Video LaryngoscopeNCT07470736
Comparative Study Between Combined Video Laryngoscope and Video Stylet Intubation Versus Combined Video Laryngoscope and Fiberoptic Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway
A study testing Video Laryngoscope plus Video Stylet and Video Laryngoscope plus Fiberoptic bronchoscope in people with Video Laryngoscope and Airway, run by National University of Malaysia at 1 site in Malaysia.
Trial summary
This study titled "Comparative Study Between Combined Video Laryngoscope and Video Stylet Intubation Versus Combined Video Laryngoscope and Fibreoptic Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway" aims to evaluate and compare two advanced intubation techniques used in managing difficult airways. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Video Laryngoscope, Airway, Difficult Airway
- What is being tested?
- Video Laryngoscope plus Video Stylet and Video Laryngoscope plus Fiberoptic bronchoscope
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMalaysia
- Study dates
- 26 Feb 2026to 14 Mar 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- the anaesthesiology medical officers who have at least more than two years of experience.
Who cannot join
- Thsoe who has severe hand tremors.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Malaysia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Kuala Lumpur, Bandar Tun Razak, 56000
Nor Shazrina Md Saad, MD, +60129530246, nshazrina@yahoo.com
About this study
Official title: Comparative Study Between Combined Video Laryngoscope and Video Stylet Intubation Versus Combined Video Laryngoscope and Fiberoptic Intubation
This study titled "Comparative Study Between Combined Video Laryngoscope and Video Stylet Intubation Versus Combined Video Laryngoscope and Fibreoptic Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway" aims to evaluate and compare two advanced intubation techniques used in managing difficult airways. Currently, there is no study in Malaysia that compares the combination of a video laryngoscope (VL) with a video stylet (VS) and the combination of VL with a fibreoptic bronchoscope (FOB). Although both methods have been investigated separately, direct comparisons in simulated difficult airway settings are limited. The findings of this study will help guide airway management protocols and improve clinical outcomes in challenging airway situations.
This is a single-centre, randomized comparative crossover trial conducted at the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, HCTM, UKM. Ethical approval will be obtained from the departmental and university ethics committees prior to commencement. The study population will consist of anaesthesiology medical officers with at least two years of experience and anaesthesiology trainees in their second to fourth year of training at HCTM, UKM. Participants with severe hand tremors or those who decline participation will be excluded.
Read more
The main objectives are to compare the first-pass intubation success rate, time to successful intubation, and operator-rated ease of intubation between the two combined techniques. Each participant will perform both VL with VS and VL with FOB intubations in a simulated difficult airway scenario. The study hypothesizes that the combined VL with VS technique will provide superior performance, a higher first-pass success rate, shorter intubation time, and greater ease of use compared to the VL with FOB technique.
Participants who fail to complete all procedures or withdraw after participation will be considered dropouts. The results from this study are expected to provide useful insights into the effectiveness and practicality of these two combination techniques for airway management training and clinical application.
Read the detailed description
Before the study been conducted, the investigator, will give a 10 minutes briefing and explanation regarding the study and consent will be taken from the participants. Based on the previous study, a video demonstration on using these devices will be shown to participants as well. Participants will be informed at least a day prior to the study conducted so that the investigator and participants can have time to prepare and allocate time for participating in the study respectively.
This study will evaluate three techniques of ETI by participants in a simulated difficult airway scenario. Participants will start off with the single technique using a VL only, which serves as the control and standard care. After completing the single technique, participants will then proceed with both combination techniques, which are combined VL with VS and combined VL with FOB. As this is randomized comparative cross-over simulation study, participants will pick an envelope that randomly stated the sequence of combination techniques which generated using computer randomisation. Each participant on each session may get the same sequence or may not. However, the sequence for the study will be in equal proportion. There will be a washout period of five minutes between each technique. This allows the investigator and participants to chart the results and get ready for the other technique respectively.
The investigator will prepare the video laryngoscope C-MAC® with blade size 3, preformed rigid stylet, monitor, C-MAC® Video Stylet and Karl Storz Fibreoptic Scope which are standardised for all participants. Besides, standard endotracheal tube (ETT) size 8mm internal diameter will be used and lubricated with KY jelly.
Participants will attempt intubation using half body Laerdal Airway Management Trainer manikin. The neck immobilisation will be made by placing a hard cervical collar on the manikin to mimic difficult airway. Before attempting intubation, participants are allowed to practice intubation using VL, combination of VL with VS and combination of VL with FOB for familiarisation with the devices after briefing and video demonstration. Participants need to practice on the normal airway manikin and need to have successful intubation for at least five attempts for each technique which are VL, combined VL with VS and combined VL with FOB before commencing the study on a simulated difficult airway.
