Congenital GlaucomaAirway and IOPNCT07504315
Study Aim to Compare the Effect of Different Technique of Airway Managment During Anaesthesia on the Haemodynamics and Intraocular Pressure. Patients Were Divided Into Three Groups of 25 Patients Each. (Group A); Patients Who Were Subjected to LMA Insertion (Group B ).
A study testing laryngeal mask insertion, I gel mask insertion and Endotracheal tube insertion in people with Congenital Glaucoma, run by Sohag University.
Trial summary
this study aim to compare the effect of different technique of airway managment during anaesthesia on the haemodynamics and intraocular pressure in pediatric patient undergoing congenital glaucoma surgery. Patients were divided into three groups of 25 patients each. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 months to 10 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Congenital Glaucoma
- What is being tested?
- laryngeal mask insertion, I gel mask insertion and Endotracheal tube insertion
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 10 Mar 2026to 20 Jun 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 months to 10 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- patient ASA grade I-II scheduled to undergoing congenital glaucoma surgery under general anaesthesia
Who cannot join
- the patient with cardiovascular problems. Patients with upper respiratory tract infection. Predicted difficult intubation patients . Full stomach patients. Patients with other congenital anomalies. Patients with previous surgically corrected congenital glaucoma in the measured eye
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Different Methods for Airway Management and Their Effect on Intraocular Pressure and Hemodynamics in Pediatrics Undergoing Congenital Glaucoma Surgery
this study aim to compare the effect of different technique of airway managment during anaesthesia on the haemodynamics and intraocular pressure in pediatric patient undergoing congenital glaucoma surgery.
Patients were divided into three groups of 25 patients each. (Group A); patients who were subjected to LMA insertion (group B ).
- Conditions
- Congenital Glaucoma
- Being tested
- laryngeal mask insertion, I gel mask insertion, Endotracheal tube insertion
- Keywords
- effect of airway management on Intraocular pressure
- Medical subject headings
- Hydrophthalmos
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
laryngeal mask insertionDevice
in this intervention air way management in form of laryngeal mask insertion during anesthesia
I gel mask insertionDevice
Air way management in form of I Gel mask insertion during anesthesia
Endotracheal tube insertionDevice
airway management in form of conventional laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| . (Group A); patients who were subjected to LMA insertion | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: laryngeal mask insertion |
| (group B );patients who were subjected to I gel tube insertion | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: I gel mask insertion |
| and (group C )patients who were subjected to conventional laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: Endotracheal tube insertion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
intraocular pressure in cm water
Measured: Immediately after intubation 2 ,3 , 5 minutes after intubation and 5 minutes after extubation.
Secondary outcomes (1)
blood pressure in form of mmhg and pulse in form of beat per minute
Measured: Immediately after intubation 2 ,3 , 5 minutes after intubation and 5 minutes after extubation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Mar 2026
- Study start10 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion20 Jun 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Congenital GlaucomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sohag UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sohag University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Waleed Adel Ahmed, Sohag University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07504315
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Soh-med-25-9----IPD
- Acronym
- Airway and IOP
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 31 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Different Methods for Airway Management and Their Effect on Intraocular Pressure and Hemodynamics in Pediatrics Undergoing Congenital Glaucoma Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07504315
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Airway and IOP / Soh-med-25-9----IPD
- Conditions
- Congenital Glaucoma
- Keywords
- effect of airway management on Intraocular pressure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Sohag UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 20 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
this study aim to compare the effect of different technique of airway managment during anaesthesia on the haemodynamics and intraocular pressure in pediatric patient undergoing congenital glaucoma surgery.
Patients were divided into three groups of 25 patients each. (Group A); patients who were subjected to LMA insertion (group B ).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| . (Group A); patients who were subjected to LMA insertion | Active comparator | Device: laryngeal mask insertion |
| (group B );patients who were subjected to I gel tube insertion | Active comparator | Device: I gel mask insertion |
| and (group C )patients who were subjected to conventional laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation | Active comparator | Device: Endotracheal tube insertion |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 months to 10 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patient ASA grade I-II scheduled to undergoing congenital glaucoma surgery under general anaesthesia
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- the patient with cardiovascular problems. Patients with upper respiratory tract infection. Predicted difficult intubation patients . Full stomach patients. Patients with other congenital anomalies. Patients with previous surgically corrected congenital glaucoma in the measured eye
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| laryngeal mask insertionin this intervention air way management in form of laryngeal mask insertion during anesthesia | Device | . (Group A); patients who were subjected to LMA insertion |
| I gel mask insertionAir way management in form of I Gel mask insertion during anesthesia | Device | (group B );patients who were subjected to I gel tube insertion |
| Endotracheal tube insertionairway management in form of conventional laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation | Device | and (group C )patients who were subjected to conventional laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation |
Primary outcome
intraocular pressure in cm water
Time frame: Immediately after intubation 2 ,3 , 5 minutes after intubation and 5 minutes after extubation.
1 secondary outcome
blood pressure in form of mmhg and pulse in form of beat per minute
Time frame: Immediately after intubation 2 ,3 , 5 minutes after intubation and 5 minutes after extubation
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Mar 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Congenital Glaucoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
The Effect of Topical Rho-kinase Inhibitors on Corneas of Patients With Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy
Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy, Cataract
Recruiting
Brain Stimulation Effects on Orientation and Mobility Skills in Adults With Vision Impairment
Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP), Rod Cone Dystrophy
RecruitingObservational study
National Cohort on Congenital Defects of the Eye
Anophthalmia, Microphthalmia
Recruiting
Stem Cell Ophthalmology Treatment Study II
Retinal Disease, Age-Related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 1/2
GVB-2001 Gene Therapy Via Intracameral Injection for the Treatment of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma (POAG)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing laryngeal mask insertion, I gel mask insertion and Endotracheal tube insertion in people with Congenital Glaucoma, run by Sohag University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact waleed Ahmed, lecturer (00201006392210, waleidadel8514@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
intraocular pressure in cm water (time frame: Immediately after intubation 2 ,3 , 5 minutes after intubation and 5 minutes after extubation.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Mar 2026.