Spinal Cord InjuryNCT07504055
Non-invasive Spinal Cord Stimulation and Blood Pressure Regulation After Spinal Cord Injury
A study testing Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation in people with Spinal Cord Injury and Orthostatic Hypertension, run by University of Louisville at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if non-invasive spinal cord stimulation intervention improves blood pressure regulation in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injury, Orthostatic Hypertension, Autonomic Dysreflexia
- What is being tested?
- Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2026to Feb 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- At least 18 years old,
- Stable medical condition,
- Non-progression SCI (no negative change in the neurological level and motor-completeness assess during screening when compared to the neurological status assessed at 6-month period after injury or at least 6 months prior to the screening),
- Motor-complete SCI according to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grade "A," "B," or "C" above T1 spinal level according to the ASIA International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) Neurological Level of Injury (NLI),
- Sustained SCI at least 12 months prior to entering the study,
- Evidence of symptomatic hypotension as determined by a total score >0 on the Orthostatic Hypotension Symptom Assessment (OSHA),
Show all 9Show fewer
- Normal renal function as defined by eGFR > 59 ml/min/1.73, creatinine value within the range of 0.6-1.2 mg/dl, and BUN values within the range of 7-18 mg/dl,
- Competent to give informed consent for the research protocol,
- Able to understand instructions.
Who cannot join
- Major pulmonary or cardiovascular disease unrelated to SCI,
- Ventilator dependence,
- Painful musculoskeletal dysfunction that might interfere with testing or stimulation,
- Unhealed fracture that might interfere with testing or stimulation,
- Unhealed contracture that might interfere with testing or stimulation,
- Unhealed pressure sore that might interfere with testing or stimulation,
Show all 15Show fewer
- Untreated clinically significant depression or psychiatric disorders,
- Ongoing drug abuse,
- Malignancy ,
- Class III obesity (BMI >40) and at least one co-morbidity thereof: a) Type 2 diabetes as defined by ≥6.5% level on two separate glycated hemoglobin (A1C) tests, b) hypertension as defined by consistent blood pressure readings of ≥140/90 mmHg or taking medication for blood pressure,
- Acute or chronic obstructive deep vein thrombosis,
- Secondary hypotension unrelated to SCI (anemia, hypervolemia, endocrine and neurological diseases),
- Major esophageal/gastrointestinal problem,
- Currently pregnant (females of childbearing potential only),
- Other major medical illness contraindicated for testing or stimulation.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Frazier Rehabilitation and Neuroscience Institute
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Andrea M Willhite, 502-582-8675, andrea.willhite@louisville.edu
- Recruiting
Frazier Rehabilitation Institute
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Andrea Willhite, MS, 502-582-8675, andrea.willhite@louisville.edu
Alexander V Ovechkin, MD, PhD
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation on Blood Pressure Regulation in Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if non-invasive spinal cord stimulation intervention improves blood pressure regulation in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Can site specific spinal cord stimulation enhance blood pressure regulation?
- Does this stimulation affect enzymes responsible for blood pressure regulation? Researchers will stimulate different sites of spinal cord and compare to see if site-specific stimulation provide blood pressure stability.
Participants will have up to six pairs of self-adhesive conductive electrodes placed on the skin over the spinal cord (midline and/or just to the left and right of midline) as cathodes and up to six pairs of self-adhesive electrodes located symmetrically on the skin over the iliac crests, clavicles, shoulders, and/or abdominal muscles (left and right of the umbilicus) as anodes for stimulation of the spinal cord.
