Pediatric AnesthesiaNCT07714785
Impact of EEG-guided Sevofluorane on Opioid Consumption and Quality of Awakening
A study testing EEG-guided and Standard in people with Pediatric Anesthesia and Emergence Delirium, Anesthesia, run by Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile at 1 site in Chile.
Trial summary
This prospective, randomized, single-blind, two-arm parallel-group clinical trial evaluates whether EEG-guided sevoflurane titration affects intraoperative opioid consumption and emergence quality in children undergoing painful elective surgery without regional anesthesia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 to 8 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pediatric Anesthesia, Emergence Delirium, Anesthesia, Postoperative Pain
- What is being tested?
- EEG-guided and Standard
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChile
- Study dates
- 23 Jun 2026to 25 Aug 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 to 8 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Age 2-8 years
- ASA Physical Status I or II
- Elective tonsillectomy (±adenoidectomy)
- Signed parental consent (and assent ≥7 years)
Who cannot join
- Neurological or psychiatric disorders
- Growth or developmental delay
- Known allergy to study medications
- Coagulation disorders
- Parental or patient refusal
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Impact of EEG-guided Sevoflurane Titration on Opioid Consumption and Emergency Quality in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Surgery Without Regional Anesthesia
This prospective, randomized, single-blind, two-arm parallel-group clinical trial evaluates whether EEG-guided sevoflurane titration affects intraoperative opioid consumption and emergence quality in children undergoing painful elective surgery without regional anesthesia. Children aged 2-8 years (ASA I-II) scheduled for elective tonsillectomy (±adenoidectomy) are randomized 1:1 to a Control Group (standard 1 age-adjusted MAC; EEG screen concealed) or a Study Group (sevoflurane titrated to a stable slow-delta/alpha EEG pattern, SEF 17-20 Hz, starting at ~0.7 MAC). In both arms, fentanyl (0.5-1 mcg/kg IV) is added when nociception signs occur. The primary outcome is intraoperative fentanyl consumption (mean mcg/kg rate). Secondary outcomes include sevoflurane exposure (EtSevo, MAC-hours), EEG burst suppression, emergence time, emergence delirium (PAED scale), postoperative pain and opioid use, and hemodynamic events. Sample size: 50 participants (25/arm; 90% power, α=0.05, expected difference 2 mcg/kg, SD=2). EEG spectral analysis is performed in MATLAB using multitaper frequency-domain bootstrap. The study has institutional ethics approval; parental consent and patient assent (≥7 years) are obtained prior to enrollment.
Read the detailed description
Electroencephalography (EEG)-guided anesthetic titration has demonstrated significant clinical benefits in both pediatric and adult patients. However, proprietary EEG-based indices widely used for monitoring anesthetic depth are affected by patient age and the specific anesthetic agent used, limiting their validity and generalizability. More recently, titrating anesthetics based on a specific interpretation of EEG waveforms and their oscillatory patterns observed on the spectrogram has gained popularity.
Previous studies indicate that sevoflurane titration based on specific EEG waveforms and oscillatory patterns yields more substantial reductions in sevoflurane exposure than previously reported with proprietary EEG indices. Furthermore, reducing sevoflurane exposure decreases the incidence of EEG burst suppression, results in faster emergence times, and reduces emergence delirium.
However, most of these benefits have been reported in the context of surgeries where intraoperative antinociception was provided via central or peripheral nerve blocks, in the absence of increased intraoperative analgesic and opioid requirements. It remains unclear whether the benefits associated with reduced sevoflurane exposure are also observed in surgeries where intraoperative antinociception cannot be provided through regional blocks. In such cases, antinociception depends primarily on the co-administration of inhaled anesthetics and opioids. Therefore, the clinical benefits of decreasing sevoflurane exposure via electroencephalographic guidance must be weighed against the side effects of higher perioperative opioid requirements.
What will be the impact of strict titration of the hypnotic component using electroencephalography in a painful surgery, in terms of intraoperative opioid consumption and the quality of anesthetic emergence? It is hypothesized that to adjust the sevoflurane dose according to EEG targets in children undergoing surgeries where intraoperative antinociception cannot be provided via regional blocks will result in a reduction of sevoflurane requirements. However, a compensatory increase in intraoperative opioid consumption is expected to be observed, which could subsequently affect the quality and duration of the anesthetic recovery period.
