Low Back Painkinesio tapeNCT07459231
The Effect of Kinesio Taping During Labor on Low Back Pain, Vaginal Birth Self-Efficacy, Postpartum Comfort Perception, and Newborn Apgar Scores
A study testing Kinesio Taping in people with Low Back Pain and Pregnancy, run by Ege University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The Kinesio Taping® technique and Kinesio Tex® tape were invented by Japanese chiropractor and acupuncturist Dr. in 1973. Developed by Kenzo Kase. This method emerged with the idea that good results could be obtained with a taping method that resembles the flexibility and structural properties of the skin without… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain, Pregnancy, Midwifery
- What is being tested?
- Kinesio Taping
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 20 Jul 2025to 15 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Women aged 18-45 years
- Singleton pregnancy
- Gestational age between 37-40 weeks
- In the active phase of labor (≥4 cm cervical dilation)
- Experiencing low back pain during labor
- No previous diagnosed lumbar spine disease
- No dermatological condition preventing kinesio or placebo taping
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Multiple pregnancy
- Cesarean delivery
- Pharmacological induction during labor (e.g., prostaglandins or oxytocin)
- Displacement or removal of the applied tape during labor
- Infection, sensory loss, or skin lesion at the taping site
- Allergy to kinesio tape or adhesive materials
- Withdrawal of consent at any stage of the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Kinesio Taping Applied During Labor on Maternal Low Back Pain, Vaginal Birth Self-Efficacy, Postpartum Comfort, and Neonatal Apgar Scores: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial
The Kinesio Taping® technique and Kinesio Tex® tape were invented by Japanese chiropractor and acupuncturist Dr. in 1973. Developed by Kenzo Kase. This method emerged with the idea that good results could be obtained with a taping method that resembles the flexibility and structural properties of the skin without restricting the individual's normal joint movements. The purpose of taping is to reduce pain and improve healing in soft tissues; It has many effects such as increasing proprioception, reducing muscle fatigue, improving muscle function, reducing delayed onset muscle pain, pain inhibition, reducing edema, lymphatic drainage and blood flow regulation. It is argued that kinesiology taping, unlike classical taping techniques, provides mechanical support without restricting movement and increases the action mechanism of lymphatic systems and muscle.
Read the detailed description
The kinesio taping technique (The Kinesio Taping® technique) and kinesio tape (Kinesio Tex® tape) were developed in 1973 by Japanese chiropractor and acupuncturist Dr. Kenzo Kase . This method emerged with the idea that good results could be obtained with a taping method that resembles the flexibility and structural properties of the skin without restricting the individual's normal joint movements . The purpose of taping is to reduce pain and improve healing in soft tissues; It has many effects such as increasing proprioception, reducing muscle fatigue, improving muscle function, reducing delayed-onset muscle pain, inhibiting pain, reducing edema, regulating lymphatic drainage and blood flow . It is argued that kinesio taping, unlike classical taping techniques, provides mechanical support without restricting movement and increases the mechanism of action of the lymphatic systems and muscles.
There are 6 different taping techniques developed with increasing experience over the years. These techniques are titled as Mechanical Correction Technique, Fascia Correction Technique, Area Correction Technique, Functional Correction Technique, Ligament Correction Technique, Lymphatic Correction Technique. The application method of the tape is determined according to the desired effect and the muscle type to be applied. The tape has I, Y, X, Fan, Web and Ring (Donut) application methods, while I and Y techniques are preferred if pain and edema are at the forefront. I tape is known as the most preferred taping method especially in acute muscle pain and is thought to reduce pain and edema. Area Correction Technique is applied to leave more space on the painful and inflamed area. Increasing the space area by lifting the skin over the expected area of effect; provides a decrease in the pressure in this area, while the irritation on the chemoreceptors is eliminated and the pain in the area is reduced. As sensory input increases, the gate control mechanism is activated; tension is applied to the middle 1/3 of the I-shaped strip , it is placed in the area where field correction is desired, and the ends of the strip are glued without applying tension. A single strip or strips glued on top of each other can be used.