Read the detailed description
This study introduces a novel mechanistic framework for treating and understanding autonomic regulation of blood pressure in SCI. The central hypothesis is that targeted specific scTS will restore cardiovascular homeostasis by strengthening complex neurohormonal pathways of blood pressure control. We expect that changes in these physiological and biochemical parameters will translate into greater cardiovascular stability, reduced frequency and severity of hypotensive and hypertensive episodes, and enhanced quality of life for individuals with SCI in individuals with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) at the neurological level T1 and above, and more than one year after injury. The study team will recruit up to forty participants with the goal of fifteen participants to complete study interventions and assessments through the second follow-up visit. After recruitment and screening, primary and secondary outcome measures will be obtained at the following time points: 1) Pre-intervention (inclusive of randomization and mapping), 2) Session 20, 3) Mid-Intervention, 4) Session 60, 5) post-intervention, 6) 1st Follow-Up (8 weeks after post-intervention), and 7) 2nd Follow-Up (16 weeks after post-intervention). Participants will be asked to complete eighty sessions over a 16 to 20-week period, delivered 4 to 5 days per week for one hour each day. The stimulation will be delivered with frequency of up to 100 Hz, with incrementally increased intensity up to 200 mA to the participant for 80 sessions 1 hour long spanning 16 to 20 weeks.
- Being tested
- Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries, Autonomic Dysreflexia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Spinal Cord Transcutaneous StimulationDevice
Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation (scTS) will be administered using the Biostim/Neostim (Cosyma Inc., Denver CO) device. Up to six pairs of self-adhesive conductive electrodes will be placed on the skin over the spinal cord (midline and/or just to the left and right of midline) as cathodes and up to six pairs of self-adhesive electrodes located symmetrically on the skin over the iliac crests, clavicles, shoulders, and/or abdominal muscles (left and right of the umbilicus) as anodes. During scTS mapping sessions, stimulation will be provided to assess the impact on functional outcomes and to refine stimulation parameters for training (e.g., blood pressure modulation, respiratory function) targeted for each arm. Using multi-variant combinations of electrode locations and different electrical configurations, the stimulation will be delivered at a level specific to each arm with frequency of up to 100 Hz, with incrementally increased intensity up to 200 mA.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CV-scTS 1 | Active comparator | The participants in this arm will receive spinal cord stimulation at the thoracolumbar level (T10 to L1 spinal cord levels) targeted for blood pressure regulation. There will be mapping sessions where stimulation will be provided to assess the impact on functional outcomes and to refine stimulation parameters for training. Using multi-variant combinations of electrode locations and different electrical configurations, the stimulation will be delivered with frequency of up to 100 Hz, with incrementally increased intensity up to 200mA. During stimulation interventions, 5 mA-sub-motor threshold intensity with mapping-identified frequency, pulse width, and intensity will be delivered during interventional bouts. Receives: Device: Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation |
| CV-scTS 2 | Active comparator | The participants in this arm will receive spinal cord stimulation at the lumbosacral level (L1 to S1 spinal cord levels) targeted for blood pressure regulation. There will be mapping sessions where stimulation will be provided to assess the impact on functional outcomes and to refine stimulation parameters for training. Using multi-variant combinations of electrode locations and different electrical configurations, the stimulation will be delivered with frequency of up to 100 Hz, with incrementally increased intensity up to 200mA. During stimulation interventions, 5 mA-sub-motor threshold intensity with mapping-identified frequency, pulse width, and intensity will be delivered during interventional bouts. Receives: Device: Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation |
| Resp-scTS | Active comparator | Qualifying participants of NCT06019949 (IRB #23.0570) randomized to the respiratory stimulation alone intervention group (Resp-scTS) will be invited to participate in this study to collect additional outcome measures. Overlapping assessments will be shared between the two studies. Participants in this arm will receive spinal cord stimulation at the thoracic level (T1 to T9 spinal cord levels) targeted for respiratory function. There will be mapping sessions where stimulation will be provided to assess the impact on functional outcomes and to refine stimulation parameters for training. Using multi-variant combinations of electrode locations and different electrical configurations, the stimulation will be delivered with frequency of up to 100 Hz, with incrementally increased intensity up to 200mA. During stimulation interventions, 5 mA-sub-motor threshold intensity with mapping-identified frequency, pulse width, and intensity will be delivered during interventional bouts. Receives: Device: Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Baroreflex Sensitivity
Baroreflex Sensitivity refers to the ability of the baroreflex mechanism in the body to sense changes in blood pressure and modulate heart rate and vascular tone accordingly. It is calculated as a linear regression of systolic blood pressure plotted against its corresponding R-R peaks on the electrocardiograph.