- Being tested
- EEG-guided, Standard
- Keywords
- Sevoflurano, Pediatric Anesthesia, Tonsillectomy, Electroencephalogram
- Medical subject headings
- Emergence Delirium, Pain, Postoperative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EEG-guidedProcedure or surgery
Induction with sevoflurane 3% in O₂. Maintenance titrated to the minimum concentration sustaining a continuous slow-delta/alpha EEG pattern (SEF 17-20 Hz), starting at 0.7 age-adjusted MAC in O₂/air FiO₂ 60%.
StandardProcedure or surgery
Arm Description: Induction with sevoflurane 5% in O₂. Maintenance at fixed 1 age-adjusted MAC in O₂/air FiO₂ 60%. BIS monitor attached but screen concealed; anesthesiologist blinded to EEG data.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Active comparator | Induction with sevoflurane 5% in O₂. Maintenance at fixed 1 age-adjusted MAC in O₂/air FiO₂ 60%. BIS monitor attached but screen concealed; anesthesiologist blinded to EEG data. Receives: Procedure: Standard |
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Induction with sevoflurane 3% in O₂. Maintenance titrated to the minimum concentration sustaining a continuous slow-delta/alpha EEG pattern (SEF 17-20 Hz), starting at 0.7 age-adjusted MAC in O₂/air FiO₂ 60%. Receives: Procedure: EEG-guided |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total intraoperative opioid consumption
Mean fentanyl rate (mcg/kg).
Measured: Intraoperative period
Secondary outcomes (15)
Sevoflurane exposure
Age-adjusted MAC-hours
Measured: Intraoperative period
Sevoflurane exposure
EtSevo
Measured: Intraoperative period
EEG burst suppression
incidence
Measured: Intraoperative period
EEG spectral markers_TBP
Total band power
Measured: Intraoperative period
EEG spectral markers_MedF
Median frequency
Measured: Intraoperative period
EEG spectral markers_SEF95
SEF 95%
Measured: Intraoperative period
EEG burst suppression
Cumulative duration
Measured: Intraoperative period
hemodynamic, Bradicardia
Intraoperative bradycardia (HR<20% basaline) requiring intervention
Measured: Intraoperative period
hemodynamic, hypotension
intraoperative hypotension (MAP<20% basaline) requiring intervention
Measured: Intraoperative period
emergence time
Time from anesthesia discontinuation to extubation
Measured: From end of anesthesia period to extubation
Eye opening, emergence time
Time from anesthesia discontinuation to eye opening
Measured: From end of anesthesia period to extubation
emergence delirium
incidence by paed scale
Measured: Post anesthesia period
Postoperative pain
flacc/vas scores
Measured: Post anesthesia period
Rescue analgesia
Drug use for rescue analgesia non opioids (mg)
Measured: Post anesthesia period
postoperative opioid use
fentanyl use for pain rescue (mcg)
Measured: Post anesthesia period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jul 2026
- Study start23 Jun 2026
- Primary completion25 Aug 2026
- Study completion25 Aug 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pediatric AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Pontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Assignment 1:1
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Victor Contreras, MSN, RN, Study chair, ResearcherMauricio Ibacache, Phd, Principal investigator, Professor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07714785
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 260319004
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 23 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 8 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Study Protocol Statistical Analysis Plan Informed Consent Form Clinical Study Report
Publications
Miyasaka KW, Suzuki Y, Brown EN, Nagasaka Y. EEG-Guided Titration of Sevoflurane and Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Apr 21;179(7):704-12. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.0517. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 40257811Wang HY, Chen TY, Li DJ, Lin PY, Su KP, Chiang MH, Carvalho AF, Stubbs B, Tu YK, Wu YC, Roerecke M, Smith L, Tseng PT, Hung KC. Association of pharmacological prophylaxis with the risk of pediatric emergence delirium after sevoflurane anesthesia: An updated network meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2021 Dec;75:110488. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110488. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
PubMed 34481361Sun Y, Ye F, Wang J, Ai P, Wei C, Wu A, Xie W. Electroencephalography-Guided Anesthetic Delivery for Preventing Postoperative Delirium in Adults: An Updated Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2020 Sep;131(3):712-719. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004746.
