AzTrials
AzTrials

Venous CongestionMICRO-CONGESTNCT07499401

Evaluation of the Microcirculatory Response to Fluids in Critically Ill Patients With Venous Congestion: A Prospective Observational Study

An observational study of Venous Congestion and Microcirculation, run by Università Politecnica delle Marche at 1 site in Italy.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The hypothesis is that fluid-responsive patients who show signs of venous congestion experience a worsening of microcirculatory status after fluid administration compared to patients without signs of venous congestion Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
fluid challenge
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
15 Dec 2024to Jun 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit

Who may be able to join

  • Critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit
  • Invasive or minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring

Who cannot join

  • Suspected or confirmed pregnancy
  • Inability to access the oral cavity (e.g., facial trauma, oral bleeding)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • AOU delle Marche

    Ancona, Italy, 60123

    Abele Donati Pr, PhD, +390715963858, a.donati@univpm.it

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

The hypothesis is that fluid-responsive patients who show signs of venous congestion experience a worsening of microcirculatory status after fluid administration compared to patients without signs of venous congestion

Being tested
fluid challenge
Medical subject headings
Hyperemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • fluid challengeDrug

    Signs of venous congestion and microcirculatory status will be assessed at baseline. A fluid challenge will then be performed, and microcirculation will be evaluated at the end of fluid administration and again after 30 minutes

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Sublingual total vessel density (TVD)

    To compare changes in sublingual microcirculatory parameter - total vessel density (TVD) - before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Change in Sublingual percentage of perfused vessels (PPV)

    To compare changes in sublingual microcirculatory parameter - percentage of perfused vessels (PPV) - before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  2. Change in Sublingual Microcirculatory Flow Index (MFI)

    The primary objective of the study is to compare changes in sublingual microcirculation, measured by the Microcirculatory Flow Index (MFI), before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  3. Change in Sublingual perfused vessel density (PVD)

    To compare changes in sublingual microcirculatory parameters - perfused vessel density (PVD) - before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  4. Change in Sublingual microcirculatory heterogeneity index (MHI)

    To compare changes in sublingual microcirculatory parameters - microcirculatory heterogeneity index (MHI) - before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  5. Change in Sublingual PPV in Non-Preload-Dependent Patients With and Without Venous Congestion

    To compare changes in sublingual PPV before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in non-preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  6. Change in Sublingual TVD in Non-Preload-Dependent Patients With and Without Venous Congestion

    To compare changes in sublingual TVD before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in non-preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  7. Change in Sublingual MFI in Non-Preload-Dependent Patients With and Without Venous Congestion

    To compare changes in sublingual MFI before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in non-preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  8. Change in Sublingual PVD in Non-Preload-Dependent Patients With and Without Venous Congestion

    To compare changes in sublingual PVD before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in non-preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  9. Change in Sublingual MHI in Non-Preload-Dependent Patients With and Without Venous Congestion

    To compare changes in sublingual MHI before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in non-preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  10. Association Between Venous Congestion and TVD in Critically Ill Patients and Subpopulations

    • evaluate the relationship between signs of venous congestion TVD at baseline, after fluid administration, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Measured: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  11. Association Between Venous Congestion and PVD in Critically Ill Patients and Subpopulations

    To evaluate the relationship between signs of venous congestion and PVD at baseline, after fluid administration, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Measured: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  12. Association Between Venous Congestion and MFI in Critically Ill Patients and Subpopulations

    To evaluate the relationship between signs of venous congestion and MFI at baseline, after fluid administration, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Measured: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  13. Association Between Venous Congestion and PPV in Critically Ill Patients and Subpopulations

    To evaluate the relationship between signs of venous congestion and PPV at baseline, after fluid administration, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Measured: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  14. Association Between Venous Congestion and MHI in Critically Ill Patients and Subpopulations

    To evaluate the relationship between signs of venous congestion and MHI at baseline, after fluid administration, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Measured: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  15. Association Between Venous Congestion and TVD at Baseline

    To evaluate the association between signs of venous congestion and TVD at baseline in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Measured: Baseline

  16. Association Between Venous Congestion and PVD at Baseline

    To evaluate the association between signs of venous congestion and PVD at baseline in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Measured: Baseline

  17. Association Between Venous Congestion and MFI at Baseline

    To evaluate the association between signs of venous congestion and MFI at baseline in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Measured: Baseline

  18. Association Between Venous Congestion and PPV at Baseline

    To evaluate the association between signs of venous congestion and PPV at baseline in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Measured: Baseline

  19. Association Between Venous Congestion and MHI at Baseline

    To evaluate the association between signs of venous congestion and MHI at baseline in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Mar 2026
  2. Study start15 Dec 2024
  3. Primary completionJun 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07499401
Sponsor's protocol ID
Prot. 2024 213
Acronym
MICRO-CONGEST
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
18 Apr 2025
Last updated
2 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Venous Congestion and Microcirculation, run by Università Politecnica delle Marche at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Sublingual total vessel density (TVD) (time frame: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in