Food InsecurityREVIVENCT07640594
Randomized Evaluation of Voucher Interventions for Value and Effectiveness (REVIVE) in Philippines
A study testing Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 3,000), Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 5,000) and Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 8,000) in people with Food Insecurity and Undernutrition, run by International Food Policy Research Institute at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study aims to evaluate whether revised food voucher programs, combined with nutrition education sessions, can improve food security, dietary quality, nutrition knowledge, and nutritional outcomes among low-income households in the Philippines. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 0 months to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Food Insecurity, Undernutrition, Diet Quality
- What is being tested?
- Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 3,000), Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 5,000) and Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 8,000)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5,320 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 29 Apr 2026to 30 Mar 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 0 months to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Households enrolled in the REVIVE study sample drawn from Listahanan 3-eligible low-income households
- Residency within selected study clusters in the study municipalities
- Household consent to participate in the study and all survey components
- Availability of a primary respondent (meal planner or primary food preparer) willing to participate in household interviews
- For individual dietary assessment components: presence of at least one woman of reproductive age (15-49 years) and/or at least one child under five years of age, where applicable
Who cannot join
- Households unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
- Households not residing within the designated study clusters at the time of baseline data collection
- Inability to complete core survey modules due to communication barriers or other conditions preventing reliable data collection
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Neha Kumar, PhD contact
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
International Food Policy Research Institute
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20006
Phuong Nguyen, 2028264088, p.h.nguyen@cgiar.org
About this study
This study aims to evaluate whether revised food voucher programs, combined with nutrition education sessions, can improve food security, dietary quality, nutrition knowledge, and nutritional outcomes among low-income households in the Philippines. Researchers will compare different monthly voucher amounts-Philippine Peso (PhP) 3,000, PhP 5,000, and PhP 8,000-with a no-voucher control group to determine which approach is most effective.
The main questions the study aims to answer are:
Read more
- Do food vouchers improve household food security, reduce hunger, and improve dietary quality and nutrient intake?
- Do larger voucher amounts lead to greater improvements in nutrition and health outcomes?
- Does enhanced nutrition education improve nutrition knowledge and healthy eating practices?
Participants will:
- Receive either a monthly food voucher or no voucher, depending on study group assignment
- Attend nutrition education and Social and Behavior Change Communication (SBCC) sessions if assigned to a voucher group
- Complete household interviews on food consumption, household expenditures, food security, and nutrition knowledge
- Participate in dietary assessments and anthropometric measurements for women and children under 5 years of age
Read the detailed description
The REVIVE study is a cluster-randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of revised food voucher interventions combined with nutrition-focused Social and Behavior Change Communication (SBCC) among low-income households in the Philippines. The study will compare three monthly voucher amounts (PhP 3,000, PhP 5,000, and PhP 8,000) with a control group receiving no voucher to assess whether larger voucher values lead to greater improvements in food security, dietary quality, and nutrition-related outcomes.
The intervention includes structured food vouchers with revised allocations emphasizing protein-rich foods, fruits, and vegetables, together with nutrition education sessions delivered by trained local government staff. The study will be implemented across selected urban and rural areas in the Philippines.
Researchers will collect household- and individual-level data through surveys, dietary assessments, and anthropometric measurements to examine the effects of the intervention on household food consumption, nutrition knowledge, food insecurity, dietary quality, and nutritional status among women of reproductive age and children under five years of age. The study will also assess potential spillover effects within participating communities.
- Conditions
- Food Insecurity, Undernutrition, Diet Quality, Nutrition Knowledge
- Being tested
- Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 3,000), Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 5,000), Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 8,000)
- Keywords
- Food Vouchers, Social and Behavior Change Communication, Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial, Philippines
- Medical subject headings
- Malnutrition
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 3,000)Behavioural
Households receive a monthly food voucher valued at PhP 3,000 with a structured allocation of 10% for carbohydrates and oils, 45% for protein-rich foods, and 45% for fruits and vegetables. Vouchers are redeemable continuously throughout the month. The intervention is combined with six structured social and behavior change communication (SBCC) sessions focused on nutrition knowledge, healthy dietary practices, maternal and child nutrition, and WASH behaviors, delivered by trained local government staff.
Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 5,000)Behavioural
Households receive a monthly food voucher valued at PhP 5,000 with the same allocation structure (10% carbohydrates and oils, 45% protein, 45% fruits and vegetables) and continuous redemption design. The voucher is paired with six SBCC sessions covering nutrition education and behavior change topics related to diet quality and household nutrition.
Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 8,000)Behavioural
Households receive a monthly food voucher valued at PhP 8,000 with the same structured food group allocation and continuous redemption system. The intervention includes six SBCC sessions aimed at improving nutrition knowledge and dietary practices for maternal and child health.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control: No Voucher | No intervention | Households in this arm do not receive food vouchers during the study period |
| Monthly Food Voucher - PhP 3,000 | Experimental | Households receive a monthly food voucher valued at PhP 3,000, structured with a 10% allocation for carbohydrates and oils, 45% for protein-rich foods, and 45% for fruits and vegetables. Vouchers can be redeemed continuously and are accompanied by six structured nutrition-focused social and behavior change communication (SBCC) sessions delivered by trained local government staff. Receives: Behavioral: Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 3,000) |
| Monthly Food Voucher - PhP 5,000 | Experimental | Households receive a monthly food voucher valued at PhP 5,000, with the same food group allocation (10% carbohydrates and oils, 45% protein, 45% fruits and vegetables) and continuous redemption design. Voucher receipt is combined with six SBCC sessions aimed at improving nutrition knowledge and dietary practices. Receives: Behavioral: Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 5,000) |
| Monthly Food Voucher - PhP 8,000 | Experimental | Households receive a monthly food voucher valued at PhP 8,000, structured with 10% allocation for carbohydrates and oils, 45% for protein, and 45% for fruits and vegetables, and redeemed continuously. The intervention is paired with six nutrition-focused SBCC sessions delivered by trained local government personnel to improve dietary behaviors and nutrition knowledge. Receives: Behavioral: Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 8,000) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Nutrition Knowledge
Composite measure of nutrition knowledge assessed using a structured questionnaire administered to the primary household meal planner. The instrument includes items on food groups, dietary diversity, micronutrient-rich foods, maternal and child feeding practices, and understanding of voucher allocation rules. A total score will be constructed by summing correct responses and standardizing across respondents. Subdomain scores (e.g., dietary diversity knowledge, micronutrient knowledge, child feeding knowledge) will also be analyzed.
Measured: Baseline and End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Individual Nutrient Adequacy
Summary measure of dietary nutrient adequacy among women of reproductive age and children under five years, derived from 24-hour dietary recall data. Probability of adequacy will be estimated for energy, macronutrients, and selected micronutrients (vitamin A, B-complex vitamins, vitamin C, calcium, iron, and zinc). The mean probability of adequacy will be calculated by averaging across 11 micronutrients.
Measured: End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women (MDD-W)
Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women (MDD-W), defined as the proportion of women of reproductive age who consume foods from at least 5 of 10 food groups during the previous 24 hours, based on a 24-hour dietary recall.
Measured: End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Global Dietary Quality Score (GDQS)
Global Dietary Quality Score (GDQS), a food-based metric derived from 24-hour dietary recall data that assesses overall dietary quality by accounting for consumption of both healthy and unhealthy food groups. GDQS ranges from 0 to 49, with higher scores indicating better dietary quality and lower risk of nutrient inadequacy and diet-related non-communicable diseases.
Measured: End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Hunger and Food Insecurity Experience Scale
Household food insecurity and hunger will be assessed using the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES), an experience-based measure consisting of eight questions about access to adequate food during the previous 4 weeks. The scale captures a range of food insecurity experiences, including worry about obtaining food, reduced dietary quality, reduced food quantity, skipping meals, and going without food.
The raw FIES score ranges from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating greater severity of food insecurity and hunger. Responses will be used to calculate both continuous FIES scores and categorical classifications of food insecurity severity.
Measured: Baseline and End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Household Food Consumption Score (FCS)
The Food Consumption Score (FCS) is a composite measure of household dietary diversity, food frequency, and relative nutritional importance of foods consumed. The FCS is calculated using a 7-day recall of household food consumption across standardized food groups. Consumption frequencies are weighted according to the nutritional value of each food group and summed to generate the total score.
The FCS ranges from 0 to 112, with higher scores indicating better household food consumption, greater dietary diversity, and improved food access. Lower scores indicate poorer food consumption patterns and greater vulnerability to food insecurity.