Measured: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 weeks and 16-weeks follow-up period.
Renal Artery Systolic Velocity (Right and Left)
Renal Artery Systolic Velocity is the velocity of blood flow in the main renal artery supplying the kidneys. It will be obtained individually for right main renal artery and left main renal artery.
Measured: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 weeks and 16-weeks follow-up period.
Plasma Renin Activity
Plasma Renin Activity is a biochemical blood test that measures the enzymatic activity of renin in the plasma. It is assessed by determining how effectively renin converts angiotensinogen to angiotensin I to evaluate the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) activity.
Measured: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #20; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #60; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 and 16-weeks follow-up.
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme
The blood test for angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) evaluates the concentration of ACE in the bloodstream, an enzyme that converts angiotensin I into angiotensin II, which helps regulate blood pressure by constricting small blood vessels.
Measured: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #20; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #60; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 and 16-weeks follow-up.
Aldosterone
An aldosterone blood test measures the hormone aldosterone in the blood to evaluate adrenal gland function and its impact on blood pressure and electrolyte balance.
Measured: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #20; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #60; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 and 16-weeks follow-up.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Complete Blood Count
This test will evaluate various components of blood including hematocrit; hemoglobin; mean corpuscular volume (MCV); mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH); mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC); red cell distribution width (RDW); percentage and absolute differential counts; platelet count (PLT); red cell count (RBC); white blood cell count (WBC) for compounding effects.
Measured: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #20; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #60; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 and 16-weeks follow-up.
Metabolic Panel
This test will evaluate Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN); BUN:creatinine ratio; calcium, chloride, creatinine, eGFR; glucose; potassium and sodium to check for compounding effects.
Measured: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #20; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #60; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 and 16-weeks follow-up.
Lipid Panel
This test will evaluate total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL); low-density lipoprotein (LDL); triglycerides and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) in blood for to check for compounding effects.
Measured: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #20; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #60; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 and 16-weeks follow-up.
Thyroid Panel
This test will evaluate level of thyroid hormones in the blood to check for compounding effects.
Measured: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #20; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #60; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 and 16-weeks follow-up.
Incidence of Orthostatic Hypotension
A pre-defined questionnaire in which participants will be asked to rate how severe their symptoms of low blood pressure are from 0 (none) to 10 (worst possible). The metrics include dizziness, lightheadedness, feeling faint, or feeling like you might black out; problems with vision (blurring, seeing spots, tunnel vision, etc.); weakness; fatigue; trouble concentrating; and head and neck discomfort.
Measured: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 weeks and 16-weeks follow-up period.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Mar 2026
- Study start1 Apr 2026
- Primary completionFeb 2029 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of LouisvilleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Louisville
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Kentucky Spinal Cord and Head Injury Research Board
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alexander V Ovechkin, MD, PhD, University of Louisville
- Investigators
- Alexander Ovechkin, Principal investigator, University of Louisville
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07504055
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 25-17 KSCHIRT
- Other IDs
- GR05737
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 28 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: Plans for sharing individual participant data are currently under consideration. Decisions regarding data sharing will be made following study completion in accordance with institutional guidelines and participant privacy protections.
Publications
Itzkovich M, Gelernter I, Biering-Sorensen F, Weeks C, Laramee MT, Craven BC, Tonack M, Hitzig SL, Glaser E, Zeilig G, Aito S, Scivoletto G, Mecci M, Chadwick RJ, El Masry WS, Osman A, Glass CA, Silva P, Soni BM, Gardner BP, Savic G, Bergstrom EM, Bluvshtein V, Ronen J, Catz A. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: reliability and validity in a multi-center international study. Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Dec 30;29(24):1926-33. doi: 10.1080/09638280601046302. Epub 2007 Mar 5.
