AzTrials
AzTrials

Nursing EducationMoulageNCT07509723

Moulage Technique in Child Abuse Recognition

A study testing Moulage Technique Group and movie group in people with Nursing Education and Simulation of Physical Illness, run by Atlas University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Early recognition of physical abuse in children is essential for ensuring child safety and preventing further harm. However, distinguishing abuse-related injuries from accidental findings can be challenging, especially for nursing students who have limited clinical experience. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 25 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Moulage Technique Group and movie group
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
10 Apr 2026to 30 Jun 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 25 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Agreeing to participate in the study voluntarily
  • Having completed the Child Health and Diseases course

Who cannot join

  • Having received any education or training related to child abuse and neglect other than the Child Health and Diseases course

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

sermin dinç, Dr. contact

+905424033430

sermin.dinc@atlas.edu.tr

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Atlas University

    Istanbul, Kağıthane, 34098

    sermin dinç, 05424033430, sermin.dinc@atlas.edu.tr

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Role of Moulage Technique in Identifying Physical Abuse in Children: A Randomized Controlled Study With Nursing Students

Early recognition of physical abuse in children is essential for ensuring child safety and preventing further harm. However, distinguishing abuse-related injuries from accidental findings can be challenging, especially for nursing students who have limited clinical experience. Simulation-based educational methods may provide safe and effective environments for developing these skills.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of moulage-based simulation training in improving nursing students' ability to recognize signs of physical abuse in children. The study will use a randomized controlled design in which students will be assigned to either a moulage-based simulation group or a control group receiving standard theoretical education.

Read more

After a lecture on child physical abuse within the Child Health and Pediatric Nursing course, students will participate in laboratory practice sessions. The intervention group will assess a pediatric mannequin prepared with simulated abuse findings using moulage techniques. Students' knowledge and recognition of physical abuse indicators will be evaluated before and after the intervention.

The study seeks to determine whether moulage-based education improves nursing students' recognition of physical abuse findings and supports the development of clinical assessment skills.

Read the detailed description

Child abuse is a significant global public health problem and may occur in various forms, including physical, emotional, and sexual abuse as well as neglect. Physical abuse in children may manifest through a wide range of clinical findings such as bruises, burns, bite marks, cuts, fractures, and head injuries. Because these findings may sometimes be confused with other medical conditions or accidental injuries, it is critically important for healthcare professionals to accurately recognize signs of physical trauma in order to ensure the early protection of children.

Nurses frequently represent the first point of contact between abused children and the healthcare system and therefore play a key role in identifying trauma-related findings. For this reason, simulation-based educational strategies have gained increasing importance in nursing education to strengthen students' clinical observation and decision-making skills. Among these strategies, moulage is a makeup-based simulation technique that realistically replicates physical trauma findings such as bruises, burns, lacerations, and bite marks. By creating realistic clinical scenarios, moulage allows students to practice recognizing injury patterns and improves their ability to assess potential abuse cases.

Educational simulations using moulage can enhance students' engagement, facilitate experiential learning, and provide opportunities to practice clinical assessment skills in a safe learning environment. Such applications may contribute to improved recognition of trauma-related findings and support the development of professional competencies required for identifying possible child abuse cases.

The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of moulage-based simulation in improving nursing students' ability to recognize physical abuse findings in children. Within this framework, simulated physical abuse findings will be created on a pediatric mannequin using moulage techniques, and students will be asked to conduct a general physical assessment of the child. The effectiveness of this method will be compared with a traditional educational approach based on watching film scenes that include examples of physical abuse indicators.

The study will be conducted within the Child Health and Pediatric Nursing course at a university in Istanbul between December 2025 and February 2026. Students participating in the course will be randomly assigned to either a moulage-based simulation group or a film-based learning group. Following the educational interventions, students' knowledge, attitudes, communication skills, and learning experiences related to child abuse recognition will be evaluated using standardized assessment tools.

This research seeks to determine whether moulage-based simulation provides a more effective learning environment for recognizing signs of physical abuse in children. In addition, the study aims to explore how simulation-based training contributes to students' professional competencies in identifying potential abuse cases and to identify possible challenges encountered during the learning process.

