Multiple SclerosisNCT07770620
Effects of Face-to-Face Versus Telerehabilitation-Based Circuit Training in People With Multiple Sclerosis
A study testing Face-to-Face Circuit Training and Synchronous Telerehabilitation-Based Circuit Training in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This randomized controlled study was planned to compare the effects of delivering the same exercise content face-to-face and through telerehabilitation in individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. All participants will receive circuit training for 8 weeks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Sclerosis
- What is being tested?
- Face-to-Face Circuit Training and Synchronous Telerehabilitation-Based Circuit Training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 14 Sep 2026to 15 Feb 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis Age between 18 and 65 years Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score between 2.0 and 5.5 Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score greater than 24 No relapse within the past 3 months Ability to walk at least 100 meters with or without an assistive device Willingness to participate in the study and provision of written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Botulinum toxin treatment for spasticity or a surgical procedure within the past 6 months Participation in a regular physiotherapy or rehabilitation program within the past 3 months Presence of a secondary neurological, orthopedic, or systemic disease that prevents independent standing and walking Presence of severe peripheral vestibular dysfunction Presence of a medical condition that may prevent participation in exercise Failure to provide written informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Bakırköy Prof. Dr. Mazhar Osman Mental Health and Neurological Diseases Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Istanbul, 34147
About this study
This randomized controlled study was planned to compare the effects of delivering the same exercise content face-to-face and through telerehabilitation in individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. All participants will receive circuit training for 8 weeks. The program will consist of two sessions per week, each lasting approximately 60 minutes. Assessments will be performed before and after treatment. Participants will be divided into two groups according to the mode of delivery: face-to-face and telerehabilitation. Telerehabilitation sessions will be conducted synchronously (via live connection) twice a week.
The study population will consist of adults aged 18-65 years with a diagnosis of MS who attend Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa Hospital. Individuals who meet the eligibility criteria will be included in the study on a voluntary basis after being informed about the study. Participants will be allocated to the groups using stratified randomization based on EDSS scores.
The circuit training program will consist of endurance-, resistance-, and balance-focused exercise components. The effects of the interventions will be evaluated in terms of walking endurance and speed, functional mobility, dynamic balance, lower-extremity functional muscle strength, perceived walking ability, fatigue, quality of life, and the physical and psychological impact of MS. All assessments will be performed before the intervention and at the end of the 8-week program.
Read the detailed description
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease characterized by inflammation, demyelination, and axonal loss in the central nervous system, affecting functions such as balance, walking, muscle strength, and fatigue, thereby reducing individuals' participation in activities and quality of life. Balance, coordination, strengthening, and aerobic exercise approaches are widely used in MS rehabilitation, and these methods are supported by a high level of evidence for improving functional capacity.
One method that allows these approaches to be combined and structured around functional tasks is circuit training, in which exercises are organized as consecutive stations with short rest intervals. Circuit training is defined as a comprehensive exercise model that targets endurance, balance, strength, and motor control components within the same session. Straudi et al. demonstrated that supervised and home-based task-oriented circuit training improved walking endurance and had positive effects on walking speed, functional mobility, fatigue, and muscle oxygen consumption. Doğan et al. reported that telerehabilitation- and virtual reality-supported circuit training improved trunk control, upper extremity function, and ataxia severity. In a meta-analysis conducted by Du et al., circuit training interventions were reported to have positive effects on balance, walking, fatigue, and quality of life in individuals with MS.
However, studies directly investigating circuit training in individuals with MS are limited. In recent years, telerehabilitation has emerged as a contemporary approach that provides access independent of distance; however, the need for further controlled studies to strengthen the level of evidence in MS has been emphasized.
The aim of this study is to investigate and compare the effects of an 8-week circuit training program delivered face-to-face and through synchronous telerehabilitation on walking capacity, functional mobility, lower-extremity muscle strength, fatigue, activities of daily living, and quality of life in individuals with MS.
