Non-specific Low Back PainNCT07555795
Motivating Core-muscle Exercises With Wearable Sensors, Haptics and Interactive Gaming
A study testing MMG-biofeedback belt in people with Non-specific Low Back Pain and Low Back Pain, run by Imperial College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether a wearable biofeedback smartbelt system can improve pain and disability in adults with chronic lower back pain. The intervention combines a wearable belt that measures muscle activity with a mobile application that provides real-time feedback during exercise. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-specific Low Back Pain, Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- MMG-biofeedback belt
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 20 Apr 2026to 20 Apr 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Over the age of 18
- Non-specific LBP for at least 6 weeks in the past 12 months
- Pain 4/10 on a visual analogue scale or more or Oswestry Disability Index over 20%
Who cannot join
- Serious spinal pathology ("red flags") such as:
- History of malignancy with new onset back pain suggestive of recurrence.
- Unexplained weight loss, fever, or systemic symptoms.
- Recent significant trauma (e.g., fall from height, road traffic accident).
- Suspected or confirmed spinal infection (e.g., discitis, osteomyelitis).
- Cauda equina symptoms, including urinary retention/incontinence or saddle anaesthesia.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Progressive neurological deficit (e.g., worsening weakness, loss of reflexes).
- Recent spinal surgery or invasive spinal procedures within the past 3 months.
- Severe cardiovascular or respiratory disease that prevents safe participation in mild to moderate exercise (e.g., unstable angina, uncontrolled heart failure).
- Pregnant women or those less than three months postpartum.
- Known allergy to materials used in the belt (e.g., Lycra or related fabrics).
- Cognitive impairment that prevents informed consent or ability to follow exercise instructions.
- Concurrent participation in another intervention trial that may interfere with the study outcomes.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Imperial College London
London
Reneira Seeamber Balaghee, +447496682750, r.seeamber18@imperial.ac.uk
About this study
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether a wearable biofeedback smartbelt system can improve pain and disability in adults with chronic lower back pain. The intervention combines a wearable belt that measures muscle activity with a mobile application that provides real-time feedback during exercise.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
- Does the MMG-biofeedback system improve disability, as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), compared to standard care alone over an 8-week period?
- Does the system reduce perceived pain levels and improve exercise adherence in individuals with lower back pain over an 8-week period?
Researchers will compare participants receiving the MMG-biofeedback belt alongside standard care to those receiving standard care alone to determine whether the addition of real-time muscle activation feedback leads to improved outcomes.
Participants will:
- Be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (biofeedback system + standard care) or control group (standard care only)
- Complete an 8-week home-based exercise programme, all participants are asked to complete the programme at least 5 times a week
- Use the wearable belt and mobile application during exercise sessions (intervention group only)
- Receive a booklet with the exercise programme and video links (control group only)
- Complete questionnaires on pain, disability, and usability at baseline and after 8 weeks, and at a 3-month follow-up
- Have their exercise adherence and engagement monitored throughout the study
The study includes an initial pilot phase to assess feasibility, followed by a larger randomised controlled phase to evaluate early clinical effectiveness.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND
Lower back pain is the leading cause of chronic disability in the UK and entails direct treatment costs to the NHS of >£1.5 billion p.a. Evidence-based guidelines recommend back exercises and/or physiotherapy as the principle treatment. However, since long-term, intensive physiotherapy is unrealistic on the NHS given limited resources, professional bodies increasingly advocate self-management.
While self-led back exercise may be cost-efficient, its effectiveness is diminished by poor patient motivation and compliance. The current standard of care: a short course of training by a physiotherapist, followed by provision of a visual guide, are met with exercise adherence rates as low as 30%. This results in persistent pain, depression, unemployment and analgesic dependency.
The approach we shall take is to devise a practical sensor-feedback system that can detect appropriate back exercises, thereby encouraging self-motivation and automated supervision of exercise. The system is unique in using a patented sensor system - mechanomyography (MMG) - that wirelessly measures trunk and limb muscle contraction (in addition to movement), which is key to assessing core-strengthening exercises.
Our team have pioneered clinical applications of wearable mechanomyography (MMG) for purposes such as: remote assessment and exercises in stroke, and foetal movement detection via maternal abdomen. In one study, MMGs worn on stroke patients' arms predicted expert 3-class classifications of arm function with accuracies of up to 80%. Our ability to detect muscular contraction with MMG, rather than joint movement, will be important for monitoring back exercises since many of these involve isometric trunk muscle contraction, i.e. without spinal or limb movements.
