AzTrials
AzTrials

PediatricDEX LMANCT07562308

Laryngeal Mask Airways Are Supraglottic Devices Used to Maintain Airway Patency During Anesthesia and in Difficult Airways. IV Dexmedetomidine Improves LMA Insertion Success and Decreases Coughing, While IV Lidocaine Decreases Postoperative Cough.

A study testing Dexamedomedine and Lidocaine (drug) in people with Pediatric and Elective, run by Assiut University at 2 sites in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Laryngeal Mask Airways Are Supraglottic Devices Used to Maintain Airway Patency During Anesthesia and in Difficult Airways. LMA may help in reducing postoperative pulmonary complications. IV Dexmedetomidine Improves LMA Insertion Success and Decreases trials number, While IV Lidocaine Decreases Postoperative Cough. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 12 years
Conditions the study is for
Pediatric, Elective, Surgery in Early Childhood
What is being tested?
Dexamedomedine and Lidocaine (drug)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
2 sitesEgypt
Study dates
1 May 2026to 1 Nov 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Parental/guardian consent.
  • Age 2-12 years
  • ASA physical status I-II.
  • Elective surgery requiring LMA (duration <2 hours).

Who cannot join

  • Known airway anomalies (e.g., tonsillar hypertrophy, cleft palate).
  • Cardiovascular disease (bradycardia, arrhythmias).
  • Allergy to study drugs.
  • BMI >95th percentile.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Egypt2 sites
  • Faculty of Medicine Assiut University

    Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 71621

  • Faculty of Medicine

    Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 71621

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Vs. Lidocaine for Laryngeal Mask Insertion Conditions In Pediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgeries, A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Laryngeal Mask Airways Are Supraglottic Devices Used to Maintain Airway Patency During Anesthesia and in Difficult Airways. LMA may help in reducing postoperative pulmonary complications. IV Dexmedetomidine Improves LMA Insertion Success and Decreases trials number, While IV Lidocaine Decreases Postoperative Cough. This is a randomized interventional trial comparing both drugs. IV DEX will be compared vs IV lidocaine regarding the feasibility of insertion, number of trials, incidence of cough, postoperative pulmonary complications and hemodynamic profile.

Being tested
Dexamedomedine, Lidocaine (drug)
Keywords
Dexmedetomidine, Lidocaine, LMA, Pediatrics, Elective

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DexamedomedineDrug

    Also called DEX, Precedex

    IV 0.2 mic/ kg of dexmedetomidine will be diluted over 10 ml saline and given to the patient over 10 minutes before induction and assess the feasibility of classic LMA insertion

  • Lidocaine (drug)Drug

    IV 1.5 mg/kg of lidocaine will be diluted over 10 ml saline and given to the patient 1 minute before induction and assess the feasibility of classic LMA insertion

Study groups in NCT07562308
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group (D) DEXActive comparatorDose: 0.2 mcg/kg IV in 10 mL saline, infused over 10 min pre-induction.
Receives: Drug: Dexamedomedine
Group (L) LidocaineActive comparatorDose: 1.5 mg/kg IV (max 100 mg) in 10 ml saline over 1 min before induction.
Receives: Drug: Lidocaine (drug)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. First-attempt insertion success rate

    The success of the first trial of classic LMA insertion will be assessed. Binary: yes or no.

    Measured: After induction of anesthesia

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Ease of insertion (4-point scale)

    Grade 1: No resistance. Grade 2: Mild resistance. Grade 3: Moderate resistance. Grade 4: Failed insertion and need for another airway management tool.

    Measured: After Induction of anesthesia

  2. Heart rate

    Monitored continuously and recorded every 15 minutes. Atropine IV will be given if bradycardia occurs.

    Measured: Every 15 minutes till recovery

  3. MAP

    Mean arterial blood pressure

    Measured: Every 15 minutes

  4. Recovery Time

    Time from discontinuation of anesthesia till the child is fully awake.

    Measured: After cessation of anesthesia administration

  5. Postoperative Agitation

    PAED scale

    1. The child makes eye contact with the caregiver
    2. The child's actions are purposeful
    3. The child is aware of his/her surroundings
    4. The child is restless
    5. The child is inconsolable

    Measured: In PACU

  6. Postoperative Complications

    Laryngeal Spasm, Coughing

    Measured: 0,1,2,6 hours postoperative.

  7. PONV

    PONV grade Patient response 0 Without PONV I Nausea without vomiting II Nausea with vomiting (< 3 times/d) III Vomiting ≥ 3 times/d

    Measured: 24 hours postoperative

  8. Postoperative sore throat (0-3 scale).

    0 (none)

    1. (mild/complaint only upon asking)
    2. (moderate/complaint on own)
    3. (severe/hoarseness or throat pain).

    Measured: 24 hours postoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 May 2026
  2. Study start1 May 2026
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2026
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07562308
Sponsor's protocol ID
DEX and LMA insertion success
Acronym
DEX LMA
Status last verified
Nov 2026
First submitted
25 Apr 2026
Last updated
5 Nov 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Li L, Zhang Z, Yao Z, Wang H, Wang H, An H, Yao J. The impact of laryngeal mask versus other airways on perioperative respiratory adverse events in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2019 Apr;64:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.02.020. Epub 2019 Mar 13.

    PubMed 30878762
  • Ju Q, Xiao Z, Sun W, Zhu M, Lv P. The anesthesia induction effect of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing laryngeal mask intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7 RCTs. Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;10(12):12358-12366. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-2971.

    PubMed 35016404
  • Gharaei B, Jafari A, Poor Zamany M, Kamranmanesh M, Aghamohammadi H, Roodneshin F, Teymourian H, Khazaie Y, Dadkhah P. Topical Versus Intravenous Lidocaine in Children With Upper Respiratory Infection Undergoing Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double Blind, Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Aug 22;5(4):e23501. doi: 10.5812/aapm.23501v2. eCollection 2015 Aug.

    PubMed 26473098

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Dexamedomedine and Lidocaine (drug) in people with Pediatric and Elective, run by Assiut University at 2 sites in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

First-attempt insertion success rate (time frame: After induction of anesthesia). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07562308, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in