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Being tested
- Face-to-Face Circuit Training, Synchronous Telerehabilitation-Based Circuit Training
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, circuit training, telerehabilitation, rehabilitation, technology, Physiotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Sclerosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Face-to-Face Circuit TrainingBehavioural
Participants will receive an 8-week circuit training program delivered face-to-face in a clinical setting. The program will be conducted twice a week, with each session lasting approximately 60 minutes. The circuit training program will include endurance, resistance, and balance exercises. Each exercise station will consist of 3 minutes of exercise followed by 2 minutes of rest. Participants will complete two circuits, with a 10-minute rest period between circuits.
Synchronous Telerehabilitation-Based Circuit TrainingBehavioural
Participants will receive the same 8-week circuit training program through synchronous telerehabilitation. The program will be conducted twice a week through live online sessions, with each session lasting approximately 60 minutes. The circuit training program will include endurance, resistance, and balance exercises. Each exercise station will consist of 3 minutes of exercise followed by 2 minutes of rest. Participants will complete two circuits, with a 10-minute rest period between circuits.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Face-to-Face | Experimental | Participants in this group will receive an 8-week circuit training program delivered face-to-face in a clinical setting. The program will be conducted twice a week, with each session lasting approximately 60 minutes, and will include endurance, resistance, and balance exercises. Receives: Behavioral: Face-to-Face Circuit Training |
| Telerehabilitation-Based | Experimental | Participants in this group will receive the same 8-week circuit training program through synchronous telerehabilitation. The program will be conducted twice a week through live online sessions, with each session lasting approximately 60 minutes, and will include endurance, resistance, and balance exercises. Receives: Behavioral: Synchronous Telerehabilitation-Based Circuit Training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Walking Endurance: 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Walking endurance will be assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test. During the test, participants will be instructed to walk as far as possible for 6 minutes along a predefined, level course. At the end of the test, the total distance covered will be recorded in meters, and this value will reflect the individual's functional walking capacity and endurance. Any assistive device used by the participant, the need for rest, and the development of symptoms during the test will also be recorded.
Measured: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8
Secondary outcomes (8)
Walking Speed: Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25FW)
Walking speed will be assessed using the Timed 25-Foot Walk Test. Participants will be instructed to walk a distance of 25 feet, approximately 7 meters, safely but as quickly as possible. The time required to complete the test will be recorded in seconds; a shorter completion time indicates better short-distance walking performance. This test will be used to objectively assess ambulation and lower-extremity function in individuals with MS.
Measured: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8
Functional Mobility: Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Functional mobility will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go Test. The participant will begin in a seated position on a chair; upon command, the participant will stand up, walk a distance of 3 meters, turn around, return to the chair, and sit down. The time required to complete the test will be recorded in seconds. This test provides an integrated assessment of functional movements frequently used in daily life, including sit-to-stand, walking, turning, and sitting down.
Measured: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8
Dynamic Balance: Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest)
Dynamic balance will be assessed using the Mini-BESTest. The Mini-BESTest consists of tasks involving anticipatory postural control, reactive postural responses, sensory orientation, and dynamic gait. The participant's ability to use different balance strategies, generate postural responses, and maintain stability during movement will be assessed. Each item will be scored according to performance, and the total score will provide information about the level of dynamic balance.
Measured: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8
Lower-Extremity Functional Muscle Strength: Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (5xSTS)
Lower-extremity functional muscle strength will be assessed using the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test. Participants will be instructed to stand up from and sit down on a standard chair five consecutive times, preferably without using their arms. The time required to complete the test will be recorded in seconds. A shorter completion time will indicate better lower-extremity functional muscle strength and functional transfer performance. Participants will be observed for safety during the test, and the use of an assistive device will be recorded if necessary.
Measured: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8
Patient-Perceived Impact on Walking Ability: Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12)
The patient-perceived impact on walking ability will be assessed using the MSWS-12. The scale consists of 12 items that assess the impact of MS on walking function based on patient-reported outcomes. Participants will rate the difficulties they have experienced while walking and the impact of these difficulties on their daily lives. Higher scores indicate a greater perceived limitation in walking due to MS.
