Comparative Effectiveness ResearchNCT07646184
Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block in Thoracic Spine Surgeries
A study testing Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block and Erector spinae block in people with Comparative Effectiveness Research and Regional Block, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Spinal surgeries coincide with high level of pain due to extensive dissection and muscle retraction so inadequate pain control delays patient recovery, rehabilitation and also is an important source of patient dissatisfaction [1]. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Comparative Effectiveness Research, Regional Block
- What is being tested?
- Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block and Erector spinae block
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 20 May 2026to 30 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Inclusion Criteria: adult patients of both sexes undergoing elective thoracic spine surgeries aged from 18 years to 60 years, ASA I or II, thoracic levels between T1 to T7
Who cannot join
- Parents refusal. Coagulopathy. Allergy to local anesthesia. Local infection at the site of injection. Pregnancy. Sever motor deficit (grade < 2) and sever sensory deficit (grade < 1).
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Spinal surgeries coincide with high level of pain due to extensive dissection and muscle retraction so inadequate pain control delays patient recovery, rehabilitation and also is an important source of patient dissatisfaction [1].
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids are used to control pain post spine surgeries. The side effects of opioids are nausea and vomiting (PONV), delirium, sedation, constipation, tolerance, respiratory depression, and high dependence [2]. Many efforts done by different studies to decrease the length of hospital stay and the dependence on opioids by using multimodal analgesic modalities including regional blocks by injection of local anesthesia before skin incision to block the pain pathway from the start. [3] The SPSM originates from C7-T2 (sometimes T3) spinous processes, progressing obliquely and inserting on the lateral of the second to fifth ribs' angle , The Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB) first described by Tulgar et al,[4] is a novel interfascial plane block that involves the injection of a local anesthetic between the Serratus posterior superior and intercostal muscles, dermatomal analysis of the patients showed sensory block reached the C3 dermatome in all patients in the cephalic direction. In the caudal direction, it was determined that sensory block reached at least the T7 dermatome in all patients.
Read more
Erector spinae plane (ESP) block first described in 2016 by Forero et al. [5], it is a truncal block which inject (LA) between the thoracic transverse process and erector spinae muscle and spread to the thoracic paravertebral space thereby targeting the dorsal and ventral rami of spinal nerves [6]. Because they may provide an alternative to thoracic paravertebral blocks with fewer risks of pneumothorax, it is used to provide postoperative analgesia for thoracic and spine surgeries. And also used to manage chronic pain such as complex regional pain syndrome and failed back surgery syndrome [2].
Aim of the work:
Compare the efficacy of serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block versus erector spinae plane block in thoracic spine surgeries at the level between T1 to T7 Primary outcome: NRS (Numerical rating scale) Secondary outcome: 1st dose of rescue analgesia, total doses of rescue analgesia, motor block, and 1st time of ambulation
Patients and methods:
This randomized double-blinded study will be carried out on 60 adult patients of both sexes undergoing elective thoracic spine surgeries in Tanta University Hospitals for a period of from April 2026 to December 2026.
Informed written consent will be obtained from the parents. They will receive an explanation of the purpose of the study, and every patient will have a secret code number. All data of the patients will be confidential with secret codes and private files for each patient; all given data will be used for current medical research only.
Any unexpected risks that appeared during the research will be cleared to the participants and ethical committee on time. Investigator who is blinded to group allocation provided postoperative care and assessments.
Inclusion Criteria: adult patients of both sexes undergoing elective thoracic spine surgeries aged from 18 years to 60 years, ASA I or II, thoracic levels between T1 to T7
Exclusion Criteria:
Parents refusal. Coagulopathy. Allergy to local anesthesia. Local infection at the site of injection. Pregnancy. Sever motor deficit (grade < 2) and sever sensory deficit (grade < 1).
Randomization and blindness:
Computer-generated randomization numbers will be used for random allocation and each patients' code will be kept in an opaque sealed envelope. Patients will be randomly allocated with 1:1 allocation ratio into three groups in a parallel manner:
- Group S (n=35): Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block will receive 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine on each side.
- Group E (n=35): erector spinae block group will receive 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine on each side.
Methods:
- Preoperative: Medical and surgical history of the patients will be taken, clinical examination of the patients will be performed and routine laboratory investigations such as CBC, and coagulation studies.
