Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)SaBrILDNCT07627594
Safety of Bronchoscopy in Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease
An observational study of Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) and Bronchoscopy, run by University of Milan at 11 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Bronchoscopy is an essential technique, routinely used in the differential diagnosis workup of many Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILDs) and in referral centres is a common procedure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD), Bronchoscopy, Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL)
- How many people
- 427 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2026to 30 May 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients ≥18 years old with interstitial lung disease who need to undergo bronchoscopy for diagnostic purposes, at the time of the first diagnosis or during follow-up (included in the work-up of an acute exacerbation). During the study period, individual patients may undergo more than one bronchoscopic procedure (e.g., for initial diagnostic purposes or for subsequent clinical indications such as disease exacerbation). Therefore, each procedure will be considered as a separate observation for safety analysis.
Who may be able to join
- Consecutive adult (≥18 years old) patients with suspected or confirmed ILD who need to undergo bronchoscopy as part of their routine clinical practice,
- Patients able to understand and sign an informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients who refused the study partecipation;
- Patients with contraindications to bronchoscopy
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 2 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
11 sites in 2 countries
Italy10 sites
Respiratory Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria IRCCS Policlinico di Sant'Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
Bologna, 38050
Piero Candoli, MD, +390512144649, piero.candoli@aosp.bo.it
Piero Candoli, MD
Unit of Pneumology, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, Genoa, Italy
Genova, 16132
Emanuela Barisione, MD, +390105555801, emanuela.barisione@aomliguria.it)
Emanuela Barisione, MD
Respiratory Unit - Legnano Hospital, ASST Ovest Milanese
Legnano, 20025
Paolo Carlucci, MD, +390331449926, paolo.carlucci@asst-ovestmi.it
Paolo Carlucci, MD
Pulmonology Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo. Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan (Italy), Milano, Lombardia 20142
Milan, Lombardy, 20162
Jacopo Cefalo, MD, +390281843025, jacopo.cefalo@asst-santipaolocarlo.it
Marta Italia, MD, +390281843025, marta.italia@unimi.it
Division of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Polo Universitario, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco
Milan, 20157
Pierachille Santus, MD, Professor, +390239042875, pierachille.santus@unimi.it
Pierachille Santus, MD, Professor
Respiratory Unit - Center for Rare Lung Disease - Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
Modena, 41124
Stefania Cerri, MD, Professor, +390594225335, stefycerri@unimore.it
Stefania Cerri, MD, Professor
Respiratory Unit - IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori Foundation, Monza
Monza, 20900
Fabrizio Luppi, MD, Professor, +390392339040, fabrizio.luppi@unimib.it
Fabrizio Luppi, MD, Professor
Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Department of Pulmonology, Oncology and Hematology, Antonio Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy
Naples, 80131
Nadia Corcione, MD, +390817473391, nadia.corcione@gmail.com
Nadia Corcione, MD
Unit of Respiratory Medicine "L. Vanvitelli", A.O. dei Colli, Monaldi Hospital, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
Naples, 80138
Fabio Perrotta, MD, Professor, +393288238978, fabio.perrotta@unicampania.it
Fabio Perrotta, MD, Professor
Respiratory Unit, Santa Maria alle Scotte University Hospital, Siena
Siena, 53100
Paolo Cameli, MD, Professor, +390577235555, paolo.cameli@unisi.it
Paolo Cameli, MD, Professor
France1 site
- Service de Pneumologie Allergologie et Transplantation, Centre Constitutif du Centre de Référence des Maladies Pulmonaires Rares, FHU INFIRE, Paris, France
Paris, 75877
Bruno Crestani, MD, Professor, +330140256800, bruno.crestani@aphp.fr
Bruno Crestani, MD, Professor
About this study
Official title: Safety of Bronchoscopy in Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease: A Prospective, Observational, Multicentre, International Study
Bronchoscopy is an essential technique, routinely used in the differential diagnosis workup of many Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILDs) and in referral centres is a common procedure. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), bronchial and transbronchial biopsies with forceps and cryoprobes, and lymph node sampling with endosonography represent the most used sampling techniques in these patients. However, patients with ILDs refer to medical attention in a wide range of clinical conditions from mild functional impairment, with absent or few respiratory symptoms, to severe lung involvement with low exercise tolerance and/or chronic respiratory failure. In these patients, a balance between benefits and risk, i.e. to the safety and diagnostic utility of bronchoscopy should be always carefully evaluated. Moreover, there is a wide variability in adverse events entity and frequency depending by procedures performed during bronchoscopy.
Despite its crucial utility, only few data are available in the literature on the safety of bronchoscopy in patients with ILDs and limited data on the utility and safety of this sampling technique are present in patients with AE-ILDs.