Measured: Baseline and endline (approximately 24 months after baseline survey)
Height-for-Age Z-score (HAZ) in Children Under Five Years of Age
Height-for-age z-score (HAZ) among children under five years of age, calculated using the World Health Organization (WHO) Child Growth Standards. HAZ is a standardized measure of linear growth relative to age and sex. HAZ values typically range from approximately -6 to +6, with higher values indicating better growth status. Children with HAZ < -2 standard deviations are classified as stunted.
Measured: End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Weight-for-Age Z-score (WAZ) in Children Under Five Years of Age
Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ) among children under five years of age, calculated using the World Health Organization (WHO) Child Growth Standards. WAZ is a standardized measure of body weight relative to age and sex. WAZ values typically range from approximately -6 to +6, with higher values indicating better nutritional status. Children with WAZ < -2 standard deviations are classified as underweight.
Measured: End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Weight-for-Height Z-score (WHZ) in Children Under Five Years of Age
Weight-for-height z-score (WHZ) among children under five years of age, calculated using the World Health Organization (WHO) Child Growth Standards. WHZ is a standardized measure of body weight relative to height. WHZ values typically range from approximately -5 to +5, with higher values indicating better nutritional status. Children with WHZ < -2 standard deviations are classified as wasted.
Measured: End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Body Mass Index (BMI) Among Women of Reproductive Age
Body mass index (BMI) among women of reproductive age, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m²). BMI is a continuous measure of nutritional status. Higher BMI values indicate greater body mass relative to height. Nutritional status categories (underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obesity) will be classified according to World Health Organization (WHO) standard cut-offs and Asian-specific cut-offs
Measured: End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Household Food and Non-food Expenditure
Total household food expenditure over a 4-week recall period, including food purchased, produced, received as transfers, and redeemed through food vouchers. Monthly-equivalent household expenditures on non-food categories including health, education, housing, utilities, transport, communication, clothing, durable goods, debt repayment, and other miscellaneous expenditures
Measured: Baseline and End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jun 2026
- Study start29 Apr 2026
- Primary completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Mar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Food InsecurityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study uses a cluster-randomized controlled trial design to evaluate the effectiveness of different food voucher amounts and nutrition education interventions among low-income households in the Philippines. Study clusters are randomly assigned to one of four groups: monthly food vouchers valued at PhP 3,000, PhP 5,000, or PhP 8,000, or a control group receiving no voucher. Voucher interventions are combined with nutrition-focused social and behavior change communication (SBCC) sessions delivered by trained local government staff. Outcomes will be compared across study groups to assess the effects of the interventions on food security, dietary quality, nutrition knowledge, and nutritional status.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5,320 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- International Food Policy Research Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Phuong Hong Nguyen, International Food Policy Research Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07640594
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NDH-26-0412
- Acronym
- REVIVE
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 18 May 2026
- Last updated
- 10 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data (IPD), including household survey data, dietary intake data, anthropometric measurements may be shared after completion of the study. Data sharing will be subject to approval from relevant Philippine government authorities and institutional data governance and ethics requirements. Only fully de-identified datasets will be shared.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Evaluation of Voucher Interventions for Value and Effectiveness (REVIVE) in Philippines
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07640594
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REVIVE / NDH-26-0412
- Conditions
- Food Insecurity, Undernutrition, Diet Quality, Nutrition Knowledge
- Keywords
- Food Vouchers, Social and Behavior Change Communication, Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial, Philippines
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 5,320 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- International Food Policy Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 29 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to evaluate whether revised food voucher programs, combined with nutrition education sessions, can improve food security, dietary quality, nutrition knowledge, and nutritional outcomes among low-income households in the Philippines. Researchers will compare different monthly voucher amounts-Philippine Peso (PhP) 3,000, PhP 5,000, and PhP 8,000-with a no-voucher control group to determine which approach is most effective.
The main questions the study aims to answer are:
- Do food vouchers improve household food security, reduce hunger, and improve dietary quality and nutrient intake?
- Do larger voucher amounts lead to greater improvements in nutrition and health outcomes?
- Does enhanced nutrition education improve nutrition knowledge and healthy eating practices?