PubMed 17852230Hubli M, Krassioukov AV. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in spinal cord injury: clinical practicability. J Neurotrauma. 2014 May 1;31(9):789-97. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3148. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
PubMed 24175653Aslan SC, Chopra MK, McKay WB, Folz RJ, Ovechkin AV. Evaluation of respiratory muscle activation using respiratory motor control assessment (RMCA) in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. J Vis Exp. 2013 Jul 19;(77):50178. doi: 10.3791/50178.
PubMed 23912611American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society. ATS/ERS Statement on respiratory muscle testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Aug 15;166(4):518-624. doi: 10.1164/rccm.166.4.518. No abstract available.
PubMed 12186831Ozer MN, Shannon SR. Renal sonography in asymptomatic persons with spinal cord injury: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Jan;72(1):35-7.
PubMed 1898695Kaufmann H, Malamut R, Norcliffe-Kaufmann L, Rosa K, Freeman R. The Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire (OHQ): validation of a novel symptom assessment scale. Clin Auton Res. 2012 Apr;22(2):79-90. doi: 10.1007/s10286-011-0146-2. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
PubMed 22045363Osborn JW, Tyshynsky R, Vulchanova L. Function of Renal Nerves in Kidney Physiology and Pathophysiology. Annu Rev Physiol. 2021 Feb 10;83:429-450. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-031620-091656.
PubMed 33566672Johns EJ, Kopp UC, DiBona GF. Neural control of renal function. Compr Physiol. 2011 Apr;1(2):731-67. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c100043.
PubMed 23737201Sata Y, Head GA, Denton K, May CN, Schlaich MP. Role of the Sympathetic Nervous System and Its Modulation in Renal Hypertension. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Mar 29;5:82. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00082. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 29651418Ackermann, U., Regulation of arterial blood pressure. Surgery - Oxford International Edition, 2004. 22(5): p. 120a-120f.
Legg Ditterline BE, Aslan SC, Randall DC, Harkema SJ, Ovechkin AV. Baroreceptor reflex during forced expiratory maneuvers in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2016 Jul 15;229:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
PubMed 27137412Legg Ditterline BE, Aslan SC, Randall DC, Harkema SJ, Castillo C, Ovechkin AV. Effects of Respiratory Training on Heart Rate Variability and Baroreflex Sensitivity in Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Mar;99(3):423-432. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.033. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
PubMed 28802811Aslan SC, Randall DC, Krassioukov AV, Phillips A, Ovechkin AV. Respiratory Training Improves Blood Pressure Regulation in Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jun;97(6):964-73. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.11.018. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
PubMed 26718236Aslan SC, Randall DC, Donohue KD, Knapp CF, Patwardhan AR, McDowell SM, Taylor RF, Evans JM. Blood pressure regulation in neurally intact human vs. acutely injured paraplegic and tetraplegic patients during passive tilt. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007 Mar;292(3):R1146-57. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00225.2006. Epub 2006 Nov 2.
PubMed 17082357Aslan SC, Legg Ditterline BE, Park MC, Angeli CA, Rejc E, Chen Y, Ovechkin AV, Krassioukov A, Harkema SJ. Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation of Lumbosacral Networks Modulates Arterial Blood Pressure in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury-Induced Cardiovascular Deficits. Front Physiol. 2018 May 18;9:565. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00565. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 29867586
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation on Blood Pressure Regulation in Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07504055
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 25-17 KSCHIRT
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of LouisvilleUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Kentucky Spinal Cord and Head Injury Research Board
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if non-invasive spinal cord stimulation intervention improves blood pressure regulation in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Can site specific spinal cord stimulation enhance blood pressure regulation?
