Education NursingNCT07679867
Video-based Training About Infant Urine Collection
A study testing Intervention in people with Education Nursing and Urine Contamination, run by Şeyda BİNAY YAZ at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of video-based training on nursing students' knowledge and clinical skill performance in infant urine collection. Background: Accurate urine collection in infants is a critical nursing procedure influencing diagnostic accuracy and infection management. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 26 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Education Nursing, Urine Contamination, Nursing Skills
- What is being tested?
- Intervention
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 69 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 3 Mar 2025to 12 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 26 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Being between 19-26 years of age
- Being enrolled as a third-year nursing student
- Taking the Pediatric Nursing course for the first time
- Voluntary participation
Who cannot join
- Absence from the study on the dates when research data will be collected
- Incomplete participation in pretest or posttest assessments
- Withdrawal from the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
İzmir Bakircay University
Izmir, Menemen, 35665
About this study
Official title: The Effectiveness of Video-based Training on Nursing Students' Knowledge and Clinical Skill Performance in Infant Urine Collection: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of video-based training on nursing students' knowledge and clinical skill performance in infant urine collection.
Background: Accurate urine collection in infants is a critical nursing procedure influencing diagnostic accuracy and infection management. Traditional teaching methods may be insufficient for developing both knowledge and psychomotor skills.
Design: A Pre-Post test Randomized Controlled Trial. Methods: A total of 69 nursing students were assigned to intervention (n=33) and control (n=36) groups. The intervention group received video-assisted training, while the control group received standard instruction. Knowledge and skill performance were assessed using structured tools. Statistical analyses included t-tests, effect size calculations, and weighted kappa.
- Being tested
- Intervention
- Keywords
- Nursing education, video learning, clinical skills, urine collection, pediatric
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
InterventionOther
Participants in the intervention group were shown an educational video prepared by the researcher outlining the steps of the urine-collection procedure for infants (i.e., collecting a urine sample with a pediatric urine bag). Students performed the procedure (collecting a urine sample using a urine bag) on a baby mannequin in a laboratory setting. During this practice, they were evaluated using a checklist by two independent researchers who monitored all steps of the process.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Video | Experimental | Participants in the intervention group were shown an educational video prepared by the researcher outlining the steps of the urine-collection procedure for infants (i.e., collecting a urine sample with a pediatric urine bag). Students performed the procedure (collecting a urine sample using a urine bag) on a baby mannequin in a laboratory setting. During this practice, they were evaluated using a checklist by two independent researchers who monitored all steps of the process. Receives: Other: Intervention |
| Placebo | No intervention | Participants in the control group received instruction on the Infant Urine Collection procedure (obtaining a urine sample using a pediatric urine bag) through a demonstration. Students practiced the procedure in a laboratory setting using a baby mannequin (obtaining a urine sample using a urine bag). During this practice, they were evaluated using a checklist by two independent researchers who monitored all steps of the process. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Knowledge test scores
A knowledge test was administered to assess participants' understanding of urine sample collection. This test was given twice to participants, both before and after the procedure.
This test, prepared by researchers in line with the literature, consists of 22 questions covering the skills required to collect urine samples from infants aged 0-1 years. The test is presented as a knowledge assessment. Expert opinions were obtained for the test, and it was revised accordingly. Questions are answered as true or false, with correct answers earning 1 point and incorrect ones earning 0. The minimum score on this test is 0, and the maximum is 22. A high score on this knowledge test indicates sufficient knowledge of collecting urine samples.
Measured: The duration of this test was 15-20 minutes.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Skill Score
A checklist was created to assess participants' skills in collecting urine samples. This checklist was administered individually to each student.
This checklist, prepared by researchers based on the literature, consists of 20 statements covering urine sample collection skills in infants aged 0-1 years. The information form is in test format. Expert opinions were sought for the test, and the questionnaire was revised accordingly. The questions in the form were answered and calculated as follows: "Sufficient = 2 points, Partially Sufficient = 1 point, and Insufficient = 0 points". The minimum score on this checklist is 0, and the maximum is 40. A high score on this checklist indicates that the student has learned and applied the skill.
