Cardiac Output, LowPiLCOsNCT07810621
Post-Induction Low Cardiac Output Syndrome in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
An observational study of Cardiac Output, Low and Coronary Arterial Disease, run by Ataturk University at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Hemodynamic change after induction of general anesthesia is usually judged from mean arterial pressure. Pressure, however, is a surrogate for flow, and the two can separate: cardiac output may fall while arterial pressure remains apparently adequate. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiac Output, Low, Coronary Arterial Disease, Anesthesia, General
- What is being tested?
- routine clinical monitoring, observed only
- How many people
- 103 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 11 Sep 2026to 16 Nov 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adults scheduled for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass at two tertiary cardiovascular surgery centre. Patients are approached before induction of anesthesia and enrolled consecutively. Every eligible patient during the enrollment period enters the cohort and no selection is applied.
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 years or older.
- Scheduled for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
- Availability of perioperative cardiac output monitoring using the MostCare hemodynamic monitoring system, initiated before induction of anesthesia.
- Availability of required baseline preoperative clinical and laboratory data.
- Written informed consent obtained from the participant or a legally authorized representative.
Who cannot join
- Age under 18 years.
- Coronary artery bypass grafting combined with valvular or aortic surgery.
- Preoperative mechanical circulatory support, including intra-aortic balloon pump support.
- Preoperative continuous infusion of inotropic or vasopressor agents.
- Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%.
- Baseline cardiac index (CI) <2.0 L/min/m² before induction of anesthesia.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Atrial fibrillation or other clinically significant arrhythmias that may affect the reliability of arterial pulse waveform analysis.
- Moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation.
- Failure to establish reliable arterial waveform monitoring before induction of anesthesia.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
Ankara Bilkent City Hospital
Ankara, Ankara, 06000
Ataturk University
Erzurum, Erzurum, 25240
About this study
Official title: Post-Induction Low Cardiac Output Syndrome (PiLCOs): A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study to Identify Flow-Based Early Hypoperfusion in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgical Patients
Hemodynamic change after induction of general anesthesia is usually judged from mean arterial pressure. Pressure, however, is a surrogate for flow, and the two can separate: cardiac output may fall while arterial pressure remains apparently adequate. The interval that follows induction of anesthesia, before surgical stimulation begins and while hemodynamic conditions are determined by anesthetic management alone, has not been characterized in terms of flow. This study is designed to define post-induction low cardiac output (PiLCOs) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
This is a prospective, observational, two-centre cohort study. Consecutive adults undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass at two tertiary cardiovascular surgery centre will be enrolled. No aspect of anesthetic or surgical management will be altered for the purposes of the study. An arterial catheter is sited before induction while the patient is awake, and cardiac index is recorded continuously at 30-second intervals by arterial waveform analysis. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, stroke volume index and cardiac index are recorded at the same resolution.
Read more
The analysis window is the 30 minutes that follow induction of anesthesia. The period of cardiopulmonary bypass is excluded from all analyses, because flow during bypass is generated by the pump rather than by the heart.
The primary outcome has two components, both defined over that window and both referenced to a cardiac index threshold of 2.0 L/min/m2. The first is the total time spent below threshold, in minutes. The second is the cumulative low-output burden, defined as the integral over time of the difference between the threshold and the measured cardiac index, taken only where that difference is positive. Dimensional analysis reduces the unit of burden to L/m2, a body-surface-indexed volume of undelivered flow, which multiplied by body surface area yields an absolute flow deficit in liters. Time below threshold describes how long the exposure lasts and cumulative burden describes how deep it is. The two together define the exposure, and neither alone is sufficient.
Secondary outcomes are the same two measures computed at cardiac index thresholds of 2.2 and 2.5 L/min/m2; the incidence of PiLCOs, defined as at least one measurement below 2.0 L/min/m2 within the window; the time-weighted average depth across the window and the median depth sustained while below threshold; the distribution of cumulative burden across the three consecutive ten-minute segments of the window; and the time from induction to the first measurement below threshold.
Exploratory analyses will examine the association between the presence and the magnitude of PiLCOs and the postoperative course, including acute kidney injury, serum lactate, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and mortality. All outcome analyses are treated as exploratory and hypothesis-generating, and no adjustment is made for multiple comparisons.
Sample size was derived from an internal pilot of 30 patients, comprising the first 15 consecutive patients enrolled at each centre. In that pilot the standard deviation of time below threshold was 8.14 min and the incidence of PiLCOs was 70.0%. Setting the half-width of the 95% confidence interval at 1.7 min for mean time below threshold requires 88 patients, and setting it at 9.5 percentage points for incidence requires 90; the larger figure was carried forward and rounded to 90, allocated as 45 patients per centre. Allowing 15% for withdrawal, protocol deviation and unusable recordings gives a planned enrollment of 103 patients. Because the study estimates the frequency and the magnitude of an event that has not previously been characterized, rather than testing a prespecified superiority hypothesis, sample size is based on the precision of estimation rather than on power.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE
Peri-operative hemodynamic management is built almost entirely around arterial pressure. International consensus recommends that mean arterial pressure be kept at or above 60-65 mmHg in patients at risk, notes that organ injury depends on both the depth and the duration of hypotension, and identifies the area beneath a pressure threshold as the metric most closely associated with injury. That framework arose from a large observational literature linking intra-operative hypotension to acute kidney injury, myocardial injury and death.