- Does this stimulation affect enzymes responsible for blood pressure regulation? Researchers will stimulate different sites of spinal cord and compare to see if site-specific stimulation provide blood pressure stability.
Participants will have up to six pairs of self-adhesive conductive electrodes placed on the skin over the spinal cord (midline and/or just to the left and right of midline) as cathodes and up to six pairs of self-adhesive electrodes located symmetrically on the skin over the iliac crests, clavicles, shoulders, and/or abdominal muscles (left and right of the umbilicus) as anodes for stimulation of the spinal cord.
Detailed description
This study introduces a novel mechanistic framework for treating and understanding autonomic regulation of blood pressure in SCI. The central hypothesis is that targeted specific scTS will restore cardiovascular homeostasis by strengthening complex neurohormonal pathways of blood pressure control. We expect that changes in these physiological and biochemical parameters will translate into greater cardiovascular stability, reduced frequency and severity of hypotensive and hypertensive episodes, and enhanced quality of life for individuals with SCI in individuals with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) at the neurological level T1 and above, and more than one year after injury. The study team will recruit up to forty participants with the goal of fifteen participants to complete study interventions and assessments through the second follow-up visit. After recruitment and screening, primary and secondary outcome measures will be obtained at the following time points: 1) Pre-intervention (inclusive of randomization and mapping), 2) Session 20, 3) Mid-Intervention, 4) Session 60, 5) post-intervention, 6) 1st Follow-Up (8 weeks after post-intervention), and 7) 2nd Follow-Up (16 weeks after post-intervention). Participants will be asked to complete eighty sessions over a 16 to 20-week period, delivered 4 to 5 days per week for one hour each day. The stimulation will be delivered with frequency of up to 100 Hz, with incrementally increased intensity up to 200 mA to the participant for 80 sessions 1 hour long spanning 16 to 20 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CV-scTS 1 | Active comparator | Device: Spinal Cord Transcutaneous StimulationThe participants in this arm will receive spinal cord stimulation at the thoracolumbar level (T10 to L1 spinal cord levels) targeted for blood pressure regulation. There will be mapping sessions where stimulation will be provided to assess the impact on functional outcomes and to refine stimulation parameters for training. Using multi-variant combinations of electrode locations and different electrical configurations, the stimulation will be delivered with frequency of up to 100 Hz, with incrementally increased intensity up to 200mA. During stimulation interventions, 5 mA-sub-motor threshold intensity with mapping-identified frequency, pulse width, and intensity will be delivered during interventional bouts. |
| CV-scTS 2 | Active comparator | Device: Spinal Cord Transcutaneous StimulationThe participants in this arm will receive spinal cord stimulation at the lumbosacral level (L1 to S1 spinal cord levels) targeted for blood pressure regulation. There will be mapping sessions where stimulation will be provided to assess the impact on functional outcomes and to refine stimulation parameters for training. Using multi-variant combinations of electrode locations and different electrical configurations, the stimulation will be delivered with frequency of up to 100 Hz, with incrementally increased intensity up to 200mA. During stimulation interventions, 5 mA-sub-motor threshold intensity with mapping-identified frequency, pulse width, and intensity will be delivered during interventional bouts. |
| Resp-scTS | Active comparator | Device: Spinal Cord Transcutaneous StimulationQualifying participants of NCT06019949 (IRB #23.0570) randomized to the respiratory stimulation alone intervention group (Resp-scTS) will be invited to participate in this study to collect additional outcome measures. Overlapping assessments will be shared between the two studies. Participants in this arm will receive spinal cord stimulation at the thoracic level (T1 to T9 spinal cord levels) targeted for respiratory function. There will be mapping sessions where stimulation will be provided to assess the impact on functional outcomes and to refine stimulation parameters for training. Using multi-variant combinations of electrode locations and different electrical configurations, the stimulation will be delivered with frequency of up to 100 Hz, with incrementally increased intensity up to 200mA. During stimulation interventions, 5 mA-sub-motor threshold intensity with mapping-identified frequency, pulse width, and intensity will be delivered during interventional bouts. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- At least 18 years old,
- Stable medical condition,