As for the study control, participants will start by intubating the manikin using VL C-MAC® with blade size 3. The intubation time for VL will start from VL C-MAC® blade size 3 passes upper incisor till successful ETI using ETT loaded preformed rigid stylet. For the combination techniques, the participant will manoeuvre the VL to optimal position and then held by an assistant. With the VL in situ by the assistant, each participant will advance the VS or FOB through the vocal cord and then the ETT will be advanced under indirect visualisation. The investigator will time the intubation attempts using a standard stopwatch. This study will divide the intubation time for the combined technique into three parts. For the first part, the time will start from the VL blade passes the upper incisors till glottic view (V-G) is obtained. The second intubation time will start when the ETT loaded FOB or VS passes the upper incisors and stops once the ETT loaded FOB or VS passes through the glottic opening (I-G time). For the third part, the timing will start when the ETT loaded FOB or VS passes through the glottic opening and stop upon successful ETI (G-E time). Successful ETI is defined once the real time video monitoring shows the ETT passes through the vocal cord and chest inflation is observed upon bag insufflation within 60 seconds of intubation by the participant. This 60-second time limit is established based on findings from previous difficult airway study. Participants are allowed up to three attempts for each technique. Participants will be considered as drop outs if they do not perform VL and two combination techniques of VL with VS and VL with FOB in one setting, and wish to withdraw from the study even after completing the procedure.
Failure of intubation is defined when the intubation done lasted longer than 60 seconds or if the ETT is placed in the oesophagus. Total time (TT) of intubation for combined techniques will be the sum of V-G, I-G and G-E time. Other variables that will be recorded in this study include glottic visualization which is described according to the Cormack-Lehane (CL) classification and the Percentage of Glottis Opening (POGO) scale even though the CL and POGO scales are used in direct laryngoscopy and VL respectively.
At the end of each technique, participants will be asked to rate the ease of intubation by a 5-point Likert scale from very difficult to very easy and their preference on the combination devices of VL with VS and VL with FOB also will be recorded. All these data will be collected using data collection sheet.
- Being tested
- Video laryngoscope alone as a control, Video Laryngoscope plus Video Stylet, Video Laryngoscope plus Fiberoptic bronchoscope
- Keywords
- Video laryngoscope, Video sylet intubation, Simulated difficult airway, Airway
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Video laryngoscope alone as a controlDevice
this is the control arm of the study where it is the standard of care now
Video Laryngoscope plus Video StyletDevice
This will be the first inteventional group
Video Laryngoscope plus Fiberoptic bronchoscopeDevice
This will be the second interventional group
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| This is the control | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: Video laryngoscope alone as a control; Device: Video Laryngoscope plus Video Stylet; Device: Video Laryngoscope plus Fiberoptic bronchoscope |
| This is the first intervention group | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Video laryngoscope alone as a control; Device: Video Laryngoscope plus Video Stylet; Device: Video Laryngoscope plus Fiberoptic bronchoscope |
| This is the 2ndd intervention group | Experimental | This will be the second interventional group Receives: Device: Video laryngoscope alone as a control; Device: Video Laryngoscope plus Video Stylet; Device: Video Laryngoscope plus Fiberoptic bronchoscope |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
compare first-pass intubation success rate between combined video laryngoscope with video stylet and combined video laryngoscope with fiberoptic bronchoscope.
Successful endotracheal intubation is defined once the real time video monitoring shows the ETT passes through the vocal cord and chest inflation is observed upon bag insufflation within 60 seconds of intubation by the participant.
Measured: From enrollment until completion of simulation on the same day
Secondary outcomes (2)
Compare intubation time between combined videolaryngoscope with video stylet and combined video laryngoscope with fiberoptic bronchoscope.
It is the time taken during successful endotracheal intubation
Measured: From enrollment until simulation end at the same day
To evaluate ease of intubation as rated by operators between combined video laryngopscope with video stylet and combined video laryngoscope with fiberoptic bronchoscope.
At the end of each technique, participants will be asked to rate the ease of intubation from very difficult mark 5 to very easy mark as 1 and need to state their preference on the combination devices.
