AzTrials
AzTrials

Psychological Well-BeingNCT07740148

Human-Created vs AI-generated Art on Immediate Psychological Responses

A study testing Human-created Animated Art Film and AI-generated Comparator Film in people with Psychological Well-Being, run by Stanford University at 2 sites in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This online randomized controlled trial will evaluate the immediate psychological effects of a brief human-created animated art film. U.S.-based adults recruited through Prolific will be randomized in Stanford Qualtrics to view a human-created animated art film, view an AI-created comparison video, or to a do-nothing… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Psychological Well-Being
What is being tested?
Human-created Animated Art Film and AI-generated Comparator Film
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
4,500 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
31 Jul 2026to Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Resides in the United States
  • Able to read and understand English
  • Current Prolific participant
  • Able to provide electronic informed consent
  • Able to complete the study online using a computer or mobile device with internet access

Who cannot join

  • Residence outside the United States
  • Unable to read and understand English sufficiently to complete the study
  • Does not provide electronic informed consent
  • Prior participation in this study

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Maya Adam, MD, PhD contact

6508393600

madam@stanford.edu

United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Prolific Academic Online Academic Research Platform

    Palo Alto, California, 94304

    Enrolling by invitation
  • Stanford University

    Stanford, California, 94305

    Maya Adam, MD, PhD, 650-839-3600, madam@stanford.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Immediate Psychological Effects of a Brief Human-Created Animated Art Film: A Three-Arm Online Randomized Controlled Trial

This online randomized controlled trial will evaluate the immediate psychological effects of a brief human-created animated art film. U.S.-based adults recruited through Prolific will be randomized in Stanford Qualtrics to view a human-created animated art film, view an AI-created comparison video, or to a do-nothing control arm. Outcomes will be assessed immediately after exposure.

Being tested
Human-created Animated Art Film, AI-generated Comparator Film
Keywords
Animated video, digital human-created art, AI-generated art, moral elevation, social connection, empathy, hope, artificial intelligence
Medical subject headings
Psychological Well-Being

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Human-created Animated Art FilmOther

    A brief, ~3min human-created art film featuring 2D animation, dance, song and instrumental music.

  • AI-generated Comparator FilmOther

    A brief, ~3min AI-generated film featuring 2D animation, dance, song and instrumental music.

Study groups in NCT07740148
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Human-Created Animated Art FilmExperimentalParticipants view the brief human-created animated art film Thought of You.
Receives: Other: Human-created Animated Art Film
AI-Created Comparison VideoExperimentalParticipants view a brief AI-created comparison video.
Receives: Other: AI-generated Comparator Film
Do-nothing ControlNo interventionParticipants do not receive any intervention.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. State Moral Elevation

    State moral elevation is assessed using a 9-item State Moral Elevation Scale. Each item is rated from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Extremely). Item scores are summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating greater state moral elevation.

    Measured: Immediately after assigned exposure, within the single study session (approximately 10 minutes after enrollment).

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change From Baseline in State Empathic Concern

    State empathic concern is assessed using 4 items adapted from Batson's empathic concern scale: compassionate, sympathetic, warm, and tender. Each item is rated from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely). Item scores are summed to produce a total score ranging from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater empathic concern.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after assigned exposure, within the single study session.

  2. Change From Baseline in State Social Connection

    State social connection is assessed using the 10-item University of British Columbia State Social Connection Scale. Each item is rated from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 7 (Strongly agree). Negatively worded items are reverse scored and item scores are summed, yielding a total score from 10 to 70; higher scores indicate greater state social connection.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after assigned exposure, within the single study session

  3. Change From Baseline in State Hope

    State hope is assessed using the 6-item State Hope Scale. Each item is rated from 1 (Definitely false) to 8 (Definitely true). Item scores are summed to produce a total score ranging from 6 to 48, with higher scores indicating greater state hope.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after assigned exposure, within the single study session.

  4. Change From Baseline in Motivation to Improve Close Relationships

    Motivation to put effort into improving close relationships is assessed with one investigator-developed visual analogue scale ranging from 1-100, with higher scores indicating greater motivation.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after assigned exposure, within the single study session.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jul 2026
  2. Study start31 Jul 2026
  3. Primary completion21 Aug 2026
  4. Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
4,500 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07740148
Sponsor's protocol ID
86234
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
28 Jul 2026
Last updated
24 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Human-created Animated Art Film and AI-generated Comparator Film in people with Psychological Well-Being, run by Stanford University at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Maya Adam, MD, PhD (6508393600, madam@stanford.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

State Moral Elevation (time frame: Immediately after assigned exposure, within the single study session (approximately 10 minutes after enrollment).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in