RATIONALE FOR CURRENT STUDY
Lower back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Although exercise-based rehabilitation is recommended as a first-line treatment, adherence to prescribed exercises is often poor, and many patients struggle to activate key stabilising muscles effectively. The MMG-biofeedback belt has been developed to address these limitations by providing real-time feedback on core muscle activation, with the aim of improving exercise quality, motivation, and consistency.
Meaningful improvements in disability over an 8-week period have been demonstrated in previous rehabilitation studies, including a large cohort showing clinically significant reductions in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores following standard physiotherapy programmes. Research also shows a clear dose-response relationship between exercise frequency and improvements in pain and disability, with greater adherence producing substantially larger effects. The MMG-biofeedback system is specifically designed to support this behavioural change by increasing engagement and encouraging regular, correctly performed exercises during unsupervised home practice.
Our proof-of-concept work has already shown that biofeedback substantially increases trunk muscle activation and self-initiated exercise behaviour, and these effects are expected to improve further with the enhanced design of the belt and app. Together, this evidence indicates that the MMG-biofeedback belt has strong potential to improve exercise adherence, muscle engagement, and clinical outcomes. A structured Phase 1/2 trial is therefore warranted to assess the early clinical effectiveness before progressing to a Phase 3 trial on a larger, multi-centre cohort.
STUDY OBJECTIVES
Primary Objective
- To determine the clinical effectiveness of the MMG-biofeedback system in improving disability and pain in patients with LBP when used alongside standard care, as compared to standard care alone over an 8-week period. Secondary Objectives
- To assess feasibility metrics, including recruitment and retention, usability, data completeness, adherence, and device safety.
- To evaluate user perspectives regarding motivation, comfort, usability, and perceived value of the belt and app.
STUDY DESIGN
This study is a two-stage, parallel-group randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate the early clinical effectiveness of the MMG-biofeedback belt system for individuals with chronic lower back pain (LBP). All participants will have LBP and will be randomised to either the intervention group, receiving the MMG-biofeedback belt and mobile application alongside standard care; or the control group, which will receive standard care alone. All participants will complete an eight-week intervention period with assessments at baseline and immediately after the programme.
The first stage of the study is an internal pilot involving the first 40 participants recruited. These participants will be randomised using a provisional allocation ratio of 1:1 (intervention: control) and will complete all study procedures. The purpose of the pilot is to determine the feasibility of recruitment and retention, evaluate MMG signal quality and completeness, assess adherence to prescribed home exercises, and confirm the safety and practicality of the protocol. Progression to the full trial will be dependent on predefined feasibility criteria, including acceptable signal quality, adequate adherence, absence of unexpected safety concerns, and satisfactory usability ratings.
Based on the findings of this pilot stage, the final randomisation ratio for the main trial (Phase 2) will be selected. This may remain at 1:1 or may shift to 2:1 if this is deemed to provide a more appropriate balance between statistical power, feasibility, and resource considerations. This adaptive decision will be made before the commencement of Phase 2 and will not affect the pilot data, which will be retained in all final analyses.
The second stage of the study is the early-effectiveness RCT, in which a further 40 participants with LBP will be recruited, bringing the total sample to 80 participants. These participants will be randomised using the final allocation ratio determined from the pilot stage and will follow the same intervention and assessment procedures as those in the pilot. The purpose of Phase 2 is to evaluate the early clinical effectiveness of the MMG-biofeedback belt in addition to standard care and to estimate effect sizes and variability necessary for planning a Phase 3 trial. This stage will also enable a broader assessment of usability, adherence and device performance across a larger and more diverse participant sample.
- Conditions
- Non-specific Low Back Pain, Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- MMG-biofeedback belt
- Keywords
- wearables, core muscle, exercise therapy, biofeedback
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MMG-biofeedback beltDevice
Also called UPPITT
The intervention consists of a wearable belt incorporating mechanomyography (MMG) sensors to detect muscle activity in the abdominal and lower back regions, paired with a mobile application that provides real-time visual feedback on core muscle activation during exercise. The system is designed to guide users in engaging the correct muscles, improve exercise performance, and support adherence to a prescribed exercise programme during both supervised and home-based sessions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Exercise with real-time muscle biofeedback | Experimental | Participants randomised to the intervention arm will receive a standardised lab session on the use of the MMG-biofeedback belt and mobile application. A physiotherapist or trained researcher will demonstrate how to perform each exercise, correct belt positioning, app navigation, calibration procedures, and how to interpret the real-time muscle activation feedback.
