures
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hip Fracture and Sarcopenia, run by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hip Fracture Pattern (time frame: Baseline (at admission)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07443046, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2026.