Arterial pressure, however, is not perfusion. Perfusion is determined by flow, and pressure and flow can separate, particularly where vascular tone is changing rapidly under the influence of anesthetic agents, surgical stimulation and vasoactive drugs. A recent prospective cohort in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting reported a mean of 86.4 minutes of low cardiac index across the whole operation, of which 69% occurred while the patient was normotensive, with a correlation between cardiac index and mean arterial pressure of only 0.33. Low cardiac output after cardiac surgery has itself been defined in at least 262 different ways, under which reported adult incidence ranges from 1.5% to 91%.
The interval that follows induction of anesthesia has a particular standing among these periods. It precedes surgical stimulation, it is short, and hemodynamic conditions within it are determined by anesthetic management alone. Post-induction hypotension has been characterized in detail and is conventionally measured over the first 20 minutes after induction. What happens to flow during this interval has not been described. This study sets out to characterize it.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING
This is a prospective, observational, two-centre cohort study conducted at two tertiary cardiovascular surgery centre. The study is observational in the strict sense: no aspect of anesthetic technique, monitoring, fluid or vasoactive management, or surgical conduct is altered for the purposes of the study, and the investigators take no part in clinical decisions. The study is reported in accordance with the STROBE statement.
Consecutive adults scheduled for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass are screened and enrolled. Patients are enrolled before induction of anesthesia so that baseline measurement can begin while they are awake.
HAEMODYNAMIC MONITORING AND DATA ACQUISITION
An arterial catheter is sited before induction while the patient is awake, in keeping with routine practice at both centre for this operation. Cardiac output is derived from the arterial waveform by pulse contour analysis via pressure recording analytical method and indexed to body surface area. Cardiac index is recorded continuously at 30-second intervals from before induction until the end of the operation.
Recorded at the same resolution are mean arterial pressure, systolic and diastolic pressure, heart rate, stroke volume and stroke volume index. Body surface area is computed once for each patient from height and weight.
The time of induction is recorded prospectively on the case report form as the moment at which the intravenous induction agent is given, and is cross-checked against the monitor clock. Where the two disagree, the discrepancy is documented and resolved before analysis by a prespecified rule.
THE ANALYSIS WINDOW
The analysis window is the 30 minutes that begin at induction of anesthesia. This length was chosen for two reasons. It extends beyond the 20 minutes over which post-induction hypotension is conventionally measured, so that the study can determine whether the conventional window is adequate for flow. It also ends before surgical stimulation is established in most patients, so that the exposure measured remains attributable to anesthetic management rather than to surgery.
The period of cardiopulmonary bypass is excluded from all analyses. Flow during bypass is generated by the pump rather than by the heart, so cardiac index derived from the arterial waveform has no physiological meaning in that interval. The bypass period is identified from the perfusion record and confirmed against the arterial waveform.
PRIMARY OUTCOME
The primary outcome has two components. Both are defined over the 30-minute window and both are referenced to a cardiac index threshold of 2.0 L/min/m2.
The first component is time below threshold: the total duration for which cardiac index lies below 2.0 L/min/m2, expressed in minutes.
The second component is cumulative low-output burden: the integral over time of the difference between the threshold and the measured cardiac index, taken only where that difference is positive. Formally, for threshold T and cardiac index CI(t), burden is the integral of the positive part of T minus CI(t) over the window.
The two components answer different questions and neither is sufficient alone. Time below threshold states how long the exposure lasted but is indifferent to its depth: one minute at 1.9 L/min/m2 and one minute at 1.0 L/min/m2 count equally. Cumulative burden states how deep the exposure was but is indifferent to its shape: a brief profound fall and a prolonged shallow one may yield the same value. Reported together they define the exposure.
The unit of burden reduces under dimensional analysis. Cardiac index is expressed in L/min/m2 and time in minutes, so their product is L/m2, a volume of undelivered flow indexed to body surface area. Multiplied by the patient's body surface area it becomes an absolute flow deficit expressed in litres, which is the quantity of blood flow that the circulation failed to deliver during the window.
Both components are computed between consecutive measurement pairs by the trapezoidal rule with linear interpolation, and threshold crossings are located exactly rather than rounded to the sampling grid. Intervals between consecutive measurements longer than the sampling period are not counted as observed time.
SECONDARY OUTCOMES
Time below threshold and cumulative burden are additionally computed at cardiac index thresholds of 2.2 and 2.5 L/min/m2 over the same window, so that the findings do not depend on a single threshold.
The incidence of PiLCOs is defined as the proportion of patients with at least one measurement below 2.0 L/min/m2 within the window.
Two measures of depth are reported. Time-weighted average depth is cumulative burden divided by the length of the window and describes the mean shortfall spread across the whole interval. Depth during exposure is the mean shortfall computed only over the time spent below threshold and describes how far below the threshold the circulation actually ran while the event was occurring.