With the kinesiology taping technique, which has a very large area of effect, especially the musculoskeletal system, different techniques and indications are added every day and the number of studies and investigations on this subject is increasing day by day. Kinesio-tape can also be applied during pregnancy with the protocol defined by Kase. Pain relief is the most important criterion in treatment because pain can seriously affect the pregnant woman. The key to using kinesio tape to relieve pain is how to choose the appropriate position, how to adjust the appropriate tension and how to determine the duration of the adhesive. Since patients and clinicians tend to avoid medications and invasive treatments during pregnancy, kinesio taping offers a new treatment for low back pain during pregnancy as a drug-free and safe alternative treatment. The functional movement and healing effect of the tape is better than physical therapy and does not harm the fetus. In recent years, clinical attention has been drawn to the effect of kinesio taping on low back pain during pregnancy, and relevant studies have been published showing that kinesio taping has a significant effect on low back pain during pregnancy. In a prospective study conducted by Pawel et al. on 106 pregnant women in the third trimester of pregnancy, patients were divided into two groups; 'I' shaped taping was applied to the kinesio-therapy group, additional transverse taping to the same area and abdominal taping to support the abdominal muscles and reduce lumbar load were applied and followed for one week. Pain intensity was followed immediately after taping on the same day, 2 days after taping and on the 5th day, with the kinesio tape removed and the 7th day with VAS pain score and RMDQ (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire). The control group was taped as placebo. In this study, it was determined that kinesio taping was superior to placebo and its effect continued after the tape was removed. In a study conducted by Xue et al., it was observed that kinesio taping intervention reduced low back pain in the second and third trimesters compared with the control group, and the differences were statistically significant. This suggests that kinesio taping has a positive effect in improving low back pain and low back dysfunction during pregnancy, is superior to other methods including placebos, medications, and other general physical therapy methods, and therefore may serve as a useful therapeutic alternative.
This taping technique, which has been proven to be effective in many areas and has given positive responses in studies on managing back pain during pregnancy, has not been studied in the literature, although it has been proven to relieve back pain in different trimesters of pregnancy. Although labor pain varies from person to person, it is known as a universal symptom of labor. Pain varies according to the stages of labor. While the pain in the first stage of labor is mostly tissue-specific pain caused by uterine contractions and stimulation of the cervix, the pain in the second stage is somatic due to stretching in the vagina and perineum, traction on the uterus and pelvic organs, and distension of the pelvic floor muscles. The pain in the third and fourth stages of labor is tissue-related and traumatic and is caused by expulsion of the placenta and uterine involution. Although the neural mechanism of labor pain is similar to other acute pains, it has many characteristics specific to labor pain. In the first stage of labor, pain is felt in the areas where the uterus and adnexa are located due to mechanical tension in the lower segment of the uterus and dilatation of the cervix, hypoxia and ischemia in the uterus during contraction, pressure and tension in the adnexa, parietal peritoneum and structures surrounding them, bladder, urethra, rectum and pelvis, pressure in the lumbosacral plexus and spasms in the skeletal muscles. The uterus and cervix receive transmission from the sympathetic nerves in the uterine and cervical plexus. Pain receptors are transmitted by small, unmyelinated C fibers. It passes from the lumbar and inferior trochanteric sympathetic chain to the T10-11-12 and L1 nerves. Contraction pain is transmitted by T10-11-12 and L1 fibers and is poorly localized. In the early first stage, a dull pain is felt in the T11-T12 region. As labor progresses, pain gradually intensifies and is transmitted to the abdomen, waist and upper sacral region via the T10-L1 nerves. During this period, pain spreads from the waist to the back and legs, becoming increasingly severe. Research shows that ineffective coping with back pain during labor can cause fatigue, anxiety, stress, prolonged labor, deterioration in the pregnancy-fetus relationship, risk of cesarean section, decreased birth satisfaction, negative thoughts about future births, and early or late postpartum depression. Ineffective coping with back pain during birth reduces the amount of oxygen passing to the fetus, and the rate of hypoxia, distress, perinatal morbidity and mortality in the fetus increases. Therefore, by minimizing back pain during labor, the pregnant woman can actively participate in the birth, the labor process is shortened, the mother and baby interaction after birth is stronger, and it helps to reduce anxiety about birth and increase the comfort level. With the use of the kinesio taping method for back pain felt during birth; pain relief, experiencing labor as a more comfortable and relaxed process, and positive effects on the health of the newborn can be observed.