Participants will be issued the MMG-biofeedback belt and app after training and will use the system throughout their prescribed home-based exercise sessions for the full eight-week intervention period. Participants are asked to perform the exercise programme (20-30 mins) at least 5 times a week. The app will provide real-time feedback on muscle activation, progress summaries and reminders. Participants are asked to carry on any other treatment as usual. Aside from routine data collection and belt troubleshooting, participants in the control group will not receive additional input from the research team. Receives: Device: MMG-biofeedback belt |
| Exercise without biofeedback (waitlist control) | No intervention | Participants randomised to the control arm will receive a standardised lab session, whereby core strength and endurance measures are taken. A physiotherapist or trained researcher will demonstrate how to perform each exercise. Participants will be issued with a booklet containing the exercise programme with exercise video links and are asked to perform their prescribed home-based exercise sessions for the full eight-week intervention period. Participants are asked to perform the exercise programme (20-30 mins) at least 5 times a week. No MMG-biofeedback belt will be provided to this group, participants are asked to carry on any other treatment as usual. Aside from routine data collection, participants in the control group will not receive additional input from the research team. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Oswestry Disability Index
Measured: From enrollment to 3 months after the end of treatment period (8 weeks treatment)
Pain Visual Analogue Scale
Measured: From enrollment to 3 months after the end of treatment period (8 weeks treatment)
Secondary outcomes (3)
EQ-5D-5L
Measured: From enrollment to 3 months after the end of treatment period (8 weeks treatment)
MSK-HQ
Measured: From enrollment to 3 months after the end of treatment period (8 weeks treatment)
Exercise Adherence
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Apr 2026
- Study start20 Apr 2026
- Primary completion20 Apr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion20 Apr 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Non-specific Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Imperial College LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants are allocated to either an intervention group receiving real-time muscle biofeedback via a wearable belt during exercise, or a control group performing the same exercise programme without feedback. Outcomes are assessed at baseline, after the initial study period and at a 3-month follow-up to enable comparison between groups. Following completion of the primary study phase, participants in the control group are offered access to the intervention (waitlist control design).
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Surrey Physio
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Paul Bentley, Principal investigator, Imperial College London
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07555795
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 19IC5674
- Other IDs
- MR/X013464/1
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Apr 2026
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in publications will be made available to other researchers upon reasonable request. This will include participant-level data for primary and secondary outcomes (e.g. disability scores, pain scores, adherence metrics), along with relevant baseline characteristics. Raw sensor data (e.g. MMG signals) and proprietary algorithms will not be shared in full due to intellectual property considerations. However, processed or aggregated data derived from these signals may be shared where appropriate to support reproducibility of findings. All shared data will be fully anonymised in accordance with GDPR and institutional data protection policies.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Motivating Core-muscle Exercises With Wearable Sensors, Haptics and Interactive Gaming
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07555795
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 19IC5674
- Conditions
- Non-specific Low Back Pain, Low Back Pain
- Keywords
- wearables, core muscle, exercise therapy, biofeedback
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Surrey Physio
- Study start
- 20 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Apr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 20 Apr 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether a wearable biofeedback smartbelt system can improve pain and disability in adults with chronic lower back pain. The intervention combines a wearable belt that measures muscle activity with a mobile application that provides real-time feedback during exercise.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does the MMG-biofeedback system improve disability, as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), compared to standard care alone over an 8-week period?
- Does the system reduce perceived pain levels and improve exercise adherence in individuals with lower back pain over an 8-week period?
Researchers will compare participants receiving the MMG-biofeedback belt alongside standard care to those receiving standard care alone to determine whether the addition of real-time muscle activation feedback leads to improved outcomes.
Participants will:
- Be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (biofeedback system + standard care) or control group (standard care only)
- Complete an 8-week home-based exercise programme, all participants are asked to complete the programme at least 5 times a week
- Use the wearable belt and mobile application during exercise sessions (intervention group only)
- Receive a booklet with the exercise programme and video links (control group only)
- Complete questionnaires on pain, disability, and usability at baseline and after 8 weeks, and at a 3-month follow-up
- Have their exercise adherence and engagement monitored throughout the study
The study includes an initial pilot phase to assess feasibility, followed by a larger randomised controlled phase to evaluate early clinical effectiveness.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND
Lower back pain is the leading cause of chronic disability in the UK and entails direct treatment costs to the NHS of >£1.5 billion p.a. Evidence-based guidelines recommend back exercises and/or physiotherapy as the principle treatment. However, since long-term, intensive physiotherapy is unrealistic on the NHS given limited resources, professional bodies increasingly advocate self-management.
