AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Lung DiseasesAirFlyNCT07478094

Longitudinal Outcomes of Patients With Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension Treated With Iloprost

An observational study of Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Lung Diseases, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This observational real-world study aims to evaluate the longitudinal clinical outcomes of adult patients with Group 3 pulmonary hypertension (PH), associated with chronic lung diseases such as interstitial lung disease, who are treated with inhaled iloprost in routine clinical practice. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
72 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
1 May 2026to 1 Jun 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adults with pulmonary hypertension due to chronic lung disease and/or hypoxia (group 3 pulmonary hypertension) receiving care at a specialized pulmonary circulation outpatient clinic. The study population includes patients with underlying interstitial lung disease or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who were treated with inhaled iloprost as part of routine clinical practice. The cohort represents a real-world population followed longitudinally using data available from medical records, without additional study-specific procedures or patient contact.

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Diagnosis of group 3 pulmonary hypertension confirmed by right heart catheterization, defined as mean pulmonary artery pressure >20 mmHg, pulmonary artery wedge pressure ≤15 mmHg, and pulmonary vascular resistance >2 Wood units
  • Presence of documented underlying chronic lung disease (e.g., interstitial lung disease confirmed by high-resolution computed tomography with restrictive pattern on pulmonary function testing, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
  • Use of inhaled iloprost for a minimum of 3 months, documented in medical records
  • Availability of baseline clinical data (at initiation of inhaled iloprost) and at least one follow-up assessment

Who cannot join

  • Pulmonary hypertension from other clinical groups (Groups 1, 2, 4, or 5) as the predominant diagnosis
  • Insufficient clinical information in medical records to allow characterization or longitudinal assessment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Instituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-900

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: AirFly: Longitudinal Outcomes of Patients With Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension Treated With Iloprost

This observational real-world study aims to evaluate the longitudinal clinical outcomes of adult patients with Group 3 pulmonary hypertension (PH), associated with chronic lung diseases such as interstitial lung disease, who are treated with inhaled iloprost in routine clinical practice.

Treatment options for Group 3 PH remain limited, and the use of pulmonary vasodilators is controversial due to potential worsening of gas exchange. Inhaled iloprost may provide a more selective approach by targeting well-ventilated lung regions. However, real-world data on its use in this population are scarce.

Read more

The primary objective of this study is to assess changes in clinical risk status over time using the COMPERA 2.0 four-stratum risk model. Secondary objectives include describing patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and the evolution of functional parameters and biomarkers, as well as documenting relevant clinical events such as hospitalizations, treatment escalation, and discontinuation.

The study will retrospectively analyze data from approximately 50 adult patients with confirmed Group 3 PH who received inhaled iloprost as part of their routine care in a specialized pulmonary hypertension center. No additional patient contact or interventions will occur.

Read the detailed description

Group 3 pulmonary hypertension (PH), associated with chronic lung diseases such as interstitial lung disease, represents a common and clinically challenging PH phenotype, frequently associated with reduced exercise capacity, increased oxygen requirements, and higher mortality. Unlike pulmonary arterial hypertension (Group 1), where targeted therapies have demonstrated clear benefits, treatment options for Group 3 PH remain limited and are primarily focused on management of the underlying lung disease and supportive measures.

The use of systemic pulmonary vasodilators in this population is controversial due to the potential risk of worsening ventilation-perfusion mismatch and hypoxemia. Inhaled prostacyclin analogues may offer a more selective therapeutic approach by preferentially targeting well-ventilated lung regions, potentially mitigating these risks. Inhaled iloprost, approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension, has been used off-label in selected patients with Group 3 PH; however, available evidence is limited and largely derived from small or short-term studies. Data describing real-world patient profiles, treatment patterns, and longitudinal clinical outcomes remain scarce.

Risk stratification has become a key component of disease monitoring in pulmonary hypertension. The COMPERA 2.0 model, which incorporates clinical and non-invasive parameters into a four-stratum risk framework, has demonstrated sensitivity to detect prognostically meaningful changes over time.

