AzTrials
AzTrials

Glioma Glioblastoma MultiformeResPGliomaNCT07567196

PET-Guided Resection in High-Grade Gliomas

An observational study of Glioma Glioblastoma Multiforme and Glioma, High Grade, run by Universita degli Studi di Genova at 2 sites in Italy.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adults, with a poor prognosis despite maximal treatment. Current evidence suggests that supramaximal resection, including non-enhancing FLAIR-hyperintense regions, improves survival. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
100 participants
Where
2 sitesItaly
Study dates
1 Apr 2022to 31 Dec 2029
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population includes adult patients diagnosed with high-grade glioma, located supratentorially and eligible for surgical resection. Inclusion criteria consist of age ≥18 years, have a high-grade glioma (WHO grade III/IV) diagnosed on MRI as assessed by the neurosurgeon, and provide written informed consent. Exclusion criteria include tumors located in the cerebellum, brainstem, or midline. Patients with medical conditions precluding MRI, such as those with a pacemaker, are not eligible. Other exclusion criteria include the inability to provide written informed consent, secondary high-grade gliomas resulting from malignant transformation of a low-grade glioma, and a second primary malignancy within the past five years.

Who may be able to join

  • age ≥18 years
  • high-grade glioma (WHO grade III/IV) diagnosed on MRI
  • provide written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • tumors located in the cerebellum, brainstem, or midline.
  • Patients with medical conditions precluding MRI
  • inability to provide written informed consent
  • secondary high-grade gliomas resulting from malignant transformation of a low-grade glioma
  • other primary malignancy within the past five years

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Andrea Bianconi, MD contact

+393475805577

andrea.bianconi@unige.it

Italy2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Metropolitana

    Genova, 16100

    Andrea Bianconi, 3475805577, andrea.bianconi@unige.it

    Recruiting
  • AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza

    Torino, Turin, 10126

    Fabio Cofano, Md, 0116335427, fabio.cofano@unito.it

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: ResPGlioma: Impact of PET-Guided Resection on Survival in High-Grade Gliomas - A Multicenter Prospective Study

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adults, with a poor prognosis despite maximal treatment. Current evidence suggests that supramaximal resection, including non-enhancing FLAIR-hyperintense regions, improves survival. However, the extent of FLAIR resection is often limited by functional constraints and its non-specific nature, as it may represent both tumor infiltration and peritumoral edema. This study explores the role of 18F-DOPA PET in refining supramaximal resection by providing a more specific surgical target beyond contrast-enhancing areas.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of 18F-DOPA PET-guided resection on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in GBM patients, by comparing outcomes between those undergoing PET-RM integrated resection versus conventional MRI-guided resection.

Read more

Methods: ResPGlioma is a multicenter, prospective, non-randomized study conducted at IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (Genoa) and AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza (Turin). Patients with newly diagnosed, supratentorial, high-grade gliomas undergo preoperative 18F-DOPA PET and MRI. Surgery follows the principle of maximal safe resection, with postoperative MRI at 48 hours assessing the extent of resection (EOR). To confirm PET resection or non-PET resection status, patients will undergo a postoperative 18F-DOPA PET scan at 30 ± 7 days following surgery, prior to the initiation of chemoradiotherapy. Patients are categorized based on EOR criteria (RANO) and PET volume resection (PET-resection vs. PET non-resection). Statistical analyses include Kaplan-Meier survival curves and regression models to identify prognostic factors.Patients are categorized based on EOR criteria (RANO) and PET volume resection (PET-resection vs. PET non-resection). Statistical analyses include Kaplan-Meier survival curves and regression models to identify prognostic factors.

Expected Outcomes: The authors hypothesize that PET-guided resection improves PFS and OS by enabling a more precise tumor removal beyond contrast-enhancing margins while preserving neurological function. Preliminary data support that PET hypercaptant areas contain viable tumor cells and should be resected. This approach may offer a more accessible yet effective alternative to FLAIR-guided supramaximal resection.

