AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial FibrillationNCT07492498

A Village Doctor-led Telehealth Supported Trial of Heart Failure Prevention in AF Patients: MIRACLE-AF 2 (Heart Failure Prevention)

A study testing Village-Doctor Led Integrated Care in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure, run by Jiangsu Taizhou People's Hospital at 3 sites in China.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This cluster randomized study aims to compare village doctor-led integrated care versus usual care to improve cardiovascular health, atrial fibrillation management, self-management adherence, and heart failure prevention among older rural patients with atrial fibrillation in China.The primary outcome at 12 months is… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure
What is being tested?
Village-Doctor Led Integrated Care
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,356 participants
Where
3 sitesChina
Study dates
26 Jul 2026to 30 Dec 2033
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 1. The village clinics need to be willing and able to provide integrated care to their patients with atrial fibrillation; 2. The village doctors from one village clinic serves all AF patients from 3-5 nearby villages; 3. The village doctors are trained to have a fundamental understanding of telemedicine; 4. Patients are eligible for participation if 1)they aged 65-80 years.
  • 2)Availability of an electrocardiogram confirming atrial fibrillation, or an official diagnosis certificate of atrial fibrillation issued by a specialist.
  • 3)Receiving healthcare management from a primary medical institution near the place of residence.
  • 4)Able to understand and sign the informed consent form.

Who cannot join

  • A documented history of HF, or newly diagnosed HF according to the 2026 ESC Guidelines for the management of heart failure. HF will require current or prior typical symptoms and/or signs attributable to a structural and/or functional cardiac abnormality. Participants with LVEF <50% will be classified as having heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In participants with LVEF ≥50%, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) will require objective evidence of cardiac structural and/or functional abnormalities consistent with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction or elevated filling pressures, supported by elevated natriuretic peptide levels. In participants with AF, supportive echocardiographic abnormalities will include left atrial volume index (LAVI) >40 mL/m², E/e' >15, pulmonary artery systolic pressure >35 mmHg, or tricuspid regurgitation velocity >2.8 m/s.
  • Expected survival of less than 12 months.
  • Severe renal insufficiency, defined as creatinine clearance <30 mL/min, or currently receiving dialysis treatment.
  • Cardiac dysfunction caused by reversible secondary causes, including hyperthyroid heart disease, anemic heart disease, or uncorrected congenital heart disease.
  • Indication for pacemaker implantation but without pacemaker placement.
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease complicated by type II respiratory failure.
  • Special populations, such as patients with mental illness.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

China3 sites, 3 recruiting
  • Village Clinics in Suining County, Jiangsu Province

    Xuzhou, Suining, 221200

    Wensu Chen, 15050848274, Chen.wensu@163.com

    Recruiting
  • Village Clinics in Dongtai City, Jiangsu Province

    Yancheng, Dongtai, 224200

    Cheng Wu, 18012515515, wucheng1413@163.com

    Recruiting
  • Village Clinics in Jiangdu District, Jiangsu Province

    Yangzhou, Jiangdu, 225267

    Ming Chu, 13814010410, chuming@njmu.edu.cn

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

This cluster randomized study aims to compare village doctor-led integrated care versus usual care to improve cardiovascular health, atrial fibrillation management, self-management adherence, and heart failure prevention among older rural patients with atrial fibrillation in China.The primary outcome at 12 months is the change in Life's Essential 8 cardiovascular health score from baseline (phase 1). The primary outcome at 36 months is a composite cardiovascular endpoint including cardiovascular death, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, hospitalization for worsening HF or acute coronary syndrome, and emergency department visits due to AF (phase 2) . The primary outcome at 48 months is new-incident heart-failure diagnosis (phase 3) .An extended observational follow-up, the new-incident heart-failure diagnosis observational follow-up study, will be conducted at Year 7 to evaluate long-term effects.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common among older adults and is strongly associated with heart failure (HF), stroke, hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality. AF and HF interact bidirectionally and may form a self-perpetuating cycle, particularly in older patients. Although the Atrial Fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway is recommended to improve the comprehensive management of AF, older adults with AF in rural China remain particularly vulnerable because of limited access to specialist care, inadequate HF screening and risk stratification, suboptimal implementation of guideline-recommended treatment, and insufficient continuity of follow-up. HF is one of the most common and clinically important complications of AF and is strongly associated with adverse prognosis. Therefore, AF management should extend beyond stroke prevention and incorporate earlier identification, prevention, and management of HF. China's rural primary healthcare system relies heavily on village doctors; however, village doctors often have limited clinical resources, standardized training, and access to specialist support, which may hinder the delivery of long-term integrated care for patients with AF who are at risk of developing HF. A telemedicine-supported, village-doctor-led integrated care model incorporating regular follow-up, medication review, cardiovascular risk monitoring, ABC pathway-based AF management, simplified exercise rehabilitation, timely specialist consultation, and structured patient education may therefore improve cardiovascular health and reduce the risk of incident HF in this population.

