AzTrials
AzTrials

Low Back PainNCT07785804

Effectiveness of the SelfBack-App in Preventing and Treating Low Back Pain Versus no Intervention: a Non-randomized Clinical Trial

A study testing Selfback app in people with Low Back Pain, run by Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel at 1 site in Belgium.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide and represents a major burden for both individuals and healthcare systems. In Belgium, more than one in five adults experiences an episode of low back pain each year. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 18 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Low Back Pain
What is being tested?
Selfback app
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
144 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
1 Jun 2026to 1 Nov 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Currently working as a nurse, assistant nurse - logistical assistance in one of the selected units of the Universitair Ziekenhuis (UZ) Brussel, Valida or Inkendaal
  • Presence or not of LBP of any duration
  • Age: ≥18 years
  • Own and regularly use a smartphone (with at least Android 7.0 or iOS11.0) with internet access (Wi-Fi and/or mobile data)
  • Have a working email address and have access to a computer with internet access to complete questionnaires in a web browser.

Who cannot join

  • Unable to speak, read or understand the national languages (Dutch/French/German) nor English
  • Presence of red flags as described in the KCE LBP guidelines
  • Work leave for medical reasons of more than 3 consecutive days during the last 6 months
  • Cognitive impairments or learning disabilities limiting participation
  • Mental or physical illness or condition limiting participation
  • Inability to take part in exercise or physical activity
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Pregnancy
  • Previous back surgery
  • Ongoing participation in other research trials for LBP management

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Belgium1 site
  • Uz Brussel

    Brussels, Brussels Capital, 1090

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide and represents a major burden for both individuals and healthcare systems. In Belgium, more than one in five adults experiences an episode of low back pain each year. Healthcare workers, including nurses, nursing assistants, and logistical staff, are particularly vulnerable because of the physical demands of their profession. Daily activities such as patient handling, prolonged standing, repetitive movements, and manual lifting increase their risk of developing low back pain. As a result, these complaints can affect not only the health and well-being of employees but also their work ability, sickness absence, and, ultimately, the continuity and quality of patient care.

The present study evaluates the effectiveness of the SelfBack app, a digital self-management tool developed to support people with non-specific low back pain. The application uses information provided by the user, together with data recorded by a step counter, to create a personalised weekly programme. This programme includes exercises, walking goals, and educational material, all of which are adapted to the user's symptoms, progress, and individual needs.

Read more

The study will be conducted at Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel and Valida and will include nurses, nursing assistants, and logistical staff who experience non-specific low back pain. Hospital departments will be assigned to either the intervention group or the control group. Participants in the intervention group will receive access to the SelfBack app in addition to their usual care, while those in the control group will continue to receive usual care only.

The main objective is to determine whether the use of the SelfBack app improves low back pain-related functional disability after three months. Functional disability will be assessed using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), a widely used and validated questionnaire for people with low back pain.

In addition to the primary outcome, the study will examine the effects of the intervention on pain intensity, work ability, physical activity, health-related quality of life, and psychological factors such as fear of movement and self-efficacy. Participants' experiences with the application will also be explored. Data will be collected through online questionnaires at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months.

The SelfBack app is a CE-marked Class I medical device, and no serious adverse events are expected. All personal data will be handled in compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

The results of this study will help determine whether a personalised digital self-management programme can provide additional benefits when used alongside standard care for people with non-specific low back pain.

Read the detailed description

Low back pain (LBP) is a frequent condition that can affect daily functioning, physical activity, and work participation. Healthcare professionals, including nurses, assistant nurses, and logistical staff, are considered a population at increased risk because their professional activities often involve physical demands such as patient handling, repetitive movements, prolonged standing, and manual tasks.

The present study evaluates the effectiveness of the SelfBack application, a digital decision-support system designed to support the prevention and self-management of non-specific low back pain. The SelfBack system provides participants with individually adapted weekly recommendations through a smartphone application. These recommendations consist of exercise suggestions, activity goals, and educational information aimed at supporting participants in managing their symptoms and maintaining physical activity.