Measured: From enrollment of the study until completion of the simulation on the same day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Mar 2026
- Study start26 Feb 2026
- Primary completion14 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion14 Mar 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Video LaryngoscopeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National University of Malaysia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mohammad Nizam Mokhtar, National University of Malaysia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07470736
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- JEP-2025-1094
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 10 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 17 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All IPD that underlie results in a publication
Publications
La Via, L.; Merola, F.; Messina, S.; Sanfilippo, G.; Tornitore, F.; Lombardo, F.; Sanfilippo, M.; Tigano, S.; Sanfilippo, F. Use of Combined Laryngo-Bronchoscopy Intubation Approach in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario with Cervical Stabilization. Signa Vitae 2023, 19, 104-111, doi:10.22514/sv.2023.073. 2. Gunasekaran, K.; Joshi, R.; Karunagaran, P.; Yachendra, V.S.G. A Hybrid Technique Using Video Laryngoscope-Assisted Flexible Bronchoscopy to Facilitate Endotracheal Intubation in Children with Anticipated Difficult Airway: A Case Series. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2025, 53, 77-81, doi:10.4274/TJAR.2024.241587. 3. Pius, J.; Noppens, R.R. Learning Curve and Performance in Simulated Difficult Airway for the Novel C-MAC® Video-Stylet and C-MAC® Macintosh Video Laryngoscope: A Prospective Randomized Manikin Trial. PLoS One 2020, 15, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242154. 4. Pan, H.-S.; Corey, T.; Luk, H.-N.; Qu, J.Z.; Shikani, A. Combined Styletubation with Videolaryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Thyroidectomy with Intraoperative Neuromonitoring. Anesthesia Research 2023, 1, 8-23, doi:10.3390/anesthres1010003. 5. Lenhardt, R.; Burkhart, M.T.; Brock, G.N.; Kanchi-Kandadai, S.; Sharma, R.; Akça, O. Is Video Laryngoscope-Assisted Flexible Tracheoscope Intubation Feasible for Patients with Predicted Difficult Airway? A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg 2014, 118, 1259-1265, doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000220. 6. Luk, H.-N.; Luk, H.-N.; Zhensheng Qu, J.; Shikani, A. A Paradigm Shift of Airway Management: The Role of Video-Assisted Intubating Stylet Technique. In Advances in Tracheal Intubation; IntechOpen, 2023. 7. Crawley, S.M.; Dalton, A.J. Predicting the Difficult Airway. BJA Educ 2015, 15, 253-258, doi:10.1093/bjaceaccp/mku047. 8. Kim, S.M.; Kim, H.J. Successful Advancement of Endotracheal Tube with Combined Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy and Videolaryngoscopy in a Patient with a Huge Goiter. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 2020, 8, doi:1
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Study Between Combined Video Laryngoscope and Video Stylet Intubation Versus Combined Video Laryngoscope and Fiberoptic Intubation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07470736
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- JEP-2025-1094
- Keywords
- Video laryngoscope, Video sylet intubation, Simulated difficult airway, Airway
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National University of MalaysiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 26 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 14 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study titled "Comparative Study Between Combined Video Laryngoscope and Video Stylet Intubation Versus Combined Video Laryngoscope and Fibreoptic Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway" aims to evaluate and compare two advanced intubation techniques used in managing difficult airways. Currently, there is no study in Malaysia that compares the combination of a video laryngoscope (VL) with a video stylet (VS) and the combination of VL with a fibreoptic bronchoscope (FOB). Although both methods have been investigated separately, direct comparisons in simulated difficult airway settings are limited. The findings of this study will help guide airway management protocols and improve clinical outcomes in challenging airway situations.
This is a single-centre, randomized comparative crossover trial conducted at the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, HCTM, UKM. Ethical approval will be obtained from the departmental and university ethics committees prior to commencement. The study population will consist of anaesthesiology medical officers with at least two years of experience and anaesthesiology trainees in their second to fourth year of training at HCTM, UKM. Participants with severe hand tremors or those who decline participation will be excluded.
The main objectives are to compare the first-pass intubation success rate, time to successful intubation, and operator-rated ease of intubation between the two combined techniques. Each participant will perform both VL with VS and VL with FOB intubations in a simulated difficult airway scenario. The study hypothesizes that the combined VL with VS technique will provide superior performance, a higher first-pass success rate, shorter intubation time, and greater ease of use compared to the VL with FOB technique.
Participants who fail to complete all procedures or withdraw after participation will be considered dropouts. The results from this study are expected to provide useful insights into the effectiveness and practicality of these two combination techniques for airway management training and clinical application.
Detailed description
Before the study been conducted, the investigator, will give a 10 minutes briefing and explanation regarding the study and consent will be taken from the participants. Based on the previous study, a video demonstration on using these devices will be shown to participants as well. Participants will be informed at least a day prior to the study conducted so that the investigator and participants can have time to prepare and allocate time for participating in the study respectively.