Measured: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8
Fatigue: Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)
Fatigue will be assessed using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale. The MFIS is a patient-reported measure that assesses the physical, cognitive, and psychosocial impact of fatigue on daily life. Participants will indicate the extent to which fatigue has affected their activities, cognitive functioning, social life, and overall functioning. Higher total scores indicate a greater impact of fatigue on daily life.
Measured: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8
Quality of Life: Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life Questionnaire (MusiQoL)
Quality of life will be assessed using the MusiQoL. The MusiQoL is a patient-reported measure developed to assess MS-specific health-related quality of life. The questionnaire evaluates different dimensions of quality of life, including activities of daily living, psychological well-being, symptoms, relationships with friends, family relationships, coping, relationship with the health care system, and the overall impact of the disease on the individual. Higher scores indicate better perceived quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8
Physical and Psychological Impact of Multiple Sclerosis: Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29)
The physical and psychological impact of MS will be assessed using the MSIS-29. The scale consists of 29 items that assess the patient-reported impact of MS on daily life, physical functioning, mobility, emotional status, and overall well-being. The physical and psychological subscales can be evaluated separately. Higher total and subscale scores indicate a greater perceived impact of the disease on the individual.
Measured: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Aug 2026
- Study start14 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Feb 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple SclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Istanbul University - CerrahpasaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Adennur Tayboğa, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07770620
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- iuc-telerehab-circuittraining
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Aug 2026
- Last updated
- 18 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: There is currently no plan to share individual participant data (IPD) with other researchers.
Publications
Chisari C, Venturi M, Bertolucci F, Fanciullacci C, Rossi B. Benefits of an intensive task-oriented circuit training in Multiple Sclerosis patients with mild disability. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;35(3):509-18. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141144.
PubMed 25248447Lehmann I, Thaler I, Luder G, Damm U, Walti C, Steinheimer S, Verra ML, Muri RM, Nyffeler T, Vanbellingen T, Kamm CP. Standardized, comprehensive, hospital-based circuit training in people with multiple sclerosis: results on feasibility, adherence and satisfaction of the training intervention. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Jun;56(3):279-285. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06191-2. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
PubMed 32225136Ozden F, Ozkeskin M, Yuceyar N. The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the multiple sclerosis impact scale-29. Turk J Med Sci. 2022 Aug;52(4):1216-1222. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5426. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
PubMed 36326386Simeoni M, Auquier P, Fernandez O, Flachenecker P, Stecchi S, Constantinescu C, Idiman E, Boyko A, Beiske A, Vollmer T, Triantafyllou N, O'Connor P, Barak Y, Biermann L, Cristiano E, Atweh S, Patrick D, Robitail S, Ammoury N, Beresniak A, Pelletier J; MusiQol study group. Validation of the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life questionnaire. Mult Scler. 2008 Mar;14(2):219-30. doi: 10.1177/1352458507080733. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
PubMed 17942521Armutlu K, Keser I, Korkmaz N, Akbiyik DI, Sumbuloglu V, Guney Z, Karabudak R. Psychometric study of Turkish version of Fatigue Impact Scale in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurol Sci. 2007 Apr 15;255(1-2):64-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.01.073. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
PubMed 17337007Dib H, Tamam Y, Terzi M, Hobart J. Testing patient-reported outcome measurement equivalence in multinational clinical trials: An exemplar using the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2017 Sep 1;3(3):2055217317728740. doi: 10.1177/2055217317728740. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
PubMed 28975038Moller AB, Bibby BM, Skjerbaek AG, Jensen E, Sorensen H, Stenager E, Dalgas U. Validity and variability of the 5-repetition sit-to-stand test in patients with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(26):2251-8. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.683479. Epub 2012 May 22.
