AzTrials
AzTrials

Self-EfficacyPEANUTS-PILOTNCT07531849

Nutrition Labelling Education Program in Socioeconomically Vulnerable Areas - PILOT STUDY

A study testing Peanuts in people with Self-Efficacy and Food Choices, run by University of Paris 13 at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Front-of-pack nutrition labels (FoPLs) have been adopted in many countries to help consumers rapidly assess the nutritional quality of foods and to encourage healthier choices. Among these schemes, interpretive systems such as Nutri-Score appear particularly promising, as their graphic design improves understanding… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Peanuts
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
135 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Jan 2026to 31 Jul 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Respondents must be aged 18
  • No formal income criterion is applied; Participants are considered as low-income (justified by the fact that the study is conducted in an area known to be socioeconomically vulnerable).

Who cannot join

  • Subjects who are homeless
  • Subjects who depend exclusively on food aid (Subjects never engaging in grocery shopping)
  • Subjects living outside of mainland France
  • French language comprehension will be assessed at baseline using functional health literacy questions in the inclusion questionnaire. Insufficient French literacy will not be used as an exclusion criterion at enrolment. Nevertheless, if analyses show that participants who do not speak and read French have outcome scores that are substantially and systematically lower than those of the rest of the sample, these participants may be excluded from planned sensitivity analyses to preserve data quality and comparability.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Université Sorbonne Paris Nord

    Bobigny, 93000

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Impact of a Brief Front-of-pack Nutrition Labelling Education Program on Self-efficacy, Food Literacy and Purchase Intentions in Socioeconomically Vulnerable Areas - Pilot Study

Front-of-pack nutrition labels (FoPLs) have been adopted in many countries to help consumers rapidly assess the nutritional quality of foods and to encourage healthier choices. Among these schemes, interpretive systems such as Nutri-Score appear particularly promising, as their graphic design improves understanding and use compared with more complex or purely numerical formats. In France, where social inequalities in diet-related chronic diseases are pronounced, implementing and effectively using FoPLs is especially challenging in socioeconomically vulnerable areas. Seine-Saint-Denis, a department with a markedly higher prevalence of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases than the national average, offers a relevant setting to test prevention strategies embedded within routine care. The PEANUTS-PILOT project is a quasi-experimental before-after interventional pilot study conducted in primary care and hospital outpatient settings, with later extension to the social sector. It aims to obtain preliminary estimates of the effectiveness of a brief, literacy-sensitive nutrition education program focused on on-pack nutrition information (Nutri-Score, nutrition facts panel, claims and marketing elements) on self-efficacy, food literacy and the nutritional quality of purchase intentions among adults living in vulnerable territories. These estimates are intended to inform the design and sample-size calculation of a subsequent full-scale study

Read the detailed description

Front-of-pack nutrition labels (FoPLs) have been adopted in many countries to help consumers rapidly assess the nutritional quality of foods and to encourage healthier choices. Among these schemes, interpretive systems such as Nutri-Score appear particularly promising, as their graphic design improves understanding and use compared with more complex or purely numerical formats. In France, where social inequalities in diet-related chronic diseases are pronounced, implementing and effectively using FoPLs is especially challenging in socioeconomically vulnerable areas. Seine-Saint-Denis, a department with a markedly higher prevalence of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases than the national average, offers a relevant setting to test prevention strategies embedded within routine care.

The PEANUTS-PILOT project is a quasi-experimental before-after interventional pilot study conducted first in primary care, to inform a subsequent full-scale study (PEANUTS), including extension to social and community-based structures. The study targets adult patients living in vulnerable territories who attend municipal primary care centres or hospital services. After informed consent, participants complete a baseline questionnaire assessing food literacy, understanding and use of on-pack nutrition information (including Nutri-Score), perceived self-efficacy in choosing healthier food products in the supermarket, and the nutritional quality of purchase intentions.

The intervention consists of a brief (45-60 minute) group-based education session focused on on-pack nutrition information (Nutri-Score, nutritional declaration, nutrition and health claims, and key marketing elements). Sessions are modular and literacy-sensitive: based on the inclusion questionnaire, participants are allocated to educational pathways (Group A and/or Group B) according to their initial knowledge and food literacy profile, with two levels of intensity in each pathway (A1/A2 and B1/B2). At the beginning of each session, facilitators perform a short educational assessment to select the most appropriate level for the group and adapt examples and activities to participants' literacy levels and everyday food purchasing context. All sessions include an active discussion phase followed by a practical "learning by doing" component, using real or mock food packages and price scenarios to support the use of Nutri-Score and other FoPL elements in constrained-budget situations.

In PEANUTS-PILOT, the program is implemented in a university hospital group and municipal health centres in Seine-Saint-Denis. Interventions are delivered by advanced practice nurses and dietitians trained in the study protocol. Approximately 100 participants will be included in this pilot study, allowing an initial evaluation of feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness, as well as the collection of qualitative feedback (e.g. spontaneously raised questions, strategies to handle group heterogeneity) to inform training materials for non-specialist facilitators. The pilot will also provide preliminary estimates of outcome variability and changes to inform the design and sample-size calculation of the subsequent full-scale PEANUTS study. In the subsequent full-scale study, Ithe program is intended to be transferred to social services and community-based organizations, where social workers and volunteers trained in PEANUTS will deliver the intervention refined following the pilot, thereby supporting capacity-building in the social sector.

