Central Post-stroke PainNCT07758829
Motor Cortex Stimulation for Post-Stroke Thalamic Pain
A study testing Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS) System in people with Central Post-stroke Pain and Stroke, run by Aerospace Center Hospital.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the mechanisms and predictive factors of motor cortex stimulation (MCS) for treating post-stroke thalamic pain, a challenging central neuropathic pain condition. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Central Post-stroke Pain, Stroke, Electric Stimulation Therapy
- What is being tested?
- Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS) System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2026to 30 Jun 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age between 18 and 80 years. Diagnosed with chronic post-stroke central pain with a pain duration of at least 1 year, with stroke localized to the thalamus.
- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score ≥ 5 at baseline. Poor response to or intolerance of conventional pharmacotherapy for pain. Medically suitable for surgical treatment (no coagulopathy, no infection at surgical site, no severe psychiatric disorders, etc.).
- Voluntarily agrees to receive motor cortex stimulation (MCS) treatment. Able to communicate effectively with researchers and willing to comply with all study requirements.
- Sufficient cognitive ability to use the patient programmer and patient programmer charger.
Who cannot join
- History of alcohol, drug, or substance abuse or dependence within the past 12 months.
- Trigeminal neuralgia or atypical facial pain. Advanced cardiovascular or other systemic disease that precludes surgical intervention.
- Prior history of ablative or related intracranial surgery. Presence of other neurological disorders, such as multiple sclerosis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, or brain/spinal cord tumors.
- Implanted drug pump and/or another implantable device (e.g., cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, cochlear implant, other neurostimulation systems such as spinal cord stimulator or deep brain stimulator).
- Metastatic malignancy or untreated localized malignancy. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, planned pregnancy, or women of childbearing potential without reliable contraceptive measures.
- Severe depression or anxiety (as determined by clinical assessment). Any other condition deemed unsuitable for participation by the investigator.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: A Study on Mechanisms and Predictive Factors of Motor Cortex Stimulation for Post-Stroke Thalamic Pain Based on Multimodal Imaging
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the mechanisms and predictive factors of motor cortex stimulation (MCS) for treating post-stroke thalamic pain, a challenging central neuropathic pain condition. Approximately 25% of patients show no short-term response to MCS, and about 20% experience long-term efficacy decay, yet the underlying analgesic mechanisms remain unclear and objective predictive biomarkers are lacking.
This study aims to answer the following main questions:
Read more
How does MCS modulate thalamic pain through the coordinated interaction of structural connectivity, functional network dynamics, and metabolic balance in the brain? What are the distinct neuroimaging characteristics that differentiate short-term non-responders, long-term responders, and those with long-term efficacy decay? Which multimodal imaging biomarkers can reliably predict short-term and long-term MCS efficacy? Participants will undergo a two-stage MCS surgical procedure. In stage I, epidural electrodes are implanted over the motor cortex, followed by a 2-week external trial stimulation. Participants who achieve a ≥50% reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score will proceed to stage II, receiving an implanted pulse generator for long-term stimulation. Those who do not respond in the short term will have the electrodes removed without undergoing stage II implantation.
All participants will complete baseline clinical assessments and multimodal MRI scans (including T1, DTI, resting-state fMRI, and MRS) before surgery. Participants who receive the permanent implant will undergo follow-up clinical evaluations and repeat MRI scans at 3 and 6 months post-surgery.
Researchers will compare imaging features across three outcome groups-short-term non-responders, long-term responders, and long-term decay group-to identify predictive biomarkers. Multimodal imaging data will be integrated using LASSO regression to build prediction models for both short-term screening and long-term efficacy warning.
This research is expected to establish a "mechanism exploration - efficacy prediction - clinical decision" paradigm, providing objective imaging-based evidence to guide patient selection and postoperative management for MCS treatment.
Read the detailed description
Background and Rationale
Post-stroke thalamic pain is a refractory central neuropathic pain condition that significantly impairs patients' quality of life. Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) has emerged as a promising neuromodulatory therapy, yet its clinical application faces two major challenges: approximately 25% of patients show inadequate short-term response during the external trial phase, and about 20% of initial responders experience progressive efficacy decay within six months of permanent implantation. The neural mechanisms underlying MCS analgesia remain incompletely understood, and objective predictors for patient selection and long-term outcome are lacking.