Measured: This skill assessment lasted 15-20 minutes.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jul 2026
- Study start3 Mar 2025
- Primary completion29 Dec 2025
- Study completion12 Mar 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Education NursingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A Pre-Post test Randomized Controlled Trial.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 69 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Şeyda BİNAY YAZ
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bakırçay University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Şeyda BİNAY YAZ, Ege University
- Investigators
- Fatma Gürsul, Project Specialist, Study chair, Izmir Bakircay University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07679867
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Bakiırcay University
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 13 May 2026
- Last updated
- 1 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: The study will be prepared for publication
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effectiveness of Video-based Training on Nursing Students' Knowledge and Clinical Skill Performance in Infant Urine Collection: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07679867
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Bakiırcay University
- Keywords
- Nursing education, video learning, clinical skills, urine collection, pediatric
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 69 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Şeyda BİNAY YAZUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bakırçay University
- Study start
- 3 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Mar 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of video-based training on nursing students' knowledge and clinical skill performance in infant urine collection.
Background: Accurate urine collection in infants is a critical nursing procedure influencing diagnostic accuracy and infection management. Traditional teaching methods may be insufficient for developing both knowledge and psychomotor skills.
Design: A Pre-Post test Randomized Controlled Trial. Methods: A total of 69 nursing students were assigned to intervention (n=33) and control (n=36) groups. The intervention group received video-assisted training, while the control group received standard instruction. Knowledge and skill performance were assessed using structured tools. Statistical analyses included t-tests, effect size calculations, and weighted kappa.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A Pre-Post test Randomized Controlled Trial.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Video | Experimental | Other: InterventionParticipants in the intervention group were shown an educational video prepared by the researcher outlining the steps of the urine-collection procedure for infants (i.e., collecting a urine sample with a pediatric urine bag). Students performed the procedure (collecting a urine sample using a urine bag) on a baby mannequin in a laboratory setting. During this practice, they were evaluated using a checklist by two independent researchers who monitored all steps of the process. |
| Placebo | No intervention | –Participants in the control group received instruction on the Infant Urine Collection procedure (obtaining a urine sample using a pediatric urine bag) through a demonstration. Students practiced the procedure in a laboratory setting using a baby mannequin (obtaining a urine sample using a urine bag). During this practice, they were evaluated using a checklist by two independent researchers who monitored all steps of the process. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 26 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Being between 19-26 years of age
- Being enrolled as a third-year nursing student
- Taking the Pediatric Nursing course for the first time
- Voluntary participation
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Absence from the study on the dates when research data will be collected
- Incomplete participation in pretest or posttest assessments
- Withdrawal from the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| InterventionParticipants in the intervention group were shown an educational video prepared by the researcher outlining the steps of the urine-collection procedure for infants (i.e., collecting a urine sample with a pediatric urine bag). Students performed the procedure (collecting a urine sample using a urine bag) on a baby mannequin in a laboratory setting. During this practice, they were evaluated using a checklist by two independent researchers who monitored all steps of the process. | Other | Video |
Primary outcome
Knowledge test scores
Time frame: The duration of this test was 15-20 minutes.
A knowledge test was administered to assess participants' understanding of urine sample collection. This test was given twice to participants, both before and after the procedure. This test, prepared by researchers in line with the literature, consists of 22 questions covering the skills required to collect urine samples from infants aged 0-1 years. The test is presented as a knowledge assessment. Expert opinions were obtained for the test, and it was revised accordingly. Questions are answered as true or false, with correct answers earning 1 point and incorrect ones earning 0. The minimum score on this test is 0, and the maximum is 22. A high score on this knowledge test indicates sufficient knowledge of collecting urine samples.
1 secondary outcome
Skill Score
Time frame: This skill assessment lasted 15-20 minutes.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jul 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. The study will be prepared for publication
Related trials for Education Nursing
Active, not recruiting
Enhancing Male Nursing Students' Competence in Maternity Care: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Egypt
Maternity Nursing Obstetric Nursing Clinical Competence Education, Nursing Simulation Training
Not yet recruiting
A Multidimensional Intervention to Improve Ethical Decision-Making Competence Among Nursing Student Interns: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Ethical Decision-Making Competence in Nursing Student Interns
Not yet recruitingObservational study
"The Relationship Between Nursing Students' Perceptions of the Clinical Learning Environment and Their Person-Centered Care Competency"
Education Nursing
Not yet recruiting
HMD-Based Virtual Reality Simulation in Nursing Skills Education
Nursing Education Research, Nursing Education
Not yet recruiting
The Effect Of Low-Fidelity Simulation Education Pressure Injuries
Nursing Education Research, Simulation Based Learning
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fatma Gürsul, Project Specialist study chair
Izmir Bakircay University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intervention in people with Education Nursing and Urine Contamination, run by Şeyda BİNAY YAZ at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Knowledge test scores (time frame: The duration of this test was 15-20 minutes.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jul 2026.