Participants will:
- Receive either a monthly food voucher or no voucher, depending on study group assignment
- Attend nutrition education and Social and Behavior Change Communication (SBCC) sessions if assigned to a voucher group
- Complete household interviews on food consumption, household expenditures, food security, and nutrition knowledge
- Participate in dietary assessments and anthropometric measurements for women and children under 5 years of age
Detailed description
The REVIVE study is a cluster-randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of revised food voucher interventions combined with nutrition-focused Social and Behavior Change Communication (SBCC) among low-income households in the Philippines. The study will compare three monthly voucher amounts (PhP 3,000, PhP 5,000, and PhP 8,000) with a control group receiving no voucher to assess whether larger voucher values lead to greater improvements in food security, dietary quality, and nutrition-related outcomes.
The intervention includes structured food vouchers with revised allocations emphasizing protein-rich foods, fruits, and vegetables, together with nutrition education sessions delivered by trained local government staff. The study will be implemented across selected urban and rural areas in the Philippines.
Researchers will collect household- and individual-level data through surveys, dietary assessments, and anthropometric measurements to examine the effects of the intervention on household food consumption, nutrition knowledge, food insecurity, dietary quality, and nutritional status among women of reproductive age and children under five years of age. The study will also assess potential spillover effects within participating communities.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- This study uses a cluster-randomized controlled trial design to evaluate the effectiveness of different food voucher amounts and nutrition education interventions among low-income households in the Philippines. Study clusters are randomly assigned to one of four groups: monthly food vouchers valued at PhP 3,000, PhP 5,000, or PhP 8,000, or a control group receiving no voucher. Voucher interventions are combined with nutrition-focused social and behavior change communication (SBCC) sessions delivered by trained local government staff. Outcomes will be compared across study groups to assess the effects of the interventions on food security, dietary quality, nutrition knowledge, and nutritional status.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control: No Voucher | No intervention | –Households in this arm do not receive food vouchers during the study period |
| Monthly Food Voucher - PhP 3,000 | Experimental | Behavioral: Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 3,000)Households receive a monthly food voucher valued at PhP 3,000, structured with a 10% allocation for carbohydrates and oils, 45% for protein-rich foods, and 45% for fruits and vegetables. Vouchers can be redeemed continuously and are accompanied by six structured nutrition-focused social and behavior change communication (SBCC) sessions delivered by trained local government staff. |
| Monthly Food Voucher - PhP 5,000 | Experimental | Behavioral: Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 5,000)Households receive a monthly food voucher valued at PhP 5,000, with the same food group allocation (10% carbohydrates and oils, 45% protein, 45% fruits and vegetables) and continuous redemption design. Voucher receipt is combined with six SBCC sessions aimed at improving nutrition knowledge and dietary practices. |
| Monthly Food Voucher - PhP 8,000 | Experimental | Behavioral: Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 8,000)Households receive a monthly food voucher valued at PhP 8,000, structured with 10% allocation for carbohydrates and oils, 45% for protein, and 45% for fruits and vegetables, and redeemed continuously. The intervention is paired with six nutrition-focused SBCC sessions delivered by trained local government personnel to improve dietary behaviors and nutrition knowledge. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 0 months to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Households enrolled in the REVIVE study sample drawn from Listahanan 3-eligible low-income households
- Residency within selected study clusters in the study municipalities
- Household consent to participate in the study and all survey components
- Availability of a primary respondent (meal planner or primary food preparer) willing to participate in household interviews
- For individual dietary assessment components: presence of at least one woman of reproductive age (15-49 years) and/or at least one child under five years of age, where applicable
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Households unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
- Households not residing within the designated study clusters at the time of baseline data collection
- Inability to complete core survey modules due to communication barriers or other conditions preventing reliable data collection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 3,000)Households receive a monthly food voucher valued at PhP 3,000 with a structured allocation of 10% for carbohydrates and oils, 45% for protein-rich foods, and 45% for fruits and vegetables. Vouchers are redeemable continuously throughout the month. The intervention is combined with six structured social and behavior change communication (SBCC) sessions focused on nutrition knowledge, healthy dietary practices, maternal and child nutrition, and WASH behaviors, delivered by trained local government staff. | Behavioural | Monthly Food Voucher - PhP 3,000 |
| Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 5,000)Households receive a monthly food voucher valued at PhP 5,000 with the same allocation structure (10% carbohydrates and oils, 45% protein, 45% fruits and vegetables) and continuous redemption design. The voucher is paired with six SBCC sessions covering nutrition education and behavior change topics related to diet quality and household nutrition. | Behavioural | Monthly Food Voucher - PhP 5,000 |
| Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 8,000)Households receive a monthly food voucher valued at PhP 8,000 with the same structured food group allocation and continuous redemption system. The intervention includes six SBCC sessions aimed at improving nutrition knowledge and dietary practices for maternal and child health. | Behavioural | Monthly Food Voucher - PhP 8,000 |
Primary outcome
Nutrition Knowledge
Time frame: Baseline and End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Composite measure of nutrition knowledge assessed using a structured questionnaire administered to the primary household meal planner. The instrument includes items on food groups, dietary diversity, micronutrient-rich foods, maternal and child feeding practices, and understanding of voucher allocation rules. A total score will be constructed by summing correct responses and standardizing across respondents. Subdomain scores (e.g., dietary diversity knowledge, micronutrient knowledge, child feeding knowledge) will also be analyzed.