The primary aim of this study is to assess the overall rate of complications occurring within 24 hours after bronchoscopy. Study rate and type of complications occurring during the endoscopic procedure, within 30 days after bronchoscopy, in patients with AE-ILDs, among fibrotic Vs non-fibrotic ILD, and according to each employed sampling technique will be also recorded.
- Conditions
- Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD), Bronchoscopy, Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL), Acute Exacerbation, Cryobiopsy, Transbronchial Biopsy
- Keywords
- ILD, BAL, acute exacerbation, cryobiopsy, transbronchial biopsy, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary fibrosis
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Diseases, Interstitial, Pulmonary Fibrosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients ≥18 years old with ILD who need to undergo bronchoscopy for diagnostic purpose | Patients ≥18 years old with interstitial lung disease who need to undergo bronchoscopy for diagnostic purposes, at the time of the first diagnosis or during follow-up (included in the work-up of an acute exacerbation). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall rate of complications occurring 30 days after bronchoscopy in patients with ILDs
To assess the overall rate of complications occurring 30 days after bronchoscopy in patients with Interstitial Lung Diseases undergoing the endoscopic examination for diagnostic purposes, at the time of the first diagnosis or during follow-up (included in the work-up of an acute exacerbation).
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (17)
Rate and type of complications occurring during a single sampling technique or techniques combination (e.g. bronchoscopy with BAL and TBLB)
Evaluation of the incidence and type of complications associated with individual or combined bronchoscopic sampling techniques performed during the same examination, (e.g. bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) combined with transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB)). The analysis aims to determine whether the use of multiple sampling procedures during a single bronchoscopic session is associated with a different safety profile compared with standalone techniques.
Measured: 30 days
Rate and type of complications occurring within 24 hours after bronchoscopy
Compications will be assessed for single sampling technique or combination of different techniques
Measured: 24 hours
Rate and type of complications occurring during the endoscopic procedure, within 24 hours and 30 days after bronchoscopy, at the time of the first ILD diagnosis Vs. during the follow-up
Assessment of the incidence, timing, and nature of complications occurring during bronchoscopy, within the first 24 hours, and up to 30 days after the procedure, comparing patients undergoing bronchoscopy at the time of initial ILD diagnosis with those undergoing the procedure during disease follow-up. The analysis aims to evaluate whether the clinical context and stage of disease management influence the safety profile of bronchoscopic procedures in ILD patients.
Measured: Within 24 hours and at 30 days
Rate and type of complications occurring during the endoscopic procedure, within 24 hours and 30 days after bronchoscopy in case of suspected/diagnosed AE.
Assessment of the incidence, timing, and type of complications occurring during bronchoscopy, within the first 24 hours, and up to 30 days after the procedure in patients undergoing endoscopic evaluation for suspected or confirmed acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD). This analysis aims to investigate the safety profile of bronchoscopy in the setting of acute respiratory deterioration, a clinical condition often associated with increased frailty and higher risk of adverse events.
Measured: Within 24 hours and at 30 days
Comparison of rate and type of complications among non-exacerbated fibrotic Vs. non-fibrotic ILDs
Comparison of the incidence and type of bronchoscopy-related complications between patients with non-exacerbated fibrotic ILDs and those with non-fibrotic ILDs, in order to evaluate whether the underlying radiological and pathological pattern of interstitial lung disease may influence the safety profile of endoscopic procedures.
Measured: 30 days
Difference in rate and type of complications analysed for single sampling technique using as severity scale The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v6.0 (MedDRA 28.0)
Comparison of the incidence and severity of complications according to the specific bronchoscopic sampling technique performed, in order to evaluate the safety profile associated with each individual diagnostic procedure. Severity of complications will be assessed using The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v6.0 (MedDRA 28.0).
Measured: 30 days
Rate and type of complications related to the respiratory support and type of sedation
Evaluation of the incidence and type of bronchoscopy-related complications according to the modality of respiratory support administered during the procedure, including low-flow oxygen therapy, high-flow nasal cannulas, Venturi mask, non-invasive ventilation, and invasive mechanical ventilation, as well as according to the type of sedation or anaesthesia employed, including conscious sedation, deep sedation, and general anaesthesia. This analysis aims to investigate the potential impact of ventilatory support and sedation strategies on procedural safety in patients with ILD.
Measured: 30 days
Overall complications rate in patients <80 years old Vs ≥80 years old
Comparison of the overall rate of bronchoscopy-related complications between patients younger than 80 years and those aged 80 years or older, in order to assess the impact of advanced age on the safety of endoscopic procedures in ILD patients.
Measured: 30 days
Comparison of complications rate between patients with and without chronic respiratory failure with ILD who underwent bronchoscopy
Comparison of the incidence of bronchoscopy-related complications between patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) with chronic respiratory failure and those without chronic respiratory failure, in order to evaluate whether the presence of long-standing ventilatory impairment is associated with an increased procedural risk and a different safety profile of endoscopic techniques.