Read the detailed description

Background and Scientific Rationale: Glioblastoma (GBM), classified as a CNS WHO grade 4 tumor under the 2021 WHO Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors, is the most common and aggressive primary brain malignancy. Despite the current standard of care-maximal surgical resection followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy-its prognosis remains poor, with a mean overall survival (OS) of approximately 15 months. [11]Surgery plays a critical role in disease control, as the extent of resection (EOR) is one of the few modifiable prognostic factors. Traditionally, surgical resection is guided by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), primarily through gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1) and Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) T2-weighted sequences. Although there is no universally accepted definition of gross total resection (GTR), a near-complete removal (90-100%) of the contrast-enhancing tumor volume is associated with better outcomes. [5, 6]However, glioma cells frequently infiltrate areas beyond the contrast-enhanced margins, often extending into the FLAIR hyperintense region. Resection of these regions has been shown to confer a survival benefit, albeit at the potential cost of functional deficits, as FLAIR hyperintensity is non-specific and may also represent peritumoral edema. [1]This challenge has led to the exploration of additional imaging modalities, such as positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and hybrid imaging techniques, to improve glioma delineation.[4, 8] PET imaging, particularly using amino acid tracers such as 18F-DOPA, has emerged as a valuable tool for identifying the true biological extent of gliomas. Unlike 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), which lacks specificity in brain imaging, radiolabeled amino acids offer superior tumor-to-background contrast due to their selective uptake via the L-type amino acid transporters (LAT). [7]Molecular imaging with 18F-DOPA PET allows for the delineation of the so-called biological tumor volume (BTV), highlighting metabolically active and potentially more aggressive tumor regions. Importantly, the BTV frequently extends beyond the contrast-enhancing margins and, in some cases, may identify tumor areas not detected by FLAIR.[3, 10] Evidence supporting the oncological relevance of PET-guided resection is growing. Several studies have demonstrated that PET-defined tumor volumes correspond to regions of viable neoplastic tissue, and surgical resection of these hypercaptant areas has been associated with improved OS. [2]Among the various amino acid radiotracers available, 18F-DOPA has shown particular promise not only in assessing tumor grade and aggressiveness but also in monitoring treatment response and distinguishing true progression from treatment-related changes. [9] Preliminary data from the study initial cohort of 24 patients further support this approach. In a subset of 5 patients, histopathological analyses of different tissue samples confirmed that PET hypercaptant areas outside the contrast-enhancing tumor region harbored a high mitotic index and a significant neoplastic component. Notably, these areas exhibited a higher proliferation rate compared to regions identified solely through FLAIR imaging. These findings, presented at national and international neurosurgical conferences, reinforce the hypothesis that PET-guided resection may enhance oncological outcomes and warrant further investigation through a dedicated multicenter study.

This study seeks to validate the clinical utility of PET-guided glioma resection by comparing outcomes in patients undergoing PET-RM integrated surgery versus standard MRI-guided resection. The authors hypothesize that PET-guided resection will yield superior survival benefits, as it enables more selective yet extensive tumor removal, providing a more precise target for supramaximal resection refining the balance between oncological efficacy and functional preservation.

Objectives: The authors hypothesize that 18F-DOPA PET can provide a more reliable and achievable surgical target than FLAIR hyperintensity in supramaximal resection, as it may differentiate infiltrative tumor tissue from peritumoral edema. Since PET-defined tumor volumes are larger than contrast-enhancing regions but smaller than FLAIR hyperintensity, PET-guided resection could optimize the balance between maximal tumor removal and functional preservation, enhancing the maximal safe resection approach.

Furthermore, the authors hypothesize-supported by the study preliminary data-that PET hypercaptant areas beyond the contrast-enhancing tumor harbor viable tumor cells and should be considered a biologically relevant resection target.

The main objectives of the present study are:

  1. To evaluate the impact of 18F-DOPA PET-guided resection on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to conventional MRI-guided resection.
  2. To validate the biological significance of PET hypercaptant areas through histopathological correlation, confirming the presence of neoplastic cells in PET-positive regions beyond contrast enhancement.
  3. To analyze the correlation between PET parameters and molecular markers to improve glioma characterization and surgical planning

This study is a multicenter, prospective, non-randomized trial conducted at IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (Genoa) and AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza (Turin). Patients with newly diagnosed, supratentorial high-grade gliomas will be enrolled and undergo preoperative 18F-DOPA PET and MRI. The aim is to compare outcomes between patients undergoing PET-guided resection and those receiving conventional MRI-guided resection.