- Non-progression SCI (no negative change in the neurological level and motor-completeness assess during screening when compared to the neurological status assessed at 6-month period after injury or at least 6 months prior to the screening),
- Motor-complete SCI according to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grade "A," "B," or "C" above T1 spinal level according to the ASIA International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) Neurological Level of Injury (NLI),
- Sustained SCI at least 12 months prior to entering the study,
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Major pulmonary or cardiovascular disease unrelated to SCI,
- Ventilator dependence,
- Painful musculoskeletal dysfunction that might interfere with testing or stimulation,
- Unhealed fracture that might interfere with testing or stimulation,
- Unhealed contracture that might interfere with testing or stimulation,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal Cord Transcutaneous StimulationSpinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation (scTS) will be administered using the Biostim/Neostim (Cosyma Inc., Denver CO) device. Up to six pairs of self-adhesive conductive electrodes will be placed on the skin over the spinal cord (midline and/or just to the left and right of midline) as cathodes and up to six pairs of self-adhesive electrodes located symmetrically on the skin over the iliac crests, clavicles, shoulders, and/or abdominal muscles (left and right of the umbilicus) as anodes. During scTS mapping sessions, stimulation will be provided to assess the impact on functional outcomes and to refine stimulation parameters for training (e.g., blood pressure modulation, respiratory function) targeted for each arm. Using multi-variant combinations of electrode locations and different electrical configurations, the stimulation will be delivered at a level specific to each arm with frequency of up to 100 Hz, with incrementally increased intensity up to 200 mA. | Device | CV-scTS 1, CV-scTS 2, Resp-scTS |
Primary outcome
Baroreflex Sensitivity
Time frame: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 weeks and 16-weeks follow-up period.
Baroreflex Sensitivity refers to the ability of the baroreflex mechanism in the body to sense changes in blood pressure and modulate heart rate and vascular tone accordingly. It is calculated as a linear regression of systolic blood pressure plotted against its corresponding R-R peaks on the electrocardiograph.
Renal Artery Systolic Velocity (Right and Left)
Time frame: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 weeks and 16-weeks follow-up period.
Renal Artery Systolic Velocity is the velocity of blood flow in the main renal artery supplying the kidneys. It will be obtained individually for right main renal artery and left main renal artery.
Plasma Renin Activity
Time frame: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #20; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #60; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 and 16-weeks follow-up.
Plasma Renin Activity is a biochemical blood test that measures the enzymatic activity of renin in the plasma. It is assessed by determining how effectively renin converts angiotensinogen to angiotensin I to evaluate the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) activity.
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme
Time frame: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #20; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #60; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 and 16-weeks follow-up.
The blood test for angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) evaluates the concentration of ACE in the bloodstream, an enzyme that converts angiotensin I into angiotensin II, which helps regulate blood pressure by constricting small blood vessels.
Aldosterone
Time frame: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #20; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #60; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 and 16-weeks follow-up.
An aldosterone blood test measures the hormone aldosterone in the blood to evaluate adrenal gland function and its impact on blood pressure and electrolyte balance.
5 secondary outcomes
Complete Blood Count
Time frame: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #20; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #60; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 and 16-weeks follow-up.
Metabolic Panel
Time frame: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #20; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #60; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 and 16-weeks follow-up.
Lipid Panel
Time frame: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #20; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #60; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 and 16-weeks follow-up.
Thyroid Panel
Time frame: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #20; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #60; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 and 16-weeks follow-up.
