Monkey PoxNCT07620600
Performance Evaluation of Mpox Molecular POC Diagnostics
An observational study of Monkey Pox, run by Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerland at 1 site in Uganda.
Trial summary
PP016 is a FIND-sponsored retrospective clinical performance study evaluating rapid molecular point-of-care (mPOC) tests for the detection of Mpox virus (MPXV) using archived lesion swab specimens collected in Uganda. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Monkey Pox
- What is being tested?
- MPOX IVD test
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUganda
- Study dates
- 18 Jun 2026to 31 Aug 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study population consists of archived skin lesion swabs specimens. These were previously collected from individuals suspected of mpox infection - confirmed by PCR as MPXV positive or negative - under research studies and/or public health surveillance protocols during past and ongoing mpox outbreaks and available in the selected clinical sites.
Who may be able to join
- Lesion swabs stored in VTM/UTM (non-inactivating)
- Aliquot with sufficient volume to run the reference PCR and at least one index test (≥2600 μL per pair reference-index tests: ideally at least 1400 μL for 3 index tests and 1200 μL for reference PCR, including 1 possible repeat per test)
- Available PCR result for specimen selection (i.e. confirmed MPXV positive or negative)
- Samples collected from 2020 onwards.
Who cannot join
- Unknown date of collection
- >3 freeze-thaw cycles of sample.
- Samples collected with expired swab collection devices or UTM/VTM
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Uganda1 site
National Health Laboratory Services, Central Public Health Laboratory
Kampala, Buganda Region
About this study
Official title: Clinical Performance Evaluation of Novel Rapid Molecular Point-of-care (POC) Diagnostics for Mpox Virus
PP016 is a FIND-sponsored retrospective clinical performance study evaluating rapid molecular point-of-care (mPOC) tests for the detection of Mpox virus (MPXV) using archived lesion swab specimens collected in Uganda. Conducted at the Central Public Health Laboratory (CPHL) in Kampala, the study compares up to three investigational assays-Genes2Me VZV-Q, KH Medical RADI-ONE Mpox, and SD Biosensor STANDARD M10 MPX/OPX-against the BioPerfectus laboratory PCR reference test. The primary objective is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of each assay for detecting MPXV in archived positive and negative samples, while secondary analyses assess performance by Ct value and viral clade. The study uses a blinded, non-interventional case-control design with de-identified specimens collected since 2020. Approximately 80 samples per device evaluation are included. PP016 was initiated in response to ongoing mpox outbreaks and the need for accurate decentralized diagnostics in low-resource settings. The study complies with ISO 20916, ICH-GCP principles where applicable, and Ugandan ethical and regulatory requirements, with findings expected to support future regulatory approvals and implementation of rapid mpox diagnostics in low- and middle-income countries
Read the detailed description
PP016 is a FIND-sponsored retrospective, non-interventional clinical performance evaluation study designed to assess the diagnostic accuracy and operational suitability of up to three rapid molecular point-of-care (mPOC) tests for the detection of Mpox virus (MPXV) using archived lesion swab specimens collected in Uganda. The study, titled "Clinical Performance Evaluation of Novel Rapid Molecular Point-of-Care Diagnostics for Mpox Virus," is being conducted at the Central Public Health Laboratory (CPHL) in Kampala, Uganda. The study was developed in response to the growing public health importance of mpox, particularly following the 2022 and 2024 WHO Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEICs), and the ongoing outbreaks affecting several African countries including Uganda, where thousands of confirmed cases have been reported. Because conventional laboratory PCR testing remains centralized and difficult to access in many low-resource or decentralized settings, the study aims to determine whether rapid molecular POC assays can provide accurate and scalable diagnostic alternatives to improve outbreak response, surveillance, patient management, and contact tracing. The study evaluates three investigational molecular diagnostic platforms: the VZV-Q Real-Time PCR Kit for OnePCR (Genes2Me, India), the RADI-ONE Mpox Detection Kit (KH Medical, South Korea), and the STANDARD M10 MPX/OPX assay (SD Biosensor, South Korea). Their performance is compared against the laboratory-based BioPerfectus Monkeypox Virus Real Time PCR Kit, which serves as the reference standard and is currently listed under the African Medicines Regulatory Harmonisation Emergency Use Listing for mpox diagnosis. The study uses archived lesion swab samples stored in viral or universal transport medium from suspected mpox cases collected since 2020 under routine surveillance or prior research activities. Eligible samples must have known PCR status, adequate volume for both reference and index testing, and acceptable storage conditions.
