AzTrials
AzTrials

Pain ManagementNCT07501754

Use of a Custom-Made Acrylic Palatal Stent to Minimize Donor Site Morbidity After Suture-Free Epithelialized Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Randomized Clinical Trial

A study testing Custom-Made Acrylic Palatal Stent and No Palatal stent in people with Pain Management and Mucogingival Defects, run by University of Turin, Italy at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Epithelialized gingival graft (EGG) harvesting from the palate is associated with postoperative morbidity, including pain and bleeding, due to healing by secondary intention. The effectiveness of palatal stents in reducing donor-site morbidity, particularly in suture-free techniques, remains unclear. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pain Management, Mucogingival Defects, Healing
What is being tested?
Custom-Made Acrylic Palatal Stent and No Palatal stent
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
44 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
7 Jan 2025to 24 May 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults ≥18 years of age
  • Patients requiring periodontal plastic surgery involving epithelialized gingival graft (EGG) harvesting from the palate
  • Indications including keratinized tissue augmentation, soft tissue thickness augmentation, or root coverage procedures
  • Adequate palatal tissue thickness to allow graft harvesting (≥2 mm)
  • Full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) and full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) ≤20%
  • Ability to understand and complete patient-reported outcome questionnaires
  • Signed informed consent
  • Willingness to comply with study procedures and follow-up visits

Who cannot join

  • compromised general health contraindicating the procedures (ASA III-VI)
  • heavy smokers (≥ 10 cigarettes/day),
  • systemic diseases or medications affecting treatment outcomes,
  • known allergies or hypersensitivity to ibuprofen.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • C.I.R. Dental School

    Torino, Torino, 10126

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Epithelialized gingival graft (EGG) harvesting from the palate is associated with postoperative morbidity, including pain and bleeding, due to healing by secondary intention. The effectiveness of palatal stents in reducing donor-site morbidity, particularly in suture-free techniques, remains unclear.

This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluates the effect of a custom-made acrylic palatal stent (APS) compared with no stent on postoperative outcomes following EGG harvesting.

The primary outcome is postoperative pain assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include other patient-reported measures, clinician-reported healing, and exploratory assessments of tissue healing.

Read the detailed description

Epithelialized gingival graft (EGG) harvesting is widely used in periodontal plastic surgery but is associated with postoperative discomfort at the palatal donor site. Healing occurs by secondary intention and may result in pain, bleeding, and delayed recovery.

Palatal stents have been proposed as a mechanical approach to protect the wound and reduce morbidity; however, evidence supporting their effectiveness, especially in suture-free techniques, is limited.

This randomized controlled, assessor-blind, parallel-arm clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of a custom-made acrylic palatal stent (APS) on postoperative morbidity following EGG harvesting. Patients were randomly assigned to receive APS or no stent after surgery.

The primary outcome is postoperative pain. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported measures, clinical healing parameters, and exploratory assessments of tissue healing.

Being tested
Custom-Made Acrylic Palatal Stent, No Palatal stent
Medical subject headings
Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Custom-Made Acrylic Palatal StentDevice

    A custom-made acrylic palatal stent (APS) will be fabricated prior to surgery based on an impression of the maxillary arch. The device will be thermoformed, trimmed, polished, and adjusted for proper fit and retention.

    Following epithelialized gingival graft (EGG) harvesting, the APS will be positioned over the palatal donor site to provide mechanical protection and stabilization of the blood clot. The stent will be worn continuously during the early healing phase according to the study protocol.

  • No Palatal stentOther

    Following epithelialized gingival graft (EGG) harvesting, no protective device will be applied to the palatal donor site. Hemostasis will be achieved through local anesthesia only, without the use of sutures, pressure, or additional hemostatic agents. Healing will occur by secondary intention

Study groups in NCT07501754
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Custom-Made Acrylic Palatal StentExperimentalA custom-made acrylic palatal stent (APS) will be fabricated prior to surgery based on an impression of the maxillary arch. The device will be thermoformed, trimmed, polished, and adjusted for proper fit and retention. Following epithelialized gingival graft (EGG) harvesting, the APS will be positioned over the palatal donor site to provide mechanical protection and stabilization of the blood clot. The stent will be worn continuously during the early healing phase according to the study protocol.
Receives: Device: Custom-Made Acrylic Palatal Stent
No palatal stentActive comparatorFollowing epithelialized gingival graft (EGG) harvesting, no protective device will be applied to the palatal donor site. Hemostasis will be achieved through local anesthesia only, without the use of sutures, pressure, or additional hemostatic agents. Healing will occur by secondary intention
Receives: Other: No Palatal stent

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Postoperative pain at the palatal donor site

    Postoperative pain assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates worst imaginable pain. Patients will record pain daily using standardized questionnaires

    Measured: 7 days after surgery

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Postoperative bleeding

    Patient-reported bleeding at the palatal donor site assessed using a 100-mm VAS

    Measured: Daily from Day 1 to Day 7, Day 14, 21, 28

  2. Postoperative swelling

    Patient-reported swelling assessed using a 100-mm VAS.

    Measured: Daily from Day 1 to Day 7, day 14, 21, 28

  3. Analgesic consumption

    Total intake of ibuprofen (mg) recorded by patients during the postoperative period.

    Measured: 7 days after surgery

  4. Oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-14)

    Oral health-related quality of life assessed using the OHIP-14 questionnaire

    Measured: Baseline, 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, 28 days

  5. Willingness to undergo retreatment

    Patient willingness to undergo a similar procedure in the future (yes/no)

    Measured: 28 days after surgery

  6. Epithelialization

    Wound epithelialization assessed using hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) test and classified as none, partial, or complete.

    Measured: 7 and 14 days after surgery

  7. Clinical wound healing

    Healing assessed from standardized photographs evaluating color match, tissue contour, and scar appearance using visual analog scales.

    Measured: 7, 14 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Mar 2026
  2. Study start7 Jan 2025
  3. Primary completion24 Mar 2026
  4. Study completion24 May 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
44 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07501754
Sponsor's protocol ID
FGFTurin
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
24 Mar 2026
Last updated
2 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Custom-Made Acrylic Palatal Stent and No Palatal stent in people with Pain Management and Mucogingival Defects, run by University of Turin, Italy at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Postoperative pain at the palatal donor site (time frame: 7 days after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in