PubMed 22612360Dogruoz Karatekin B, Icagasioglu A, Pasin O. Validity, reliability and minimal detectable change of Mini-BESTest Turkish version in neurological disorders. Acta Neurol Belg. 2023 Aug;123(4):1519-1525. doi: 10.1007/s13760-023-02299-7. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
PubMed 37326807Sebastiao E, Sandroff BM, Learmonth YC, Motl RW. Validity of the Timed Up and Go Test as a Measure of Functional Mobility in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jul;97(7):1072-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.031. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
PubMed 26944709Motl RW, Cohen JA, Benedict R, Phillips G, LaRocca N, Hudson LD, Rudick R; Multiple Sclerosis Outcome Assessments Consortium. Validity of the timed 25-foot walk as an ambulatory performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2017 Apr;23(5):704-710. doi: 10.1177/1352458517690823. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
PubMed 28206828Wetzel JL, Fry DK, Pfalzer LA. Six-minute walk test for persons with mild or moderate disability from multiple sclerosis: performance and explanatory factors. Physiother Can. 2011 Spring;63(2):166-80. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2009-62. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
PubMed 22379256Cardini R, Corrini C, Bertoni R, Anastasi D, Cattaneo D, Gervasoni E. Exploring the effectiveness of circuit training rehabilitation on balance, gait, and fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2024 Dec;125:101413. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2024.101413. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
PubMed 39357272Dogan M, Ayvat E, Kilinc M. Telerehabilitation versus virtual reality supported task-oriented circuit therapy on upper limbs and trunk functions in patients with multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled study. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Mar;71:104558. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104558. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
PubMed 36812718Straudi S, De Marco G, Martinuzzi C, Baroni A, Lamberti N, Brondi L, Da Roit M, Pizzongolo LDM, Basaglia N, Manfredini F. Combining a supervised and home-based task-oriented circuit training improves walking endurance in patients with multiple sclerosis. The MS_TOCT randomized-controlled trial. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Apr;60:103721. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103721. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
PubMed 35276451Haki M, Al-Biati HA, Al-Tameemi ZS, Ali IS, Al-Hussaniy HA. Review of multiple sclerosis: Epidemiology, etiology, pathophysiology, and treatment. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Feb 23;103(8):e37297. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037297.
PubMed 38394496
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Face-to-Face Versus Telerehabilitation-Based Circuit Training in People With Multiple Sclerosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07770620
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- iuc-telerehab-circuittraining
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, circuit training, telerehabilitation, rehabilitation, technology, Physiotherapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul University - CerrahpasaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 14 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Feb 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized controlled study was planned to compare the effects of delivering the same exercise content face-to-face and through telerehabilitation in individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. All participants will receive circuit training for 8 weeks. The program will consist of two sessions per week, each lasting approximately 60 minutes. Assessments will be performed before and after treatment. Participants will be divided into two groups according to the mode of delivery: face-to-face and telerehabilitation. Telerehabilitation sessions will be conducted synchronously (via live connection) twice a week.
The study population will consist of adults aged 18-65 years with a diagnosis of MS who attend Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa Hospital. Individuals who meet the eligibility criteria will be included in the study on a voluntary basis after being informed about the study. Participants will be allocated to the groups using stratified randomization based on EDSS scores.
The circuit training program will consist of endurance-, resistance-, and balance-focused exercise components. The effects of the interventions will be evaluated in terms of walking endurance and speed, functional mobility, dynamic balance, lower-extremity functional muscle strength, perceived walking ability, fatigue, quality of life, and the physical and psychological impact of MS. All assessments will be performed before the intervention and at the end of the 8-week program.
Detailed description
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease characterized by inflammation, demyelination, and axonal loss in the central nervous system, affecting functions such as balance, walking, muscle strength, and fatigue, thereby reducing individuals' participation in activities and quality of life. Balance, coordination, strengthening, and aerobic exercise approaches are widely used in MS rehabilitation, and these methods are supported by a high level of evidence for improving functional capacity.