This study will evaluate three techniques of ETI by participants in a simulated difficult airway scenario. Participants will start off with the single technique using a VL only, which serves as the control and standard care. After completing the single technique, participants will then proceed with both combination techniques, which are combined VL with VS and combined VL with FOB. As this is randomized comparative cross-over simulation study, participants will pick an envelope that randomly stated the sequence of combination techniques which generated using computer randomisation. Each participant on each session may get the same sequence or may not. However, the sequence for the study will be in equal proportion. There will be a washout period of five minutes between each technique. This allows the investigator and participants to chart the results and get ready for the other technique respectively.
The investigator will prepare the video laryngoscope C-MAC® with blade size 3, preformed rigid stylet, monitor, C-MAC® Video Stylet and Karl Storz Fibreoptic Scope which are standardised for all participants. Besides, standard endotracheal tube (ETT) size 8mm internal diameter will be used and lubricated with KY jelly.
Participants will attempt intubation using half body Laerdal Airway Management Trainer manikin. The neck immobilisation will be made by placing a hard cervical collar on the manikin to mimic difficult airway. Before attempting intubation, participants are allowed to practice intubation using VL, combination of VL with VS and combination of VL with FOB for familiarisation with the devices after briefing and video demonstration. Participants need to practice on the normal airway manikin and need to have successful intubation for at least five attempts for each technique which are VL, combined VL with VS and combined VL with FOB before commencing the study on a simulated difficult airway.
As for the study control, participants will start by intubating the manikin using VL C-MAC® with blade size 3. The intubation time for VL will start from VL C-MAC® blade size 3 passes upper incisor till successful ETI using ETT loaded preformed rigid stylet. For the combination techniques, the participant will manoeuvre the VL to optimal position and then held by an assistant. With the VL in situ by the assistant, each participant will advance the VS or FOB through the vocal cord and then the ETT will be advanced under indirect visualisation. The investigator will time the intubation attempts using a standard stopwatch. This study will divide the intubation time for the combined technique into three parts. For the first part, the time will start from the VL blade passes the upper incisors till glottic view (V-G) is obtained. The second intubation time will start when the ETT loaded FOB or VS passes the upper incisors and stops once the ETT loaded FOB or VS passes through the glottic opening (I-G time). For the third part, the timing will start when the ETT loaded FOB or VS passes through the glottic opening and stop upon successful ETI (G-E time). Successful ETI is defined once the real time video monitoring shows the ETT passes through the vocal cord and chest inflation is observed upon bag insufflation within 60 seconds of intubation by the participant. This 60-second time limit is established based on findings from previous difficult airway study. Participants are allowed up to three attempts for each technique. Participants will be considered as drop outs if they do not perform VL and two combination techniques of VL with VS and VL with FOB in one setting, and wish to withdraw from the study even after completing the procedure.
Failure of intubation is defined when the intubation done lasted longer than 60 seconds or if the ETT is placed in the oesophagus. Total time (TT) of intubation for combined techniques will be the sum of V-G, I-G and G-E time. Other variables that will be recorded in this study include glottic visualization which is described according to the Cormack-Lehane (CL) classification and the Percentage of Glottis Opening (POGO) scale even though the CL and POGO scales are used in direct laryngoscopy and VL respectively.
At the end of each technique, participants will be asked to rate the ease of intubation by a 5-point Likert scale from very difficult to very easy and their preference on the combination devices of VL with VS and VL with FOB also will be recorded. All these data will be collected using data collection sheet.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| This is the control | Active comparator | Device: Video laryngoscope alone as a control, Device: Video Laryngoscope plus Video Stylet, Device: Video Laryngoscope plus Fiberoptic bronchoscope |
| This is the first intervention group | Experimental | Device: Video laryngoscope alone as a control, Device: Video Laryngoscope plus Video Stylet, Device: Video Laryngoscope plus Fiberoptic bronchoscope |
| This is the 2ndd intervention group | Experimental | Device: Video laryngoscope alone as a control, Device: Video Laryngoscope plus Video Stylet, Device: Video Laryngoscope plus Fiberoptic bronchoscopeThis will be the second interventional group |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- the anaesthesiology medical officers who have at least more than two years of experience.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Thsoe who has severe hand tremors.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Video laryngoscope alone as a controlthis is the control arm of the study where it is the standard of care now | Device | This is the 2ndd intervention group, This is the control, This is the first intervention group |
| Video Laryngoscope plus Video StyletThis will be the first inteventional group | Device | This is the 2ndd intervention group, This is the control, This is the first intervention group |
| Video Laryngoscope plus Fiberoptic bronchoscopeThis will be the second interventional group | Device | This is the 2ndd intervention group, This is the control, This is the first intervention group |
Primary outcome
compare first-pass intubation success rate between combined video laryngoscope with video stylet and combined video laryngoscope with fiberoptic bronchoscope.