Methods and study design The study population includes adult patients diagnosed with high-grade glioma, located supratentorially and eligible for surgical resection. Inclusion criteria consist of age ≥18 years, have a high-grade glioma (WHO grade III/IV) diagnosed on MRI as assessed by the neurosurgeon, and provide written informed consent. Exclusion criteria include tumors located in the cerebellum, brainstem, or midline. Patients with medical conditions precluding MRI, such as those with a pacemaker, are not eligible. Other exclusion criteria include the inability to provide written informed consent, secondary high-grade gliomas resulting from malignant transformation of a low-grade glioma, and a second primary malignancy within the past five years. Eligible patients are scheduled for a preoperative 18F-DOPA PET scan within one week prior to surgery. PET and MRI images are co-registered using neuronavigation systems to optimize surgical planning. Neurosurgical resections are performed with a maximal safe resection approach, prioritizing function preservation. In the neurosurgical procedure, tumor samples are collected from five distinct areas: contrast-enhancing, PET-positive, FLAIR-positive, PET-only, and MRI-negative regions. These tissue samples undergo histopathological and molecular characterization to validate PET-defined tumor infiltration. Five different areas are considered: a) CE area (inside both PET and FLAIR volumes); b) n-CE areas (PET+ and FLAIR+); c) only-PET+; d) only-FLAIR+; e) not evident MRI disease. An experienced pathologist evaluates these samples blindly, analyzing: 1) neoplastic component (%), 2) necrosis (%), 3) mitosis (10/high power field), 4) vascular proliferation (absent, focal, or diffuse), 5) infiltrative component (%), and 6) normal/reactive component (%). After surgery, patients will be categorized into two groups based on the extent of PET-guided resection: those in whom the entire PET-positive tumor volume has been removed and those with residual PET-positive tissue. Postoperative assessment includes MRI at 48 hours to evaluate the extent of resection (EOR) according to RANO criteria and 18F-DOPA PET at 30 ±7 days to determine residual metabolic tumor activity.Longitudinal follow-up is conducted, tracking progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) through neuro-oncology teams at both centers.

Imaging Protocol MRI data will be acquired using a 3 Tesla Siemens Prisma scanner with an advanced imaging protocol, including T1, T2, FLAIR, DTI, DSC, and DCE sequences. For each patient, relative cerebral blood volume (CBV) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-derived metrics will be evaluated across clinical outcome groups. The dataset will include standard deviations and medians of these parameters, categorized by tumor diagnosis and molecular subtypes. Log-rank tests will evaluate the association between rCBV, ADC metrics, and PFS. The extent of resection (EOR) will be quantified using volumetric analysis according to RANO criteria. PET imaging will be conducted on a Siemens Biograph 16 PET-CT scanner, with 18F-DOPA injected 15 minutes before a static 90-minute scan. The collected data will be analyzed using semi-quantitative and dynamic approaches. PET images will be co-registered with MRI using intraoperative neuronavigation systems (Brainlab AG or Medtronic S8 StealthStation). A low-dose CT scan will be used for attenuation correction.

Muldisciplinary collaboration The study relies on close collaboration between specialists. Nuclear medicine experts will oversee PET acquisition and interpretation, ensuring accurate metabolic tumor delineation. Neuroradiologists will analyze MRI data, quantify tumor volumes, and perform PET/MRI co-registration. Neurosurgeons will integrate PET findings into their surgical strategy, aiming to maximize resection while preserving neurological function. Neuropathologists will examine tumor samples to confirm the correlation between PET findings and histological tumor infiltration. Neuro-oncologists will manage patient follow-up, recording survival outcomes and treatment responses, contributing to the overall evaluation of the impact of PET-guided surgery on glioma management.

Data Analysis Statistical analysis involves Kaplan-Meier survival curves to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Additionally, multivariate regression models will identify independent prognostic factors, considering variables such as age, tumor location, molecular subtypes, and EOR. Sample size calculation is based on the prevalence of high-grade gliomas in the participating centers, with a target enrollment of at least 100 patients, evenly distributed between the two groups. Histopathological analysis will include assessments of neoplastic density, necrosis, mitotic count, and vascular proliferation. Pearson's chi-square test will be used for categorical variables, while a Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test or Fisher's Exact test will be applied for numerical variables. A paired sample Student's t-test will compare numerical variables between samples.

Work Plan and Timeline The study spans four years and is divided into sequential phases. Phase 1 (Months 0-6) focused on study preparation, including ethical approvals, imaging and surgical protocol development, staff training, and PET/MRI integration into neuronavigation workflows.

