AzTrials
AzTrials

Tibial Shaft FractureELPPNCT07657559

RCT - Suprapatellar Approach Versus Lateral Parapatellar Approach in Tibial Shaft Fracture

A study testing suprapatellar approach and extra-articular lateral parapatellar approach in people with Tibial Shaft Fracture and Intramedullary Nail, run by Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to compare 2 surgical techniques for tibial shaft nailing (suprapatellar approach vs extra-articular lateral parapatellar approach). following peri-operative and postoperative outcomes Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Tibial Shaft Fracture, Intramedullary Nail
What is being tested?
suprapatellar approach and extra-articular lateral parapatellar approach
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Aug 2026to 31 Aug 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • age 18-60 years
  • tibial shaft fractures

Who cannot join

  • pervious knee injury
  • open fracture at least Gustilo grade II
  • ipsilateral femur and ankle fractures

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Tiwat Wongkasemjit M.D., Resident contact

+66893146833

toytiwat@gmail.com

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Suprapatellar Approach Versus Extra-articular Lateral Parapatellar Approach in Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aims to compare 2 surgical techniques for tibial shaft nailing (suprapatellar approach vs extra-articular lateral parapatellar approach). following peri-operative and postoperative outcomes

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized controlled trial study, compared extra-articular lateral parapatellar approach with suprapatellar approach in tibial shaft nailing. peri-operative data are operative time, blood loss, fluoroscopy time, hospital stay. post-operative outcomes include Lysholm Knee Score, VAS-knee, range of motion. these outcomes are following postoperative day 1, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months.

Being tested
suprapatellar approach, extra-articular lateral parapatellar approach
Keywords
suprapatellar approach, extra-articular lateral parapatellar approach, intramedullary nailing, tibial shaft fracture

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • suprapatellar approachProcedure or surgery

    semi-extended position longitudinal incision 2 cm. above patella nail insertion procedure under patellofemoral joint

  • extra-articular lateral parapatellar approachProcedure or surgery

    semi-extended position longitudinal incision 4-5 cm., lateral to patellar tendon nail insertion procedure

Study groups in NCT07657559
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
suprapatellar approachActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: suprapatellar approach
extra-articular lateral parapatellar approachExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: extra-articular lateral parapatellar approach

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Lysholm Knee Score

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. operative time

    Measured: operation

  2. VAS score of knee

    Measured: POD 1, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

  3. range of motion

    knee

    Measured: POD 1, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

  4. intraoperative blood loss

    Measured: operation

  5. fluoroscopy time

    Measured: operation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jun 2026
  2. Study start1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
patients were divided into two groups using computer-generated block-of-four randomization.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07657559
Sponsor's protocol ID
016/2567
Acronym
ELPP
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
14 Jun 2026
Last updated
18 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: data was save in form of Microsoft excel spreadsheet and SPSS file

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing suprapatellar approach and extra-articular lateral parapatellar approach in people with Tibial Shaft Fracture and Intramedullary Nail, run by Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Tiwat Wongkasemjit M.D., Resident (+66893146833, toytiwat@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Lysholm Knee Score (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in