PubMed 32224720
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of EEG-guided Sevoflurane Titration on Opioid Consumption and Emergency Quality in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Surgery Without Regional Anesthesia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07714785
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 260319004
- Keywords
- Sevoflurano, Pediatric Anesthesia, Tonsillectomy, Electroencephalogram
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Pontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 23 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Aug 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This prospective, randomized, single-blind, two-arm parallel-group clinical trial evaluates whether EEG-guided sevoflurane titration affects intraoperative opioid consumption and emergence quality in children undergoing painful elective surgery without regional anesthesia. Children aged 2-8 years (ASA I-II) scheduled for elective tonsillectomy (±adenoidectomy) are randomized 1:1 to a Control Group (standard 1 age-adjusted MAC; EEG screen concealed) or a Study Group (sevoflurane titrated to a stable slow-delta/alpha EEG pattern, SEF 17-20 Hz, starting at ~0.7 MAC). In both arms, fentanyl (0.5-1 mcg/kg IV) is added when nociception signs occur. The primary outcome is intraoperative fentanyl consumption (mean mcg/kg rate). Secondary outcomes include sevoflurane exposure (EtSevo, MAC-hours), EEG burst suppression, emergence time, emergence delirium (PAED scale), postoperative pain and opioid use, and hemodynamic events. Sample size: 50 participants (25/arm; 90% power, α=0.05, expected difference 2 mcg/kg, SD=2). EEG spectral analysis is performed in MATLAB using multitaper frequency-domain bootstrap. The study has institutional ethics approval; parental consent and patient assent (≥7 years) are obtained prior to enrollment.
Detailed description
Electroencephalography (EEG)-guided anesthetic titration has demonstrated significant clinical benefits in both pediatric and adult patients. However, proprietary EEG-based indices widely used for monitoring anesthetic depth are affected by patient age and the specific anesthetic agent used, limiting their validity and generalizability. More recently, titrating anesthetics based on a specific interpretation of EEG waveforms and their oscillatory patterns observed on the spectrogram has gained popularity.
Previous studies indicate that sevoflurane titration based on specific EEG waveforms and oscillatory patterns yields more substantial reductions in sevoflurane exposure than previously reported with proprietary EEG indices. Furthermore, reducing sevoflurane exposure decreases the incidence of EEG burst suppression, results in faster emergence times, and reduces emergence delirium.
However, most of these benefits have been reported in the context of surgeries where intraoperative antinociception was provided via central or peripheral nerve blocks, in the absence of increased intraoperative analgesic and opioid requirements. It remains unclear whether the benefits associated with reduced sevoflurane exposure are also observed in surgeries where intraoperative antinociception cannot be provided through regional blocks. In such cases, antinociception depends primarily on the co-administration of inhaled anesthetics and opioids. Therefore, the clinical benefits of decreasing sevoflurane exposure via electroencephalographic guidance must be weighed against the side effects of higher perioperative opioid requirements.
