StrokeNCT07661849
Efficacy of Tele-CPASS Compared to In-person CPASS Therapy for Upper Extremity Motor Recovery
A study testing Tele-CPASS and In-person CPASS therapy in people with Stroke and Hemiparesis, run by University of Texas, El Paso at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study evaluates whether a home-based telerehabilitation program (tele-CPASS) is as effective as an in-person rehabilitation program (CPASS) for improving arm and hand function after stroke. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Hemiparesis, Upper Extremity Impairments
- What is being tested?
- Tele-CPASS and In-person CPASS therapy
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2025to 31 Aug 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 21 years or older
- Neuroimaging-confirmed stroke within 40 days prior to enrollment
- Persistent hemiparesis resulting in impaired upper extremity function, defined by a score of 0 to 3 on the NIH Stroke Scale motor arm item
- Able to participate in all study-related activities, including 1-year follow-up
- Short Blessed Memory Orientation and Concentration Scale score less than 8
- Able to follow 2-step commands
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score greater than 25
- No upper extremity injury or condition that limited upper extremity use prior to the stroke
Who cannot join
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Persistent disabling neurologic condition, such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinsonism, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or dementia requiring medication
- Clinically significant fluctuations in mental status within 72 hours prior to randomization
- Active psychosis, psychosis within the prior 2 years, active substance abuse, or prior substance abuse
- Dense sensory loss, defined by a score of 3 or 4 on the NIH Stroke Scale sensory item
- Ataxia out of proportion to weakness in the affected arm, defined by a score greater than 1 on the NIH Stroke Scale ataxia item
Show all 10Show fewer
- Not expected to survive 12 months because of other illnesses
- Pregnancy
- Severe aphasia
- Receipt of botulinum toxin or expectation of receiving botulinum toxin during the study period
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
Rehabilitation Sciences Complex, University of Texas at El Paso, 3333 N Mesa St, El Paso, TX 79902
El Paso, Texas, 79902
Shashwati Geed, PhD, 915-747-7289, sgeed@utep.edu
- Recruiting
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso - Neurology Clinic
El Paso, Texas, 79905
Dr. Paisith Piriyawat, Medical Director, Rehabilitation Services, UMC-EP, MD, 915-215-5900, Paisith.Piriyawat@ttuhsc.edu
Israel Alba, MBA, CCRP, 915-215-4616
- Recruiting
University Medical Center of El Paso - Rehabilitation Services
El Paso, Texas, 79905
Dr. Paisith Piriyawat, Medical Director, Rehabilitation Services, UMC-EP, MD, 915-215-5900, Paisith.Piriyawat@ttuhsc.edu
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Tele-CPASS, a Telerehabilitation Intervention Using Critical Periods After Stroke Study (CPASS) Compared to In-person CPASS for Upper Extremity Motor Recovery
This study evaluates whether a home-based telerehabilitation program (tele-CPASS) is as effective as an in-person rehabilitation program (CPASS) for improving arm and hand function after stroke. Stroke often leads to long-term difficulty using the affected arm in daily activities, and access to in-person therapy can be limited. This study aims to determine whether therapy delivered remotely can provide similar benefits to standard in-clinic care.
Participants who recently experienced a stroke will be randomly assigned to receive 20 hours of upper extremity rehabilitation therapy either in person or through a telehealth platform. Both groups will receive the same type and amount of therapy focused on practicing meaningful, patient-selected daily activities. Participants will complete assessments before treatment, immediately after treatment, and at 6 and 12 months to measure recovery of arm function, real-world arm use, and participation in daily life.
The results of this study will help determine whether telerehabilitation can improve access to effective stroke recovery interventions while maintaining clinical effectiveness comparable to in-person therapy.