The study was initially designed as a single-centre clinical trial. Following an amendment dated 17/07/2026, the study was expanded into a multicentre trial to include an additional recruitment site. In addition to Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Ziekenhuis Valida will participate in the recruitment of participants. This modification was introduced because recruitment was progressing more slowly than initially expected. Expanding recruitment to a second centre allows a larger number of eligible healthcare workers to be approached and improves the feasibility of completing participant inclusion within the planned timeframe.

The study compares two approaches: usual care combined with access to the SelfBack application and usual care without additional digital intervention. The aim is to determine whether the addition of a digital self-management support system can improve outcomes related to low back pain compared with usual care alone.

The SelfBack application is a digital decision-support system that provides participants with a personalized weekly self-management plan. The recommendations are generated based on information collected from the participant and are adapted according to changes in symptoms and activity levels throughout the intervention period.

Participant information is obtained through an initial questionnaire, repeated self-reports within the application, and activity information collected through a step-counting device. These data are used by the SelfBack system to provide recommendations that correspond with the participant's individual situation.

Exercise adherence is monitored through the application, where participants indicate whether suggested activities have been performed.

The SelfBack application is used only for delivering the intervention content, including educational information, activity recommendations, and exercise guidance. Study questionnaires and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are collected separately through REDCap.

This study is designed as a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial with two parallel groups. Participants are recruited among healthcare workers employed in selected departments of UZ Brussel and Ziekenhuis Valida.

Allocation to the intervention or control condition is determined according to the department in which participants work. This approach allows implementation within the clinical environment while avoiding practical difficulties associated with individual randomization among colleagues working in the same unit.

Participants allocated to the intervention group receive access to the SelfBack application in addition to usual care. Participants allocated to the control group continue with usual care without access to the digital intervention during the study period.

The study follows a pragmatic design, meaning that participants continue to receive the usual healthcare support available in their normal setting. Additional treatments, such as consultations with healthcare professionals, physiotherapy, or medication use, are not restricted and may continue according to standard practice.

The total duration of participation is twelve months. Follow-up assessments are performed after three, six, and twelve months to evaluate changes over time.

Before any study-related procedure takes place, participants receive information about the study and are given sufficient opportunity to consider participation. Written informed consent is obtained before enrolment.

The informed consent procedure has been adapted to allow electronic signing of the informed consent form. Participants can complete the electronic informed consent process when they are logged into a hospital computer using their personal identification through the badge reader system. This modification was introduced to simplify the consent procedure while maintaining secure identification of participants.

Data collection within this study is performed digitally. All study-related questionnaires and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are collected through REDCap (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA), which is used as the Electronic Data Capture (EDC) system for the registration and management of study data.

The SelfBack application remains the digital tool used for delivering the intervention, including educational information, exercise recommendations, and personalized activity plans. REDCap is used specifically for collecting and storing study questionnaires and clinical research data.

Access rights are assigned according to the responsibilities of each study team member and are controlled throughout the study period. Study data are entered within a reasonable timeframe following completion of study assessments. Any modifications made to entered data are automatically documented through an audit trail, including information regarding the date, time, and person responsible for the modification.

All collected information is handled according to applicable data protection requirements.

After enrolment and completion of the informed consent procedure, participants start the study according to their assigned study group.

Participants allocated to the control group continue receiving usual care and complete the scheduled questionnaires through REDCap. Participants allocated to the SelfBack intervention group receive access to the SelfBack application in addition to usual care. They use the application to receive personalized exercise recommendations, educational content, and activity goals.

The follow-up period lasts twelve months. Participants complete digital questionnaires at three predefined assessment moments: three months after study enrolment; six months after study enrolment; twelve months after study enrolment.

The primary evaluation moment occurs after three months, corresponding with the main intervention period. Additional follow-up assessments at six and twelve months are performed to evaluate whether observed changes are maintained over time.

No physical study visits are required during the follow-up period. Communication and data collection occur digitally. If participants experience worsening symptoms or severe complaints during the study, they are advised to contact their usual healthcare provider according to standard care procedures.

The study evaluates the impact of the intervention through several questionnaires assessing physical functioning, symptoms, psychological factors, work-related outcomes, and quality of life.

All Patient-Reported Outcome Measures are completed digitally through REDCap at baseline and during follow-up assessments at three, six, and twelve months.