Time frame: From enrollment until completion of simulation on the same day
Successful endotracheal intubation is defined once the real time video monitoring shows the ETT passes through the vocal cord and chest inflation is observed upon bag insufflation within 60 seconds of intubation by the participant.
2 secondary outcomes
Compare intubation time between combined videolaryngoscope with video stylet and combined video laryngoscope with fiberoptic bronchoscope.
Time frame: From enrollment until simulation end at the same day
To evaluate ease of intubation as rated by operators between combined video laryngopscope with video stylet and combined video laryngoscope with fiberoptic bronchoscope.
Time frame: From enrollment of the study until completion of the simulation on the same day
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Mar 2026.
- BackgroundLa Via, L.; Merola, F.; Messina, S.; Sanfilippo, G.; Tornitore, F.; Lombardo, F.; Sanfilippo, M.; Tigano, S.; Sanfilippo, F. Use of Combined Laryngo-Bronchoscopy Intubation Approach in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario with Cervical Stabilization. Signa Vitae 2023, 19, 104-111, doi:10.22514/sv.2023.073. 2. Gunasekaran, K.; Joshi, R.; Karunagaran, P.; Yachendra, V.S.G. A Hybrid Technique Using Video Laryngoscope-Assisted Flexible Bronchoscopy to Facilitate Endotracheal Intubation in Children with Anticipated Difficult Airway: A Case Series. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2025, 53, 77-81, doi:10.4274/TJAR.2024.241587. 3. Pius, J.; Noppens, R.R. Learning Curve and Performance in Simulated Difficult Airway for the Novel C-MAC® Video-Stylet and C-MAC® Macintosh Video Laryngoscope: A Prospective Randomized Manikin Trial. PLoS One 2020, 15, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242154. 4. Pan, H.-S.; Corey, T.; Luk, H.-N.; Qu, J.Z.; Shikani, A. Combined Styletubation with Videolaryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Thyroidectomy with Intraoperative Neuromonitoring. Anesthesia Research 2023, 1, 8-23, doi:10.3390/anesthres1010003. 5. Lenhardt, R.; Burkhart, M.T.; Brock, G.N.; Kanchi-Kandadai, S.; Sharma, R.; Akça, O. Is Video Laryngoscope-Assisted Flexible Tracheoscope Intubation Feasible for Patients with Predicted Difficult Airway? A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg 2014, 118, 1259-1265, doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000220. 6. Luk, H.-N.; Luk, H.-N.; Zhensheng Qu, J.; Shikani, A. A Paradigm Shift of Airway Management: The Role of Video-Assisted Intubating Stylet Technique. In Advances in Tracheal Intubation; IntechOpen, 2023. 7. Crawley, S.M.; Dalton, A.J. Predicting the Difficult Airway. BJA Educ 2015, 15, 253-258, doi:10.1093/bjaceaccp/mku047. 8. Kim, S.M.; Kim, H.J. Successful Advancement of Endotracheal Tube with Combined Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy and Videolaryngoscopy in a Patient with a Huge Goiter. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 2020, 8, doi:1
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All IPD that underlie results in a publication
Related trials for Video Laryngoscope
Active, not recruiting
OR Video-Laryngoscope Evaluations
Video Laryngoscopy, Quality Improvement
Enrolling by invitation
Hyperangulated Versus Standard Geometry Laryngoscope Blade Trial
Acute Respiratory Failure
Not yet recruiting
ASIGN Trial- Angulated Versus Standard Video-laryngoscope Blade in Nasal Intubation
Nasal Intubation
Enrolling by invitation
Hyperangulated Video Laryngoscopes Used for Intubation With Simultaneous Cervical Spine Immobilization
Cervical Spine Immobilisation, Airway Management
Enrolling by invitation
Videolaryngoscopes in the Morbidly Obese
Obesity Difficult Airway Airway Management
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Video Laryngoscope plus Video Stylet and Video Laryngoscope plus Fiberoptic bronchoscope in people with Video Laryngoscope and Airway, run by National University of Malaysia at 1 site in Malaysia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Malaysia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Mohammad Nizam Mokhtar, MBChB (+6091455555 ext. 5785, drnizam@ukm.edu.my), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
compare first-pass intubation success rate between combined video laryngoscope with video stylet and combined video laryngoscope with fiberoptic bronchoscope. (time frame: From enrollment until completion of simulation on the same day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07470736, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2026.