- Intraoperative:
Monitoring (non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, electrocardiogram and temperature probe) will be applied during induction and maintenance of anesthesia. No premedication will be administered. The intravenous line will be inserted, give preload crystalloid 500 ml, preoxygenation 5 minutes with 80% oxygen. Anesthesia will be induced by injection fentanyl 1mic/kg, xylocaine 1mg/kg, propofol 1-2 mg/kg, and atracurium 0.5 mg/kg, ventilation with mask for 3 minutes then intubation using armored tube. Anesthesia will be maintained with isoflurane, O2 to Air 50%: 50%, be sure adequate preload and adequate blood pressure then change the position of patients from supine to prone position, take precaution of prone position and make sure
Read the detailed description
Spinal surgeries coincide with high level of pain due to extensive dissection and muscle retraction so inadequate pain control delays patient recovery, rehabilitation and also is an important source of patient dissatisfaction [1].
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids are used to control pain post spine surgeries. The side effects of opioids are nausea and vomiting (PONV), delirium, sedation, constipation, tolerance, respiratory depression, and high dependence [2]. Many efforts done by different studies to decrease the length of hospital stay and the dependence on opioids by using multimodal analgesic modalities including regional blocks by injection of local anesthesia before skin incision to block the pain pathway from the start. [3] The SPSM originates from C7-T2 (sometimes T3) spinous processes, progressing obliquely and inserting on the lateral of the second to fifth ribs' angle , The Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB) first described by Tulgar et al,[4] is a novel interfascial plane block that involves the injection of a local anesthetic between the Serratus posterior superior and intercostal muscles, dermatomal analysis of the patients showed sensory block reached the C3 dermatome in all patients in the cephalic direction. In the caudal direction, it was determined that sensory block reached at least the T7 dermatome in all patients.
Erector spinae plane (ESP) block first described in 2016 by Forero et al. [5], it is a truncal block which inject (LA) between the thoracic transverse process and erector spinae muscle and spread to the thoracic paravertebral space thereby targeting the dorsal and ventral rami of spinal nerves [6]. Because they may provide an alternative to thoracic paravertebral blocks with fewer risks of pneumothorax, it is used to provide postoperative analgesia for thoracic and spine surgeries. And also used to manage chronic pain such as complex regional pain syndrome and failed back surgery syndrome [2].
Aim of the work:
Compare the efficacy of serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block versus erector spinae plane block in thoracic spine surgeries at the level between T1 to T7 Primary outcome: NRS (Numerical rating scale) Secondary outcome: 1st dose of rescue analgesia, total doses of rescue analgesia, motor block, and 1st time of ambulation
Patients and methods:
This randomized double-blinded study will be carried out on 60 adult patients of both sexes undergoing elective thoracic spine surgeries in Tanta University Hospitals for a period of from April 2026 to December 2026.
Informed written consent will be obtained from the parents. They will receive an explanation of the purpose of the study, and every patient will have a secret code number. All data of the patients will be confidential with secret codes and private files for each patient; all given data will be used for current medical research only.
Any unexpected risks that appeared during the research will be cleared to the participants and ethical committee on time. Investigator who is blinded to group allocation provided postoperative care and assessments.
Inclusion Criteria: adult patients of both sexes undergoing elective thoracic spine surgeries aged from 18 years to 60 years, ASA I or II, thoracic levels between T1 to T7
Exclusion Criteria:
Parents refusal. Coagulopathy. Allergy to local anesthesia. Local infection at the site of injection. Pregnancy. Sever motor deficit (grade < 2) and sever sensory deficit (grade < 1).
Randomization and blindness:
Computer-generated randomization numbers will be used for random allocation and each patients' code will be kept in an opaque sealed envelope. Patients will be randomly allocated with 1:1 allocation ratio into three groups in a parallel manner:
- Group S (n=35): Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block will receive 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine on each side.
- Group E (n=35): erector spinae block group will receive 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine on each side.
Methods:
- Preoperative: Medical and surgical history of the patients will be taken, clinical examination of the patients will be performed and routine laboratory investigations such as CBC, and coagulation studies.