This retrospective observational study aims to characterize the clinical evolution of patients with Group 3 PH treated with inhaled iloprost in routine practice. The primary focus is the longitudinal change in risk status according to the COMPERA 2.0 four-stratum model. In addition, the study will explore changes in functional parameters such as WHO functional class and six-minute walk distance, biomarker trends when available, patterns of iloprost use (including monotherapy or combination therapy), and the occurrence of relevant clinical events such as hospitalizations, treatment escalation, and treatment discontinuation.

Data will be obtained from existing medical records of patients followed in a specialized pulmonary hypertension center, without additional patient contact or intervention.

Keywords
Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension, Interstitial Lung Disease, Inhaled Iloprost, Observational Study
Medical subject headings
Lung Diseases, Interstitial

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07478094
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension Treated With Inhaled IloprostAdults (≥18 years) with group 3 pulmonary hypertension (PH due to chronic lung disease and/or hypoxia) followed at a specialized pulmonary circulation outpatient clinic who received inhaled iloprost during routine clinical care. Group 3 PH was confirmed by right heart catheterization according to current hemodynamic criteria and in the presence of documented underlying lung disease (e.g., interstitial lung disease or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Risk Stratification According to the COMPERA 2.0 Four-Stratum Model

    Primary outcome is the longitudinal change in clinical risk category assessed using the COMPERA 2.0 four-stratum model (low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high, high risk). Risk status will be determined based on available clinical variables (World Health Organization functional class, 6-minute walk distance, and BNP or NT-proBNP levels, when available). The analysis will evaluate the proportion of patients who demonstrate improvement, stability, or worsening of risk category during follow-up compared with baseline (defined as initiation of inhaled iloprost).

    Measured: From baseline (initiation of inhaled iloprost) through available follow-up assessments during routine clinical care (follow-up of 3 to 6 months)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change in World Health Organization (WHO) Functional Class

    Within-patient longitudinal change in World Health Organization (WHO) functional class during follow-up compared with baseline (defined as initiation of inhaled iloprost). WHO functional class ranges from I (no limitation of physical activity) to IV (inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms), with higher classes indicating worse functional status.

    Measured: From baseline (initiation of inhaled iloprost) through available follow-up assessments during routine clinical care (follow-up of 3 to 6 months)

  2. Change in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)

    Within-patient change in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), measured in meters, comparing baseline (initiation of inhaled iloprost) and follow-up assessments during routine clinical care. Higher values indicate better exercise capacity.

    Measured: From baseline (initiation of inhaled iloprost) through available follow-up assessments during routine clinical care (follow-up of 3 to 6 months)

  3. Change in BNP or NT-proBNP Levels

    Within-patient variation in B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels during follow-up compared with baseline. BNP and NT-proBNP are biomarkers of cardiac stress; higher values indicate worse cardiac strain and prognosis.

    Measured: From baseline (initiation of inhaled iloprost) through available follow-up assessments during routine clinical care (follow-up of 3 to 6 months)

  4. Clinical Events During Follow-up

    Occurrence of clinically relevant events during follow-up, including pulmonary hypertension-related hospitalizations, therapeutic escalation, discontinuation of inhaled iloprost (with reason, when available), and all-cause mortality. These events will be descriptively summarized.

    Measured: From baseline (initiation of inhaled iloprost) through available follow-up assessments during routine clinical care (follow-up of 3 to 6 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Mar 2026
  2. Study start1 May 2026
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2026
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
72 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07478094
Sponsor's protocol ID
SGP 28054
Acronym
AirFly
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
27 Feb 2026
Last updated
24 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Lung Diseases, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Risk Stratification According to the COMPERA 2.0 Four-Stratum Model (time frame: From baseline (initiation of inhaled iloprost) through available follow-up assessments during routine clinical care (follow-up of 3 to 6 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in