AzTrials
AzTrials

Oral HealthNCT07611292

Periodontal Biocompatibility of Pediatric Crowns

An observational study of Oral Health and Pediatric Dentistry, run by Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Different full-coverage crown materials are widely used in pediatric dentistry for the restoration of primary teeth with extensive substance loss. Since these restorations remain in close contact with gingival tissues for prolonged periods, they may influence periodontal health depending on their surface… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 9 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Clinical periodontal assessments, GCF measurements and sample collection
How many people
21 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
30 Jun 2024to 20 Apr 2026
How long will I take part?
2 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 9 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Study population: children who applied for the dental treatment to the Faculty of Dentistry in Rize

Who may be able to join

  • Children who were aged between 6 and 9 years
  • Children had a score of 3 or 4 on the Frankl Behavioral Scale
  • Children had an indication for full coronal restoration in the primary second molars in all the three quadrants
  • Presence of extensive or chronic carious lesions involving the pulp with radiographic scores ranging between 2 and 3
  • Presence of localized hypoplastic defects
  • Normal or non-resorbed interproximal bone levels, defined radiographically as a distance of no more than 2 mm between the interdental bone crest and the cementoenamel junction
  • Those where the root resorption level was blunt or the apex was rounded, and those where 1/4 of the root has been resorbed

Who cannot join

  • Children had any systemic disease
  • History of allergy to local anesthetic agents, nickel, or resin-based restorative materials
  • Extremely poor oral hygiene
  • Periodontal disease
  • Malocclusion

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Sema Aydinoglu

    Rize

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Comparative Evaluation of Periodontal Biocompatibility of Pediatric Crowns Using Clinical Parameters and GCF Biomarkers

Different full-coverage crown materials are widely used in pediatric dentistry for the restoration of primary teeth with extensive substance loss. Since these restorations remain in close contact with gingival tissues for prolonged periods, they may influence periodontal health depending on their surface characteristics, marginal adaptation, and biological properties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of stainless steel crowns (SSC), prefabricated zirconia crowns (PZC), and fiber-glass crowns (FGC) on periodontal health in children using both clinical periodontal parameters and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) biomarkers, including IL-1β and MMP-8, within a split-mouth study design.

Being tested
Clinical periodontal assessments, GCF measurements and sample collection
Keywords
oral health, pediatric dentistry, periodontal health

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Clinical periodontal assessments, GCF measurements and sample collectionOther

    Clinical periodontal assessments were carried out for all participants at baseline (T0), as well as during the third-month (T1) and sixth-month (T2) follow-up visits. The clinical periodontal status was assessed with the probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI).

    For each patient, GCF measurements and sample collection were performed at baseline (T0), as well as during the third-month (T1) and sixth-month (T2) visits. MMP-8 and IL-1β analyses were performed on GCF samples by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Study groups in NCT07611292
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1Teeth diagnosed with an indication for full coronal restoration and treated with stainless steel crown.
Receives: Other: Clinical periodontal assessments, GCF measurements and sample collection
Group 2Teeth diagnosed with an indication for full coronal restoration and treated with prefabricated zirconia crown.
Receives: Other: Clinical periodontal assessments, GCF measurements and sample collection
Group 3Teeth diagnosed with an indication for full coronal restoration and treated with fiber glass crown.
Receives: Other: Clinical periodontal assessments, GCF measurements and sample collection
Group 4Healthy primary molars (control group)
Receives: Other: Clinical periodontal assessments, GCF measurements and sample collection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. assessment of probing pocket depth (PPD)

    probing pocket depth (PPD) was measured the distance between the gingival margin and the deepest point of the sulcus. PPD was evaluated from six surfaces (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual/mesiopalatal, midlingual/midpalatal, and distolingual/distopalatal) of the teeth. The measurements were done utilizing a Williams periodontal probe.

    Measured: From beginning to the end of treatment at 6 months

  2. assessment of matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) level in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF)

    MMP-8 was performed on GCF samples by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the Medical Biochemistry Research and Application Laboratory of the Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Faculty of Medicine. Twenty-four hours before the assay procedure, the eppendorf tubes were removed from the deep freezer and allowed to thaw progressively at -20 °C followed by +4 °C. Prior to analysis, both the samples and assay reagents were equilibrated to room temperature (18-25 °C). Each GCF specimen was analyzed individually without combining the samples. The results were expressed in ng/mL (MMP-8).

    Measured: in the sixth month (after sample collection was complete)

  3. Assessment of bleeding on probing (BOP)

    Bleeding on probing (BOP) scores were obtained from four surfaces (mesial, distal, buccal, and palatal/lingual) of the primary second molars. The measurements were done utilizing a Williams periodontal probe.

    Measured: From beginning to the end of treatment at 6 months

  4. Assessment of plaque index (PI)

    Plaque index (PI) scores were obtained from four surfaces (mesial, distal, buccal, and palatal/lingual) of the primary second molars. The measurements were done utilizing a Williams periodontal probe.

    Measured: From beginning to the end of treatment at 6 months

  5. Assessment of Gingival index (GI)

    Gingival index (GI) scores were obtained from four surfaces (mesial, distal, buccal, and palatal/lingual) of the primary second molars. The measurements were done utilizing a Williams periodontal probe.

    Measured: From beginning to the end of treatment at 6 months

  6. Assessment of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) level in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF)

    In GCF samples taken from patients, IL-1β level was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according to the manufacturer's instructions at the Medical Biochemistry Research and Application Laboratory of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Faculty of Medicine. Twenty-four hours before the assay procedure, the eppendorf tubes were removed from the deep freezer and allowed to thaw progressively at -20 °C followed by +4 °C. Prior to analysis, both the samples and assay reagents were equilibrated to room temperature (18-25 °C). Each GCF specimen was analyzed individually without combining the samples. The results were expressed in pg/mL (IL-1β).

    Measured: in the sixth month (after sample collection was complete)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 May 2026
  2. Study start30 Jun 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2025
  4. Study completion20 Apr 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
21 participants (actual)
Target duration
2 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07611292
Sponsor's protocol ID
2024/05
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
14 May 2026
Last updated
28 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Aydinoglu S, Sakin Ulubay S, Yemenoglu H, Atak M, Kose O. Comparative evaluation of periodontal biocompatibility of pediatric crowns using clinical parameters and GCF biomarkers. BMC Oral Health. 2026 Aug 1;26(1):2119. doi: 10.1186/s12903-026-09482-1.

    PubMed 42947093

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Oral Health and Pediatric Dentistry, run by Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

assessment of probing pocket depth (PPD) (time frame: From beginning to the end of treatment at 6 months). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07611292, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in