Measured: 30 days
Comparison of complications rate between patients with FVC <80% and ≥80% of predicted value
Comparison of the incidence of bronchoscopy-related complications between patients with interstitial lung disease stratified according to forced vital capacity (FVC), comparing those with FVC <80% of the predicted value versus those with FVC ≥80%, in order to assess whether the degree of ventilatory functional impairment is associated with differences in procedural safety.
Measured: 30 days
Rate and type of complications occurring during the endoscopic procedure when used for therapeutic purposes in patients with ILD
Assessment of the incidence, timing, and nature of complications occurring during bronchoscopy when performed for therapeutic purposes in patients with interstitial lung disease, in order to characterize the safety profile of interventional endoscopic procedures in this specific clinical setting.
Measured: 30 days
Need for respiratory support escalation following bronchoscopy
Evaluation of the need for escalation of respiratory support following bronchoscopy in patients with interstitial lung disease, including progression from baseline oxygen supplementation or ventilatory assistance to more intensive modalities.
Measured: 30 days
Diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy in patients with ILD (i.e. number of patients for whom bronchoscopy has provided a definite diagnosis of specific ILD or alternative diagnosis).
Evaluation of the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy in patients with interstitial lung disease, defined as the proportion of cases in which the procedure leads to a definitive diagnosis, either confirming a specific ILD subtype or identifying alternative clinically relevant conditions such as lower respiratory tract infection or malignancy. This outcome aims to quantify the overall diagnostic effectiveness of bronchoscopic evaluation in this patient population.
Measured: 30 days
Comparison of complications rate between patients with Eastern Cooperative Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) <2 and ≥2
Comparison of the incidence of bronchoscopy-related complications between patients with interstitial lung disease stratified according to functional performance status, specifically between those with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) <2 and those with ECOG-PS ≥2, in order to assess whether a poorer baseline functional status is associated with an increased procedural risk and a different safety profile of bronchoscopy.
The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) is a standardized clinical scale used to assess a patient's functional status, level of independence, and ability to perform activities of daily living. It is widely employed in cancer clinical practice and research to evaluate prognosis, treatment eligibility, tolerance to systemic therapy, and overall disease burden.
The ECOG-PS scale ranges from 0 to 5, with increasing scores indicating progressive functional impairment.
Measured: 30 days
30-day hospitalization rate after bronchoscopy
Assessment of hospitalization rate following bronchoscopy in patients with interstitial lung disease, in order to evaluate short-term post-procedural clinical outcomes and overall safety of the endoscopic procedure in this population.
Measured: 30 days
Regression logistic analysis of the main clinical, demographic, functional, radiological and procedural variables potentially related to the presence of complications.
Assessment of the main clinical, demographic, functional, radiological, and procedural characteristics associated with the occurrence of bronchoscopy-related complications in patients with interstitial lung disease through univariate and multivariate analysis, aiming to identify potential factors that may be linked to an increased risk of adverse events.
Measured: 30 days
30 days mortality rate after bronchoscopy
Assessment of 30-days mortality rate following bronchoscopy in patients with interstitial lung disease, in order to evaluate short-term post-procedural clinical outcomes and overall safety of the endoscopic procedure in this population.
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jun 2026
- Study start1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 May 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion30 May 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 427 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Milan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michele Mondoni, University of Milan
- Investigators
- Michele Mondoni, MD, Principal investigator, University of Milan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07627594
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SaBrILD
- Acronym
- SaBrILD
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 15 May 2026
- Last updated
- 4 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Safety of Bronchoscopy in Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease: A Prospective, Observational, Multicentre, International Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07627594
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SaBrILD / SaBrILD
- Conditions
- Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD), Bronchoscopy, Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL), Acute Exacerbation, Cryobiopsy, Transbronchial Biopsy
- Keywords
- ILD, BAL, acute exacerbation, cryobiopsy, transbronchial biopsy, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary fibrosis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 427 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MilanUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 May 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Bronchoscopy is an essential technique, routinely used in the differential diagnosis workup of many Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILDs) and in referral centres is a common procedure. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), bronchial and transbronchial biopsies with forceps and cryoprobes, and lymph node sampling with endosonography represent the most used sampling techniques in these patients. However, patients with ILDs refer to medical attention in a wide range of clinical conditions from mild functional impairment, with absent or few respiratory symptoms, to severe lung involvement with low exercise tolerance and/or chronic respiratory failure. In these patients, a balance between benefits and risk, i.e. to the safety and diagnostic utility of bronchoscopy should be always carefully evaluated. Moreover, there is a wide variability in adverse events entity and frequency depending by procedures performed during bronchoscopy.