Study Design
This is a prospective, single-arm cohort study conducted at Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China. A total of 200 patients with refractory post-stroke thalamic pain will be enrolled. All participants will undergo a standardized two-stage MCS surgical protocol. The study design incorporates comprehensive clinical assessments and multimodal MRI acquisition at baseline, with longitudinal follow-up at 3 and 6 months post-surgery for patients receiving permanent implants.
Surgical Protocol
The study employs a modified MCS surgical technique. Preoperative planning utilizes multimodal imaging-guided navigation combined with individual functional brain mapping to identify the optimal motor cortex coverage area. Two 8-contact epidural paddle electrodes are implanted in parallel over the primary motor cortex (M1) and adjacent premotor areas through a small craniotomy. Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring, including somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) for central sulcus localization and motor evoked potentials (MEP) for motor area verification, guides precise electrode placement.
The procedure is conducted in two stages. Stage I involves electrode implantation and external trial stimulation. Following a 2-week trial period with programmed stimulation parameters (40 Hz, 200 μs pulse width), short-term response is determined based on a ≥50% reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score from baseline. Responders proceed to Stage II for implantation of an internal pulse generator, while non-responders undergo electrode removal without permanent implantation.
Multimodal Imaging Protocol
All participants undergo a comprehensive MRI protocol at baseline (approximately 38 minutes per session), including:
High-resolution 3D T1-weighted imaging for structural segmentation and thalamic volumetric analysis Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) with 64 diffusion directions for white matter tractography and pathway integrity assessment Resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) for functional connectivity analysis Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) targeting bilateral thalamus, anterior cingulate cortex, and insula for quantification of glutamate, GABA, NAA, choline, and creatine concentrations Participants receiving permanent implants undergo repeat MRI scans at 3 and 6 months post-surgery to capture longitudinal changes in structural, functional, and metabolic measures.
Clinical Assessments
Clinical evaluations are conducted at baseline, 2 weeks (end of trial period), and 3 and 6 months post-surgery. Assessments include:
Pain measures: Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Quality of life and function: SF-36, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Emotional and cognitive function: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Adverse event and complication monitoring Analytical Framework
The study employs a "structure-function-metabolism" three-dimensional analytical framework to investigate MCS mechanisms:
Structural dimension: Corticothalamic pathway integrity assessed by DTI metrics (FA, MD, RD) and thalamic gray matter volume Functional dimension: Default mode network (DMN) and salience network (SN) connectivity dynamics derived from rs-fMRI independent component analysis Metabolic dimension: Glutamate/GABA ratio and other metabolite concentrations in pain-related brain regions Outcome Classification
Participants are categorized into three outcome groups based on their clinical trajectory:
Short-term non-responders: VAS improvement <50% at 2-week trial (no Stage II implantation) Long-term responders: VAS improvement ≥50% at both 2-week trial and 6-month follow-up Long-term decay group: VAS improvement ≥50% at 2-week trial but <50% at 6-month follow-up Predictive Modeling
The study aims to develop two predictive models:
Short-term screening model: Identifying baseline imaging biomarkers that distinguish short-term responders from non-responders, using LASSO-penalized logistic regression with cross-validation Long-term warning model: Among short-term responders, identifying baseline "vulnerability" markers and neuroplasticity indicators associated with 6-month efficacy decay Sample Size and Statistical Plan
Based on preliminary data from 50 prior cases, the expected outcome distribution is: 25% short-term non-responders, 60% long-term responders, and 15% long-term decay. With a target enrollment of 200 participants, the study is adequately powered for group comparisons and predictive factor identification. Statistical analyses include Kruskal-Wallis H test for three-group comparisons, LASSO regression for feature selection, and area under the curve (AUC) for model performance evaluation. Longitudinal changes within groups will be analyzed using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple comparisons will be corrected using false discovery rate (FDR). Sensitivity analyses will be performed using alternative VAS thresholds (≥30%, ≥70%) and bootstrap resampling.
Expected Impact
This research is expected to elucidate the neurobiological mechanisms of MCS analgesia through structural-functional-metabolic integration, identify reliable imaging biomarkers for patient selection, and establish a clinical decision-support framework for personalized MCS therapy in post-stroke thalamic pain.