- Intraoperative: Monitoring (non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, electrocardiogram and temperature probe) will be applied during induction and maintenance of anesthesia. No premedication will be administered. The intravenous line will be inserted, give preload crystalloid 500 ml, preoxygenation 5 minutes with 80% oxygen. Anesthesia will be induced by injection fentanyl 1mic/kg, xylocaine 1mg/kg, propofol 1-2 mg/kg, and atracurium 0.5 mg/kg, ventilation with mask for 3 minutes then intubation using armored tube. Anesthesia will be maintained with isoflurane, O2 to Air 50%: 50%, be sure adequate preload and adequate blood pressure then change the position of patients from supine to prone position, take precaution of prone position and make sure there is no compression on eye. nose. breast, chest, abdomen, genitalia, knee and dorsum of foot, avoid over abduction of upper limbs more than 90 degrees and take care of brachial plexus and radial nerves. In group S: patients in prone position, the skin will be sterilized with betadine 10% at the site of needle entry A linear probe will be placed near the medial border of the scapula and using the in-plane technique a 22-G, 80-mm block needle will be inserted between the third rib and the SPSm will be confirmed by injecting 0.5-1 ml of saline and observing the fluid lifting the serratus superior posterior muscle , 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected on each side . In group E: patients in prone position. Using strict sterilization techniques, the skin will be sterilized with betadine 10 % at the site of needle entry. The level of the thoracic vertebrae at which surgery will be proceeded will be determined on ultrasound and the block will cover 2 levels above and 2 levels below. The linear probe will be placed at the mid-vertebral line in the sagittal plane. The transducer will be shifted 3.5-4 cm laterally from midline to the surgical side to visualize the erector spinae muscle and transverse process. Using the in-plane technique, a 22-G, 80-mm block needle will be advanced until the transverse process will be reached. The correct location of the needle tip in the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle will be confirmed by injecting 0.5-1 ml of saline and observing the fluid lifting the erector spinae muscle off the transverse process while avoiding muscle distension (hydro dissection). Once the needle will be at the correct location, a negative aspiration test will be confirmed. Bupivacaine 0.25% at a dose of20 ml will be then injected on each side. Surgery will be initiated 15-20 minutes after performing the blocks, follow up hemodynamic changes intraoperative, using BSI and maintain the level to be between 40-60 %, paracetamol 1gm will be given.
- postoperatively: patients will be extubated after returning the position to supine position, shifted to PACU, another investigator who will be blinded to group allocation provided postoperative care and assessments. Morphine will be given as rescue analgesia in a dose of 0.05 mg /kg.
Measurements:
All the following data will be collected:
Demographic data: age, sex, weight, ASA class. Hemodynamic parameter (MAP- Heart rate) Motor functions will be assessed using the following muscle power scale from 0-5 at (PACU- 1h, 2h, 4h,8h,16h and 24h postoperatively) Total doses of morphine as a rescue analgesia. First dose of morphine as a rescue analgesia in dose of 0.05 mg/kg. NRS (numerical rating scale) (PACU- 1h, 2h, 4h,8h,16h and 24h postoperatively)
1st time of ambulation. Adverse events: hypotension, hematoma, infection and LAST.
- Conditions
- Comparative Effectiveness Research, Regional Block
- Being tested
- Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block, Erector spinae block
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane BlockProcedure or surgery
Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block will receive 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine on each side.
Erector spinae blockProcedure or surgery
Erector spinae block
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block | Active comparator | Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block Receives: Procedure: Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block |
| Group erector spinae block | Experimental | Erector spinae block Receives: Procedure: Erector spinae block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
NRS (Numerical rating scale)
Measured: 2 months to 4 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
2ndry outecomes
Hemodynamic changes( blood pressure in mm/hg and heart rate beats/min ) Body weight in Kg ASA Age in years 1st dose of rescue analgesia in mg total doses of rescue analgesia in mg motor block
1st time of ambulation in hour
Measured: 2 months for 4 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jun 2026
- Study start20 May 2026
- Primary completion20 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Comparative Effectiveness ResearchStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Tanta UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tanta University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mohamed Zakarea Wfa, Tanta University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07646184
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 36265PR46/5/26
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 5 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block in Thoracic Spine Surgeries
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07646184
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 36265PR46/5/26
- Conditions
- Comparative Effectiveness Research, Regional Block
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Tanta UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 May 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Spinal surgeries coincide with high level of pain due to extensive dissection and muscle retraction so inadequate pain control delays patient recovery, rehabilitation and also is an important source of patient dissatisfaction [1].