AIM OF THIS STUDY This cluster randomized study aims to compare village doctor-led integrated care versus usual care in improving cardiovascular health, guideline-based AF management, self-management adherence, clinical outcomes, and prevention of HF among older rural patients with AF in China.

DESIGN This study is a prospective, cluster randomized, open-label, parallel-group clinical trial conducted in rural China. The study aims to enroll older rural residents aged 65 to 80 years with documented AF and without a history or screening evidence of HF or asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction at baseline. Village clinics in Jiangsu Province will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group or the control group. Patients in the intervention group will receive telemedicine-supported, village doctor-led integrated care, including monthly follow-up, symptom assessment, vital-sign monitoring, medication adherence support, cardiovascular risk-factor management, ABC pathway-based AF care, simplified home-based exercise rehabilitation education, and remote cardiology consultation when needed. Village doctors will receive standardized training on stroke prevention and anticoagulation, symptom and rate/rhythm management, and management of cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities. Patients in the control group will receive usual chronic disease management according to the National Basic Public Health Service requirements, including routine follow-up, general health education, medication documentation, and referral when clinically indicated.

Being tested
Village-Doctor Led Integrated Care, Usual Care
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Village-Doctor Led Integrated CareOther

    1. Village doctor-led management. At least one follow-up contact per month will be completed at the clinic or at home, including symptom assessment, vital-sign monitoring, medication adherence management, cardiovascular risk-factor control and health guidance.
    2. Telemedicine specialist support. When symptoms fluctuate, treatment adjustment is difficult or a management problem arises, the village doctor may upload symptoms, ECG recordings, medication information and examination materials through a dedicated telemedicine platform.
    3. Standardised guideline training. Village doctors will receive training centred on the AF ABC pathway, covering stroke prevention and anticoagulation, better symptom control, cardiovascular risk-factor management, referral criteria and endpoint identification.
    4. Simplified exercise rehabilitation and lifestyle education. Village doctors will deliver enhanced health education in accordance with the study team's 15 core messages for lifestyle-related management
  • Usual CareOther

    Participants in the control group will receive usual chronic disease management according to the National Basic Public Health Service requirements. Usual care includes routine follow-up, general health education, medication registration, and standard referral procedures provided by local primary care providers. Participants will not receive the structured village-doctor led integrated care program.

Study groups in NCT07492498
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention GroupExperimentalThe intervention group will receive a village doctor-led integrated management program supported by telemedicine, guideline-based training, and a simplified exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation component, aiming to prevent incident heart failure in elderly rural patients with atrial fibrillation who have preserved cardiac function.
Receives: Other: Village-Doctor Led Integrated Care
Control GroupActive comparatorParticipants in this arm will receive usual chronic disease management according to the National Basic Public Health Service requirements.
Receives: Other: Usual Care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary Outcome of Phase 1: Change in Life's Essential 8 Cardiovascular Health Score

    Mean change in Life's Essential 8 cardiovascular health score from baseline to 12 months. The score includes diet, physical activity, nicotine exposure, sleep health, body mass index, non-HDL cholesterol, blood glucose, and blood pressure.

    Measured: Baseline to 12 months

  2. Primary Outcome of Phase 2: Composite Cardiovascular Outcome

    Composite cardiovascular endpoint, including cardiovascular death, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, hospitalization for worsening heart failure or acute coronary syndrome, and emergency visits due to atrial fibrillation.

    Measured: Baseline to 36 months

  3. Primary Outcome of Phase 3: New-incident heart-failure diagnosis

    (1) HFrEF - symptomatic cardiac dysfunction with LVEF < 50%; (2) HFpEF - symptoms of HF with LVEF ≥ 50% and echocardiographic evidence of structural or functional cardiac abnormalities; or (3) hospitalisation with heart failure as a primary cause.

    Measured: Baseline to 48 months

  4. Primary Outcome of Extension Study: Composite cardiovascular outcome

    Composite cardiovascular endpoint, including cardiovascular death, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, hospitalization for worsening heart failure or acute coronary syndrome, and emergency visits due to atrial fibrillation.

