AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney StoneNCT07516106

Prospective Multi-center Study Comparing Pulsed Tm:YAG Laser to Pulse Modulated Holmium Laser in the Treatment of Nephrolithiasis With FANS Access Sheaths

A study testing Moses Holmium:YAG laser and Thulium:YAG laser in people with Kidney Stone, run by NYU Langone Health at 2 sites in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two laser technologies that are routinely used during ureteroscopy for the treatment of kidney stones. Specifically, this study will compare a pulsed Thulium:YAG laser to a pulse-modulated Holmium:YAG laser (Moses technology) to evaluate how effective and safe they are when used… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Kidney Stone
What is being tested?
Moses Holmium:YAG laser and Thulium:YAG laser
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2026to 30 Jun 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Solitary renal stone 7 to 20 mm in size or in the case of multiple stones the conglomerate diameter (additive maximal diameter of all stones on axial imaging of computed tomography) of 7-20 mm is required
  • Must be a suitable operative candidate for flexible ureteroscopy per American Urological Association guidelines
  • Must be 18 years or older
  • Must be able to give consent
  • Bilateral ureteroscopy will be permitted , but only the side(s) where the FANS access sheath was used (per surgeon discretion) will be included in the study, however can include both sides as separate units. Subjects will be enrolled only once in the study. No subject will be enrolled more than a single time. For patients undergoing bilateral ureteroscopy, each kidney will be considered a separate unit for stone-related assessments. Peri-patient measures, such as operative time, will be recorded at the patient level. Bilateral cases will be clearly identified and handled consistently to ensure accurate and appropriate interpretation of study outcomes.
  • Must be a patient of one of the surgeons participating in this study.

Who cannot join

  • Concomitant stones in the ureter
  • Prior radiotherapy to the abdomen or pelvis
  • Neurogenic bladder or spinal cord injury
  • Pregnancy
  • Untreated urinary tract infection (UTI)
  • Anatomical abnormalities (including, but not limited to, bifid system, pelvic kidney, horseshoe kidney)
  • Prior ipsilateral upper urinary tract reconstructive procedures or history of ipsilateral ureteral stricture

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Esteban Emiliani, MD, PhD contact

646-290-4549

esteban.emilianisanz@nyulangone.org

Rozalba Gogaj, MD, MPH contact

646-825-5663

Rozalba.gogaj@nyulangone.org

United States2 sites
  • NYU Langone Health

    New York, New York, 10016

  • Mayo Clinic Arizona

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85054

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Prospective Multi-center Study Comparing Pulsed Tm:YAG Laser to Pulse Modulated Holmium Laser in the Treatment of Nephrolithiasis With Flexible And Navigable Ureteric Access Sheath (FANS)

The purpose of this study is to compare two laser technologies that are routinely used during ureteroscopy for the treatment of kidney stones. Specifically, this study will compare a pulsed Thulium:YAG laser to a pulse-modulated Holmium:YAG laser (Moses technology) to evaluate how effective and safe they are when used to break kidney stones.

Primary endpoints include stone-free rate and the zero stone-free rate at a standardized postoperative. Secondary endpoints include total operative time, lasing time (s), laser energy expended (J), efficiency (laser energy expended/stone volume; stone volume/lasing time). These endpoints aim to provide a comprehensive assessment of the clinical effectiveness and procedural efficiency of the two laser systems.

Conditions
Kidney Stone
Being tested
Moses Holmium:YAG laser, Thulium:YAG laser
Medical subject headings
Kidney Calculi

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Moses Holmium:YAG laserDevice

    Also called MOSES 2.0 Technology

    Ho:YAG with Moses pulse modulation

  • Thulium:YAG laserDevice

    Also called Thulio

    p-Tm:YAG laser lithotripsy with long pulse mode

Study groups in NCT07516106
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pulsed Thulium:YAG laserExperimentalFlexible Ureterorenoscopy (URS) for kidney stone treatment will be performed per standard medical care, and surgeons will use the Pulsed Thulium:YAG laser during the procedure.
Receives: Device: Thulium:YAG laser
Pulse-modulated Holmium:YAG laserExperimentalFlexible Ureterorenoscopy (URS) will be performed using standard techniques without deviation from routine care, and surgeons will use the pulse-modulated Holmium:YAG laser during the procedure.
Receives: Device: Moses Holmium:YAG laser

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Stone-free rate (absence of any fragments ≥ 2mm)

    Measured: Month 1

  2. Zero stone-free rate (absence of any residual fragments confirmed by negative CT scan postoperative at one month)

    Measured: Month 1

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Total operative time

    Measured: From first insertion of instruments to final removal of all instruments (up to 3 hours)

  2. Lasing time

    Measured: From start of lasing to end of lasing (up to 1 hour)

  3. Laser energy expended (J)

    Measured: From start of lasing to end of lasing (up to 1 hour)

  4. Laser energy expended per stone volume

    Measured: From start of lasing to end of lasing (up to 1 hour)

  5. Stone volume per lasing time

    Measured: From start of lasing to end of lasing (up to 1 hour)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Apr 2026
  2. Study startJun 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A simple randomization scheme will be used to assign a laser to each case according to a predefined allocation scheme. Randomization will be conducted prior to surgery, and allocation will be concealed until the start of the operating room workflow.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
70 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07516106
Sponsor's protocol ID
25-01646
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
31 Mar 2026
Last updated
7 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: The de-identified participant data from the final research dataset will be shared to achieve aims in the approved proposal beginning 9 to 36 months after publication or as required by a condition of awards or supporting agreements, provided the requesting researcher provide a methodologically sound proposal and executes a data use agreement with NYU Langone Health. This instance of data sharing will also require separate IRB review as well as review from NYU Langone's Data Sharing Strategy Board (DSSB). Requests should be directed to: esteban.emilianisanz@nyulangone.org. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be posted on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or supporting awards and agreements.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Moses Holmium:YAG laser and Thulium:YAG laser in people with Kidney Stone, run by NYU Langone Health at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Esteban Emiliani, MD, PhD (646-290-4549, esteban.emilianisanz@nyulangone.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Stone-free rate (absence of any fragments ≥ 2mm) (time frame: Month 1). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in