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain, Pregnancy, Midwifery, Birth Self-efficacy
- Being tested
- Kinesio Taping, Placebo Taping
- Keywords
- Labor, birth process, Kinesio Taping, Low Back Pain, Vaginal Birth Self-Efficacy, Postpartum Comfort, Newborn Apgar Score
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Kinesio TapingDevice
Application of elastic therapeutic kinesiology tape to the lumbar region during the active phase of labor in addition to routine obstetric care.
Placebo TapingDevice
Application of non-therapeutic adhesive tape to the lumbar region during the active phase of labor in addition to routine obstetric care.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Kinesio Taping Group | Experimental | Application of CE-marked kinesio taping to the lumbar region during active labor. Receives: Device: Kinesio Taping |
| Placebo Tapping Group | Placebo comparator | Application of non-therapeutic adhesive tape to the lumbar region during active labor. Receives: Device: Placebo Taping |
| Control Group | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Labor Low Back Pain Intensity
Low back pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
The Visual Analog Scale ranges from 0 to 10 cm, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.
Higher scores represent greater pain intensity.
Pain will be measured at three time points:
- Active phase of labor (4-8 cm cervical dilation)
- Transition phase (8-10 cm cervical dilation)
- 5 hours postpartum
Measured: During the active phase of labor (4-8 cm cervical dilatation), transition phase (8-10 cm), and at 5 hours postpartum.
Secondary outcomes (4)
Pain Severity (McGill Melzack Pain Questionnaire Score)
Pain severity assessed using the McGill Melzack Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), a validated multidimensional instrument measuring sensory and affective dimensions of pain. The questionnaire was administered during the active phase of labor and at 5 hours postpartum.
Measured: During active phase of labor (4-8 cm cervical dilatation) and at 5 hours postpartum.
Vaginal Childbirth Self-Efficacy
Childbirth self-efficacy assessed using the validated Vaginal Childbirth Self-Efficacy Scale, measuring the woman's confidence in coping with labor and birth.
Measured: During active phase of labor (4-8 cm cervical dilatation).
Postpartum Comfort Perception
Postpartum comfort perception assessed using the validated Postpartum Comfort Scale.
Measured: measured at the fifth hour postpartum
Neonatal Apgar Scores
Neonatal well-being assessed using Apgar scores evaluated at 1 and 5 minutes after birth.
Measured: At 1 and 5 minutes after delivery.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Mar 2026
- Study start20 Jul 2025
- Primary completion15 Oct 2025
- Study completion15 Oct 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ege UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a three-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled clinical investigation. Sample size was calculated using G\*Power 3.1 based on an F test (ANOVA: repeated measures, between factors), assuming a large effect size (f = 0.50), α = 0.05, and 95% power, yielding a minimum required sample of 45 participants. To account for potential attrition, 60 participants were initially planned. Recruitment continued throughout the predefined data-collection period, and 84 participants were enrolled and randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio with fixed group sizes to the Kinesio Taping (n=28), Placebo Taping (n=28), or Control (n=28) groups. The allocation list was generated using Randomizer.org, and allocation was concealed using sealed envelopes. Nine participants were excluded after randomization (cesarean delivery: 3 in the Kinesio Taping group and 3 in the Control group; tape displacement: 3 in the Placebo Taping group); 75 participants (25 per group) were included in the final analysis.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ege University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, ŞEYMA yılmaz, Ege University
- Investigators
- Seyma N Ergun Yilmaz, Degree, Principal investigator, Ege University Institute of Health SciencesZehra Baykal Akmese, Assoc.Prof.Dr., Study director, Ege University Institute of Health SciencesYasam K Akpak, Assoc.Prof.Dr., Study director, Izmir City Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Health Sciences, İzmir Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMehmet Ozkeskin, Assoc.Prof.Dr., Study director, Ege University Faculty of Health Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07459231
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EGE-SBE-SEY-01
- Acronym
- kinesio tape
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 15 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Jaron A, Konkol B, Gabrysz-Trybek E, Bladowska J, Grzywacz A, Nedjat A, Trybek G. Kinesio taping in various fields of medicine, dentistry, sport and physiotherapy. Balt J Health Phys Act. 2021, 13(2), 11-25. Doi: 10.29359/BJHPA.13.2.02
Gutke A, Betten C, Degerskar K, Pousette S, Olsen MF. Treatments for pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain: a systematic review of physiotherapy modalities. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Nov;94(11):1156-67. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12681. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
PubMed 26018758Kalinowski P, Krawulska A. Kinesio Taping vs. Placebo in Reducing Pregnancy-Related Low Back Pain: A Cross-Over Study. Med Sci Monit. 2017 Dec 26;23:6114-6120. doi: 10.12659/msm.904766.