The primary outcome measure is the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). This questionnaire evaluates limitations in daily activities related to low back pain. Participants indicate whether specific functional difficulties are present, with higher scores representing greater functional impairment.

Additional questionnaires are used to evaluate different aspects related to low back pain and its impact on daily life.

Functional disability is additionally assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which measures disability associated with spinal disorders.

General health status and well-being are evaluated using the PROMIS-29 questionnaire. This questionnaire assesses several domains, including physical functioning, pain interference, fatigue, sleep problems, anxiety, depression, and social participation.

Work-related functioning is evaluated using the Work Ability Index (WAI) and work status questionnaires. These assessments examine the participant's ability to perform work activities and monitor changes in employment situation or work adaptations.

Health-related quality of life is assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, which evaluates mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression.

Pain intensity is measured using a numerical pain rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain.

Psychological factors related to low back pain are assessed using questionnaires measuring kinesiophobia, fear-avoidance beliefs, and pain self-efficacy. These include the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), the Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ), and the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ).

Physical activity is assessed through step-count data, recommended activity goals, and reported exercise volume. Participants in the intervention group provide information regarding completion of recommended exercises through the SelfBack application.

The Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale is used to classify participants according to their general level of physical activity.

Healthcare-related resource use is documented through participant-reported information regarding medication use, physiotherapy sessions, and healthcare consultations related to low back pain.

Participants using the SelfBack application are also asked to provide user ratings regarding their experience with the application. These ratings assess overall satisfaction, ease of use, and willingness to recommend the application to others using a five-point scoring system.

The SelfBack application records information regarding participant interaction with the intervention. Participants are asked within the application whether recommended exercises have been completed and can indicate their performed activities.

However, the study does not include direct verification of exercise performance. Reported adherence therefore reflects participant-reported completion of activities.

The tailoring variables used by the SelfBack system are monitored during the intervention period. These variables include information related to pain intensity, function, fear-avoidance, work ability, sleep, pain self-efficacy, stress, depressive symptoms, and barriers to self-management.

The collected information allows the application to adapt recommendations according to the participant's reported status and progression.

The SelfBack application is considered a CE-marked Class I medical device. Based on the nature of the intervention, no serious adverse events are expected during this study.

A possible adverse event related to participation could be temporary worsening of low back pain due to muscular overload associated with performing exercises. This could occur following repetitive movements or increased physical strain.

If participants report worsening symptoms, they will be advised to seek medical advice from their usual healthcare provider according to standard clinical practice.

Serious adverse events are defined according to applicable medical device study regulations. No serious adverse events or suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions are anticipated for this clinical trial.

Conditions
Low Back Pain
Being tested
Selfback app, No Interventions
Keywords
selfback app, low back pain
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Selfback appDevice

    The SelfBack intervention consists of a digital decision-support system delivered through a smartphone application and is evaluated in healthcare workers (nurses, assistant nurses, and logistical staff) working at Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel and Ziekenhuis Valida. The application is designed to support the prevention and self-management of non-specific low back pain.

    The SelfBack application provides participants with personalized weekly self-management plans based on individual characteristics, baseline information, weekly self-reported symptoms, and activity data collected through a step counter.

    Participants allocated to the intervention group receive access to the SelfBack application in addition to usual care. Exercise adherence and activity levels are monitored through self-reported information within the application. The intervention is provided during the study period, with outcome assessments performed at 3, 6, and 12 months.

  • No InterventionsOther

    No intervention

Study groups in NCT07785804
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SelfBack App + Usual CareActive comparatorParticipants receive access to the SelfBack application providing personalized self-management plans, including exercise recommendations, activity goals, and educational content, in addition to usual care.
Receives: Device: Selfback app
Usual Care AlonePlacebo comparatorParticipants receive usual care without access to the SelfBack application during the study period.
Receives: Other: No Interventions

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

    Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire: the questionnaire includes 24 items asking participants to indicate if they experience functional impairments. This is tested by answering to a series of descriptions of functional abilities with higher scores indicating higher level of disability. This questionnaire will be held at 3 months after the begin of the intervention.

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

    Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire: As secondary endpoint it will be held at 6 and 12 months.