Incidence of Orthostatic Hypotension
Time frame: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 weeks and 16-weeks follow-up period.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Apr 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 17852230Itzkovich M, Gelernter I, Biering-Sorensen F, Weeks C, Laramee MT, Craven BC, Tonack M, Hitzig SL, Glaser E, Zeilig G, Aito S, Scivoletto G, Mecci M, Chadwick RJ, El Masry WS, Osman A, Glass CA, Silva P, Soni BM, Gardner BP, Savic G, Bergstrom EM, Bluvshtein V, Ronen J, Catz A. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: reliability and validity in a multi-center international study. Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Dec 30;29(24):1926-33. doi: 10.1080/09638280601046302. Epub 2007 Mar 5.
- Results publication: PubMed 24175653Hubli M, Krassioukov AV. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in spinal cord injury: clinical practicability. J Neurotrauma. 2014 May 1;31(9):789-97. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3148. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 23912611Aslan SC, Chopra MK, McKay WB, Folz RJ, Ovechkin AV. Evaluation of respiratory muscle activation using respiratory motor control assessment (RMCA) in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. J Vis Exp. 2013 Jul 19;(77):50178. doi: 10.3791/50178.
- Results publication: PubMed 12186831American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society. ATS/ERS Statement on respiratory muscle testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Aug 15;166(4):518-624. doi: 10.1164/rccm.166.4.518. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 1898695Ozer MN, Shannon SR. Renal sonography in asymptomatic persons with spinal cord injury: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Jan;72(1):35-7.
- Results publication: PubMed 22045363Kaufmann H, Malamut R, Norcliffe-Kaufmann L, Rosa K, Freeman R. The Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire (OHQ): validation of a novel symptom assessment scale. Clin Auton Res. 2012 Apr;22(2):79-90. doi: 10.1007/s10286-011-0146-2. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 33566672Osborn JW, Tyshynsky R, Vulchanova L. Function of Renal Nerves in Kidney Physiology and Pathophysiology. Annu Rev Physiol. 2021 Feb 10;83:429-450. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-031620-091656.
- Results publication: PubMed 23737201Johns EJ, Kopp UC, DiBona GF. Neural control of renal function. Compr Physiol. 2011 Apr;1(2):731-67. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c100043.
- Results publication: PubMed 29651418Sata Y, Head GA, Denton K, May CN, Schlaich MP. Role of the Sympathetic Nervous System and Its Modulation in Renal Hypertension. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Mar 29;5:82. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00082. eCollection 2018.
- Results publicationAckermann, U., Regulation of arterial blood pressure. Surgery - Oxford International Edition, 2004. 22(5): p. 120a-120f.
- Results publication: PubMed 27137412Legg Ditterline BE, Aslan SC, Randall DC, Harkema SJ, Ovechkin AV. Baroreceptor reflex during forced expiratory maneuvers in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2016 Jul 15;229:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 28802811Legg Ditterline BE, Aslan SC, Randall DC, Harkema SJ, Castillo C, Ovechkin AV. Effects of Respiratory Training on Heart Rate Variability and Baroreflex Sensitivity in Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Mar;99(3):423-432. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.033. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
- Official website of the Centre for this StudyLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Plans for sharing individual participant data are currently under consideration. Decisions regarding data sharing will be made following study completion in accordance with institutional guidelines and participant privacy protections.
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
MyHand-SCI: An Active Hand Orthosis for Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, Tetraplegia
Recruiting
Clinical Outcome Assessment for AT & BCI
Spinal Cord Injury, ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With 4-Aminopyridine and Intensive Rehabilitation in SCI
Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Alexander Ovechkin principal investigator
University of Louisville
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation in people with Spinal Cord Injury and Orthostatic Hypertension, run by University of Louisville at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Andrea M Willhite (1-502-581-8675, andrea.willhite@louisville.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Baroreflex Sensitivity (time frame: Within 4 weeks before an intervention; within 2 weeks after intervention #40; within 2 weeks after intervention #80; within 2 weeks after weeks after 8 weeks and 16-weeks follow-up period.). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07504055, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Apr 2026.