Read the detailed description
Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability, with a substantial proportion of survivors experiencing persistent upper extremity impairment that limits independence in daily activities. While rehabilitation can improve outcomes, access to consistent, high-dose therapy remains a major barrier, particularly in the early months after stroke when recovery potential is highest. The Critical Periods After Stroke Study (CPASS) previously demonstrated that 20 hours of intensive, task-specific upper extremity training delivered within the first six months after stroke leads to clinically meaningful improvements in motor function compared to standard care.
Despite this evidence, many patients face challenges accessing in-person outpatient rehabilitation due to transportation limitations, cost, and geographic barriers. Telerehabilitation offers a potential solution by enabling delivery of structured therapy in the home environment. Prior studies suggest that home-based rehabilitation can achieve outcomes comparable to in-clinic care, while increasing accessibility and adherence. However, the efficacy of a telerehabilitation version of CPASS (tele-CPASS) relative to the established in-person CPASS intervention has not been rigorously tested.
This study is a randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial designed to evaluate whether tele-CPASS is comparable in efficacy to in-person CPASS for improving upper extremity recovery after stroke. Participants will be enrolled in the early post-stroke period and randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) in-person CPASS delivered in a clinical setting, or (2) tele-CPASS delivered remotely in the participant's home using a secure telehealth platform. Both groups will receive the same total dose (20 hours) of therapist-guided, task-specific training over approximately 2-3 weeks. Therapy is individualized and based on patient-prioritized functional goals, emphasizing repetitive practice of meaningful daily activities.
Study procedures include baseline assessments followed by post-intervention and longitudinal follow-up assessments. In addition to standardized clinical evaluations, this study incorporates objective measurement of real-world arm use using wrist-worn accelerometers. These devices capture continuous movement data during daily life, allowing quantification of functional upper extremity use outside the clinical setting. A structured activity protocol performed in the laboratory and at home, combined with video annotation and machine learning methods, will be used to classify functional versus non-functional arm movements and enhance the ecological validity of outcome measurement.
The trial uses a non-inferiority framework to determine whether outcomes achieved with tele-CPASS are not meaningfully worse than those achieved with in-person CPASS. This approach is appropriate given prior evidence supporting the efficacy of the in-person intervention. Demonstrating comparable effectiveness would support tele-CPASS as a scalable and accessible model for delivering high-intensity stroke rehabilitation.
By directly comparing remote and in-person delivery of an evidence-based intervention, this study addresses a critical gap in stroke rehabilitation. If successful, tele-CPASS may expand access to effective therapy, reduce barriers to care, and inform future models of rehabilitation delivery that integrate clinic-based and home-based approaches.
- Being tested
- Tele-CPASS, In-person CPASS therapy
- Keywords
- Telerehabilitation, Telehealth, Stroke rehabilitation, Upper extremity recovery, Motor recovery, Critical period plasticity, Wearable sensors, Accelerometry
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Paresis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tele-CPASSBehavioural
Intervention 1: Tele-CPASS Tele-CPASS is a home-based telerehabilitation intervention consisting of 20 hours of therapist-guided, task-specific upper extremity motor training delivered remotely using a telehealth platform for individuals with stroke. Therapy is individualized based on participant-selected functional goals and focuses on repetitive practice of meaningful daily activities to improve arm and hand function after stroke. Participants complete sessions in their home environment with real-time therapist guidance and may be provided with equipment and technology needed to support remote delivery.