Despite its crucial utility, only few data are available in the literature on the safety of bronchoscopy in patients with ILDs and limited data on the utility and safety of this sampling technique are present in patients with AE-ILDs.
The primary aim of this study is to assess the overall rate of complications occurring within 24 hours after bronchoscopy. Study rate and type of complications occurring during the endoscopic procedure, within 30 days after bronchoscopy, in patients with AE-ILDs, among fibrotic Vs non-fibrotic ILD, and according to each employed sampling technique will be also recorded.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients ≥18 years old with ILD who need to undergo bronchoscopy for diagnostic purpose | – | –Patients ≥18 years old with interstitial lung disease who need to undergo bronchoscopy for diagnostic purposes, at the time of the first diagnosis or during follow-up (included in the work-up of an acute exacerbation). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients ≥18 years old with interstitial lung disease who need to undergo bronchoscopy for diagnostic purposes, at the time of the first diagnosis or during follow-up (included in the work-up of an acute exacerbation). During the study period, individual patients may undergo more than one bronchoscopic procedure (e.g., for initial diagnostic purposes or for subsequent clinical indications such as disease exacerbation). Therefore, each procedure will be considered as a separate observation for safety analysis.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Consecutive adult (≥18 years old) patients with suspected or confirmed ILD who need to undergo bronchoscopy as part of their routine clinical practice,
- Patients able to understand and sign an informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients who refused the study partecipation;
- Patients with contraindications to bronchoscopy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Overall rate of complications occurring 30 days after bronchoscopy in patients with ILDs
Time frame: 30 days
To assess the overall rate of complications occurring 30 days after bronchoscopy in patients with Interstitial Lung Diseases undergoing the endoscopic examination for diagnostic purposes, at the time of the first diagnosis or during follow-up (included in the work-up of an acute exacerbation).
17 secondary outcomes
Rate and type of complications occurring during a single sampling technique or techniques combination (e.g. bronchoscopy with BAL and TBLB)
Time frame: 30 days
Rate and type of complications occurring within 24 hours after bronchoscopy
Time frame: 24 hours
Rate and type of complications occurring during the endoscopic procedure, within 24 hours and 30 days after bronchoscopy, at the time of the first ILD diagnosis Vs. during the follow-up
Time frame: Within 24 hours and at 30 days
Rate and type of complications occurring during the endoscopic procedure, within 24 hours and 30 days after bronchoscopy in case of suspected/diagnosed AE.
Time frame: Within 24 hours and at 30 days
Comparison of rate and type of complications among non-exacerbated fibrotic Vs. non-fibrotic ILDs
Time frame: 30 days
Difference in rate and type of complications analysed for single sampling technique using as severity scale The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v6.0 (MedDRA 28.0)
Time frame: 30 days
Rate and type of complications related to the respiratory support and type of sedation
Time frame: 30 days
Overall complications rate in patients <80 years old Vs ≥80 years old
Time frame: 30 days
Comparison of complications rate between patients with and without chronic respiratory failure with ILD who underwent bronchoscopy
Time frame: 30 days
Comparison of complications rate between patients with FVC <80% and ≥80% of predicted value
Time frame: 30 days
Rate and type of complications occurring during the endoscopic procedure when used for therapeutic purposes in patients with ILD
Time frame: 30 days
Need for respiratory support escalation following bronchoscopy
Time frame: 30 days
Diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy in patients with ILD (i.e. number of patients for whom bronchoscopy has provided a definite diagnosis of specific ILD or alternative diagnosis).
Time frame: 30 days
Comparison of complications rate between patients with Eastern Cooperative Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) <2 and ≥2
Time frame: 30 days
30-day hospitalization rate after bronchoscopy
Time frame: 30 days
Regression logistic analysis of the main clinical, demographic, functional, radiological and procedural variables potentially related to the presence of complications.
Time frame: 30 days
30 days mortality rate after bronchoscopy
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)
RecruitingPhase 2
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of PIPE 791 in Subjects With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
RecruitingObservational study
Role of Genetic Factors in the Development of Lung Disease
Cystic Fibrosis, Pulmonary Fibrosis
RecruitingObservational study
Single-Cell Sequencing Analysis of Radiation Pneumonitis Signals In Patients Treated For Cancer With Radiotherapy
Radiation Pneumonitis
RecruitingPhase 2
Ambulatory Oxygen Therapy for Individuals With Mild-to-moderate Interstitial Lung Disease
Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Michele Mondoni, MD principal investigator
University of Milan
11 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) and Bronchoscopy, run by University of Milan at 11 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in Italy, France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Michele Mondoni, MD (+39 0281843025, michele.mondoni@unimi.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall rate of complications occurring 30 days after bronchoscopy in patients with ILDs (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2026.