One method that allows these approaches to be combined and structured around functional tasks is circuit training, in which exercises are organized as consecutive stations with short rest intervals. Circuit training is defined as a comprehensive exercise model that targets endurance, balance, strength, and motor control components within the same session. Straudi et al. demonstrated that supervised and home-based task-oriented circuit training improved walking endurance and had positive effects on walking speed, functional mobility, fatigue, and muscle oxygen consumption. Doğan et al. reported that telerehabilitation- and virtual reality-supported circuit training improved trunk control, upper extremity function, and ataxia severity. In a meta-analysis conducted by Du et al., circuit training interventions were reported to have positive effects on balance, walking, fatigue, and quality of life in individuals with MS.
However, studies directly investigating circuit training in individuals with MS are limited. In recent years, telerehabilitation has emerged as a contemporary approach that provides access independent of distance; however, the need for further controlled studies to strengthen the level of evidence in MS has been emphasized.
The aim of this study is to investigate and compare the effects of an 8-week circuit training program delivered face-to-face and through synchronous telerehabilitation on walking capacity, functional mobility, lower-extremity muscle strength, fatigue, activities of daily living, and quality of life in individuals with MS.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Face-to-Face | Experimental | Behavioral: Face-to-Face Circuit TrainingParticipants in this group will receive an 8-week circuit training program delivered face-to-face in a clinical setting. The program will be conducted twice a week, with each session lasting approximately 60 minutes, and will include endurance, resistance, and balance exercises. |
| Telerehabilitation-Based | Experimental | Behavioral: Synchronous Telerehabilitation-Based Circuit TrainingParticipants in this group will receive the same 8-week circuit training program through synchronous telerehabilitation. The program will be conducted twice a week through live online sessions, with each session lasting approximately 60 minutes, and will include endurance, resistance, and balance exercises. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis Age between 18 and 65 years Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score between 2.0 and 5.5 Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score greater than 24 No relapse within the past 3 months Ability to walk at least 100 meters with or without an assistive device Willingness to participate in the study and provision of written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Botulinum toxin treatment for spasticity or a surgical procedure within the past 6 months Participation in a regular physiotherapy or rehabilitation program within the past 3 months Presence of a secondary neurological, orthopedic, or systemic disease that prevents independent standing and walking Presence of severe peripheral vestibular dysfunction Presence of a medical condition that may prevent participation in exercise Failure to provide written informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Face-to-Face Circuit TrainingParticipants will receive an 8-week circuit training program delivered face-to-face in a clinical setting. The program will be conducted twice a week, with each session lasting approximately 60 minutes. The circuit training program will include endurance, resistance, and balance exercises. Each exercise station will consist of 3 minutes of exercise followed by 2 minutes of rest. Participants will complete two circuits, with a 10-minute rest period between circuits. | Behavioural | Face-to-Face |
| Synchronous Telerehabilitation-Based Circuit TrainingParticipants will receive the same 8-week circuit training program through synchronous telerehabilitation. The program will be conducted twice a week through live online sessions, with each session lasting approximately 60 minutes. The circuit training program will include endurance, resistance, and balance exercises. Each exercise station will consist of 3 minutes of exercise followed by 2 minutes of rest. Participants will complete two circuits, with a 10-minute rest period between circuits. | Behavioural | Telerehabilitation-Based |
Primary outcome
Walking Endurance: 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8
Walking endurance will be assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test. During the test, participants will be instructed to walk as far as possible for 6 minutes along a predefined, level course. At the end of the test, the total distance covered will be recorded in meters, and this value will reflect the individual's functional walking capacity and endurance. Any assistive device used by the participant, the need for rest, and the development of symptoms during the test will also be recorded.
8 secondary outcomes
Walking Speed: Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25FW)
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8
Functional Mobility: Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8
Dynamic Balance: Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest)
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8
Lower-Extremity Functional Muscle Strength: Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (5xSTS)
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8
Patient-Perceived Impact on Walking Ability: Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12)
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8
Fatigue: Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8
Quality of Life: Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life Questionnaire (MusiQoL)
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8
Physical and Psychological Impact of Multiple Sclerosis: Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29)
Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Aug 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 25248447Chisari C, Venturi M, Bertolucci F, Fanciullacci C, Rossi B. Benefits of an intensive task-oriented circuit training in Multiple Sclerosis patients with mild disability. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;35(3):509-18. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141144.
