AzTrials
AzTrials

Amphetamine Use DisordersNCT07802223

Closed-loop tTIS Targeted of the Nac as an Intervention for MUD Patients

A study testing Temporal Interference Stimulation in people with Amphetamine Use Disorders, run by Shanghai Mental Health Center at 1 site in China.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Closed-loop transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS) targeting the nucleus accumbens may modulate abnormal neural responses to drug-related cues in individuals with methamphetamine use disorder (MUD), thereby reducing drug craving and improving cognitive and behavioral control. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 years
Conditions the study is for
Amphetamine Use Disorders
What is being tested?
Temporal Interference Stimulation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Sep 2026to 1 Nov 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Individuals aged between 18 and 55 years, irrespective of gender, having completed a minimum of 9 years of education and capable of effectively cooperating in questionnaire evaluations.
  • Meet the diagnostic criteria set forth by the DSM-V concerning the amphetamine-type substance addiction.
  • A history of utilizing amphetamine-type substances for a duration not less than one year, with a frequency of use being at least once per week.
  • Consent to actively cooperate in the completion of subsequent follow-up assessments.

Who cannot join

  • Severe cognitive functional impairments manifested through a history of head trauma, cerebrovascular diseases, epilepsy, etc., or usage of cognitive enhancement drugs in the past 6 months; an intellectual disability with an IQ score less than 70.
  • A diagnosis of schizophrenia or other severe mental illnesses as per the DSM-5 criteria.
  • Abuse or dependence on other psychoactive substances (excluding nicotine) within the past 5 years.
  • Severe organic diseases that might compromise study participation.
  • Contraindications to cTBS, such as a history of epileptic seizures or the presence of metallic implants in proximity to the head.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Min Zhao, PhD contact

64387250

drminzhao@gmail.com

Tianzhen Chen, PhD contact

vomchan@hotmail.com

China1 site
  • Shanghai Mental Health Center

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200030

    Min Zhao, Phd, 18017311005 ext. 64387250, drminzhao@smhc.org.cn

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Closed-loop Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation Targeted of the Nucleus Accumbens as an Intervention for Methamphetamine Use Disorder Patients

Closed-loop transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS) targeting the nucleus accumbens may modulate abnormal neural responses to drug-related cues in individuals with methamphetamine use disorder (MUD), thereby reducing drug craving and improving cognitive and behavioral control. Stimulation will be delivered in real time according to each patient's cue-induced response time.

Read the detailed description

This project will recruit individuals with methamphetamine use disorder. Participants will receive closed-loop transcranial temporal interference stimulation targeting the nucleus accumbens once daily for five consecutive days. During each intervention session, participants will be exposed to methamphetamine-related cues, and stimulation will be triggered according to their response time.

Before and after the intervention, clinical questionnaires and behavioral tasks will be administered to evaluate changes in drug craving, methamphetamine-use-related symptoms, inhibitory control, and reward-related decision-making. Cue-induced neural responses will also be assessed to investigate the neural mechanisms through which closed-loop tTIS targeting the nucleus accumbens may alleviate craving and improve addiction-related cognitive and behavioral dysfunction.

Being tested
Temporal Interference Stimulation, Shame
Keywords
Amphetamine-type stimulants, temporal interference stimulation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Temporal Interference StimulationDevice

    Each session will comprise 240 trials, during which stimulation may be triggered up to 10 times according to the participant's cue-reactivity state. Each stimulation will consist of a 5-s current ramp-up, 30 s of continuous stimulation, and a 5-s current ramp-down. The intervention will be administered once daily for five consecutive days.

  • ShameDevice

    The stimulation parameters-including frequency, current intensity, and duration-are identical to those in the active group. However, the sham stimulation mode is activated on the device, resulting in consist of a 5-s current ramp-up, but 0 s of continuous stimulation during the stimulation.

Study groups in NCT07802223
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Temporal Interference Stimulation GroupExperimentalThe first pair of electrodes continuously delivers a current at a frequency of f1 = 2 kHz, while the second pair delivers a current at f2 = 2.130 kHz. Based on the principle of temporal interference, an alternating electric field at a frequency of f1 - f2 = 130 Hz is generated in the target region.
Receives: Device: Temporal Interference Stimulation
Control GroupSham comparatorThe stimulation parameters-including frequency, current intensity, and duration-are identical to those in the active group. However, the sham stimulation mode is activated on the device, resulting in no actual current being delivered during the stimulation.
Receives: Device: Shame

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change of Craving

    Visual Analog Scale, range0-100 point. the higher the score, the more one wants drugs.

    Measured: baseline, 1 day after treatment, 1 month after treatment

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Obsessive-Compulsive Drug Use Scale score

    Drug-related obsessive thoughts and compulsive behaviours will be assessed using the Obsessive-Compulsive Drug Use Scale (OCDUS). The scale consists of 14 items rated from 0 to 4, producing a total score ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicate more severe drug-related obsessive thoughts, craving, and impaired control over drug use.

