AzTrials
AzTrials

Critically Ill PatientsBICAR-CCNCT07782658

Bicarbonate Variation Monitoring With Indirect Calorimetry

An observational study of Critically Ill Patients and Acid-Base Disturbance, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients admitted to the intensive care unit frequently exhibit abnormal blood bicarbonate levels. These abnormalities are associated with patient outcomes and often prompt clinicians to modify management, either diagnostically or therapeutically (e.g., initiation or adjustment of mechanical ventilation, initiation or… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Indirect calorimetry measurement
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
91 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Nov 2026to 1 Nov 2027
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients admitted to the ICU

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patient admitted to the ICU within the past 72 hours
  • Receiving invasive mechanical ventilation
  • For whom the treating clinician plans to perform at least two blood bicarbonate measurements within the next 6 hours
  • No objection from the participant or their next of kin

Who cannot join

  • Planned weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation or ventilator change before the second bicarbonate measurement
  • Conditions interfering with the interpretation of indirect calorimetry data:
  • Inspiratory oxygen fraction > 60%
  • Administration of inhaled medications, including nitric oxide
  • Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) > 15 cmH₂O
  • Excessive leaks in the ventilator circuit, defined as expired volume < 95% of inspired volume
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patient on mechanical circulatory support with a gas exchanger, or planned initiation before the second blood gas analysis
  • Patient on extracorporeal renal replacement therapy, or planned initiation before the second bicarbonate measurement
  • Patient who received sodium bicarbonate within 2 hours prior to inclusion, or planned administration before the second bicarbonate measurement
  • Frequent disconnections of the ventilator circuit, or planned bronchoscopy before the second bicarbonate measurement

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Rémi SCHWEIZER, Dr contact

0033472357093

Remi.schweizer@chu-lyon.fr

France1 site
  • Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon

    Bron, Rhone, 69500

    Rémi SCHWEIZER, Dr, 0033472357093, remi.schweizer@chu-lyon.fr

    Rémi SCHWEIZER, Dr

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: BICARbonate and Indirect Calorimetry Correlation in Critical Care

Patients admitted to the intensive care unit frequently exhibit abnormal blood bicarbonate levels. These abnormalities are associated with patient outcomes and often prompt clinicians to modify management, either diagnostically or therapeutically (e.g., initiation or adjustment of mechanical ventilation, initiation or modification of extracorporeal renal replacement therapy, administration of specific diuretics, or sodium bicarbonate infusion).

Currently, the only way to determine blood bicarbonate concentration is through repeated blood sampling for laboratory analysis. However, this method is both discontinuous and invasive.

Read more

We have generated an in silico hypothesis suggesting that the mismatch between cellular CO₂ production/elimination and pulmonary CO₂ elimination reflects changes in blood bicarbonate levels. We propose to test this hypothesis in a cohort of intensive care unit patients.

If confirmed, indirect calorimetry could be positioned as a continuous, non-invasive monitoring tool for blood bicarbonate.

Being tested
Indirect calorimetry measurement
Keywords
Bicarbonate, Acid-Base disturbance, Indirect calorimetry

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Indirect calorimetry measurementDevice

    Setup of an indirect calorimetry monitor

Study groups in NCT07782658
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Study groupVentilated patient admitted to intensive care unit
Receives: Device: Indirect calorimetry measurement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Correlation coefficient between the CO₂ production/elimination mismatch assessed by indirect calorimetry and the change in blood bicarbonate over the study period.

    CO₂ production/elimination mismatch is estimated using the indirect calorimetry, assuming that the respiratory quotient remains constant throughout the study.

    Change in blood bicarbonate is obtained using two consecutive arterial blood samples.

    This relationship will be assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient if assumptions are met (normality and linearity); otherwise, Spearman's coefficient will be used. The correlation coefficient will be reported with its 95% confidence interval and p-value, and the relationship will be illustrated with a scatter plot and regression line or trend curve.

    Measured: At day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Aug 2026
  2. Study start1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
91 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07782658
Sponsor's protocol ID
69HCL26_0751
Acronym
BICAR-CC
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
20 Aug 2026
Last updated
24 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Critically Ill Patients and Acid-Base Disturbance, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Rémi SCHWEIZER, Dr (0033472357093, Remi.schweizer@chu-lyon.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Correlation coefficient between the CO₂ production/elimination mismatch assessed by indirect calorimetry and the change in blood bicarbonate over the study period. (time frame: At day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in