- Results publication: PubMed 32225136Lehmann I, Thaler I, Luder G, Damm U, Walti C, Steinheimer S, Verra ML, Muri RM, Nyffeler T, Vanbellingen T, Kamm CP. Standardized, comprehensive, hospital-based circuit training in people with multiple sclerosis: results on feasibility, adherence and satisfaction of the training intervention. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Jun;56(3):279-285. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06191-2. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 36326386Ozden F, Ozkeskin M, Yuceyar N. The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the multiple sclerosis impact scale-29. Turk J Med Sci. 2022 Aug;52(4):1216-1222. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5426. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 17942521Simeoni M, Auquier P, Fernandez O, Flachenecker P, Stecchi S, Constantinescu C, Idiman E, Boyko A, Beiske A, Vollmer T, Triantafyllou N, O'Connor P, Barak Y, Biermann L, Cristiano E, Atweh S, Patrick D, Robitail S, Ammoury N, Beresniak A, Pelletier J; MusiQol study group. Validation of the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life questionnaire. Mult Scler. 2008 Mar;14(2):219-30. doi: 10.1177/1352458507080733. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 17337007Armutlu K, Keser I, Korkmaz N, Akbiyik DI, Sumbuloglu V, Guney Z, Karabudak R. Psychometric study of Turkish version of Fatigue Impact Scale in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurol Sci. 2007 Apr 15;255(1-2):64-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.01.073. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 28975038Dib H, Tamam Y, Terzi M, Hobart J. Testing patient-reported outcome measurement equivalence in multinational clinical trials: An exemplar using the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2017 Sep 1;3(3):2055217317728740. doi: 10.1177/2055217317728740. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
- Results publication: PubMed 22612360Moller AB, Bibby BM, Skjerbaek AG, Jensen E, Sorensen H, Stenager E, Dalgas U. Validity and variability of the 5-repetition sit-to-stand test in patients with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(26):2251-8. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.683479. Epub 2012 May 22.
- Results publication: PubMed 37326807Dogruoz Karatekin B, Icagasioglu A, Pasin O. Validity, reliability and minimal detectable change of Mini-BESTest Turkish version in neurological disorders. Acta Neurol Belg. 2023 Aug;123(4):1519-1525. doi: 10.1007/s13760-023-02299-7. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 26944709Sebastiao E, Sandroff BM, Learmonth YC, Motl RW. Validity of the Timed Up and Go Test as a Measure of Functional Mobility in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jul;97(7):1072-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.031. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 28206828Motl RW, Cohen JA, Benedict R, Phillips G, LaRocca N, Hudson LD, Rudick R; Multiple Sclerosis Outcome Assessments Consortium. Validity of the timed 25-foot walk as an ambulatory performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2017 Apr;23(5):704-710. doi: 10.1177/1352458517690823. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 22379256Wetzel JL, Fry DK, Pfalzer LA. Six-minute walk test for persons with mild or moderate disability from multiple sclerosis: performance and explanatory factors. Physiother Can. 2011 Spring;63(2):166-80. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2009-62. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 39357272Cardini R, Corrini C, Bertoni R, Anastasi D, Cattaneo D, Gervasoni E. Exploring the effectiveness of circuit training rehabilitation on balance, gait, and fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2024 Dec;125:101413. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2024.101413. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There is currently no plan to share individual participant data (IPD) with other researchers.
Related trials for Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 2
Metformin as an add-on or Monotherapy in Treatment of Aging People With Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 3
Dalfampridine Combined With Physical Therapy for Mobility Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 2
Targeting Agonists of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor for Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Face-to-Face Circuit Training and Synchronous Telerehabilitation-Based Circuit Training in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yonca Zenginler Yazgan, PhD (+905326006294, y.zenginleryazgan@iuc.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Walking Endurance: 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) (time frame: Baseline and post-intervention at Week 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07770620, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Aug 2026.