Pediatric Renal StonesNCT07763743
Efficacy and Safety of Flexible Ureteroscopy With Flexible Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Vacuum-Assisted Access Sheath
A study testing Flexible Ureteroscopy in people with Pediatric Renal Stones, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are both effective treatment modalities for renal calculi measuring up to 2.5 cm in pediatric patients, demonstrating similar efficacy and complication profiles. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 14 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pediatric Renal Stones
- What is being tested?
- Flexible Ureteroscopy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 72 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2026to 10 Jun 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 14 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Renal stone burden 1- 2.5 cm confirmed by imaging (CT or ultrasound).
Who cannot join
- Patients who refuse to participate in the study.
- Untreated Urinary tract infection (UTI) proved by urine culture and sensitivity.
- Uncorrected coagulopathy.
- Anatomical anomalies or ureteral stricture precluding either surgical approach.
- Previous surgical intervention on the same kidney.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Mohamed kotb Ahmed, professor contact
Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Ain Shams University Hospitals
Cairo, Abbasia
Mohamed Abu El Naga, Professor, abuelnagam@yahoo.co.uk
Mohamed Saied, Lecturer, Dr.moh.saeed85@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: A Comparative Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Flexible Ureteroscopy With Flexible Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Vacuum-Assisted Access Sheath for the Management of Renal Stones 1- 2.5 cm in Pediatric Age Group
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are both effective treatment modalities for renal calculi measuring up to 2.5 cm in pediatric patients, demonstrating similar efficacy and complication profiles.
Suction has emerged as a potentially transformative adjunct in both percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and RIRS. Recent studies evaluating various suction mechanisms during RIRS and mini-PCNL have demonstrated multiple benefits, including reduced operative time, higher stone-free rates (SFR), decreased intrarenal pressure (IRP) and temperature, as well as enhanced intraoperative visualization.
Both FANS-UAS in RIRS and VAAS in Mini-PCNL have shown promising outcomes in the pediatric population. Taken together, these findings suggest that suction-assisted technologies whether in RIRS or Mini-PCNL enhance both efficacy and safety in pediatric stone management.
Read the detailed description
In children, renal stones commonly result from congenital anatomical defects, metabolic abnormalities, or recurrent urinary tract infections. Consequently, urolithiasis is more frequent in this age group and often requires more than one surgical intervention for complete management.
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are both effective treatment modalities for renal calculi measuring up to 2.5 cm in pediatric patients, demonstrating similar efficacy and complication profiles .
Currently, the majority of pediatric renal stones can be managed effectively using shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Surgical interventions such as open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery are reserved for a minority of cases involving anatomical abnormalities. As spontaneous passage of residual fragments occurs in only 20-25% of cases, achieving complete stone clearance is essential to minimize the risk of recurrence and additional interventions.
Technological advancements in endourological instrumentation have primarily aimed at minimizing procedure-related morbidity, including blood loss, postoperative pain, and renal injury. Consequently, miniaturized endoscopes and reduced-caliber access tracts (11-20 Fr) were developed, leading to the emergence of Mini-PCNL techniques specifically adapted for the management of large renal stones in pediatric patients.
The use of retrograde surgical approaches has expanded the capability to treat larger renal stones, despite often resulting in extended operative times. Due to its favorable safety profile and reduced complication rates, RIRS has gained acceptance as a preferred option for managing larger stones in pediatric patients.
For stones larger than 20 mm, RIRS monotherapy is associated with lower stone-free rate (SFR) compared to Mini-PCNL. However, RIRS offers advantages including reduced radiation exposure, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stay.
The Mini-PCNL and RIRS provide comparable efficacy and complication rates in the treatment of pediatric renal stones up to 2.5 cm. Furthermore, the study found that RIRS was associated with significantly shorter hospital stays, reduced radiation exposure, and decreased fluoroscopy time compared to Mini-PCNL.
Suction has been utilized in endourology for over 25 years, primarily in conjunction with ultrasound and ballistic lithotripsy devices, and more recently through the use of suction sheaths during PCNL. Intraoperative suction has been introduced as an effective method to remove residual fragments (RFs), thereby reducing the need for manual extraction with baskets.
Suction has also been employed in RIRS, providing multiple advantages including improved stone fragmentation and dusting, enhanced removal of debris and fragments, reduction of intra-renal temperature and pressure, as well as better intraoperative visualization.
In a prospective multicenter trial, Gauhar et al. demonstrated that the flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS-UAS) is safe and effective for use in pediatric RIRS, yielding high stone-free rates with low complication rates. This supports its emerging role as a valuable innovation in pediatric endourological procedures.
The initial experience using a semi-closed-circuit vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) system in pediatric patients, achieving an 80% stone-free rate with no intraoperative complications and only minor postoperative events. This technique, which integrates continuous irrigation inflow with suction-controlled outflow, was found to be a safe and effective option for managing complex renal stones in children while maintaining acceptable operative times.
- Conditions
- Pediatric Renal Stones
- Being tested
- Flexible Ureteroscopy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Flexible UreteroscopyProcedure or surgery
Also called Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
To compare the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy using a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS-UAS) versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) using a vacuum-assisted access sheath (VAAS) in the management of pediatric renal stones 1-2.5 cm
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A(Flexible Ureteroscopy with Flexible Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath ) | Active comparator | About 36 pediatric patients suffering from Renal Stones 1- 2.5 cm will be treated by Flexible Ureteroscopy with Flexible Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Receives: Procedure: Flexible Ureteroscopy |
| Group B(Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Vacuum-Assisted Access Sheath ) | Active comparator | About 36 pediatric patients suffering from Renal Stones 1- 2.5 cm will be treated by Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Vacuum-Assisted Access Sheath Receives: Procedure: Flexible Ureteroscopy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Management of pediatric renal stones
To compare stone-free rate (SFR) at 1 month after the procedure between RIRS using FURS-UAS and mini-PCNL using VASS in pediatric patients with renal stones 1-2.5 cm
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Aug 2026
- Study start1 Jun 2026
- Primary completion1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion10 Jun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pediatric Renal StonesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mohamed Ramadan, Ain Shams University
- Investigators
- Youssef Mahmoud kotb, Professor, Study chair, Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07763743
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Management of Renal Stones
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Aug 2026
- Last updated
- 13 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No