While self-led back exercise may be cost-efficient, its effectiveness is diminished by poor patient motivation and compliance. The current standard of care: a short course of training by a physiotherapist, followed by provision of a visual guide, are met with exercise adherence rates as low as 30%. This results in persistent pain, depression, unemployment and analgesic dependency.
The approach we shall take is to devise a practical sensor-feedback system that can detect appropriate back exercises, thereby encouraging self-motivation and automated supervision of exercise. The system is unique in using a patented sensor system - mechanomyography (MMG) - that wirelessly measures trunk and limb muscle contraction (in addition to movement), which is key to assessing core-strengthening exercises.
Our team have pioneered clinical applications of wearable mechanomyography (MMG) for purposes such as: remote assessment and exercises in stroke, and foetal movement detection via maternal abdomen. In one study, MMGs worn on stroke patients' arms predicted expert 3-class classifications of arm function with accuracies of up to 80%. Our ability to detect muscular contraction with MMG, rather than joint movement, will be important for monitoring back exercises since many of these involve isometric trunk muscle contraction, i.e. without spinal or limb movements.
RATIONALE FOR CURRENT STUDY
Lower back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Although exercise-based rehabilitation is recommended as a first-line treatment, adherence to prescribed exercises is often poor, and many patients struggle to activate key stabilising muscles effectively. The MMG-biofeedback belt has been developed to address these limitations by providing real-time feedback on core muscle activation, with the aim of improving exercise quality, motivation, and consistency.
Meaningful improvements in disability over an 8-week period have been demonstrated in previous rehabilitation studies, including a large cohort showing clinically significant reductions in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores following standard physiotherapy programmes. Research also shows a clear dose-response relationship between exercise frequency and improvements in pain and disability, with greater adherence producing substantially larger effects. The MMG-biofeedback system is specifically designed to support this behavioural change by increasing engagement and encouraging regular, correctly performed exercises during unsupervised home practice.
Our proof-of-concept work has already shown that biofeedback substantially increases trunk muscle activation and self-initiated exercise behaviour, and these effects are expected to improve further with the enhanced design of the belt and app. Together, this evidence indicates that the MMG-biofeedback belt has strong potential to improve exercise adherence, muscle engagement, and clinical outcomes. A structured Phase 1/2 trial is therefore warranted to assess the early clinical effectiveness before progressing to a Phase 3 trial on a larger, multi-centre cohort.
STUDY OBJECTIVES
Primary Objective
- To determine the clinical effectiveness of the MMG-biofeedback system in improving disability and pain in patients with LBP when used alongside standard care, as compared to standard care alone over an 8-week period. Secondary Objectives
- To assess feasibility metrics, including recruitment and retention, usability, data completeness, adherence, and device safety.
- To evaluate user perspectives regarding motivation, comfort, usability, and perceived value of the belt and app.
STUDY DESIGN
This study is a two-stage, parallel-group randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate the early clinical effectiveness of the MMG-biofeedback belt system for individuals with chronic lower back pain (LBP). All participants will have LBP and will be randomised to either the intervention group, receiving the MMG-biofeedback belt and mobile application alongside standard care; or the control group, which will receive standard care alone. All participants will complete an eight-week intervention period with assessments at baseline and immediately after the programme.
The first stage of the study is an internal pilot involving the first 40 participants recruited. These participants will be randomised using a provisional allocation ratio of 1:1 (intervention: control) and will complete all study procedures. The purpose of the pilot is to determine the feasibility of recruitment and retention, evaluate MMG signal quality and completeness, assess adherence to prescribed home exercises, and confirm the safety and practicality of the protocol. Progression to the full trial will be dependent on predefined feasibility criteria, including acceptable signal quality, adequate adherence, absence of unexpected safety concerns, and satisfactory usability ratings.
Based on the findings of this pilot stage, the final randomisation ratio for the main trial (Phase 2) will be selected. This may remain at 1:1 or may shift to 2:1 if this is deemed to provide a more appropriate balance between statistical power, feasibility, and resource considerations. This adaptive decision will be made before the commencement of Phase 2 and will not affect the pilot data, which will be retained in all final analyses.