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids are used to control pain post spine surgeries. The side effects of opioids are nausea and vomiting (PONV), delirium, sedation, constipation, tolerance, respiratory depression, and high dependence [2]. Many efforts done by different studies to decrease the length of hospital stay and the dependence on opioids by using multimodal analgesic modalities including regional blocks by injection of local anesthesia before skin incision to block the pain pathway from the start. [3] The SPSM originates from C7-T2 (sometimes T3) spinous processes, progressing obliquely and inserting on the lateral of the second to fifth ribs' angle , The Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB) first described by Tulgar et al,[4] is a novel interfascial plane block that involves the injection of a local anesthetic between the Serratus posterior superior and intercostal muscles, dermatomal analysis of the patients showed sensory block reached the C3 dermatome in all patients in the cephalic direction. In the caudal direction, it was determined that sensory block reached at least the T7 dermatome in all patients.
Erector spinae plane (ESP) block first described in 2016 by Forero et al. [5], it is a truncal block which inject (LA) between the thoracic transverse process and erector spinae muscle and spread to the thoracic paravertebral space thereby targeting the dorsal and ventral rami of spinal nerves [6]. Because they may provide an alternative to thoracic paravertebral blocks with fewer risks of pneumothorax, it is used to provide postoperative analgesia for thoracic and spine surgeries. And also used to manage chronic pain such as complex regional pain syndrome and failed back surgery syndrome [2].
Aim of the work:
Compare the efficacy of serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block versus erector spinae plane block in thoracic spine surgeries at the level between T1 to T7 Primary outcome: NRS (Numerical rating scale) Secondary outcome: 1st dose of rescue analgesia, total doses of rescue analgesia, motor block, and 1st time of ambulation
Patients and methods:
This randomized double-blinded study will be carried out on 60 adult patients of both sexes undergoing elective thoracic spine surgeries in Tanta University Hospitals for a period of from April 2026 to December 2026.
Informed written consent will be obtained from the parents. They will receive an explanation of the purpose of the study, and every patient will have a secret code number. All data of the patients will be confidential with secret codes and private files for each patient; all given data will be used for current medical research only.
Any unexpected risks that appeared during the research will be cleared to the participants and ethical committee on time. Investigator who is blinded to group allocation provided postoperative care and assessments.
Inclusion Criteria: adult patients of both sexes undergoing elective thoracic spine surgeries aged from 18 years to 60 years, ASA I or II, thoracic levels between T1 to T7
Exclusion Criteria:
Parents refusal. Coagulopathy. Allergy to local anesthesia. Local infection at the site of injection. Pregnancy. Sever motor deficit (grade < 2) and sever sensory deficit (grade < 1).
Randomization and blindness:
Computer-generated randomization numbers will be used for random allocation and each patients' code will be kept in an opaque sealed envelope. Patients will be randomly allocated with 1:1 allocation ratio into three groups in a parallel manner:
- Group S (n=35): Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block will receive 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine on each side.
- Group E (n=35): erector spinae block group will receive 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine on each side.
Methods:
- Preoperative: Medical and surgical history of the patients will be taken, clinical examination of the patients will be performed and routine laboratory investigations such as CBC, and coagulation studies.
- Intraoperative:
Monitoring (non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, electrocardiogram and temperature probe) will be applied during induction and maintenance of anesthesia. No premedication will be administered. The intravenous line will be inserted, give preload crystalloid 500 ml, preoxygenation 5 minutes with 80% oxygen. Anesthesia will be induced by injection fentanyl 1mic/kg, xylocaine 1mg/kg, propofol 1-2 mg/kg, and atracurium 0.5 mg/kg, ventilation with mask for 3 minutes then intubation using armored tube. Anesthesia will be maintained with isoflurane, O2 to Air 50%: 50%, be sure adequate preload and adequate blood pressure then change the position of patients from supine to prone position, take precaution of prone position and make sure
Detailed description
Spinal surgeries coincide with high level of pain due to extensive dissection and muscle retraction so inadequate pain control delays patient recovery, rehabilitation and also is an important source of patient dissatisfaction [1].
