Persons With Visual DisabilitiesNCT07713979
VisionWay Accessibility
A study testing walking path in people with Persons With Visual Disabilities, run by Ohio State University at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The challenge of outdoor wayfinding, critical for People with Visual Impairments (PVI), consists in helping users safely walk to a pre-determined nearby destination. The main focus of existing solutions from research and industry is to leverage the user's smartphone to receive safe moving directions either from a… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Persons With Visual Disabilities
- What is being tested?
- walking path
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 26 Feb 2026to 1 Sep 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- At least 18 years old
- Able to provide informed consent
- Vision worse than 20/200, encompassing PVI with severe and profound impairment as well as total blindness.
- Group 1 Inclusion:
- PVI meeting general inclusion criteria and without mobility aids
- Group 2 Inclusion:
Show all 9Show fewer
- PVI meeting general inclusion criteria and who use a cane as a mobility aid
- Group 3 Inclusion:
- PVI meeting general inclusion criteria and who use guide dogs.
Who cannot join
- Conditions that prevent safe ambulation that include, but are not limited to, neuromuscular disorder, post-operative state (such as orthopedic surgeries or cardiac surgeries), balance issues, history of falls in the last 6 months, or at the discretion of the investigator.
- Use of walker or wheelchair
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43212
Abigail Larsen, MPH, 614-406-4423, abigail.larsen@osumc.edu
Matthew Patton, 614-293-5287, matthew.patton@osumc.edu
- Recruiting
University of Maine
Orono, Maine, 04469
Nicholas Giudice, PhD, 207.581.2151, Nicholas.giudice@maine.edu
Justin Brown, 207.581.2151, justin.r.brown@osumc.edu
About this study
Official title: VisionWay: Accessibility-Aware Path Selection for Wayfinding
The challenge of outdoor wayfinding, critical for People with Visual Impairments (PVI), consists in helping users safely walk to a pre-determined nearby destination. The main focus of existing solutions from research and industry is to leverage the user's smartphone to receive safe moving directions either from a remote operator or smart app. However, multiple paths may exist to connect users with their destination, each one with unique characteristics in terms of accessibility and safety. Unfortunately, little to no attention has been paid in helping PVI decide, before even starting to walk, which path to take based on their accessibility. Thus, a barrier identified is that the followed path may not be accessible because sidewalk features such as potholes, uncontrolled crossing, interrupted sidewalks, and objects are not known in advance. The investigators' goal is to develop a mobile live, local, outside map framework called VisionWay, customized for PVI-user as a wayfinding tool to analyze, before starting to walk, the accessibility of candidate paths and choose one to the destination.
Read the detailed description
Existing solutions include cognitive maps which can help PVI confidently walk in known locations but need to be built on experience, and thus cannot be used to determine the best path towards an unfamiliar location. In fact, previous research has found that PVI, to reduce stress and increase safety, before embarking on a new journey need to be informed about whether a specific path has a paved sidewalk, street crossing point, controlled or uncontrolled crosswalk, stairs, obstacles, and potholes. Knowing these characteristics ahead of time, i.e., before starting to walk, can help PVI make choices on which path to take, which is particularly beneficial in unfamiliar environments. Trained Orientation and Mobility (O\&M) specialists often provide high-quality in-person help for PVI to walk in unfamiliar areas, notifying them of upcoming obstacles and turns on the path. However, a shortage of qualified specialists has increased the demand for remote instructors by leveraging smartphones as pointing devices. For example, services such as TappyGuide and WeAssist work by sharing the PVI's destination as well as smartphone camera and GPS data with a remote human operator, who can then consult a map to voice-guide the PVI to their destination. On the other hand, the remote directions depend on the availability of the remote operators. To alleviate this dependency, new technologies leverage mobile computing and Artificial Intelligence (AI) to sense the environment for obstacles and provide real-time navigation directions through audio or haptic feedback. For example, WeWalk's smart cane provides basic sensing and smart features to support navigation and obstacle detection alert; as part of USDOT's Inclusive Design Challenge, MPI Giudice, MPI Doore, and Co-I Fink developed the Autonomous Vehicle Assistant (AVA) app, which helps PVI safely walk towards an autonomous vehicle and accurately reach its door handle. Some recent projects target indoor localization and navigation or leverage augmented reality and haptic feedback to aid obstacle avoidance during navigation and