    Measured: Baseline to 84 months

Secondary outcomes (23)
  1. Cardiovascular Death

    Cardiovascular death was defined as death attributable to myocardial infarction, heart failure, arrhythmia, cardiac perforation or tamponade, or other deaths of cardiac origin. Death caused by ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, peripheral embolism, and pulmonary embolism was also classified as cardiovascular death

    Measured: 12 months after baseline

  2. Cardiovascular Hospitalization

    Hospitalization due to cardiovascular or neurological diseases at township-level or higher hospitals, including heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia, acute coronary syndrome, hypertensive emergency or urgency, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, and transient ischemic attack.

    Measured: 12 months after baseline

  3. Emergency Visit for Cardiovascular Events

    Incidence of emergency visits for cardiovascular events, including exacerbation of heart failure or acute coronary syndrome.

    Measured: 12 months after baseline

  4. ischemic or hemorrhagic Stroke

    All strokes: ischemic or hemorrhagic Stroke

    Measured: 12 months after baseline

  5. The proportion of patients who met all the three criteria for the ABC pathway of integrated AF care

    The 'A' criterion referred to stroke prevention or anticoagulation. 'A criterion compliant' implies that either appropriate non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOACs) use, or warfarin was used with a time in the therapeutic range (TTR) >65%. Patients who were not properly treated with OACs are considered as 'A non-compliant'. The 'B' criterion referred to better symptom control with patient-centered decisions on rate or rhythm control. Patients with an EHRA score of I or II are considered to have good control of AF symptoms ('B compliant'). On the contrary, those with an EHRA score of III or IV were defined as 'B non-compliant', which means their symptoms were insufficiently controlled. The 'C' criterion stands for optimal management of cardiovascular risk factors and other comorbidities. 'C criterion compliant' implies that all the considered risk factors and comorbidities were well controlled or optimally treated. Otherwise, patients were considered as 'C non-compliant'

    Measured: 12 month after baseline

  6. Cardiovascular Death

    Cardiovascular death was defined as death attributable to myocardial infarction, heart failure, arrhythmia, cardiac perforation or tamponade, or other deaths of cardiac origin. Death caused by ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, peripheral embolism, and pulmonary embolism was also classified as cardiovascular deathTime

    Measured: 36 months after baseline

  7. Ischemic or hemorrhagic Stroke

    All strokes: ischemic or hemorrhagic Stroke

    Measured: 36 months after baseline

  8. Worsening of heart failure or acute coronary syndrome

    A worsening of heart failure or acute coronary syndrome was defined as the need to be hospitalized or have an emergency visit in conjunction with these conditions

    Measured: 36 months after baseline

  9. Emergency visit due to AF

    Emergency visit due to AF

    Measured: 36 months after baseline

  10. All-cause mortality

    all-cause death

    Measured: 36 months after baseline

  11. The proportion of patients who met all the three criteria for the ABC pathway

    The 'A' criterion referred to stroke prevention or anticoagulation. 'A criterion compliant' implies that either appropriate non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOACs) use, or warfarin was used with a time in the therapeutic range (TTR) >65%. Patients who were not properly treated with OACs are considered as 'A non-compliant'. The 'B' criterion referred to better symptom control with patient-centered decisions on rate or rhythm control. Patients with an EHRA score of I or II are considered to have good control of AF symptoms ('B compliant'). On the contrary, those with an EHRA score of III or IV were defined as 'B non-compliant', which means their symptoms were insufficiently controlled. The 'C' criterion stands for optimal management of cardiovascular risk factors and other comorbidities. 'C criterion compliant' implies that all the considered risk factors and comorbidities were well controlled or optimally treated. Otherwise, patients were considered as 'C non-compliant'

    Measured: 36 month after baseline

  12. Cardiovascular Death

    Cardiovascular death was defined as death attributable to myocardial infarction, heart failure, arrhythmia, cardiac perforation or tamponade, or other deaths of cardiac origin. Death caused by ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, peripheral embolism, and pulmonary embolism was also classified as cardiovascular deathTime

    Measured: 48 months after baseline

  13. Ischemic or hemorrhagic Stroke

    All strokes: ischemic or hemorrhagic Stroke

    Measured: 48 months after baseline

  14. Worsening of heart failure or acute coronary syndrome

    A worsening of heart failure or acute coronary syndrome was defined as the need to be hospitalized or have an emergency visit in conjunction with these conditions