PubMed 29277836Xue X, Chen Y, Mao X, Tu H, Yang X, Deng Z, Li N. Effect of kinesio taping on low back pain during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Oct 25;21(1):712. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04197-3.
PubMed 34696756Uysal, C., İlkay, B. O. Z., & SALMAN, S. (2022). Doğum Eyleminin Aktif Fazında Yaşanan Bel Ağrısının Yönetiminde Steril Su Enjeksiyonunun Etkisi: Randomize, Plasebo Kontrollü Bir Çalışma. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 15(2), 163-174.
Kase K. Kinesio taping in pediatrics: Fundamentals and whole-body taping. In: Kase K, Wallis J, Kase T. editors. Newyork: LLC. 2006.
Kase K, Wallis J, Kase T. Clinical therapeutic application of the kinesiotaping method. Tokyo, Japan: Ken Ikai Co Ltd; 2003.
Cline ME, Herman J, Shaw ER, Morton RD. Standardization of the visual analogue scale. Nurs Res. 1992 Nov-Dec;41(6):378-80. No abstract available.
PubMed 1437591Chu KH, Chen AC, Tai CJ, Chen SF, Chien LY. Development and Validation of the Self-Efficacy Regarding Vaginal Birth Scale. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017 Jan-Feb;46(1):e13-e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
PubMed 27865753Chinchilla-Ochoa D, Barriguete-Chavez Peon P, Farfan-Labonne BE, Garza-Morales S, Leff-Gelman P, Flores-Ramos M. Depressive symptoms in pregnant women with high trait and state anxiety during pregnancy and postpartum. Int J Womens Health. 2019 Apr 24;11:257-265. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S194021. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31118827Açıkyol T., Lumbar disk hernisi olan hastalarda kinezyo bantlama ve manuel terapi etkilerinin karşılaştırılması, Hasan Kalyoncu Ünı̇versı̇tesı̇ Sağlık Bı̇lı̇mlerı̇ Enstı̇tüsü, Gaziantep, 2020, Yüksek Lisans Tezi
Baykal, Z. (2008). Bel ağrısı olan gebelerde progresif gevşeme egzersizlerinin ağrı algısına ve yaşam kalitesi üzerine etkisi. Ege Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İzmir.
Biz C, Nicoletti P, Tomasin M, Bragazzi NL, Di Rubbo G, Ruggieri P. Is Kinesio Taping Effective for Sport Performance and Ankle Function of Athletes with Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI)? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Apr 29;58(5):620. doi: 10.3390/medicina58050620.
PubMed 35630037
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Kinesio Taping Applied During Labor on Maternal Low Back Pain, Vaginal Birth Self-Efficacy, Postpartum Comfort, and Neonatal Apgar Scores: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07459231
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- kinesio tape / EGE-SBE-SEY-01
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain, Pregnancy, Midwifery, Birth Self-efficacy
- Keywords
- Labor, birth process, Kinesio Taping, Low Back Pain, Vaginal Birth Self-Efficacy, Postpartum Comfort, Newborn Apgar Score
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ege UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Kinesio Taping® technique and Kinesio Tex® tape were invented by Japanese chiropractor and acupuncturist Dr. in 1973. Developed by Kenzo Kase. This method emerged with the idea that good results could be obtained with a taping method that resembles the flexibility and structural properties of the skin without restricting the individual's normal joint movements. The purpose of taping is to reduce pain and improve healing in soft tissues; It has many effects such as increasing proprioception, reducing muscle fatigue, improving muscle function, reducing delayed onset muscle pain, pain inhibition, reducing edema, lymphatic drainage and blood flow regulation. It is argued that kinesiology taping, unlike classical taping techniques, provides mechanical support without restricting movement and increases the action mechanism of lymphatic systems and muscle.