In-person CPASS therapyBehavioural
Intervention 2: In-person CPASS therapy In-person CPASS is a clinic-based rehabilitation intervention consisting of 20 hours of therapist-guided, task-specific upper extremity motor training delivered face-to-face. Therapy is individualized based on participant-selected functional goals and focuses on repetitive practice of meaningful daily activities to improve arm and hand function after stroke. Sessions are conducted in a clinical setting under direct supervision of a therapist.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tele-CPASS | Experimental | Participants receive 20 hours of therapist-guided upper extremity motor rehabilitation delivered remotely in the home using a telehealth platform. Therapy is individualized based on participant-prioritized activities and focuses on repetitive practice of meaningful daily tasks to improve arm and hand function after stroke. Receives: Behavioral: Tele-CPASS |
| In-person CPASS | Active comparator | Participants receive 20 hours of therapist-guided upper extremity motor rehabilitation delivered in person in the clinic. Therapy is individualized based on participant-prioritized activities and focuses on repetitive practice of meaningful daily tasks to improve arm and hand function after stroke. Receives: Behavioral: In-person CPASS therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Upper Extremity Motor Function (Action Research Arm Test [ARAT])
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) is a standardized, performance-based measure of upper extremity motor function. It assesses grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement using a series of functional tasks. Scores range from 0 to 57, with higher scores indicating better motor function.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Functional Upper Extremity Use (Accelerometry)
Upper extremity activity is measured using wrist-worn accelerometers on both arms. Data are processed using validated ML algorithms to quantify the amount of functional use of the affected upper extremity during daily activities in home and community environments.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Social Participation (Stroke Impact Scale)
The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) is a patient-reported outcome measure assessing perceived participation in social and community activities. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better participation.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jun 2026
- Study start1 Sep 2025
- Primary completion31 Aug 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Aug 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas, El Paso
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, The Catholic University of America
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Dr. Shashwati Geed, PT, PhD, Principal investigator, Department of Physical Therapy and Movement Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07661849
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2127649
- Other IDs
- 90IFST0026
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 22 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data will not be shared because this is a small, single-site rehabilitation trial involving individuals recovering from stroke, and the dataset includes potentially identifiable clinical, functional, accelerometry, and video-derived movement data. The protocol includes video recordings of upper extremity activity scripts and therapy sessions, which are used for frame-by-frame annotation and machine-learning classification of functional arm use. Although study data are coded with randomly generated participant IDs and identifiers are stored separately, the combination of clinical characteristics, timing post-stroke, functional outcomes, accelerometry, and video-derived data may increase the risk of deductive identification. Deidentified aggregate results may be shared through publications and presentations.
Publications
Barth J, Geed S, Mitchell A, Brady KP, Giannetti ML, Dromerick AW, Edwards DF. The Critical Period After Stroke Study (CPASS) Upper Extremity Treatment Protocol. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2023 Jul 24;5(3):100282. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100282. eCollection 2023 Sep.
PubMed 37744191Dromerick AW, Geed S, Barth J, Brady K, Giannetti ML, Mitchell A, Edwardson MA, Tan MT, Zhou Y, Newport EL, Edwards DF. Critical Period After Stroke Study (CPASS): A phase II clinical trial testing an optimal time for motor recovery after stroke in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 28;118(39):e2026676118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2026676118.
PubMed 34544853Nieto EM, Lujan E, Mendoza CA, Arriaga Y, Fierro C, Tran T, Chang LC, Gurovich AN, Lum PS, Geed S. Accelerometry and the Capacity-Performance Gap: Case Series Report in Upper-Extremity Motor Impairment Assessment Post-Stroke. Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jun 4;12(6):615. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12060615.
PubMed 40564431
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Tele-CPASS, a Telerehabilitation Intervention Using Critical Periods After Stroke Study (CPASS) Compared to In-person CPASS for Upper Extremity Motor Recovery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07661849
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2127649
- Keywords
- Telerehabilitation, Telehealth, Stroke rehabilitation, Upper extremity recovery, Motor recovery, Critical period plasticity, Wearable sensors, Accelerometry
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas, El PasoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, The Catholic University of America
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates whether a home-based telerehabilitation program (tele-CPASS) is as effective as an in-person rehabilitation program (CPASS) for improving arm and hand function after stroke. Stroke often leads to long-term difficulty using the affected arm in daily activities, and access to in-person therapy can be limited. This study aims to determine whether therapy delivered remotely can provide similar benefits to standard in-clinic care.
