Back PainPhase 4NCT07632820
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Trigger Point Injection for Chronic Thoracic Myofascial Pain
A Phase 4 study testing Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block with 0.5% Plain Bupivacaine and Trigger Point Injection (TPI) with 0.5% Plain Bupivacaine in people with Back Pain, run by Mayo Clinic at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Chronic thoracic (mid-back) pain can be difficult to treat, and there is limited evidence to guide the use of injection therapies for pain arising from muscles and surrounding soft tissues. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block with 0.5% Plain Bupivacaine and Trigger Point Injection (TPI) with 0.5% Plain Bupivacaine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 76 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 13 Aug 2026to 30 Aug 2029
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged 18-80 years
- Chronic thoracic myofascial pain lasting at least three months
- Pain intensity of ≥4 on 11-point NRS
- At least two of three following conditions: Focal thoracic paraspinal pain, palpable taut band, referred pain pattern with palpation
Who cannot join
- Thoracic radiculopathy
- Cervical myelopathy with neurological deficit
- Prior cervicothoracic spine surgery
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Contraindication to local anesthetic
- Active malignancy
Show all 14Show fewer
- Fibromyalgia
- BMI >40 kg/m2
- Workers' compensation or active litigation related to thoracic pain
- Acute herpes zoster or history of postherpetic neuralgia involving thoracic dermatomes
- Current opioid use >50 morphine milligram equivalents daily
- Severe psychiatric or cognitive disorders, specifically history of schizophrenia, chronic psychotic disorders, dementia
- History of substance use disorder
- Inability to provide informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites, 5 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Jay Karri, MD, 410-706-3100, jkarri@som.umaryland.edu
Jay Karri, MD
- Not yet recruiting
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Nasir Hussain, MD, 614-293-8000, nasir.hussain@osumc.edu
Nasir Hussain, MD
- Not yet recruiting
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Saba Javed, MD, 877-632-6789, sjaved@mdanderson.org
Saba Javed, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224
Eva Kubrova, MD, 904-956-2043, kubrova.eva@mayo.edu
Eva Kubrova, MD
- Recruiting
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Ryan D'Souza, MD, 507-284-9696, dsouza.ryan@mayo.edu
Ryan D'Souza, MD
About this study
Official title: Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block Versus Trigger Point Injection (TPI) for Chronic Thoracic Myofascial Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Chronic thoracic (mid-back) pain can be difficult to treat, and there is limited evidence to guide the use of injection therapies for pain arising from muscles and surrounding soft tissues. Two commonly used treatments are trigger point injections (TPI) and erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks, but no studies have directly compared their effectiveness for chronic thoracic myofascial pain. The purpose of this study is to compare pain relief, physical function, emotional well-being, patient satisfaction, and safety following treatment with either an ESP block or TPI. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two treatments. Researchers will follow participants for up to 12 weeks after the procedure and collect information through questionnaires and pain assessments.
- Conditions
- Back Pain
- Being tested
- Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block with 0.5% Plain Bupivacaine, Trigger Point Injection (TPI) with 0.5% Plain Bupivacaine
- Keywords
- thoracic back pain, myofascial pain, thoracic myofascial pain, Trigger point injection, Erector spinae plane block, TPI, ESP block
- Medical subject headings
- Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block with 0.5% Plain BupivacaineDrug
Participants will receive an ultrasound-guided thoracic erector spinae plane (ESP) block at the thoracic level corresponding to the location of maximal pain. Under ultrasound guidance, a 22-gauge needle will be advanced into the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the transverse process. Participants will receive 5 mL of 0.5% plain bupivacaine per side, with bilateral injections performed when clinically indicated for bilateral thoracic pain.
Trigger Point Injection (TPI) with 0.5% Plain BupivacaineDrug
Participants will receive ultrasound-guided trigger point injection(s) into the thoracic paraspinal musculature at the site(s) of maximal tenderness. Under ultrasound guidance, 0.5% plain bupivacaine will be injected in volumes of 1-2 mL per injection site, with a maximum total volume of 5 mL per side and up to five injection sites per laterality.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block | Experimental | Participants will receive an ultrasound-guided thoracic erector spinae plane (ESP) block at the thoracic level corresponding to the location of maximal pain. Under ultrasound guidance, a 22-gauge needle will be advanced into the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the transverse process. Participants will receive 5 mL of 0.5% plain bupivacaine per side, with bilateral injections performed when clinically indicated for bilateral thoracic pain. Receives: Drug: Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block with 0.5% Plain Bupivacaine |
| Trigger Point Injection (TPI) | Active comparator | Participants will receive ultrasound-guided trigger point injection(s) into the thoracic paraspinal musculature at the site(s) of maximal tenderness. Under ultrasound guidance, 0.5% plain bupivacaine will be injected in volumes of 1-2 mL per injection site, with a maximum total volume of 5 mL per side and up to five injection sites per laterality. Receives: Drug: Trigger Point Injection (TPI) with 0.5% Plain Bupivacaine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score
A Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain is a patient-reported item regarding the level of pain experienced and is measured on a Likert scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable".
Measured: baseline, 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (6)
Modified Oswestry Disability Index
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a validated 10-item questionnaire assessing functional limitations in daily activities across spinal disorders, with total scores ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate greater disability.
Measured: baseline, 6 weeks
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom burden.
Measured: baseline, 6 weeks
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
The PCS is a 13-item instrument measuring catastrophic thinking related to pain, with scores ranging from 0 to 52, and scores of 30 or higher indicating clinically significant levels of catastrophizing.