Detailed description
The kinesio taping technique (The Kinesio Taping® technique) and kinesio tape (Kinesio Tex® tape) were developed in 1973 by Japanese chiropractor and acupuncturist Dr. Kenzo Kase . This method emerged with the idea that good results could be obtained with a taping method that resembles the flexibility and structural properties of the skin without restricting the individual's normal joint movements . The purpose of taping is to reduce pain and improve healing in soft tissues; It has many effects such as increasing proprioception, reducing muscle fatigue, improving muscle function, reducing delayed-onset muscle pain, inhibiting pain, reducing edema, regulating lymphatic drainage and blood flow . It is argued that kinesio taping, unlike classical taping techniques, provides mechanical support without restricting movement and increases the mechanism of action of the lymphatic systems and muscles.
There are 6 different taping techniques developed with increasing experience over the years. These techniques are titled as Mechanical Correction Technique, Fascia Correction Technique, Area Correction Technique, Functional Correction Technique, Ligament Correction Technique, Lymphatic Correction Technique. The application method of the tape is determined according to the desired effect and the muscle type to be applied. The tape has I, Y, X, Fan, Web and Ring (Donut) application methods, while I and Y techniques are preferred if pain and edema are at the forefront. I tape is known as the most preferred taping method especially in acute muscle pain and is thought to reduce pain and edema. Area Correction Technique is applied to leave more space on the painful and inflamed area. Increasing the space area by lifting the skin over the expected area of effect; provides a decrease in the pressure in this area, while the irritation on the chemoreceptors is eliminated and the pain in the area is reduced. As sensory input increases, the gate control mechanism is activated; tension is applied to the middle 1/3 of the I-shaped strip , it is placed in the area where field correction is desired, and the ends of the strip are glued without applying tension. A single strip or strips glued on top of each other can be used.
With the kinesiology taping technique, which has a very large area of effect, especially the musculoskeletal system, different techniques and indications are added every day and the number of studies and investigations on this subject is increasing day by day. Kinesio-tape can also be applied during pregnancy with the protocol defined by Kase. Pain relief is the most important criterion in treatment because pain can seriously affect the pregnant woman. The key to using kinesio tape to relieve pain is how to choose the appropriate position, how to adjust the appropriate tension and how to determine the duration of the adhesive. Since patients and clinicians tend to avoid medications and invasive treatments during pregnancy, kinesio taping offers a new treatment for low back pain during pregnancy as a drug-free and safe alternative treatment. The functional movement and healing effect of the tape is better than physical therapy and does not harm the fetus. In recent years, clinical attention has been drawn to the effect of kinesio taping on low back pain during pregnancy, and relevant studies have been published showing that kinesio taping has a significant effect on low back pain during pregnancy. In a prospective study conducted by Pawel et al. on 106 pregnant women in the third trimester of pregnancy, patients were divided into two groups; 'I' shaped taping was applied to the kinesio-therapy group, additional transverse taping to the same area and abdominal taping to support the abdominal muscles and reduce lumbar load were applied and followed for one week. Pain intensity was followed immediately after taping on the same day, 2 days after taping and on the 5th day, with the kinesio tape removed and the 7th day with VAS pain score and RMDQ (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire). The control group was taped as placebo. In this study, it was determined that kinesio taping was superior to placebo and its effect continued after the tape was removed. In a study conducted by Xue et al., it was observed that kinesio taping intervention reduced low back pain in the second and third trimesters compared with the control group, and the differences were statistically significant. This suggests that kinesio taping has a positive effect in improving low back pain and low back dysfunction during pregnancy, is superior to other methods including placebos, medications, and other general physical therapy methods, and therefore may serve as a useful therapeutic alternative.