Participants who recently experienced a stroke will be randomly assigned to receive 20 hours of upper extremity rehabilitation therapy either in person or through a telehealth platform. Both groups will receive the same type and amount of therapy focused on practicing meaningful, patient-selected daily activities. Participants will complete assessments before treatment, immediately after treatment, and at 6 and 12 months to measure recovery of arm function, real-world arm use, and participation in daily life.
The results of this study will help determine whether telerehabilitation can improve access to effective stroke recovery interventions while maintaining clinical effectiveness comparable to in-person therapy.
Detailed description
Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability, with a substantial proportion of survivors experiencing persistent upper extremity impairment that limits independence in daily activities. While rehabilitation can improve outcomes, access to consistent, high-dose therapy remains a major barrier, particularly in the early months after stroke when recovery potential is highest. The Critical Periods After Stroke Study (CPASS) previously demonstrated that 20 hours of intensive, task-specific upper extremity training delivered within the first six months after stroke leads to clinically meaningful improvements in motor function compared to standard care.
Despite this evidence, many patients face challenges accessing in-person outpatient rehabilitation due to transportation limitations, cost, and geographic barriers. Telerehabilitation offers a potential solution by enabling delivery of structured therapy in the home environment. Prior studies suggest that home-based rehabilitation can achieve outcomes comparable to in-clinic care, while increasing accessibility and adherence. However, the efficacy of a telerehabilitation version of CPASS (tele-CPASS) relative to the established in-person CPASS intervention has not been rigorously tested.
This study is a randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial designed to evaluate whether tele-CPASS is comparable in efficacy to in-person CPASS for improving upper extremity recovery after stroke. Participants will be enrolled in the early post-stroke period and randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) in-person CPASS delivered in a clinical setting, or (2) tele-CPASS delivered remotely in the participant's home using a secure telehealth platform. Both groups will receive the same total dose (20 hours) of therapist-guided, task-specific training over approximately 2-3 weeks. Therapy is individualized and based on patient-prioritized functional goals, emphasizing repetitive practice of meaningful daily activities.
Study procedures include baseline assessments followed by post-intervention and longitudinal follow-up assessments. In addition to standardized clinical evaluations, this study incorporates objective measurement of real-world arm use using wrist-worn accelerometers. These devices capture continuous movement data during daily life, allowing quantification of functional upper extremity use outside the clinical setting. A structured activity protocol performed in the laboratory and at home, combined with video annotation and machine learning methods, will be used to classify functional versus non-functional arm movements and enhance the ecological validity of outcome measurement.
The trial uses a non-inferiority framework to determine whether outcomes achieved with tele-CPASS are not meaningfully worse than those achieved with in-person CPASS. This approach is appropriate given prior evidence supporting the efficacy of the in-person intervention. Demonstrating comparable effectiveness would support tele-CPASS as a scalable and accessible model for delivering high-intensity stroke rehabilitation.