reduce veering. While most funded projects focus on providing real-time navigation guidance given a certain path to follow, the reality is that more than one path may exist to reach a certain destination, especially in an outdoor context. Thus, they cannot help PVI and remote operators choose the best path to follow, which requires creating accessibility maps. The problem of creating accessibility maps has been widely studied for people in wheelchairs, whose main challenge is to ensure availability of accessible entrances or curbs on the path. WheelMap is an example of such a tool, but it does not help PVI, whose definition of accessible path can be quite different. For example, a wheelchair user may find it less problematic to handle an uncontrolled zebra crossing than someone with profound or total vision impairment. The most related solution focusing on finding accessible paths for PVI is that of Cohen and Dalyot, which leverages accessibility information already available in OpenStreetMap to evaluate the accessibility of different paths for totally blind users. However, it has three limitations. First, OpenStreetMap, similar to Google Maps and Apple's Maps, does not provide important information about many harmful and beneficial sidewalk features affecting accessibility such as tactile tech, potholes, tree branches, or sidewalk restrictions. Second, it remains unclear how to describe each path's features to PVI for selection. Third, it only focuses on blind pedestrians while the definition of accessibility and the features affect it can vary widely across severe, profound, and totally blind PVI.The goal of this project is to involve PVI with different impairment severity and mobility aids in the development of VisionWay, a mobile/cloud framework that helps PVI select a pedestrian path towards their destination based on three main innovations. This study focuses on the first of these by utilizing a user study designed to reveal how various sidewalk features affect accessibility and how to design an accessibility model able to estimate it. To address this challenge, barrier, and achieve our goal, the investigators assembled a team of men, women, trainees, and members who have lived experience with vision impairment (VI). Our strengths include engineering, computer science, human factor engineering, mixed methods research, human-computer interaction for PVI, clinicians including low vision and orientation and mobility specialists (OMS), as well as team members and participants with VI. The investigators' goal is to develop a mobile live, local, outside map framework called VisionWay, customized for PVI-user as a wayfinding tool to analyze, before starting to walk, the accessibility of candidate paths and choose one to the destination. The investigators designed aims for R61 technology development and feasibility. (Aim 1) Collect survey data and observations in pilot pathways to define and validate a PVI-facing metric to measure and detect the accessibility of a walk path from static and dynamic imagery.
- Conditions
- Persons With Visual Disabilities
- Being tested
- walking path
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
walking pathBehavioural
Participants will be asked to walk a defined pathway through campus. From the preselected paths, the set and order will be randomized between participants.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Recorded walks | Experimental | The study team will record videos of a subset of users walking on selected paths on campus. Participants may be presented with the maps ahead of the walk. Such videos may include video recordings from the perspective of the study team monitoring the participant. Additionally, personal recording devices such as GoPro/action cameras, or recording eyeglasses may be provided to the participant to record walks from their perspective. From the preselected paths, the set and order will be randomized between participants. The study team will prompt participants after each path to identify and describe path features that affect accessibility, as well as to provide a perceived accessibility score (on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 is highly accessible). The video recording may include audio description of these relevant sidewalk features and the score. The research team member will record their observations of the walking paths as well. Receives: Behavioral: walking path |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PVI accessibility on sidewalks
Primary objectives are to collect prospective data in PVI groups to define which sidewalk features affect accessibility and how to design an accessibility model able to estimate accessibility. Twenty sidewalk (path) features were scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not important, 5 = very important), and participants indicated the number of additional minutes they would be willing to walk to access a route containing each feature (5-point scale. 1 = up to one minute, to 5 = five or more minutes). A combined score for each feature was determined by summing the two values (for each feature) to generate an overall priority ranking. Higher scores indicate a greater perceived importance.