This taping technique, which has been proven to be effective in many areas and has given positive responses in studies on managing back pain during pregnancy, has not been studied in the literature, although it has been proven to relieve back pain in different trimesters of pregnancy. Although labor pain varies from person to person, it is known as a universal symptom of labor. Pain varies according to the stages of labor. While the pain in the first stage of labor is mostly tissue-specific pain caused by uterine contractions and stimulation of the cervix, the pain in the second stage is somatic due to stretching in the vagina and perineum, traction on the uterus and pelvic organs, and distension of the pelvic floor muscles. The pain in the third and fourth stages of labor is tissue-related and traumatic and is caused by expulsion of the placenta and uterine involution. Although the neural mechanism of labor pain is similar to other acute pains, it has many characteristics specific to labor pain. In the first stage of labor, pain is felt in the areas where the uterus and adnexa are located due to mechanical tension in the lower segment of the uterus and dilatation of the cervix, hypoxia and ischemia in the uterus during contraction, pressure and tension in the adnexa, parietal peritoneum and structures surrounding them, bladder, urethra, rectum and pelvis, pressure in the lumbosacral plexus and spasms in the skeletal muscles. The uterus and cervix receive transmission from the sympathetic nerves in the uterine and cervical plexus. Pain receptors are transmitted by small, unmyelinated C fibers. It passes from the lumbar and inferior trochanteric sympathetic chain to the T10-11-12 and L1 nerves. Contraction pain is transmitted by T10-11-12 and L1 fibers and is poorly localized. In the early first stage, a dull pain is felt in the T11-T12 region. As labor progresses, pain gradually intensifies and is transmitted to the abdomen, waist and upper sacral region via the T10-L1 nerves. During this period, pain spreads from the waist to the back and legs, becoming increasingly severe. Research shows that ineffective coping with back pain during labor can cause fatigue, anxiety, stress, prolonged labor, deterioration in the pregnancy-fetus relationship, risk of cesarean section, decreased birth satisfaction, negative thoughts about future births, and early or late postpartum depression. Ineffective coping with back pain during birth reduces the amount of oxygen passing to the fetus, and the rate of hypoxia, distress, perinatal morbidity and mortality in the fetus increases. Therefore, by minimizing back pain during labor, the pregnant woman can actively participate in the birth, the labor process is shortened, the mother and baby interaction after birth is stronger, and it helps to reduce anxiety about birth and increase the comfort level. With the use of the kinesio taping method for back pain felt during birth; pain relief, experiencing labor as a more comfortable and relaxed process, and positive effects on the health of the newborn can be observed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- This is a three-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled clinical investigation. Sample size was calculated using G*Power 3.1 based on an F test (ANOVA: repeated measures, between factors), assuming a large effect size (f = 0.50), α = 0.05, and 95% power, yielding a minimum required sample of 45 participants. To account for potential attrition, 60 participants were initially planned. Recruitment continued throughout the predefined data-collection period, and 84 participants were enrolled and randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio with fixed group sizes to the Kinesio Taping (n=28), Placebo Taping (n=28), or Control (n=28) groups. The allocation list was generated using Randomizer.org, and allocation was concealed using sealed envelopes. Nine participants were excluded after randomization (cesarean delivery: 3 in the Kinesio Taping group and 3 in the Control group; tape displacement: 3 in the Placebo Taping group); 75 participants (25 per group) were included in the final analysis.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Kinesio Taping Group | Experimental | Device: Kinesio TapingApplication of CE-marked kinesio taping to the lumbar region during active labor. |
| Placebo Tapping Group | Placebo comparator | Device: Placebo TapingApplication of non-therapeutic adhesive tape to the lumbar region during active labor. |
| Control Group | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Women aged 18-45 years
- Singleton pregnancy
- Gestational age between 37-40 weeks
- In the active phase of labor (≥4 cm cervical dilation)
- Experiencing low back pain during labor
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Multiple pregnancy
- Cesarean delivery
- Pharmacological induction during labor (e.g., prostaglandins or oxytocin)
- Displacement or removal of the applied tape during labor
- Infection, sensory loss, or skin lesion at the taping site
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Kinesio TapingApplication of elastic therapeutic kinesiology tape to the lumbar region during the active phase of labor in addition to routine obstetric care. | Device | Kinesio Taping Group |
| Placebo TapingApplication of non-therapeutic adhesive tape to the lumbar region during the active phase of labor in addition to routine obstetric care. | Device | Placebo Tapping Group |
Primary outcome
Labor Low Back Pain Intensity
Time frame: During the active phase of labor (4-8 cm cervical dilatation), transition phase (8-10 cm), and at 5 hours postpartum.
Low back pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Visual Analog Scale ranges from 0 to 10 cm, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores represent greater pain intensity. Pain will be measured at three time points: * Active phase of labor (4-8 cm cervical dilation) * Transition phase (8-10 cm cervical dilation) * 5 hours postpartum
4 secondary outcomes
Pain Severity (McGill Melzack Pain Questionnaire Score)
Time frame: During active phase of labor (4-8 cm cervical dilatation) and at 5 hours postpartum.