By directly comparing remote and in-person delivery of an evidence-based intervention, this study addresses a critical gap in stroke rehabilitation. If successful, tele-CPASS may expand access to effective therapy, reduce barriers to care, and inform future models of rehabilitation delivery that integrate clinic-based and home-based approaches.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tele-CPASS | Experimental | Behavioral: Tele-CPASSParticipants receive 20 hours of therapist-guided upper extremity motor rehabilitation delivered remotely in the home using a telehealth platform. Therapy is individualized based on participant-prioritized activities and focuses on repetitive practice of meaningful daily tasks to improve arm and hand function after stroke. |
| In-person CPASS | Active comparator | Behavioral: In-person CPASS therapyParticipants receive 20 hours of therapist-guided upper extremity motor rehabilitation delivered in person in the clinic. Therapy is individualized based on participant-prioritized activities and focuses on repetitive practice of meaningful daily tasks to improve arm and hand function after stroke. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age 21 years or older
- Neuroimaging-confirmed stroke within 40 days prior to enrollment
- Persistent hemiparesis resulting in impaired upper extremity function, defined by a score of 0 to 3 on the NIH Stroke Scale motor arm item
- Able to participate in all study-related activities, including 1-year follow-up
- Short Blessed Memory Orientation and Concentration Scale score less than 8
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Persistent disabling neurologic condition, such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinsonism, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or dementia requiring medication
- Clinically significant fluctuations in mental status within 72 hours prior to randomization
- Active psychosis, psychosis within the prior 2 years, active substance abuse, or prior substance abuse
- Dense sensory loss, defined by a score of 3 or 4 on the NIH Stroke Scale sensory item
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tele-CPASSIntervention 1: Tele-CPASS Tele-CPASS is a home-based telerehabilitation intervention consisting of 20 hours of therapist-guided, task-specific upper extremity motor training delivered remotely using a telehealth platform for individuals with stroke. Therapy is individualized based on participant-selected functional goals and focuses on repetitive practice of meaningful daily activities to improve arm and hand function after stroke. Participants complete sessions in their home environment with real-time therapist guidance and may be provided with equipment and technology needed to support remote delivery. | Behavioural | Tele-CPASS |
| In-person CPASS therapyIntervention 2: In-person CPASS therapy In-person CPASS is a clinic-based rehabilitation intervention consisting of 20 hours of therapist-guided, task-specific upper extremity motor training delivered face-to-face. Therapy is individualized based on participant-selected functional goals and focuses on repetitive practice of meaningful daily activities to improve arm and hand function after stroke. Sessions are conducted in a clinical setting under direct supervision of a therapist. | Behavioural | In-person CPASS |
Primary outcome
Upper Extremity Motor Function (Action Research Arm Test [ARAT])
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) is a standardized, performance-based measure of upper extremity motor function. It assesses grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement using a series of functional tasks. Scores range from 0 to 57, with higher scores indicating better motor function.
2 secondary outcomes
Functional Upper Extremity Use (Accelerometry)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Social Participation (Stroke Impact Scale)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 37744191Barth J, Geed S, Mitchell A, Brady KP, Giannetti ML, Dromerick AW, Edwards DF. The Critical Period After Stroke Study (CPASS) Upper Extremity Treatment Protocol. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2023 Jul 24;5(3):100282. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100282. eCollection 2023 Sep.
- Background: PubMed 34544853Dromerick AW, Geed S, Barth J, Brady K, Giannetti ML, Mitchell A, Edwardson MA, Tan MT, Zhou Y, Newport EL, Edwards DF. Critical Period After Stroke Study (CPASS): A phase II clinical trial testing an optimal time for motor recovery after stroke in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 28;118(39):e2026676118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2026676118.
- Background: PubMed 40564431Nieto EM, Lujan E, Mendoza CA, Arriaga Y, Fierro C, Tran T, Chang LC, Gurovich AN, Lum PS, Geed S. Accelerometry and the Capacity-Performance Gap: Case Series Report in Upper-Extremity Motor Impairment Assessment Post-Stroke. Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jun 4;12(6):615. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12060615.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data will not be shared because this is a small, single-site rehabilitation trial involving individuals recovering from stroke, and the dataset includes potentially identifiable clinical, functional, accelerometry, and video-derived movement data. The protocol includes video recordings of upper extremity activity scripts and therapy sessions, which are used for frame-by-frame annotation and machine-learning classification of functional arm use. Although study data are coded with randomly generated participant IDs and identifiers are stored separately, the combination of clinical characteristics, timing post-stroke, functional outcomes, accelerometry, and video-derived data may increase the risk of deductive identification. Deidentified aggregate results may be shared through publications and presentations.
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Dr. Shashwati Geed, PT, PhD principal investigator
Department of Physical Therapy and Movement Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tele-CPASS and In-person CPASS therapy in people with Stroke and Hemiparesis, run by University of Texas, El Paso at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Dr. Shashwati Geed, PT, PhD (915-747-7289, sgeed@utep.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Upper Extremity Motor Function (Action Research Arm Test [ARAT]) (time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07661849, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2026.