Phase 2 (Months 7-30) is ongoing, with active patient recruitment at both centers. Eligible patients undergo preoperative PET and MRI, followed by surgery based on their assigned strategy. Postoperative imaging and clinical follow-up monitor disease progression and survival outcomes.

Phase 3 (Months 31-42) will involve data analysis and evaluation. Survival outcomes, PET parameters, molecular markers, and histopathological findings will be analyzed, with subgroup assessments to refine prognostic factors.

Phase 4 (Months 43-48) will focus on disseminating results through presentations at major conferences and publications in peer-reviewed journals.

Keywords
glioma, glioblastoma, PET
Medical subject headings
Glioblastoma, Glioma

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Survival

    Time from surgical resection to death from any cause

    Measured: From date of surgery until the date of death from any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to 60 months.

  2. Progression Free Survival

    Time from surgical resection to first documented disease progression (assessed by MRI according to RANO 2.0 criteria) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first

    Measured: From date of surgery until the date of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to 60 months.

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Histopathological Correlation of PET Hypercaptant Areas

    Proportion of PET-positive regions beyond contrast enhancement that contain viable neoplastic cells on histopathological examination

    Measured: At time of surgical resection (Day 0)

  2. Extent of Resection

    Percentage of tumor volume resected, comparing PET-defined tumor volume versus MRI-defined tumor volume (contrast-enhancing and FLAIR hyperintensity)

    Measured: Within 72 hours and 30 days post-surgery (postoperative MRI and PET)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 May 2026
  2. Study start1 Apr 2022
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07567196
Sponsor's protocol ID
698.050
Acronym
ResPGlioma
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
21 Apr 2026
Last updated
5 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual participant data will be shared along with the study protocol and statistical analysis plan. Data will become available beginning 6 months after publication and will remain accessible for 5 years. Access will be granted to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for meta-analysis or validation studies. Proposals should be directed to andrea.bianconi@unige.it and data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement

Publications

  • De Marco R, Pesaresi A, Bianconi A, Zotta M, Deandreis D, Morana G, Zeppa P, Melcarne A, Garbossa D, Cofano F. A Systematic Review of Amino Acid PET Imaging in Adult-Type High-Grade Glioma Surgery: A Neurosurgeon's Perspective. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 23;15(1):90. doi: 10.3390/cancers15010090.

    PubMed 36612085
  • Law I, Albert NL, Arbizu J, Boellaard R, Drzezga A, Galldiks N, la Fougere C, Langen KJ, Lopci E, Lowe V, McConathy J, Quick HH, Sattler B, Schuster DM, Tonn JC, Weller M. Joint EANM/EANO/RANO practice guidelines/SNMMI procedure standards for imaging of gliomas using PET with radiolabelled amino acids and [18F]FDG: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Mar;46(3):540-557. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4207-9. Epub 2018 Dec 5.

    PubMed 30519867
  • Karschnia P, Gerritsen JKW, Teske N, Cahill DP, Jakola AS, van den Bent M, Weller M, Schnell O, Vik-Mo EO, Thon N, Vincent AJPE, Kim MM, Reifenberger G, Chang SM, Hervey-Jumper SL, Berger MS, Tonn JC. The oncological role of resection in newly diagnosed diffuse adult-type glioma defined by the WHO 2021 classification: a Review by the RANO resect group. Lancet Oncol. 2024 Sep;25(9):e404-e419. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00130-X.

    PubMed 39214112
  • Haddad AF, Young JS, Morshed RA, Berger MS. FLAIRectomy: Resecting beyond the Contrast Margin for Glioblastoma. Brain Sci. 2022 Apr 25;12(5):544. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12050544.

    PubMed 35624931
  • Galldiks N, Kaufmann TJ, Vollmuth P, Lohmann P, Smits M, Veronesi MC, Langen KJ, Ruda R, Albert NL, Hattingen E, Law I, Hutterer M, Soffietti R, Vogelbaum MA, Wen PY, Weller M, Tonn JC. Challenges, limitations, and pitfalls of PET and advanced MRI in patients with brain tumors: A report of the PET/RANO group. Neuro Oncol. 2024 Jul 5;26(7):1181-1194. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noae049.

    PubMed 38466087

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Glioma Glioblastoma Multiforme and Glioma, High Grade, run by Universita degli Studi di Genova at 2 sites in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Andrea Bianconi, MD (+393475805577, andrea.bianconi@unige.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall Survival (time frame: From date of surgery until the date of death from any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to 60 months.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07567196, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 May 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in