Vaginal Childbirth Self-Efficacy
Time frame: During active phase of labor (4-8 cm cervical dilatation).
Postpartum Comfort Perception
Time frame: measured at the fifth hour postpartum
Neonatal Apgar Scores
Time frame: At 1 and 5 minutes after delivery.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Oct 2026.
- BackgroundJaron A, Konkol B, Gabrysz-Trybek E, Bladowska J, Grzywacz A, Nedjat A, Trybek G. Kinesio taping in various fields of medicine, dentistry, sport and physiotherapy. Balt J Health Phys Act. 2021, 13(2), 11-25. Doi: 10.29359/BJHPA.13.2.02
- Background: PubMed 26018758Gutke A, Betten C, Degerskar K, Pousette S, Olsen MF. Treatments for pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain: a systematic review of physiotherapy modalities. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Nov;94(11):1156-67. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12681. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
- Background: PubMed 29277836Kalinowski P, Krawulska A. Kinesio Taping vs. Placebo in Reducing Pregnancy-Related Low Back Pain: A Cross-Over Study. Med Sci Monit. 2017 Dec 26;23:6114-6120. doi: 10.12659/msm.904766.
- Background: PubMed 34696756Xue X, Chen Y, Mao X, Tu H, Yang X, Deng Z, Li N. Effect of kinesio taping on low back pain during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Oct 25;21(1):712. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04197-3.
- BackgroundUysal, C., İlkay, B. O. Z., & SALMAN, S. (2022). Doğum Eyleminin Aktif Fazında Yaşanan Bel Ağrısının Yönetiminde Steril Su Enjeksiyonunun Etkisi: Randomize, Plasebo Kontrollü Bir Çalışma. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 15(2), 163-174.
- BackgroundKase K. Kinesio taping in pediatrics: Fundamentals and whole-body taping. In: Kase K, Wallis J, Kase T. editors. Newyork: LLC. 2006.
- BackgroundKase K, Wallis J, Kase T. Clinical therapeutic application of the kinesiotaping method. Tokyo, Japan: Ken Ikai Co Ltd; 2003.
- Background: PubMed 1437591Cline ME, Herman J, Shaw ER, Morton RD. Standardization of the visual analogue scale. Nurs Res. 1992 Nov-Dec;41(6):378-80. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 27865753Chu KH, Chen AC, Tai CJ, Chen SF, Chien LY. Development and Validation of the Self-Efficacy Regarding Vaginal Birth Scale. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017 Jan-Feb;46(1):e13-e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
- Background: PubMed 31118827Chinchilla-Ochoa D, Barriguete-Chavez Peon P, Farfan-Labonne BE, Garza-Morales S, Leff-Gelman P, Flores-Ramos M. Depressive symptoms in pregnant women with high trait and state anxiety during pregnancy and postpartum. Int J Womens Health. 2019 Apr 24;11:257-265. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S194021. eCollection 2019.
- BackgroundAçıkyol T., Lumbar disk hernisi olan hastalarda kinezyo bantlama ve manuel terapi etkilerinin karşılaştırılması, Hasan Kalyoncu Ünı̇versı̇tesı̇ Sağlık Bı̇lı̇mlerı̇ Enstı̇tüsü, Gaziantep, 2020, Yüksek Lisans Tezi
- BackgroundBaykal, Z. (2008). Bel ağrısı olan gebelerde progresif gevşeme egzersizlerinin ağrı algısına ve yaşam kalitesi üzerine etkisi. Ege Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İzmir.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Seyma N Ergun Yilmaz, Degree principal investigator
Ege University Institute of Health Sciences
Zehra Baykal Akmese, Assoc.Prof.Dr. study director
Ege University Institute of Health Sciences
Yasam K Akpak, Assoc.Prof.Dr. study director
Izmir City Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Health Sciences, İzmir Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Kinesio Taping in people with Low Back Pain and Pregnancy, run by Ege University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Labor Low Back Pain Intensity (time frame: During the active phase of labor (4-8 cm cervical dilatation), transition phase (8-10 cm), and at 5 hours postpartum.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07459231, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2026.