The second stage of the study is the early-effectiveness RCT, in which a further 40 participants with LBP will be recruited, bringing the total sample to 80 participants. These participants will be randomised using the final allocation ratio determined from the pilot stage and will follow the same intervention and assessment procedures as those in the pilot. The purpose of Phase 2 is to evaluate the early clinical effectiveness of the MMG-biofeedback belt in addition to standard care and to estimate effect sizes and variability necessary for planning a Phase 3 trial. This stage will also enable a broader assessment of usability, adherence and device performance across a larger and more diverse participant sample.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants are allocated to either an intervention group receiving real-time muscle biofeedback via a wearable belt during exercise, or a control group performing the same exercise programme without feedback. Outcomes are assessed at baseline, after the initial study period and at a 3-month follow-up to enable comparison between groups. Following completion of the primary study phase, participants in the control group are offered access to the intervention (waitlist control design).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Exercise with real-time muscle biofeedback | Experimental | Device: MMG-biofeedback beltParticipants randomised to the intervention arm will receive a standardised lab session on the use of the MMG-biofeedback belt and mobile application. A physiotherapist or trained researcher will demonstrate how to perform each exercise, correct belt positioning, app navigation, calibration procedures, and how to interpret the real-time muscle activation feedback. Participants will be issued the MMG-biofeedback belt and app after training and will use the system throughout their prescribed home-based exercise sessions for the full eight-week intervention period. Participants are asked to perform the exercise programme (20-30 mins) at least 5 times a week. The app will provide real-time feedback on muscle activation, progress summaries and reminders. Participants are asked to carry on any other treatment as usual. Aside from routine data collection and belt troubleshooting, participants in the control group will not receive additional input from the research team. |
| Exercise without biofeedback (waitlist control) | No intervention | –Participants randomised to the control arm will receive a standardised lab session, whereby core strength and endurance measures are taken. A physiotherapist or trained researcher will demonstrate how to perform each exercise. Participants will be issued with a booklet containing the exercise programme with exercise video links and are asked to perform their prescribed home-based exercise sessions for the full eight-week intervention period. Participants are asked to perform the exercise programme (20-30 mins) at least 5 times a week. No MMG-biofeedback belt will be provided to this group, participants are asked to carry on any other treatment as usual. Aside from routine data collection, participants in the control group will not receive additional input from the research team. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Over the age of 18
- Non-specific LBP for at least 6 weeks in the past 12 months
- Pain 4/10 on a visual analogue scale or more or Oswestry Disability Index over 20%
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Serious spinal pathology ("red flags") such as:
- Recent spinal surgery or invasive spinal procedures within the past 3 months.
- Severe cardiovascular or respiratory disease that prevents safe participation in mild to moderate exercise (e.g., unstable angina, uncontrolled heart failure).
- Pregnant women or those less than three months postpartum.
- Known allergy to materials used in the belt (e.g., Lycra or related fabrics).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MMG-biofeedback beltAlso: UPPITTThe intervention consists of a wearable belt incorporating mechanomyography (MMG) sensors to detect muscle activity in the abdominal and lower back regions, paired with a mobile application that provides real-time visual feedback on core muscle activation during exercise. The system is designed to guide users in engaging the correct muscles, improve exercise performance, and support adherence to a prescribed exercise programme during both supervised and home-based sessions. | Device | Exercise with real-time muscle biofeedback |
Primary outcome
Oswestry Disability Index
Time frame: From enrollment to 3 months after the end of treatment period (8 weeks treatment)
Pain Visual Analogue Scale
Time frame: From enrollment to 3 months after the end of treatment period (8 weeks treatment)
3 secondary outcomes
EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: From enrollment to 3 months after the end of treatment period (8 weeks treatment)
MSK-HQ
Time frame: From enrollment to 3 months after the end of treatment period (8 weeks treatment)
Exercise Adherence
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in publications will be made available to other researchers upon reasonable request. This will include participant-level data for primary and secondary outcomes (e.g. disability scores, pain scores, adherence metrics), along with relevant baseline characteristics. Raw sensor data (e.g. MMG signals) and proprietary algorithms will not be shared in full due to intellectual property considerations. However, processed or aggregated data derived from these signals may be shared where appropriate to support reproducibility of findings. All shared data will be fully anonymised in accordance with GDPR and institutional data protection policies.
Related trials for Non-specific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of IASTM, Deep Friction Massage, and Sham Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Electromyographical Activation, Pain and Function in Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial
Enrolling by invitation
Effects of 3-dimensional Versus Dynamic Myofascial Release Techniques With Lumbar Mobilization and Exercise Therapy Program in Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain, Myofascial Release
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Paul Bentley principal investigator
Imperial College London
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MMG-biofeedback belt in people with Non-specific Low Back Pain and Low Back Pain, run by Imperial College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Reneira Seeamber Balaghee (+447496682750, r.seeamber18@imperial.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Oswestry Disability Index (time frame: From enrollment to 3 months after the end of treatment period (8 weeks treatment)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2026.