Outcomes are measured at inclusion, immediately before the intervention (T0), immediately after the session (T1) and at 1-month follow-up (T2). Primary outcomes include self-efficacy in choosing healthier food products in the supermarket and a multidimensional food literacy score (label reading and food selection, meal planning and budgeting, food safety/preparation/cooking). Secondary outcomes include changes in the nutritional quality of food purchase intentions and participants' understanding and perceived usefulness of on-pack nutrition information. These outcomes are assessed to obtain preliminary estimates and inform the subsequent full-scale study, rather than to provide definitive evidence of intervention effectiveness. By integrating a brief, tailored education program into routine care pathways and later into social and community settings, the PEANUTS-PILOT study aims to inform the development and evaluation of transferable tools to reduce nutrition-related health inequalities in vulnerable territories, , with subsequent implementation in social and community settings planned within the full-scale PEANUTS study.

Registration clarification: The initial registration described the PEANUTS project as a two-stage study, comprising a pilot stage ("Phase 1") and a subsequent full-scale stage ("Phase 2"), and included an enrollment target intended for the full-scale study. The registration has been revised to distinguish these stages as separate studies. This record now describes only the pilot study, designated PEANUTS-PILOT. The subsequent full-scale study, designated PEANUTS, will be registered separately, with its design and outcome measures refined following evaluation of the pilot.

Being tested
Peanuts
Keywords
Nutrition education and prevention, Primary prevention, Educational program, Front of pack nutrition labelling

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PeanutsBehavioural

    At the beginning of each session, facilitators perform a brief educational assessment to select the most appropriate level for the group, allowing flexible adaptation of content to heterogeneous literacy levels. Sessions systematically include two components: (1) an active discussion phase to convey key information, followed by (2) a practical "learning by doing" phase designed to foster autonomy in using nutrition labelling tools. Phase 1 (≈12 months) will take place in municipal primary care centers in Seine-Saint-Denis, and delivered by advanced practice nurses and dietitians (≥10 expected). During this phase, qualitative feedback (e.g. spontaneously raised questions, strategies used to manage group heterogeneity) will be collected to inform the training of non-expert facilitators. Phase 2 will extend implementation to social services and community-based organizations, where trained social workers and volunteers will deliver the same modular program, supporting capacity-building in

Study groups in NCT07531849
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalThe educational intervention consists of modular group sessions lasting 45-60 minutes, adapted to participants' initial profiles based on an inclusion questionnaire assessing food literacy and nutrition knowledge. After completion of this baseline assessment, participants are allocated to educational pathways (Group A and/or Group B) according to their initial knowledge profile, with distinct objectives for each pathway.
Receives: Behavioral: Peanuts

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Self-efficacy in choosing food products in the supermarket

    Measured through a series of 5 items rated on a 5 point Likert scale. The final score will range from 0 to 20 points. Higher scores mean higher self-efficacy

    Measured: Pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Nutritional quality of purchase intentions

    Respondents will select one food product from 8 options within each of the two choice set, scored from 0 (lower nutritional quality product - Nutri-Score E) to 4 (higher nutritional quality - Nutri-Score A).

    Measured: Pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up

  2. Food literacy

    Food literacy score (three subscales).

    • Food selection: Ability to interpret on-pack nutrition information, assessed through two objective understanding tasks (selecting, among eight products, two products with the best nutritional quality). For each objective understanding task, responses are rated between 0 and 4 points, leading to a sub-scale ranging from 0 to 8 (0-lower understanding; 8 higher understanding)
    • Meal planning and budgeting: two items on food organisation and budget management, rated on a 5-point Likert scale (from 0 to 4 points). The subscale ranges between 0 and 8 points (0-lower planning and budgeting skills- 8-Higher)
    • Food safety, preparation and cooking: two items on hygiene, preparation and cooking, rated on a 5-point scale. (from 0 to 4 points).The subscale ranges between 0 and 8 points (0-lower food safety, preparation and cooking skills- 8-Higher) Final summary score (sum of subscales) ranges from 0 (low literacy) to 24 (high literacy)

    Measured: Pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Apr 2026
  2. Study start1 Jan 2026
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2026
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Quasi-experimental single-group pre-post design with repeated measures at three time points (T0 pre-intervention, T1 immediately post-intervention, T2 at 1-month follow-up). The educational intervention consists of modular group sessions lasting 45-60 minutes, adapted to participants' initial profiles based on an inclusion questionnaire assessing food literacy and nutrition knowledge. After completion of this baseline assessment, participants are allocated to educational pathways (Group A and/or Group B) according to their initial knowledge profile, with distinct objectives for each pathway. For each pathway, facilitators use an intervention guide describing two levels of intensity (A1/A2 for Group A and B1/B2 for Group B) with specific learning objectives. At the beginning of each session, facilitators perform a brief educational assessment to select the most appropriate level for the group, allowing flexible adaptation of content to heterogeneous literacy levels.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
135 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07531849
Sponsor's protocol ID
USPN 2025-102
Acronym
PEANUTS-PILOT
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
27 Mar 2026
Last updated
13 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: IPD will be shared under strict anonymity of participants, and only with approval from the ethics committee. In case the Ethics committee deems sharing of IPD inappropriate, data may not be shared.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Peanuts in people with Self-Efficacy and Food Choices, run by University of Paris 13 at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Self-efficacy in choosing food products in the supermarket (time frame: Pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in