    Measured: baseline, 1 day after treatment, 1 month after treatment

  2. Dual-Mode of Self-Control Scale-Impulsive System score

    Impulsive tendencies will be assessed using the Impulsive System subscale of the Dual-Mode of Self-Control Scale (DMSC-S). The subscale contains 12 items rated from 1 to 5, producing a total score ranging from 12 to 60. Higher scores indicate stronger impulsive-system tendencies, including greater impulsivity, distractibility, and preference for immediate gratification.

    Measured: baseline, 1 day after treatment, 1 month after treatment

  3. Dual-Mode of Self-Control Scale-Control System score

    Self-control will be assessed using the Control System subscale of the Dual-Mode of Self-Control Scale (DMSC-S). The subscale contains 9 items rated from 1 to 5, producing a total score ranging from 9 to 45. Higher scores indicate stronger self-control, including better problem-solving and future-oriented planning.

    Measured: baseline, 1 day after treatment, 1 month after treatment

  4. Stop Single Task

    Response inhibition will be assessed using the Stop-Signal Task. The primary behavioural parameter will be the reaction time and accuracy, measured in milliseconds. A longer stop-signal reaction time indicates poorer inhibitory control, whereas a shorter stop-signal reaction time indicates better inhibitory control.

    Measured: baseline, 1 day after treatment, 1 month after treatment

  5. EEG ERP amplitude during the Stop-Signal Task

    The mean amplitude of the stop-related event-related potential and functional connection will be measured in microvolts over frontocentral electrodes within the prespecified post-stimulus time window.

    Measured: baseline, 1 day after treatment, 1 month after treatment

  6. Decision-making Preferences and Delay of Gratification

    delay discounting task,Delay of gratification will be assessed using a computerised delay-discounting task in which participants choose between smaller immediate rewards and larger delayed rewards. The discounting-rate parameter, k, will be estimated from participants' choices. A higher k value indicates steeper delay discounting, a stronger preference for immediate rewards, and a lower ability to delay gratification.

    Measured: baseline, 1 day after treatment, 1 month after treatment

  7. Changes in Reward Learning

    Reward learning will be assessed using a computerised reinforcement-learning task. A computational reinforcement-learning model will be fitted to participants' trial-by-trial choices. The learning-rate parameter, alpha, ranges from 0 to 1 and represents the extent to which recent feedback is used to update expected values. Higher values indicate greater updating in response to recent feedback.

    Measured: baseline, 1 day after treatment, 1 month after treatment

  8. sensitivity to reward and punishment

    Sensitivity to punishment will be assessed using the Sensitivity to Punishment subscale of the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ). The subscale contains 24 dichotomous items scored 0 or 1, producing a score ranging from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicate greater sensitivity to punishment.

    Measured: baseline, 1 day after treatment, 1 month after treatment

  9. Behavioral Inhibition/Activation System Scale

    Sensitivity to anticipated punishment will be assessed using the 7-item Behavioural Inhibition System subscale of the Behavioural Inhibition System/Behavioural Activation System Scales. Each item is rated from 1 to 4, producing a score ranging from 7 to 28. Higher scores indicate greater behavioural inhibition and sensitivity to anticipated punishment.

    Measured: baseline, 1 day after treatment, 1 month after treatment

  10. Beck Depression Inventory-II score

    Depressive symptom severity will be assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). The inventory consists of 21 items rated from 0 to 3, producing a total score ranging from 0 to 63. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

    Measured: baseline, 1 day after treatment, 1 month after treatment

  11. Drug-cue Flanker task

    Attentional interference from methamphetamine-related cues will be assessed using a computerised drug-cue Flanker task. The drug-cue attentional interference effect will be calculated as the difference in mean reaction time between trials containing methamphetamine-related cues and trials containing neutral cues, measured in milliseconds. A larger positive value indicates greater attentional interference from methamphetamine-related cues.

    Measured: baseline, 1 day after treatment, 1 month after treatment

  12. EEG theta power

    Theta-band power will be quantified within the prespecified frequency range, electrode region, and post-stimulus time window. The cue-related theta effect will be calculated as the difference between methamphetamine-related and neutral cue conditions. A larger value indicates a stronger theta-band response to methamphetamine-related cues.

    Measured: baseline, 1 day after treatment, 1 month after treatment

  13. EEG P3 amplitude

    Task-related electroencephalography will be recorded during the drug-cue Flanker task and the reward learning task. The mean amplitude of the P3 event-related potential will be measured in microvolts within the prespecified electrode region and post-stimulus time window. A larger positive difference indicates greater neural reactivity to methamphetamine-related cues.

    Measured: baseline, 1 day after treatment, 1 month after treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Sep 2026
  2. Study start1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07802223
Sponsor's protocol ID
MZhao-029
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
30 Jul 2026
Last updated
3 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Temporal Interference Stimulation in people with Amphetamine Use Disorders, run by Shanghai Mental Health Center at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Min Zhao, PhD (64387250, drminzhao@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change of Craving (time frame: baseline, 1 day after treatment, 1 month after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in