Individual Nutrient Adequacy
Time frame: End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Summary measure of dietary nutrient adequacy among women of reproductive age and children under five years, derived from 24-hour dietary recall data. Probability of adequacy will be estimated for energy, macronutrients, and selected micronutrients (vitamin A, B-complex vitamins, vitamin C, calcium, iron, and zinc). The mean probability of adequacy will be calculated by averaging across 11 micronutrients.
Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women (MDD-W)
Time frame: End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women (MDD-W), defined as the proportion of women of reproductive age who consume foods from at least 5 of 10 food groups during the previous 24 hours, based on a 24-hour dietary recall.
Global Dietary Quality Score (GDQS)
Time frame: End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Global Dietary Quality Score (GDQS), a food-based metric derived from 24-hour dietary recall data that assesses overall dietary quality by accounting for consumption of both healthy and unhealthy food groups. GDQS ranges from 0 to 49, with higher scores indicating better dietary quality and lower risk of nutrient inadequacy and diet-related non-communicable diseases.
Hunger and Food Insecurity Experience Scale
Time frame: Baseline and End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Household food insecurity and hunger will be assessed using the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES), an experience-based measure consisting of eight questions about access to adequate food during the previous 4 weeks. The scale captures a range of food insecurity experiences, including worry about obtaining food, reduced dietary quality, reduced food quantity, skipping meals, and going without food. The raw FIES score ranges from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating greater severity of food insecurity and hunger. Responses will be used to calculate both continuous FIES scores and categorical classifications of food insecurity severity.
6 secondary outcomes
Household Food Consumption Score (FCS)
Time frame: Baseline and endline (approximately 24 months after baseline survey)
Height-for-Age Z-score (HAZ) in Children Under Five Years of Age
Time frame: End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Weight-for-Age Z-score (WAZ) in Children Under Five Years of Age
Time frame: End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Weight-for-Height Z-score (WHZ) in Children Under Five Years of Age
Time frame: End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Body Mass Index (BMI) Among Women of Reproductive Age
Time frame: End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Household Food and Non-food Expenditure
Time frame: Baseline and End of intervention (approximately 24 months)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data (IPD), including household survey data, dietary intake data, anthropometric measurements may be shared after completion of the study. Data sharing will be subject to approval from relevant Philippine government authorities and institutional data governance and ethics requirements. Only fully de-identified datasets will be shared.
Related trials for Food Insecurity
Not yet recruiting
Health-Related Social Needs Food Boxes Delivery Program
Food Insecurity
Recruiting
Culturally Tailored Program for Food-Insecure Adults: SPICE-D
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D)
Active, not recruiting
Deliver-EE: Evaluating Effects of Meal Delivery
Healthy
Not yet recruiting
Nutrition Intervention Optimization to Better Utilize Resources and Support Health
Diabete Type 2, Obesity & Overweight
Active, not recruiting
Mobile Health Coping Intervention for Mothers Experiencing Food Insecurity
Food Insecurity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Neha Kumar, PhD contact
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 3,000), Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 5,000) and Food Voucher + SBCC (PhP 8,000) in people with Food Insecurity and Undernutrition, run by International Food Policy Research Institute at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Phuong H Nguyen, PhD (02028625600, P.H.Nguyen@cgiar.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Nutrition Knowledge (time frame: Baseline and End of intervention (approximately 24 months)). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2026.