Measured: For a period over 2 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jul 2026
- Study start26 Feb 2026
- Primary completion1 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Sep 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Persons With Visual DisabilitiesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ohio State UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ohio State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Maine
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Marco Brocanelli, PhD, Study director, Ohio State UniversitySayoko Moroi, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Ohio State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07713979
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY20251838
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Jul 2026
- Last updated
- 20 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- VisionWay: Accessibility-Aware Path Selection for Wayfinding
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07713979
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY20251838
- Conditions
- Persons With Visual Disabilities
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ohio State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Maine
- Study start
- 26 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The challenge of outdoor wayfinding, critical for People with Visual Impairments (PVI), consists in helping users safely walk to a pre-determined nearby destination. The main focus of existing solutions from research and industry is to leverage the user's smartphone to receive safe moving directions either from a remote operator or smart app. However, multiple paths may exist to connect users with their destination, each one with unique characteristics in terms of accessibility and safety. Unfortunately, little to no attention has been paid in helping PVI decide, before even starting to walk, which path to take based on their accessibility. Thus, a barrier identified is that the followed path may not be accessible because sidewalk features such as potholes, uncontrolled crossing, interrupted sidewalks, and objects are not known in advance. The investigators' goal is to develop a mobile live, local, outside map framework called VisionWay, customized for PVI-user as a wayfinding tool to analyze, before starting to walk, the accessibility of candidate paths and choose one to the destination.
Detailed description
Existing solutions include cognitive maps which can help PVI confidently walk in known locations but need to be built on experience, and thus cannot be used to determine the best path towards an unfamiliar location. In fact, previous research has found that PVI, to reduce stress and increase safety, before embarking on a new journey need to be informed about whether a specific path has a paved sidewalk, street crossing point, controlled or uncontrolled crosswalk, stairs, obstacles, and potholes. Knowing these characteristics ahead of time, i.e., before starting to walk, can help PVI make choices on which path to take, which is particularly beneficial in unfamiliar environments. Trained Orientation and Mobility (O\&M) specialists often provide high-quality in-person help for PVI to walk in unfamiliar areas, notifying them of upcoming obstacles and turns on the path. However, a shortage of qualified specialists has increased the demand for remote instructors by leveraging smartphones as pointing devices. For example, services such as TappyGuide and WeAssist work by sharing the PVI's destination as well as smartphone camera and GPS data with a remote human operator, who can then consult a map to voice-guide the PVI to their destination. On the other hand, the remote directions depend on the availability of the remote operators. To alleviate this dependency, new technologies leverage mobile computing and Artificial Intelligence (AI) to sense the environment for obstacles and provide real-time navigation directions through audio or haptic feedback. For example, WeWalk's smart cane provides basic sensing and smart features to support navigation and obstacle detection alert; as part of USDOT's Inclusive Design Challenge, MPI Giudice, MPI Doore, and Co-I Fink developed the Autonomous Vehicle Assistant (AVA) app, which helps PVI safely walk towards an autonomous vehicle and accurately reach its door handle. Some recent projects target indoor localization and navigation or leverage augmented reality and haptic feedback to aid obstacle avoidance during navigation and reduce veering. While most funded projects focus on providing real-time navigation guidance given a certain path to follow, the reality is that more than one path may exist to reach a certain destination, especially in an outdoor context. Thus, they cannot help PVI and remote operators choose the best path to follow, which requires creating accessibility maps. The problem of creating accessibility maps has been widely studied for people in wheelchairs, whose main challenge is to ensure availability of accessible entrances or curbs on the path. WheelMap is an example of such a tool, but it does not help PVI, whose definition of accessible path can be quite different. For example, a wheelchair user may find it less problematic to handle an uncontrolled zebra crossing than someone with profound or total vision impairment. The most related solution focusing on finding accessible paths for PVI is that of Cohen and Dalyot, which leverages accessibility information already available in OpenStreetMap to evaluate the accessibility of different paths for totally blind users. However, it has three