- Being tested
- Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS) System
- Keywords
- Post-Stroke Thalamic Pain, Motor Cortex Stimulation, Neuromodulation, Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Predictive Biomarkers, Brain Networks
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS) SystemDevice
Epidural paddle electrodes implanted over the primary motor cortex (M1) and adjacent premotor areas, connected to an implantable pulse generator. The system delivers programmed electrical stimulation (40 Hz, 200 μs pulse width) for pain modulation in patients with post-stroke thalamic pain. Devices used in this study: electrode model L3251 and pulse generator model G122R (provided by Beijing Pins Medical Co., Ltd., China).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS) | Experimental | All participants undergo the same two-stage motor cortex stimulation (MCS) surgical protocol. Stage I involves epidural electrode implantation over the motor cortex, followed by a 2-week external trial stimulation. Participants who achieve a ≥50% reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score proceed to Stage II for implantation of an internal pulse generator. Those who do not respond in the short term undergo electrode removal without permanent implantation. All participants receive programmed stimulation parameters (40 Hz, 200 μs pulse width) during the trial and long-term follow-up. Postoperative assessments are conducted at 3 and 6 months for those receiving permanent implants. Receives: Device: Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS) System |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Short-term Response Rate
Proportion of participants achieving a ≥50% reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score from baseline at the end of the 2-week external trial stimulation period.
Measured: 2 weeks post-stage I surgery (at the end of external trial period)
Long-term Response Rate
Proportion of participants receiving permanent implantation who maintain a ≥50% reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score from baseline at 6 months post-surgery. This outcome is assessed only in participants who achieved short-term response and proceeded to Stage II implantation.
Measured: 6 months post-surgery
Secondary outcomes (10)
Change in McGill Pain Questionnaire Short-Form (SF-MPQ) Score
Change in SF-MPQ total score from baseline to each follow-up time point.
Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Score
Change in PCS total score from baseline to each follow-up time point.
Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Change in SF-36 Quality of Life Score
Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score
Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) Score
Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) Score
Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score
Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Longitudinal Changes in Multimodal MRI Biomarkers
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Adverse Event and Complication Rate
Measured: From enrollment through 6-month follow-up
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score
Measured: 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Aug 2026
- Study start1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Central Post-stroke PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aerospace Center Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, FengYin, Aerospace Center Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07758829
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- L2608108
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Aug 2026
- Last updated
- 11 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Study on Mechanisms and Predictive Factors of Motor Cortex Stimulation for Post-Stroke Thalamic Pain Based on Multimodal Imaging
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07758829
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- L2608108
- Keywords
- Post-Stroke Thalamic Pain, Motor Cortex Stimulation, Neuromodulation, Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Predictive Biomarkers, Brain Networks
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Aerospace Center HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the mechanisms and predictive factors of motor cortex stimulation (MCS) for treating post-stroke thalamic pain, a challenging central neuropathic pain condition. Approximately 25% of patients show no short-term response to MCS, and about 20% experience long-term efficacy decay, yet the underlying analgesic mechanisms remain unclear and objective predictive biomarkers are lacking.
This study aims to answer the following main questions:
How does MCS modulate thalamic pain through the coordinated interaction of structural connectivity, functional network dynamics, and metabolic balance in the brain? What are the distinct neuroimaging characteristics that differentiate short-term non-responders, long-term responders, and those with long-term efficacy decay? Which multimodal imaging biomarkers can reliably predict short-term and long-term MCS efficacy? Participants will undergo a two-stage MCS surgical procedure. In stage I, epidural electrodes are implanted over the motor cortex, followed by a 2-week external trial stimulation. Participants who achieve a ≥50% reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score will proceed to stage II, receiving an implanted pulse generator for long-term stimulation. Those who do not respond in the short term will have the electrodes removed without undergoing stage II implantation.
All participants will complete baseline clinical assessments and multimodal MRI scans (including T1, DTI, resting-state fMRI, and MRS) before surgery. Participants who receive the permanent implant will undergo follow-up clinical evaluations and repeat MRI scans at 3 and 6 months post-surgery.
Researchers will compare imaging features across three outcome groups-short-term non-responders, long-term responders, and long-term decay group-to identify predictive biomarkers. Multimodal imaging data will be integrated using LASSO regression to build prediction models for both short-term screening and long-term efficacy warning.
This research is expected to establish a "mechanism exploration - efficacy prediction - clinical decision" paradigm, providing objective imaging-based evidence to guide patient selection and postoperative management for MCS treatment.
