Coronary AngiogramMAHI-SEAL-60NCT07768839
Potassium Ferrate Hemostatic Sealant-Assisted Early Radial Hemostasis After Transradial Coronary Angiography and PCI
A study testing Experimental: PFHS + pneumatic radial compression device and Pneumatic radial compression device alone. in people with Coronary Angiogram and Early Discharge Trans Radial Angiography, run by University of Alberta.
Trial summary
This study aims to evaluate patients undergoing coronary angiography by comparing the use of Potassium Ferrate Hemostatic Sealant (PFHS) in addition to the standard of care (SOC) pneumatic radial compression device versus SOC alone. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Angiogram, Early Discharge Trans Radial Angiography
- What is being tested?
- Experimental: PFHS + pneumatic radial compression device and Pneumatic radial compression device alone.
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2026to 1 Jun 2032
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years • Undergoing trans radial coronary angiography with or without PCI
- Radial 6Fr Prelude sheath used for the procedure
- Planned use of Inflation band (Sunny Medical) radial compression device for hemostasis
- Able to provide informed consent
- Adequate collateral circulation per institutional radial access screening (consistent with device contraindications).
Who cannot join
- On a GPIIB/IIIA inhibitor
- Known hypersensitivity to device materials
- Infection or serious skin disease at puncture site
- Abnormal collateral circulation test / insufficient dual arterial supply
- Inability to complete study assessments before discharge
- Conversion to femoral access or need for alternate hemostasis device
- Prior radial artery harvest or known chronic radial artery occlusion in the study limb (per operator judgement).
About this study
Official title: Potassium Ferrate Hemostatic Sealant-Assisted Early Radial Hemostasis After Transradial Coronary Angiography and PCI. A Randomized, Single-centre, Superiority Trial at the Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada)
This study aims to evaluate patients undergoing coronary angiography by comparing the use of Potassium Ferrate Hemostatic Sealant (PFHS) in addition to the standard of care (SOC) pneumatic radial compression device versus SOC alone. The objective is to determine whether the addition of PFHS reduces the time to successful deflation and removal of the radial compression device.
Read the detailed description
Trans radial access is commonly used for coronary angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) because it lowers bleeding risk and allows faster recovery compared with femoral access. However, achieving safe hemostasis while keeping the radial artery open is important, as prolonged or excessive compression can lead to radial artery occlusion. At MAHI, hemostasis is currently managed with a pneumatic compression device and a 60-90 minute compression period before deflation. Reducing the time to safe device deflation and removal could improve patient comfort, reduce nursing workload, and support earlier discharge. This is particularly important in a centralized healthcare system like Alberta's, where many patients travel long distances for care and may benefit from shorter and more predictable recovery times.
- Being tested
- Experimental: PFHS + pneumatic radial compression device, Pneumatic radial compression device alone.
- Keywords
- Angiogram, Angioplasty, Radial angiogram, Potassium Ferrate Hemostatic Sealant (PFHS)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Experimental: PFHS + pneumatic radial compression deviceDevice
PFHS applied at arteriotomy + pneumatic radial compression device placement; deflation protocol starts at 20 minutes using the Stat Seal 2-step deflation method regardless of PCI procedure.
Pneumatic radial compression device alone.Device
Pneumatic radial compression device alone (no PFHS) + identical deflation protocol starts at 60 minutes for diagnostic procedures and 90 minutes for PCI procedures
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PFHS + pneumatic radial compression device. | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Experimental: PFHS + pneumatic radial compression device |
| Pneumatic radial compression device alone. | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: Pneumatic radial compression device alone. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PFHS plus pneumatic radial compression
PFHS plus pneumatic radial compression initiated at 20 minutes, compared with pneumatic radial compression alone.
Measured: Immediately after the intervention
Secondary outcomes (2)
Time to patient discharge between trial arms
Time to patient discharge between trial arms.
Measured: Immediately after the intervention
Radial artery patency at discharge compared between both trial arms
Plethysmography and pulse oximetry with reverse Barbeau testing (A-D classification).
