AzTrials
AzTrials

Mental Well-beingNCT07678853

Mental and Physical Well-being and School Absence Among School Children Using Nicotine Pouches Compared to Their Peers

An observational study of Mental Well-being and Physical Well-Being, run by University of Southern Denmark at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This cross-sectional study investigates whether the use of nicotine pouches is associated with poorer mental and physical well-being and increased school absence among Danish adolescents. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Mental Well-being, Physical Well-Being, Adolescent
How many people
10,800 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
1 Sep 2020to 25 Jun 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Danish adolescents, age 13-18 years, from Aarhus municipality between September 2020 to June 2022

Who may be able to join

  • Answered all questions regarding usage of nicotine (AMQ) AND
  • Answered questions regarding mental and physical well-being in DNWQ AND/OR
  • Available data on school absence

Who cannot join

  • Student in a special needs class or reception class for newcomers

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Department of Pediactrics, Sygehus Lillebælt

    Kolding, 6000

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

This cross-sectional study investigates whether the use of nicotine pouches is associated with poorer mental and physical well-being and increased school absence among Danish adolescents.

The study population comprises 13-18-year-old students from public schools in Aarhus Municipality, Denmark, who completed two school-based questionnaires between September 2020 and June 2022: (1) the Aarhus Municipality Questionnaire (AMQ), including items on nicotine use, and (2) the Danish National Well-being Questionnaire (DNWQ), a 40-item instrument assessing different domains of school-related well-being. Questionnaire data are linked at the individual level to national administrative registers via the Danish Civil Registration System.

Read more

Exposure is defined as current use of nicotine pouches based on AMQ responses. Adolescents who report using "snus" (slang for nicotine pouches) "not every day, but every week" or "every day" are classified as nicotine pouch users. Non-exposed adolescents are those who report no use or less than weekly use; individuals who choose "I do not wish to answer" are categorized as "undisclosed" and excluded from primary analyses.

The primary outcomes are: (1) a composite mental and physical well-being score derived from 10 DNWQ items (Likert scales recoded to a 1-5 range, summed to a total score from 10 to 50) and (2) days of school absence (overall, and by illegal vs. sickness-related absence) obtained from national education registers. Secondary outcomes include item-level response patterns for the 10 DNWQ items and subgroup analyses of the association between nicotine pouch use and well-being across strata of socioeconomic status, age, sex, origin, and mental illness in the adolescent or their caregivers.

Covariates are drawn from questionnaires and national registers and include age, sex, e-cigarette and cigarette use, family structure, household education, household income, immigration status, and psychiatric diagnoses in the adolescent and household providers.

Descriptive statistics will compare baseline characteristics between nicotine pouch users and non-users. Primary analyses will apply linear mixed-effects models for the continuous well-being score and generalized linear mixed models with log link (Poisson or negative binomial) for counts of school absence, with and without adjustment for key confounders (age, sex, household education, household income, origin). Missing covariate data will be addressed using multiple imputation by chained equations under a missing-at-random assumption. Effect modification will be explored by stratified analyses and interaction terms.

The study will provide novel, population-based evidence on the potential mental, physical, and educational consequences of nicotine pouch use among adolescents, informing clinicians, public health professionals, and policymaker

Keywords
Nicotine, Nicotine pouches, Mental well-being, Physical well-being, Absence, Adolescents
Medical subject headings
Psychological Well-Being

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07678853
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Nicotine pouch usersNot described
Undisclosed use of nicotine pouchesNot described
ControlsNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mental and physical well-being score

    Mental and physical well-being score are defined per design by ten questions in the Danish National Well-being Questionaire with answer possibilities 1 - 5 (Likert scale) and with one question ranging from 1 - 4. All data has already been processed by Statistics Denmark, thus questions phrased negatively have been inverted and the question ranging from 1 - 4 has been recalculated fitting a 1 - 5 scale. The cumulative score ranging from 10 to 50 now depicts the adolescent's mental and physical well-being from low to high corresponding to the numeric value. A corrected value will be calculated for all adolescents who answered 1 to 9 questions on the questionnaire.

    Measured: During school hours in school year 2020/2021 and/or 2021/2022

  2. Days of illegal school absence and due to sickness

    Measured: During school year 2020/2021 and/or 2021/2022

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Group differences in response patterns of each of the 10 items for physical and mental well-being score

    Mental and physical well-being score are defined per design by ten questions in the Danish National Well-being Questionaire with answer possibilities 1 - 5 (Likert scale) and with one question ranging from 1 - 4. All data has already been processed by Statistics Denmark, thus questions phrased negatively have been inverted and the question ranging from 1 - 4 has been recalculated fitting a 1 - 5 scale. The cumulative score ranging from 10 to 50 now depicts the adolescent's mental and physical well-being from low to high corresponding to the numeric value. A corrected value will be calculated for all adolescents who answered 1 to 9 questions on the questionnaire.

    Measured: During school year 2020/2021 and/or 2021/2022

  2. Subgroup differences for the effect of nicotine pouch consumption and mental and physical well-being (the combined DNWQ questionnaire) for different strata of socioeconomic status, age, sex and origin

    Mental and physical well-being score are defined per design by ten questions in the Danish National Well-being Questionaire with answer possibilities 1 - 5 (Likert scale) and with one question ranging from 1 - 4. All data has already been processed by Statistics Denmark, thus questions phrased negatively have been inverted and the question ranging from 1 - 4 has been recalculated fitting a 1 - 5 scale. The cumulative score ranging from 10 to 50 now depicts the adolescent's mental and physical well-being from low to high corresponding to the numeric value. A corrected value will be calculated for all adolescents who answered 1 to 9 questions on the questionnaire.

    Measured: During school year 2020/2021 and/or 2021/2022

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jul 2026
  2. Study start1 Sep 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2022
  4. Study completion25 Jun 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
10,800 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07678853
Sponsor's protocol ID
118560-3
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
25 Jun 2026
Last updated
6 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Data has been collected from Aarhus Municipality and Statistics Denmark. Both organizations have strict data policy requirements regarding person-identifiable information, which means that individual participant data cannot be made publicly available, even in anonymized form. Access to the data is restricted to approved researchers working on secure servers under the terms set by these institutions.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Mental Well-being and Physical Well-Being, run by University of Southern Denmark at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mental and physical well-being score (time frame: During school hours in school year 2020/2021 and/or 2021/2022). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in