Detailed description
Background and Rationale
Post-stroke thalamic pain is a refractory central neuropathic pain condition that significantly impairs patients' quality of life. Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) has emerged as a promising neuromodulatory therapy, yet its clinical application faces two major challenges: approximately 25% of patients show inadequate short-term response during the external trial phase, and about 20% of initial responders experience progressive efficacy decay within six months of permanent implantation. The neural mechanisms underlying MCS analgesia remain incompletely understood, and objective predictors for patient selection and long-term outcome are lacking.
Study Design
This is a prospective, single-arm cohort study conducted at Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China. A total of 200 patients with refractory post-stroke thalamic pain will be enrolled. All participants will undergo a standardized two-stage MCS surgical protocol. The study design incorporates comprehensive clinical assessments and multimodal MRI acquisition at baseline, with longitudinal follow-up at 3 and 6 months post-surgery for patients receiving permanent implants.
Surgical Protocol
The study employs a modified MCS surgical technique. Preoperative planning utilizes multimodal imaging-guided navigation combined with individual functional brain mapping to identify the optimal motor cortex coverage area. Two 8-contact epidural paddle electrodes are implanted in parallel over the primary motor cortex (M1) and adjacent premotor areas through a small craniotomy. Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring, including somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) for central sulcus localization and motor evoked potentials (MEP) for motor area verification, guides precise electrode placement.
The procedure is conducted in two stages. Stage I involves electrode implantation and external trial stimulation. Following a 2-week trial period with programmed stimulation parameters (40 Hz, 200 μs pulse width), short-term response is determined based on a ≥50% reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score from baseline. Responders proceed to Stage II for implantation of an internal pulse generator, while non-responders undergo electrode removal without permanent implantation.
Multimodal Imaging Protocol
All participants undergo a comprehensive MRI protocol at baseline (approximately 38 minutes per session), including:
High-resolution 3D T1-weighted imaging for structural segmentation and thalamic volumetric analysis Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) with 64 diffusion directions for white matter tractography and pathway integrity assessment Resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) for functional connectivity analysis Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) targeting bilateral thalamus, anterior cingulate cortex, and insula for quantification of glutamate, GABA, NAA, choline, and creatine concentrations Participants receiving permanent implants undergo repeat MRI scans at 3 and 6 months post-surgery to capture longitudinal changes in structural, functional, and metabolic measures.
Clinical Assessments
Clinical evaluations are conducted at baseline, 2 weeks (end of trial period), and 3 and 6 months post-surgery. Assessments include:
Pain measures: Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Quality of life and function: SF-36, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Emotional and cognitive function: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Adverse event and complication monitoring Analytical Framework
The study employs a "structure-function-metabolism" three-dimensional analytical framework to investigate MCS mechanisms:
Structural dimension: Corticothalamic pathway integrity assessed by DTI metrics (FA, MD, RD) and thalamic gray matter volume Functional dimension: Default mode network (DMN) and salience network (SN) connectivity dynamics derived from rs-fMRI independent component analysis Metabolic dimension: Glutamate/GABA ratio and other metabolite concentrations in pain-related brain regions Outcome Classification
Participants are categorized into three outcome groups based on their clinical trajectory:
Short-term non-responders: VAS improvement <50% at 2-week trial (no Stage II implantation) Long-term responders: VAS improvement ≥50% at both 2-week trial and 6-month follow-up Long-term decay group: VAS improvement ≥50% at 2-week trial but <50% at 6-month follow-up Predictive Modeling
The study aims to develop two predictive models:
Short-term screening model: Identifying baseline imaging biomarkers that distinguish short-term responders from non-responders, using LASSO-penalized logistic regression with cross-validation Long-term warning model: Among short-term responders, identifying baseline "vulnerability" markers and neuroplasticity indicators associated with 6-month efficacy decay Sample Size and Statistical Plan
Based on preliminary data from 50 prior cases, the expected outcome distribution is: 25% short-term non-responders, 60% long-term responders, and 15% long-term decay. With a target enrollment of 200 participants, the study is adequately powered for group comparisons and predictive factor identification. Statistical analyses include Kruskal-Wallis H test for three-group comparisons, LASSO regression for feature selection, and area under the curve (AUC) for model performance evaluation. Longitudinal changes within groups will be analyzed using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple comparisons will be corrected using false discovery rate (FDR). Sensitivity analyses will be performed using alternative VAS thresholds (≥30%, ≥70%) and bootstrap resampling.