    Measured: 48 months after baseline

  15. Emergency visit due to AF

    Emergency visit due to AF

    Measured: 48 months after baseline

  16. All-cause mortality

    all-cause death

    Measured: 48 months after baseline

  17. The proportion of patients who met all the three criteria for the ABC pathway

    The 'A' criterion referred to stroke prevention or anticoagulation. 'A criterion compliant' implies that either appropriate non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOACs) use, or warfarin was used with a time in the therapeutic range (TTR) >65%. Patients who were not properly treated with OACs are considered as 'A non-compliant'. The 'B' criterion referred to better symptom control with patient-centered decisions on rate or rhythm control. Patients with an EHRA score of I or II are considered to have good control of AF symptoms ('B compliant'). On the contrary, those with an EHRA score of III or IV were defined as 'B non-compliant', which means their symptoms were insufficiently controlled. The 'C' criterion stands for optimal management of cardiovascular risk factors and other comorbidities. 'C criterion compliant' implies that all the considered risk factors and comorbidities were well controlled or optimally treated. Otherwise, patients were considered as 'C non-compliant'

    Measured: 48 month after baseline

  18. Cardiovascular Death

    Cardiovascular death was defined as death attributable to myocardial infarction, heart failure, arrhythmia, cardiac perforation or tamponade, or other deaths of cardiac origin. Death caused by ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, peripheral embolism, and pulmonary embolism was also classified as cardiovascular deathTime

    Measured: 84 months after baseline

  19. Ischemic or hemorrhagic Stroke

    All strokes: ischemic or hemorrhagic Stroke

    Measured: 84 months after baseline

  20. Worsening of heart failure or acute coronary syndrome

    A worsening of heart failure or acute coronary syndrome was defined as the need to be hospitalized or have an emergency visit in conjunction with these conditions

    Measured: 84 months after baseline

  21. Emergency visit due to AF

    Emergency visit due to AF

    Measured: 84 months after baseline

  22. All-cause mortality

    all-cause death

    Measured: 84 months after baseline

  23. The proportion of patients who met all the three criteria for the ABC pathway

    The 'A' criterion referred to stroke prevention or anticoagulation. 'A criterion compliant' implies that either appropriate non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOACs) use, or warfarin was used with a time in the therapeutic range (TTR) >65%. Patients who were not properly treated with OACs are considered as 'A non-compliant'. The 'B' criterion referred to better symptom control with patient-centered decisions on rate or rhythm control. Patients with an EHRA score of I or II are considered to have good control of AF symptoms ('B compliant'). On the contrary, those with an EHRA score of III or IV were defined as 'B non-compliant', which means their symptoms were insufficiently controlled. The 'C' criterion stands for optimal management of cardiovascular risk factors and other comorbidities. 'C criterion compliant' implies that all the considered risk factors and comorbidities were well controlled or optimally treated. Otherwise, patients were considered as 'C non-compliant'

    Measured: 84 month after baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Mar 2026
  2. Study start26 Jul 2026
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2033 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2033 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,356 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07492498
Sponsor's protocol ID
LSKY 2025-191-01,2026-SR-221
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
16 Mar 2026
Last updated
7 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Li M, Chen Y, Chu M, Zhang S, Yang S, Lip GYH, Chen M. Village Doctor-Led Telemedicine for Rural Patients Aged 75 Years and Older With AF: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the MIRACLE-AF Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2026 Mar 2;9(3):e261385. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.1385.

    PubMed 41817526
  • Chu M, Zhang S, Gong J, Yang S, Yang G, Sun X, Wu D, Xia Y, Jiao J, Peng X, Peng Z, Hong L, Wang Z, Li M, Lip GYH, Chen M; MIRACLE-AF Investigators. Telemedicine-based integrated management of atrial fibrillation in village clinics: a cluster randomized trial. Nat Med. 2025 Apr;31(4):1276-1285. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03511-2. Epub 2025 Feb 21.

    PubMed 39984634
  • Li M, Chu M, Shen Y, Zhang S, Yin X, Yang S, Lip GYH, Chen M; MIRACLE-AF Trial Investigators. A Novel Model of Integrated Care of Older Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Rural China. JACC Asia. 2024 Jul 30;4(10):764-773. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.07.006. eCollection 2024 Oct.

    PubMed 39553909

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Village-Doctor Led Integrated Care in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure, run by Jiangsu Taizhou People's Hospital at 3 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ming Chu (13814010410, chuming@njmu.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Primary Outcome of Phase 1: Change in Life's Essential 8 Cardiovascular Health Score (time frame: Baseline to 12 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07492498, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in