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids are used to control pain post spine surgeries. The side effects of opioids are nausea and vomiting (PONV), delirium, sedation, constipation, tolerance, respiratory depression, and high dependence [2]. Many efforts done by different studies to decrease the length of hospital stay and the dependence on opioids by using multimodal analgesic modalities including regional blocks by injection of local anesthesia before skin incision to block the pain pathway from the start. [3] The SPSM originates from C7-T2 (sometimes T3) spinous processes, progressing obliquely and inserting on the lateral of the second to fifth ribs' angle , The Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB) first described by Tulgar et al,[4] is a novel interfascial plane block that involves the injection of a local anesthetic between the Serratus posterior superior and intercostal muscles, dermatomal analysis of the patients showed sensory block reached the C3 dermatome in all patients in the cephalic direction. In the caudal direction, it was determined that sensory block reached at least the T7 dermatome in all patients.
Erector spinae plane (ESP) block first described in 2016 by Forero et al. [5], it is a truncal block which inject (LA) between the thoracic transverse process and erector spinae muscle and spread to the thoracic paravertebral space thereby targeting the dorsal and ventral rami of spinal nerves [6]. Because they may provide an alternative to thoracic paravertebral blocks with fewer risks of pneumothorax, it is used to provide postoperative analgesia for thoracic and spine surgeries. And also used to manage chronic pain such as complex regional pain syndrome and failed back surgery syndrome [2].
Aim of the work:
Compare the efficacy of serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block versus erector spinae plane block in thoracic spine surgeries at the level between T1 to T7 Primary outcome: NRS (Numerical rating scale) Secondary outcome: 1st dose of rescue analgesia, total doses of rescue analgesia, motor block, and 1st time of ambulation
Patients and methods:
This randomized double-blinded study will be carried out on 60 adult patients of both sexes undergoing elective thoracic spine surgeries in Tanta University Hospitals for a period of from April 2026 to December 2026.
Informed written consent will be obtained from the parents. They will receive an explanation of the purpose of the study, and every patient will have a secret code number. All data of the patients will be confidential with secret codes and private files for each patient; all given data will be used for current medical research only.
Any unexpected risks that appeared during the research will be cleared to the participants and ethical committee on time. Investigator who is blinded to group allocation provided postoperative care and assessments.
Inclusion Criteria: adult patients of both sexes undergoing elective thoracic spine surgeries aged from 18 years to 60 years, ASA I or II, thoracic levels between T1 to T7
Exclusion Criteria:
Parents refusal. Coagulopathy. Allergy to local anesthesia. Local infection at the site of injection. Pregnancy. Sever motor deficit (grade < 2) and sever sensory deficit (grade < 1).
Randomization and blindness:
Computer-generated randomization numbers will be used for random allocation and each patients' code will be kept in an opaque sealed envelope. Patients will be randomly allocated with 1:1 allocation ratio into three groups in a parallel manner:
- Group S (n=35): Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block will receive 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine on each side.
- Group E (n=35): erector spinae block group will receive 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine on each side.
Methods:
- Preoperative: Medical and surgical history of the patients will be taken, clinical examination of the patients will be performed and routine laboratory investigations such as CBC, and coagulation studies.