Expected Impact
This research is expected to elucidate the neurobiological mechanisms of MCS analgesia through structural-functional-metabolic integration, identify reliable imaging biomarkers for patient selection, and establish a clinical decision-support framework for personalized MCS therapy in post-stroke thalamic pain.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS) | Experimental | Device: Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS) SystemAll participants undergo the same two-stage motor cortex stimulation (MCS) surgical protocol. Stage I involves epidural electrode implantation over the motor cortex, followed by a 2-week external trial stimulation. Participants who achieve a ≥50% reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score proceed to Stage II for implantation of an internal pulse generator. Those who do not respond in the short term undergo electrode removal without permanent implantation. All participants receive programmed stimulation parameters (40 Hz, 200 μs pulse width) during the trial and long-term follow-up. Postoperative assessments are conducted at 3 and 6 months for those receiving permanent implants. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age between 18 and 80 years. Diagnosed with chronic post-stroke central pain with a pain duration of at least 1 year, with stroke localized to the thalamus.
- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score ≥ 5 at baseline. Poor response to or intolerance of conventional pharmacotherapy for pain. Medically suitable for surgical treatment (no coagulopathy, no infection at surgical site, no severe psychiatric disorders, etc.).
- Voluntarily agrees to receive motor cortex stimulation (MCS) treatment. Able to communicate effectively with researchers and willing to comply with all study requirements.
- Sufficient cognitive ability to use the patient programmer and patient programmer charger.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- History of alcohol, drug, or substance abuse or dependence within the past 12 months.
- Trigeminal neuralgia or atypical facial pain. Advanced cardiovascular or other systemic disease that precludes surgical intervention.
- Prior history of ablative or related intracranial surgery. Presence of other neurological disorders, such as multiple sclerosis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, or brain/spinal cord tumors.
- Implanted drug pump and/or another implantable device (e.g., cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, cochlear implant, other neurostimulation systems such as spinal cord stimulator or deep brain stimulator).
- Metastatic malignancy or untreated localized malignancy. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, planned pregnancy, or women of childbearing potential without reliable contraceptive measures.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS) SystemEpidural paddle electrodes implanted over the primary motor cortex (M1) and adjacent premotor areas, connected to an implantable pulse generator. The system delivers programmed electrical stimulation (40 Hz, 200 μs pulse width) for pain modulation in patients with post-stroke thalamic pain. Devices used in this study: electrode model L3251 and pulse generator model G122R (provided by Beijing Pins Medical Co., Ltd., China). | Device | Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS) |
Primary outcome
Short-term Response Rate
Time frame: 2 weeks post-stage I surgery (at the end of external trial period)
Proportion of participants achieving a ≥50% reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score from baseline at the end of the 2-week external trial stimulation period.
Long-term Response Rate
Time frame: 6 months post-surgery
Proportion of participants receiving permanent implantation who maintain a ≥50% reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score from baseline at 6 months post-surgery. This outcome is assessed only in participants who achieved short-term response and proceeded to Stage II implantation.
10 secondary outcomes
Change in McGill Pain Questionnaire Short-Form (SF-MPQ) Score
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Score
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Change in SF-36 Quality of Life Score
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) Score
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) Score
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Longitudinal Changes in Multimodal MRI Biomarkers
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Adverse Event and Complication Rate
Time frame: From enrollment through 6-month follow-up
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score
Time frame: 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Central Post-stroke Pain
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Outcome Prediction and Recovery After Spontaneous Intracerebral Haemorrhage
Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Hemorrhagic Stroke
Active, not recruiting
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain
Chronic Neuropathic Pain, Post-Stroke Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
Myofascial Dysfunction in Post Stroke Shoulder Pain
Stroke
Recruiting
Post-stroke Pain tAN-fMRI
Post Stroke Pain
Recruiting
Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation for Refractory Chronic Pain
Spinal Cord Injuries, Nerve Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS) System in people with Central Post-stroke Pain and Stroke, run by Aerospace Center Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Mingming Zhao, Doctor of Medicine(M.D.) (86-18600317173, mingming157@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Short-term Response Rate (time frame: 2 weeks post-stage I surgery (at the end of external trial period)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Aug 2026.