Measured: baseline, 6 weeks
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
The PGIC questionnaire is a 7-point Likert scale ranging from "very much worse" to "very much improved." This measure provides a global assessment of treatment benefit from the patient's perspective.
Measured: 6 weeks
Repeat Injections
This measure will assess the number of patients requiring repeat injection(s) within 12 weeks following the index procedure. Measurement: Binary outcome (yes/no), obtained via follow-up assessment of medical record review (no patient questionnaire).
Measured: 12 weeks
Adverse Events
We will assess the occurrence of procedure-related adverse events within 6 weeks following the index procedure. This will involve categorical recording of adverse events including but not limited to: injection site pain, hematoma, infection, vasovagal reaction, allergic reaction, pneumothorax, and new or worsening neurologic symptoms. All adverse events will be recorded and categorized according to severity and relatedness to the procedure.
Measured: Day 0 (procedure day), 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jun 2026
- Study start13 Aug 2026
- Primary completion1 Aug 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Aug 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mayo ClinicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Ohio State University, University of Maryland, Baltimore
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ryan S. D'Souza, Mayo Clinic
- Investigators
- Ryan D'Souza, MD, Principal investigator, Mayo Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07632820
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 26-004708
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 3 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 9 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block Versus Trigger Point Injection (TPI) for Chronic Thoracic Myofascial Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07632820
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 26-004708
- Conditions
- Back Pain
- Keywords
- thoracic back pain, myofascial pain, thoracic myofascial pain, Trigger point injection, Erector spinae plane block, TPI, ESP block
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Ohio State University, University of Maryland, Baltimore
- Study start
- 13 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic thoracic (mid-back) pain can be difficult to treat, and there is limited evidence to guide the use of injection therapies for pain arising from muscles and surrounding soft tissues. Two commonly used treatments are trigger point injections (TPI) and erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks, but no studies have directly compared their effectiveness for chronic thoracic myofascial pain. The purpose of this study is to compare pain relief, physical function, emotional well-being, patient satisfaction, and safety following treatment with either an ESP block or TPI. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two treatments. Researchers will follow participants for up to 12 weeks after the procedure and collect information through questionnaires and pain assessments.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block | Experimental | Drug: Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block with 0.5% Plain BupivacaineParticipants will receive an ultrasound-guided thoracic erector spinae plane (ESP) block at the thoracic level corresponding to the location of maximal pain. Under ultrasound guidance, a 22-gauge needle will be advanced into the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the transverse process. Participants will receive 5 mL of 0.5% plain bupivacaine per side, with bilateral injections performed when clinically indicated for bilateral thoracic pain. |
| Trigger Point Injection (TPI) | Active comparator | Drug: Trigger Point Injection (TPI) with 0.5% Plain BupivacaineParticipants will receive ultrasound-guided trigger point injection(s) into the thoracic paraspinal musculature at the site(s) of maximal tenderness. Under ultrasound guidance, 0.5% plain bupivacaine will be injected in volumes of 1-2 mL per injection site, with a maximum total volume of 5 mL per side and up to five injection sites per laterality. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adults aged 18-80 years
- Chronic thoracic myofascial pain lasting at least three months
- Pain intensity of ≥4 on 11-point NRS
- At least two of three following conditions: Focal thoracic paraspinal pain, palpable taut band, referred pain pattern with palpation
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Thoracic radiculopathy
- Cervical myelopathy with neurological deficit
- Prior cervicothoracic spine surgery
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Contraindication to local anesthetic
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block with 0.5% Plain BupivacaineParticipants will receive an ultrasound-guided thoracic erector spinae plane (ESP) block at the thoracic level corresponding to the location of maximal pain. Under ultrasound guidance, a 22-gauge needle will be advanced into the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the transverse process. Participants will receive 5 mL of 0.5% plain bupivacaine per side, with bilateral injections performed when clinically indicated for bilateral thoracic pain. | Drug | Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block |
| Trigger Point Injection (TPI) with 0.5% Plain BupivacaineParticipants will receive ultrasound-guided trigger point injection(s) into the thoracic paraspinal musculature at the site(s) of maximal tenderness. Under ultrasound guidance, 0.5% plain bupivacaine will be injected in volumes of 1-2 mL per injection site, with a maximum total volume of 5 mL per side and up to five injection sites per laterality. | Drug | Trigger Point Injection (TPI) |
Primary outcome
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score
Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks
A Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain is a patient-reported item regarding the level of pain experienced and is measured on a Likert scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable".
6 secondary outcomes
Modified Oswestry Disability Index
Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Repeat Injections
Time frame: 12 weeks
Adverse Events
Time frame: Day 0 (procedure day), 6 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Sep 2026.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Back Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Virtual Reality Exergames Versus Spinal Manipulation in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Chronic Nonspecific Low-back Pain, CNSLBP
Recruiting
Trans-arterial Embolization for the Treatment of Facet Pain Due to Facet Arthropathy
Facet Joint Arthropathy, Pain
Not yet recruiting
Radiofrequency and Pelvic Floor-Core Exercise for Chronic Low Back Pain in Women With Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
Chronic Low Back Pain, Urinary Incontinence
Not yet recruiting
ESP Versus SPSIP Block for Pain Relief After Shoulder Arthroscopy
Postoperative Pain
Recruiting
Meditation for Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain
Chronic Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Ryan D'Souza, MD principal investigator
Mayo Clinic
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block with 0.5% Plain Bupivacaine and Trigger Point Injection (TPI) with 0.5% Plain Bupivacaine in people with Back Pain, run by Mayo Clinic at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ryan D'Souza, MD (507-284-9696, dsouza.ryan@mayo.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score (time frame: baseline, 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2026.