The primary objective is to determine the clinical sensitivity/positive percent agreement (PPA) and specificity/negative percent agreement (NPA) of each investigational assay relative to the reference PCR, while secondary objectives include assessing performance according to PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values as a proxy for viral load and evaluating potential differences in performance by circulating mpox virus clades if such information is available. Statistical analyses will use Wilson score confidence intervals, with subgroup analyses by age, sex, Ct value, and viral clade. The study follows a blinded case-control design in which specimens are de-identified, shuffled, relabeled with unique FIND study identifiers, and tested independently to minimize bias. Reference PCR testing is performed first to confirm specimen quality and classification before testing on the investigational devices. Invalid or inconclusive results are repeated once and documented according to predefined procedures. No patient recruitment or intervention occurs, and test results are not used for clinical management, making the study low risk from an ethical and safety perspective.
Data are collected using OpenClinica Enterprise Edition, a validated electronic data capture system with audit trails and secure cloud hosting. FIND oversees monitoring, quality assurance, operator training, and regulatory compliance throughout the study.
The study is funded by FIND with support from the Government of the Netherlands and is expected to generate independent evidence to support regulatory submissions, procurement decisions, WHO evaluation processes, and future implementation of rapid mpox diagnostics in low- and middle-income countries.
- Conditions
- Monkey Pox
- Being tested
- MPOX IVD test
- Medical subject headings
- Mpox, Monkeypox
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MPOX IVD testDiagnostic test
Each (negative and positive) sample will be tested on the standard of reference and the investigational IVD
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Positive samples | 50 confirmed MPXV-positive samples Receives: Diagnostic Test: MPOX IVD test | |
| Negative samples | 30 confirmed MPXV-negative samples Receives: Diagnostic Test: MPOX IVD test |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Point estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV respectively) with 95% confidence intervals.
Point estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV respectively) with 95% confidence intervals.
Measured: July-August 2026
Secondary outcomes (2)
Point estimates of sensitivity/PPA stratified by Ct values of the reference PCR test.
Point estimates of sensitivity/PPA stratified by Ct values of the reference PCR test.
Measured: July-August 2026
Point estimates of sensitivity/PPA and specificity/NPA with 95% confidence intervals stratified by virus clade.
Point estimates of sensitivity/PPA and specificity/NPA with 95% confidence intervals stratified by virus clade.
Measured: July-August 2026
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jun 2026
- Study start18 Jun 2026
- Primary completion31 Aug 2026
- Study completion31 Aug 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Monkey PoxStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07620600
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PP016
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 27 May 2026
- Last updated
- 4 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Performance Evaluation of Novel Rapid Molecular Point-of-care (POC) Diagnostics for Mpox Virus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07620600
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PP016
- Conditions
- Monkey Pox
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, SwitzerlandUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
PP016 is a FIND-sponsored retrospective clinical performance study evaluating rapid molecular point-of-care (mPOC) tests for the detection of Mpox virus (MPXV) using archived lesion swab specimens collected in Uganda. Conducted at the Central Public Health Laboratory (CPHL) in Kampala, the study compares up to three investigational assays-Genes2Me VZV-Q, KH Medical RADI-ONE Mpox, and SD Biosensor STANDARD M10 MPX/OPX-against the BioPerfectus laboratory PCR reference test. The primary objective is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of each assay for detecting MPXV in archived positive and negative samples, while secondary analyses assess performance by Ct value and viral clade. The study uses a blinded, non-interventional case-control design with de-identified specimens collected since 2020. Approximately 80 samples per device evaluation are included. PP016 was initiated in response to ongoing mpox outbreaks and the need for accurate decentralized diagnostics in low-resource settings. The study complies with ISO 20916, ICH-GCP principles where applicable, and Ugandan ethical and regulatory requirements, with findings expected to support future regulatory approvals and implementation of rapid mpox diagnostics in low- and middle-income countries
Detailed description
PP016 is a FIND-sponsored retrospective, non-interventional clinical performance evaluation study designed to assess the diagnostic accuracy and operational suitability of up to three rapid molecular point-of-care (mPOC) tests for the detection of Mpox virus (MPXV) using archived lesion swab specimens collected in Uganda. The study, titled "Clinical Performance Evaluation of Novel Rapid Molecular Point-of-Care Diagnostics for Mpox Virus," is being conducted at the Central Public Health Laboratory (CPHL) in Kampala, Uganda. The study was developed in response to the growing public health importance of mpox, particularly following the 2022 and 2024 WHO Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEICs), and the ongoing outbreaks affecting several African countries including Uganda, where thousands of confirmed cases have been reported. Because conventional laboratory PCR testing remains centralized and difficult to access in many low-resource or decentralized settings, the study aims to determine whether rapid molecular POC assays can provide accurate and scalable diagnostic alternatives to improve outbreak response, surveillance, patient management, and contact tracing. The study evaluates three investigational molecular diagnostic platforms: the VZV-Q Real-Time PCR Kit for OnePCR (Genes2Me, India), the RADI-ONE Mpox Detection Kit (KH Medical, South Korea), and the STANDARD M10 MPX/OPX assay (SD Biosensor, South Korea). Their performance is compared against the laboratory-based BioPerfectus Monkeypox Virus Real Time PCR Kit, which serves as the reference standard and is currently listed under the African Medicines Regulatory Harmonisation Emergency Use Listing for mpox diagnosis. The study uses archived lesion swab samples stored in viral or universal transport medium from suspected mpox cases collected since 2020 under routine surveillance or prior research activities. Eligible samples must have known PCR status, adequate volume for both reference and index testing, and acceptable storage conditions.