    Measured: 6 en 12 maanden

  2. Oswestry disability questionnaire

    The Oswestry disability index (ODI) is used to measure functional disability. It contains ten topics whereby each is scored on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 5 (maximum disability possible). Higher values present more disability, low values present less disability.

    Measured: 3, 6 en 12 maanden

  3. PROMIS 29

    The PROMIS 29 is a set of short forms that includes questions from seven different areas: depression, anxiety, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep problems, and social participation. Each area is assessed with four questions, plus an additional question about pain intensity (numeric rating scale) (NRS) (question 29). The PROMIS tools have been tested and validated in large populations, making them suitable for research on various conditions. They are not disease-specific and measure the past seven days, except for Physical Function, which doesn't have a specific timeframe.

    Measured: This questionnaire will be held for 3, 6 and 12 months.

  4. Work Ability Index (WAI)

    The WAI measures the work ability taking into account physical and mental parts of work as well as different diseases and their impact on work ability.

    Measured: This questionnaire will be held for 3, 6 and 12 months.

  5. EQ5D - 5L

    The EuroQoL 5-Dimension questionnaire is used to assess quality of life in five areas: mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression.

    Measured: This questionnaire will be held for 3, 6 and 12 months

  6. VAS score

    Pain intensity: VAS score (VAS: 0-10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain imaginable) will be used for the assessment of overall pain, defined as a combination of back and leg pain (but not pain from other body parts). The VAS pain score is believed to be reliable, valid and sensitive to change.

    Measured: This questionnaire will be held for 3, 6 and 12 months.

  7. Tampa scale of kinesiophobia (TSK )

    Tampa scale of kinesiophobia (TSK ): consists of 17 questions designed to assess the fear of movement (kinesiophobia) in individuals with low back pain. Higher scores suggest a higher fear of movement. The TSK is well-established and demonstrates strong clinical reliability in both acute and chronic low back pain patients.

    Measured: This questionnaire will be hold at 3, 6 and 12 months.

  8. The Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ)

    The FABQ is a 5-item questionnaire, where the participants score their beliefs about their LBP on an ordinal scale ranging from zero [completely disagree] to six [completely agree].

    Measured: This questionnaire will be held for 3, 6 and 12 months.

  9. Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire:

    The questionnaire assesses the participant's level of confidence in carrying out specific activities despite their pain. The PSEQ is a 10-item questionnaire scored on an ordinal scale ranging from zero to six.

    Measured: This questionnaire will be held for 3, 6 and 12 months.

  10. Physical activity

    Weekly recommended step count goal, and the actual achieved step count per day

    Measured: [Timeframe: weekly for 9 months]. This questionnaire will be held for 3, 6 and 12 months.

  11. Exercise volume

    The patients report back their completed exercise volume as number of sets and repetitions for their suggested exercises, when they perform them.

    Measured: This questionnaire will be held for 3, 6 and 12 months.

  12. Healthcare service use:

    Patients will keep a diary to log usage of pain medication as well as physiotherapy and physician visits related to low back pain.

    Measured: 12 months

  13. Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale

    Participants indicate their amount of time per week performing leisure activities with four levels of intensity ranging from sedentary to vigorous physically active.

    Measured: This questionnaire will be held for 3, 6 and 12 months. (18)

  14. Tailoring variables:

    Participants in the intervention are on a weekly basis asked a set of tailoring questions. These are tracked over the intervention period. The tailoring questions include items on low back pain (NRS for pain intensity), function, fear-avoidance, workability, sleep, pain self- efficacy, stress, symptoms of depression, and barriers for self-management.

    Measured: Participants in the intervention are on a weekly basis asked a set of tailoring questions.

  15. User ratings

    Three rating questions are asked, focusing on overall satisfaction, ease of use.. Each question is scored using a 5-point scale.

    Measured: This questionnaire will be held for 3, 6 and 12 months.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Aug 2026
  2. Study start1 Jun 2026
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This is a multicentre, randomized controlled clinical trial with two parallel groups. Participants are allocated at department level to either the intervention group receiving the SelfBack application in addition to usual care, or the control group receiving usual care alone. Each participant remains in the assigned group throughout the 12-month study period. Outcomes are assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after study enrolment.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
144 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07785804
Sponsor's protocol ID
25099
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
20 Aug 2026
Last updated
25 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Dube MO, Langevin P, Roy JS. Measurement properties of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in populations with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Pain Rep. 2021 Dec 21;6(4):e972. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000972. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.