Being tested
Moulage Technique Group, movie group
Keywords
Child Physical Abuse, Moulage Technique, Nursing education

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Moulage Technique GroupOther

    Makeup (moulage) will be applied to a 3-5-year-old mannequin by an expert trained in moulage techniques. The application will be based on visual examples of physical abuse findings presented in the book "Physical Signs of Child Abuse" (Hobbs \& Wynne, 2001), which serves as an atlas commonly used in healthcare studies for identifying physical signs and lesions associated with child abuse.

    Students will then be asked to perform a "general physical assessment of the child" on the mannequin with the applied moulage injuries.

  • movie groupOther

    Control group watches film clips showing physical abuse signs to support learning and discussion.

    A total of 30 minutes of selected clips from three films depicting physical abuse (Sleepers, Antwone Fisher, The Tale) will be shown. These clips include visual examples of physical abuse indicators, such as bruises, repeated injury marks (e.g., belt buckle marks, stick marks), and soft tissue injuries. The films will be shown only within the scope of the study and not as part of the course curriculum.

Study groups in NCT07509723
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control group watching film clips showing physical abuse signs to support learning and discussion.Active comparatorA total of 30 minutes of selected clips from three films depicting physical abuse (Sleepers, Antwone Fisher, The Tale) will be shown. These clips include visual examples of physical abuse indicators, such as bruises, repeated injury marks (e.g., belt buckle marks, stick marks), and soft tissue injuries. The films will be shown only within the scope of the study and not as part of the course curriculum. During the intervention, students in both groups will be observed and guided by Assistant Professor Dr. Suna Uysal and Lecturer Nil Bruk, who have been invited from different universities.
Receives: Other: movie group
Moulage Technique GroupExperimentalMoulage applied to a child mannequin to assess students' attitudes and behavioral responses.
Receives: Other: Moulage Technique Group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Healthcare Professionals' Attitudes Toward Reporting Child Abuse Scale

    It is a 5-point Likert scale.

    Each item is scored as:

    Strongly disagree = 1

    Disagree = 2

    Neutral = 3

    Agree = 4

    Strongly agree = 5

    Some items are reverse-scored; for these, 1↔5, 2↔4, 3 remains 3.

    Total score is the sum of all item scores.

    Higher scores indicate a more positive attitude toward reporting child abuse, while lower scores indicate reluctance or a negative attitude.

    Measured: "pre-intervention"

  2. Recognition of the signs and risk factors of child abuse and neglect measured using the Scale for Identifying the Signs and Risks of Child Abuse and Neglect.

    The Attitudes of Healthcare Professionals Toward Reporting Child Abuse Scale, developed by Aynur Uysal in 1998, has 67 items and six subscales assessing knowledge of physical, behavioral, and neglect signs of abuse, as well as parent, child, and family risk factors. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with some reverse-scored, and higher subscale averages indicate greater knowledge in that area.

    Measured: "immediately after the intervention"

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning

    The scale is a 12-item, 5-point Likert instrument with two subscales: "Satisfaction with Current Learning" (5 items) and "Self-Confidence in Learning" (7 items). Scores range from 1 to 5 per item, with higher scores indicating greater learning satisfaction and self-confidence, and the total score ranges from 12 to 60.

    The scale consists of 12 items and two subscales:

    Satisfaction with Current Learning (5 items)

    Self-Confidence in Learning (7 items)

    The instrument is a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5, and it contains no negatively worded items. Total scores range from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating higher levels of satisfaction with learning and greater self-confidence.

    The internal consistency reliability of the scale was reported as Cronbach's alpha = 0.89.

    Measured: "immediately after the intervention"

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Apr 2026
  2. Study start10 Apr 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion15 Jun 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
70 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07509723
Sponsor's protocol ID
E-22686390-050.99-93020
Acronym
Moulage
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
5 Mar 2026
Last updated
3 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Moulage Technique Group and movie group in people with Nursing Education and Simulation of Physical Illness, run by Atlas University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact sermin dinç, Dr. (+905424033430, sermin.dinc@atlas.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Healthcare Professionals' Attitudes Toward Reporting Child Abuse Scale (time frame: "pre-intervention"). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in