limitations. First, OpenStreetMap, similar to Google Maps and Apple's Maps, does not provide important information about many harmful and beneficial sidewalk features affecting accessibility such as tactile tech, potholes, tree branches, or sidewalk restrictions. Second, it remains unclear how to describe each path's features to PVI for selection. Third, it only focuses on blind pedestrians while the definition of accessibility and the features affect it can vary widely across severe, profound, and totally blind PVI.The goal of this project is to involve PVI with different impairment severity and mobility aids in the development of VisionWay, a mobile/cloud framework that helps PVI select a pedestrian path towards their destination based on three main innovations. This study focuses on the first of these by utilizing a user study designed to reveal how various sidewalk features affect accessibility and how to design an accessibility model able to estimate it. To address this challenge, barrier, and achieve our goal, the investigators assembled a team of men, women, trainees, and members who have lived experience with vision impairment (VI). Our strengths include engineering, computer science, human factor engineering, mixed methods research, human-computer interaction for PVI, clinicians including low vision and orientation and mobility specialists (OMS), as well as team members and participants with VI. The investigators' goal is to develop a mobile live, local, outside map framework called VisionWay, customized for PVI-user as a wayfinding tool to analyze, before starting to walk, the accessibility of candidate paths and choose one to the destination. The investigators designed aims for R61 technology development and feasibility. (Aim 1) Collect survey data and observations in pilot pathways to define and validate a PVI-facing metric to measure and detect the accessibility of a walk path from static and dynamic imagery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Recorded walks | Experimental | Behavioral: walking pathThe study team will record videos of a subset of users walking on selected paths on campus. Participants may be presented with the maps ahead of the walk. Such videos may include video recordings from the perspective of the study team monitoring the participant. Additionally, personal recording devices such as GoPro/action cameras, or recording eyeglasses may be provided to the participant to record walks from their perspective. From the preselected paths, the set and order will be randomized between participants. The study team will prompt participants after each path to identify and describe path features that affect accessibility, as well as to provide a perceived accessibility score (on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 is highly accessible). The video recording may include audio description of these relevant sidewalk features and the score. The research team member will record their observations of the walking paths as well. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- At least 18 years old
- Able to provide informed consent
- Vision worse than 20/200, encompassing PVI with severe and profound impairment as well as total blindness.
- PVI meeting general inclusion criteria and without mobility aids
- PVI meeting general inclusion criteria and who use a cane as a mobility aid
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Conditions that prevent safe ambulation that include, but are not limited to, neuromuscular disorder, post-operative state (such as orthopedic surgeries or cardiac surgeries), balance issues, history of falls in the last 6 months, or at the discretion of the investigator.
- Use of walker or wheelchair
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| walking pathParticipants will be asked to walk a defined pathway through campus. From the preselected paths, the set and order will be randomized between participants. | Behavioural | Recorded walks |
Primary outcome
PVI accessibility on sidewalks
Time frame: For a period over 2 hours
Primary objectives are to collect prospective data in PVI groups to define which sidewalk features affect accessibility and how to design an accessibility model able to estimate accessibility. Twenty sidewalk (path) features were scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not important, 5 = very important), and participants indicated the number of additional minutes they would be willing to walk to access a route containing each feature (5-point scale. 1 = up to one minute, to 5 = five or more minutes). A combined score for each feature was determined by summing the two values (for each feature) to generate an overall priority ranking. Higher scores indicate a greater perceived importance.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jul 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Persons With Visual Disabilities
Not yet recruiting
Breast and Cervical Cancer Awareness Training in Visually Impaired Women
Persons With Visual Disabilities, Breast Neoplasms
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Marco Brocanelli, PhD study director
Ohio State University
Sayoko Moroi, MD, PhD principal investigator
Ohio State University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing walking path in people with Persons With Visual Disabilities, run by Ohio State University at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Abigail Larsen, MPH (614-293-5287, abigail.larsen@osumc.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PVI accessibility on sidewalks (time frame: For a period over 2 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.