    PubMed 34963996
  • Khutok K, Janwantanakul P, Jensen MP, Kanlayanaphotporn R. Responsiveness of the PROMIS-29 Scales in Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Jan 15;46(2):107-113. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003724.

    PubMed 33347091
  • Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017.

    PubMed 11074683
  • Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3115-24. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006. No abstract available.

    PubMed 11124727
  • Rezaei B, Mousavi E, Heshmati B, Asadi S. Low back pain and its related risk factors in health care providers at hospitals: A systematic review. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Sep 30;70:102903. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102903. eCollection 2021 Oct.

    PubMed 34691437
  • Sandal LF, Stochkendahl MJ, Svendsen MJ, Wood K, Overas CK, Nordstoga AL, Villumsen M, Rasmussen CDN, Nicholl B, Cooper K, Kjaer P, Mair FS, Sjogaard G, Nilsen TIL, Hartvigsen J, Bach K, Mork PJ, Sogaard K. An App-Delivered Self-Management Program for People With Low Back Pain: Protocol for the selfBACK Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Dec 3;8(12):e14720. doi: 10.2196/14720.

    PubMed 31793897
  • Sandal LF, Bach K, Overas CK, Svendsen MJ, Dalager T, Stejnicher Drongstrup Jensen J, Kongsvold A, Nordstoga AL, Bardal EM, Ashikhmin I, Wood K, Rasmussen CDN, Stochkendahl MJ, Nicholl BI, Wiratunga N, Cooper K, Hartvigsen J, Kjaer P, Sjogaard G, Nilsen TIL, Mair FS, Sogaard K, Mork PJ. Effectiveness of App-Delivered, Tailored Self-management Support for Adults With Lower Back Pain-Related Disability: A selfBACK Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Oct 1;181(10):1288-1296. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4097.

    PubMed 34338710
  • Oliveira CB, Maher CG, Pinto RZ, Traeger AC, Lin CC, Chenot JF, van Tulder M, Koes BW. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview. Eur Spine J. 2018 Nov;27(11):2791-2803. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5673-2. Epub 2018 Jul 3.

    PubMed 29971708
  • Hayden JA, Ellis J, Ogilvie R, Malmivaara A, van Tulder MW. Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 28;9(9):CD009790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009790.pub2.

    PubMed 34580864
  • Wong AYL, Chan LLY, Lo CWT, Chan WWY, Lam KCK, Bao JCH, Ferreira ML, Armijo-Olivo S. Prevalence/Incidence of Low Back Pain and Associated Risk Factors Among Nursing and Medical Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PM R. 2021 Nov;13(11):1266-1280. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12560. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

    PubMed 33492778
  • Stochkendahl MJ, Kjaer P, Hartvigsen J, Kongsted A, Aaboe J, Andersen M, Andersen MO, Fournier G, Hojgaard B, Jensen MB, Jensen LD, Karbo T, Kirkeskov L, Melbye M, Morsel-Carlsen L, Nordsteen J, Palsson TS, Rasti Z, Silbye PF, Steiness MZ, Tarp S, Vaagholt M. National Clinical Guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset low back pain or lumbar radiculopathy. Eur Spine J. 2018 Jan;27(1):60-75. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5099-2. Epub 2017 Apr 20.

    PubMed 28429142
  • Sang S, Wang J, Jin J. Prevalence of low back pain among intensive care nurses: A meta-analysis. Nurs Crit Care. 2021 Nov;26(6):476-484. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12646. Epub 2021 May 25.

    PubMed 34036704
  • GBD 2021 Low Back Pain Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of low back pain, 1990-2020, its attributable risk factors, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023 May 22;5(6):e316-e329. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00098-X. eCollection 2023 Jun.

    PubMed 37273833
  • Grimby G, Borjesson M, Jonsdottir IH, Schnohr P, Thelle DS, Saltin B. The "Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale" and its application to health research. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Dec;25 Suppl 4:119-25. doi: 10.1111/sms.12611.

    PubMed 26589125

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Selfback app in people with Low Back Pain, run by Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07785804, which also lists 14 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Aug 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in