- Intraoperative: Monitoring (non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, electrocardiogram and temperature probe) will be applied during induction and maintenance of anesthesia. No premedication will be administered. The intravenous line will be inserted, give preload crystalloid 500 ml, preoxygenation 5 minutes with 80% oxygen. Anesthesia will be induced by injection fentanyl 1mic/kg, xylocaine 1mg/kg, propofol 1-2 mg/kg, and atracurium 0.5 mg/kg, ventilation with mask for 3 minutes then intubation using armored tube. Anesthesia will be maintained with isoflurane, O2 to Air 50%: 50%, be sure adequate preload and adequate blood pressure then change the position of patients from supine to prone position, take precaution of prone position and make sure there is no compression on eye. nose. breast, chest, abdomen, genitalia, knee and dorsum of foot, avoid over abduction of upper limbs more than 90 degrees and take care of brachial plexus and radial nerves. In group S: patients in prone position, the skin will be sterilized with betadine 10% at the site of needle entry A linear probe will be placed near the medial border of the scapula and using the in-plane technique a 22-G, 80-mm block needle will be inserted between the third rib and the SPSm will be confirmed by injecting 0.5-1 ml of saline and observing the fluid lifting the serratus superior posterior muscle , 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected on each side . In group E: patients in prone position. Using strict sterilization techniques, the skin will be sterilized with betadine 10 % at the site of needle entry. The level of the thoracic vertebrae at which surgery will be proceeded will be determined on ultrasound and the block will cover 2 levels above and 2 levels below. The linear probe will be placed at the mid-vertebral line in the sagittal plane. The transducer will be shifted 3.5-4 cm laterally from midline to the surgical side to visualize the erector spinae muscle and transverse process. Using the in-plane technique, a 22-G, 80-mm block needle will be advanced until the transverse process will be reached. The correct location of the needle tip in the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle will be confirmed by injecting 0.5-1 ml of saline and observing the fluid lifting the erector spinae muscle off the transverse process while avoiding muscle distension (hydro dissection). Once the needle will be at the correct location, a negative aspiration test will be confirmed. Bupivacaine 0.25% at a dose of20 ml will be then injected on each side. Surgery will be initiated 15-20 minutes after performing the blocks, follow up hemodynamic changes intraoperative, using BSI and maintain the level to be between 40-60 %, paracetamol 1gm will be given.
- postoperatively: patients will be extubated after returning the position to supine position, shifted to PACU, another investigator who will be blinded to group allocation provided postoperative care and assessments. Morphine will be given as rescue analgesia in a dose of 0.05 mg /kg.
Measurements:
All the following data will be collected:
Demographic data: age, sex, weight, ASA class. Hemodynamic parameter (MAP- Heart rate) Motor functions will be assessed using the following muscle power scale from 0-5 at (PACU- 1h, 2h, 4h,8h,16h and 24h postoperatively) Total doses of morphine as a rescue analgesia. First dose of morphine as a rescue analgesia in dose of 0.05 mg/kg. NRS (numerical rating scale) (PACU- 1h, 2h, 4h,8h,16h and 24h postoperatively)
1st time of ambulation. Adverse events: hypotension, hematoma, infection and LAST.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block | Active comparator | Procedure: Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane BlockSerratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block |
| Group erector spinae block | Experimental | Procedure: Erector spinae blockErector spinae block |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Inclusion Criteria: adult patients of both sexes undergoing elective thoracic spine surgeries aged from 18 years to 60 years, ASA I or II, thoracic levels between T1 to T7
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Parents refusal. Coagulopathy. Allergy to local anesthesia. Local infection at the site of injection. Pregnancy. Sever motor deficit (grade < 2) and sever sensory deficit (grade < 1).
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane BlockSerratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block will receive 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine on each side. | Procedure or surgery | Group Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block |
| Erector spinae blockErector spinae block | Procedure or surgery | Group erector spinae block |
Primary outcome
NRS (Numerical rating scale)
Time frame: 2 months to 4 months
1 secondary outcome
2ndry outecomes
Time frame: 2 months for 4 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Comparative Effectiveness Research
Not yet recruiting
The Social Needs Assistance for Hospitalized Kids Trial
Social Needs, Health-Related Social Needs
RecruitingObservational study
Dopamine vs. Norepinephrine for Hypotension in Very Preterm Infants With Late-onset Sepsis
Late-Onset Neonatal Sepsis, Extreme Prematurity
RecruitingPhase 3
CSP #2026 - Beta Blocker Dialyzability on Cardiovascular Outcomes
End-Stage Kidney Disease, End-Stage Renal Disease
Recruiting
Health Ahead Comparative Effectiveness Study
Health Services Accessibility, Rural Health
Recruiting
Evaluating Novel Healthcare Approaches to Nurturing and Caring for Hospitalized Elders
Delirium, Neurocognitive Disorders
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block and Erector spinae block in people with Comparative Effectiveness Research and Regional Block, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
NRS (Numerical rating scale) (time frame: 2 months to 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2026.