The primary objective is to determine the clinical sensitivity/positive percent agreement (PPA) and specificity/negative percent agreement (NPA) of each investigational assay relative to the reference PCR, while secondary objectives include assessing performance according to PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values as a proxy for viral load and evaluating potential differences in performance by circulating mpox virus clades if such information is available. Statistical analyses will use Wilson score confidence intervals, with subgroup analyses by age, sex, Ct value, and viral clade. The study follows a blinded case-control design in which specimens are de-identified, shuffled, relabeled with unique FIND study identifiers, and tested independently to minimize bias. Reference PCR testing is performed first to confirm specimen quality and classification before testing on the investigational devices. Invalid or inconclusive results are repeated once and documented according to predefined procedures. No patient recruitment or intervention occurs, and test results are not used for clinical management, making the study low risk from an ethical and safety perspective.
Data are collected using OpenClinica Enterprise Edition, a validated electronic data capture system with audit trails and secure cloud hosting. FIND oversees monitoring, quality assurance, operator training, and regulatory compliance throughout the study.
The study is funded by FIND with support from the Government of the Netherlands and is expected to generate independent evidence to support regulatory submissions, procurement decisions, WHO evaluation processes, and future implementation of rapid mpox diagnostics in low- and middle-income countries.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Positive samples | – | Diagnostic Test: MPOX IVD test50 confirmed MPXV-positive samples |
| Negative samples | – | Diagnostic Test: MPOX IVD test30 confirmed MPXV-negative samples |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study population consists of archived skin lesion swabs specimens. These were previously collected from individuals suspected of mpox infection - confirmed by PCR as MPXV positive or negative - under research studies and/or public health surveillance protocols during past and ongoing mpox outbreaks and available in the selected clinical sites.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Lesion swabs stored in VTM/UTM (non-inactivating)
- Aliquot with sufficient volume to run the reference PCR and at least one index test (≥2600 μL per pair reference-index tests: ideally at least 1400 μL for 3 index tests and 1200 μL for reference PCR, including 1 possible repeat per test)
- Available PCR result for specimen selection (i.e. confirmed MPXV positive or negative)
- Samples collected from 2020 onwards.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Unknown date of collection
- >3 freeze-thaw cycles of sample.
- Samples collected with expired swab collection devices or UTM/VTM
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MPOX IVD testEach (negative and positive) sample will be tested on the standard of reference and the investigational IVD | Diagnostic test | Negative samples, Positive samples |
Primary outcome
Point estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV respectively) with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: July-August 2026
Point estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV respectively) with 95% confidence intervals.
2 secondary outcomes
Point estimates of sensitivity/PPA stratified by Ct values of the reference PCR test.
Time frame: July-August 2026
Point estimates of sensitivity/PPA and specificity/NPA with 95% confidence intervals stratified by virus clade.
Time frame: July-August 2026
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Sep 2026.
Related trials for Monkey Pox
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Clinical Trial Evaluating the Monkeypox Recombinant Protein Vaccine
Health Volunteer
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of LC16m8 Mpox Vaccine in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
Mpox (Monkeypox), Mpox
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
New York City Observational Study of Mpox Immunity
Monkeypox, Mpox
Enrolling by invitation
Smart Analysis and Decision-Making for Emerging Infectious Diseases
Emerging Infectious Diseases, COVID-19
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Smallpox Vaccine for Mpox Post-Exposure Prophylaxis: A Cluster RCT
Monkeypox
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Monkey Pox, run by Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerland at 1 site in Uganda.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Uganda. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Point estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV respectively) with 95% confidence intervals. (time frame: July-August 2026). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2026.