What will be the impact of strict titration of the hypnotic component using electroencephalography in a painful surgery, in terms of intraoperative opioid consumption and the quality of anesthetic emergence? It is hypothesized that to adjust the sevoflurane dose according to EEG targets in children undergoing surgeries where intraoperative antinociception cannot be provided via regional blocks will result in a reduction of sevoflurane requirements. However, a compensatory increase in intraoperative opioid consumption is expected to be observed, which could subsequently affect the quality and duration of the anesthetic recovery period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Assignment 1:1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Active comparator | Procedure: StandardInduction with sevoflurane 5% in O₂. Maintenance at fixed 1 age-adjusted MAC in O₂/air FiO₂ 60%. BIS monitor attached but screen concealed; anesthesiologist blinded to EEG data. |
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Procedure: EEG-guidedInduction with sevoflurane 3% in O₂. Maintenance titrated to the minimum concentration sustaining a continuous slow-delta/alpha EEG pattern (SEF 17-20 Hz), starting at 0.7 age-adjusted MAC in O₂/air FiO₂ 60%. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 to 8 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age 2-8 years
- ASA Physical Status I or II
- Elective tonsillectomy (±adenoidectomy)
- Signed parental consent (and assent ≥7 years)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Neurological or psychiatric disorders
- Growth or developmental delay
- Known allergy to study medications
- Coagulation disorders
- Parental or patient refusal
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EEG-guidedInduction with sevoflurane 3% in O₂. Maintenance titrated to the minimum concentration sustaining a continuous slow-delta/alpha EEG pattern (SEF 17-20 Hz), starting at 0.7 age-adjusted MAC in O₂/air FiO₂ 60%. | Procedure or surgery | Intervention Group |
| StandardArm Description: Induction with sevoflurane 5% in O₂. Maintenance at fixed 1 age-adjusted MAC in O₂/air FiO₂ 60%. BIS monitor attached but screen concealed; anesthesiologist blinded to EEG data. | Procedure or surgery | Control Group |
Primary outcome
Total intraoperative opioid consumption
Time frame: Intraoperative period
Mean fentanyl rate (mcg/kg).
15 secondary outcomes
Sevoflurane exposure
Time frame: Intraoperative period
Sevoflurane exposure
Time frame: Intraoperative period
EEG burst suppression
Time frame: Intraoperative period
EEG spectral markers_TBP
Time frame: Intraoperative period
EEG spectral markers_MedF
Time frame: Intraoperative period
EEG spectral markers_SEF95
Time frame: Intraoperative period
EEG burst suppression
Time frame: Intraoperative period
hemodynamic, Bradicardia
Time frame: Intraoperative period
hemodynamic, hypotension
Time frame: Intraoperative period
emergence time
Time frame: From end of anesthesia period to extubation
Eye opening, emergence time
Time frame: From end of anesthesia period to extubation
emergence delirium
Time frame: Post anesthesia period
Postoperative pain
Time frame: Post anesthesia period
Rescue analgesia
Time frame: Post anesthesia period
postoperative opioid use
Time frame: Post anesthesia period
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 40257811Miyasaka KW, Suzuki Y, Brown EN, Nagasaka Y. EEG-Guided Titration of Sevoflurane and Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Apr 21;179(7):704-12. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.0517. Online ahead of print.
- Background: PubMed 34481361Wang HY, Chen TY, Li DJ, Lin PY, Su KP, Chiang MH, Carvalho AF, Stubbs B, Tu YK, Wu YC, Roerecke M, Smith L, Tseng PT, Hung KC. Association of pharmacological prophylaxis with the risk of pediatric emergence delirium after sevoflurane anesthesia: An updated network meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2021 Dec;75:110488. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110488. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
- Background: PubMed 32224720Sun Y, Ye F, Wang J, Ai P, Wei C, Wu A, Xie W. Electroencephalography-Guided Anesthetic Delivery for Preventing Postoperative Delirium in Adults: An Updated Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2020 Sep;131(3):712-719. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004746.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Study Protocol Statistical Analysis Plan Informed Consent Form Clinical Study Report
Related trials for Pediatric Anesthesia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of IV Dexmedetomidine Versus Clonidine Versus no Alpha 2 Agonist on Emergency Delirium, PACU Length of Stay and Time to Hospital Discharge in Children Undergoing (Adeno)Tonsillectomy: a Prospective Observational Study
Emergency Delirium, Postoperative Delirium (POD)
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar ESP Block Versus TAP Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Children Undergoing Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia, Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Volume and PONV in Pediatric Appendectomy Cases
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Second- and Third-Generation Laryngeal Mask Airway in Pediatric Patients
Airway Management, Anesthesia, General
RecruitingPhase 4
Propofol-Ketamine Versus Sevoflurane for Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization
Propofol, Ketamine
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Victor Contreras, MSN, RN study chair
Researcher
Mauricio Ibacache, Phd principal investigator
Professor
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing EEG-guided and Standard in people with Pediatric Anesthesia and Emergence Delirium, Anesthesia, run by Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile at 1 site in Chile.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Chile. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total intraoperative opioid consumption (time frame: Intraoperative period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07714785, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2026.