Measured: Immediately after the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Aug 2026
- Study start1 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Jan 2032 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jun 2032 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Coronary AngiogramStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AlbertaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alberta
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07768839
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MAHI-SEAL-60 Trial
- Acronym
- MAHI-SEAL-60
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 23 Jul 2026
- Last updated
- 17 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Potassium Ferrate Hemostatic Sealant-Assisted Early Radial Hemostasis After Transradial Coronary Angiography and PCI. A Randomized, Single-centre, Superiority Trial at the Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07768839
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MAHI-SEAL-60 / MAHI-SEAL-60 Trial
- Keywords
- Angiogram, Angioplasty, Radial angiogram, Potassium Ferrate Hemostatic Sealant (PFHS)
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AlbertaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2032 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2032 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to evaluate patients undergoing coronary angiography by comparing the use of Potassium Ferrate Hemostatic Sealant (PFHS) in addition to the standard of care (SOC) pneumatic radial compression device versus SOC alone. The objective is to determine whether the addition of PFHS reduces the time to successful deflation and removal of the radial compression device.
Detailed description
Trans radial access is commonly used for coronary angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) because it lowers bleeding risk and allows faster recovery compared with femoral access. However, achieving safe hemostasis while keeping the radial artery open is important, as prolonged or excessive compression can lead to radial artery occlusion. At MAHI, hemostasis is currently managed with a pneumatic compression device and a 60-90 minute compression period before deflation. Reducing the time to safe device deflation and removal could improve patient comfort, reduce nursing workload, and support earlier discharge. This is particularly important in a centralized healthcare system like Alberta's, where many patients travel long distances for care and may benefit from shorter and more predictable recovery times.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PFHS + pneumatic radial compression device. | Experimental | Device: Experimental: PFHS + pneumatic radial compression device |
| Pneumatic radial compression device alone. | Active comparator | Device: Pneumatic radial compression device alone. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years • Undergoing trans radial coronary angiography with or without PCI
- Radial 6Fr Prelude sheath used for the procedure
- Planned use of Inflation band (Sunny Medical) radial compression device for hemostasis
- Able to provide informed consent
- Adequate collateral circulation per institutional radial access screening (consistent with device contraindications).
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- On a GPIIB/IIIA inhibitor
- Known hypersensitivity to device materials
- Infection or serious skin disease at puncture site
- Abnormal collateral circulation test / insufficient dual arterial supply
- Inability to complete study assessments before discharge
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: PFHS + pneumatic radial compression devicePFHS applied at arteriotomy + pneumatic radial compression device placement; deflation protocol starts at 20 minutes using the Stat Seal 2-step deflation method regardless of PCI procedure. | Device | PFHS + pneumatic radial compression device. |
| Pneumatic radial compression device alone.Pneumatic radial compression device alone (no PFHS) + identical deflation protocol starts at 60 minutes for diagnostic procedures and 90 minutes for PCI procedures | Device | Pneumatic radial compression device alone. |
Primary outcome
PFHS plus pneumatic radial compression
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
PFHS plus pneumatic radial compression initiated at 20 minutes, compared with pneumatic radial compression alone.
2 secondary outcomes
Time to patient discharge between trial arms
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
Radial artery patency at discharge compared between both trial arms
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Coronary Angiogram
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Randomized Prospective Trial on the Cost-Effectiveness of Photon-Counting CT Versus Energy-Integrating Detector CT in Suspected Chronic Coronary Syndrome
Computed Tomography Angiography, Coronary Artery Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Inclisiran to Prevent Cardiovascular Events in High-risk Primary Prevention Patients.
Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Not yet recruiting
Sirolimus-Coated Versus Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for Recurrent Coronary In-Stent Restenosis After Prior Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Treatment (SPRIT)
Coronary In-stent Restenosis, Coronary Artery Disease
Enrolling by invitation
The DANE-HEART Trial - Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for Primary Prevention
Coronary Atherosclerosis and Other Heart Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Experimental: PFHS + pneumatic radial compression device and Pneumatic radial compression device alone. in people with Coronary Angiogram and Early Discharge Trans Radial Angiography, run by University of Alberta.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PFHS plus pneumatic radial compression (time frame: Immediately after the intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2026.