The temporal distribution of exposure is described by the share of cumulative burden accruing within each of the three consecutive ten-minute segments of the window, and by the time from induction to the first measurement below threshold.
FLOW AND PRESSURE
A prespecified secondary analysis addresses whether pressure-based monitoring is able to detect the event. The proportion of sub-threshold exposure occurring while the patient is normotensive is quantified, a normotensive episode being defined as a cardiac index below 2.0 L/min/m2 recorded at a mean arterial pressure of 65 mmHg or above. The correlation between cardiac index and mean arterial pressure within the window is examined over the same period, and the agreement between the two in classifying a patient as exposed or unexposed is described.
EXPLORATORY ANALYSES
The association between the presence and the magnitude of PiLCOs and the postoperative course is examined for acute kidney injury, serum lactate, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and mortality. Patient-level and procedural characteristics, among them age, body-mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, comorbidity burden, induction agent dose and cardiopulmonary bypass duration, are examined as correlates of exposure.
All outcome analyses are exploratory and hypothesis-generating. The number of covariates admitted to any model is constrained by the rule of at least ten events per variable, and no adjustment is made for multiple comparisons. Associations found here are intended to inform the design of subsequent studies rather than to establish causation.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Continuous variables are summarized as mean and standard deviation where the distribution is symmetrical and as median and interquartile range where it is skewed. Distributional shape is assessed by the Shapiro-Wilk test together with bias-corrected coefficients of skewness and excess kurtosis, and uni-modality is examined using the bi-modality coefficient derived from those two moments. Confidence intervals for proportions are constructed by the Wilson score method and for means and medians by percentile bootstrap.
Groups are compared using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Effect size is reported as the Hodges-Lehmann estimate of location shift with its distribution-free confidence interval and as Cliff's delta for overlap. Associations between continuous variables are examined by Spearman rank correlation. A two-sided p value below 0.05 is taken as the threshold for statistical significance.
No value-based artifact filter is applied to the cardiac index record, and no measurement is excluded other than those flagged as invalid by the monitor itself. Removing low readings as artifact would cause systematic under-ascertainment of the very event under study.
Recording coverage within the window is quantified for each patient across the three ten-minute segments. A patient whose weighted coverage falls below a prespecified minimum is not included in the primary analysis, because the exposure cannot be estimated reliably from a sparse record.
SAMPLE SIZE
Sample size is based on the precision of estimation rather than on the power of a hypothesis test, because the study estimates the frequency and the magnitude of an event that has not previously been characterized rather than testing a prespecified superiority hypothesis.
An internal pilot of 30 patients, comprising the first 15 consecutive patients enrolled at each centre, was used to estimate variability. In that pilot the mean time below threshold was 6.59 minutes with a standard deviation of 8.14 minutes, and the incidence of PiLCOs was 70.0%.
Two precision targets were set. For mean time below threshold the half-width of the 95% confidence interval is to be no greater than 1.7 minutes, which requires 88 patients. For the incidence of PiLCOs the half-width is to be no greater than 9.5 percentage points, which requires 90 patients. The larger of the two figures was carried forward and rounded to 90, allocated as 45 patients per centre. Allowing 15% for withdrawal, protocol deviation and unusable recordings gives a planned enrollment of 103 patients.
ETHICS
The study is approved by the institutional review board at each participating centre and written informed consent is obtained from every patient before enrollment. Because the study imposes no intervention and alters no aspect of care, the risk to participants is confined to the handling of clinical data, which is stored in de-identified form.
- Being tested
- routine clinical monitoring, observed only
- Keywords
- Cardiac Index, Low Cardiac Output, Hemodynamic Monitoring, Hypoperfusion, Post-Induction Hemodynamics, Perioperative Hemodynamics, PiLCOs, post-induction low cardiac output, cumulative low-output burden
- Medical subject headings
- Cardiac Output, Low
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
routine clinical monitoring, observed onlyOther
routine clinical monitoring, observed only
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass | Consecutive adults undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass at two tertiary cardiovascular surgery centres. All participants receive routine anaesthetic and surgical care; no aspect of management is altered for the study. An arterial catheter is sited before induction while the patient is awake, as is routine for this operation at both centres, and cardiac index is recorded continuously at 30-second intervals by arterial waveform analysis from before induction until the end of the operation. There is a single cohort and no assignment of any kind; all enrolled patients are observed under the same protocol. Receives: Other: routine clinical monitoring, observed only |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time below threshold: total duration with a cardiac index below 2.0 L/min/m2, in minutes
The total duration for which cardiac index lies below 2.0 L/min/m2 during the analysis window, expressed in minutes. Cardiac index is recorded continuously at 30-second intervals by arterial waveform analysis. Duration is computed between consecutive measurement pairs by the trapezoidal rule with linear interpolation, and threshold crossings are located exactly rather than rounded to the sampling grid. Intervals between consecutive measurements longer than the sampling period are not counted as observed time. The period of cardiopulmonary bypass is excluded.
Measured: From induction of anaesthesia to 30 minutes after induction
Cumulative low-output burden: time integral of the cardiac index deficit below 2.0 L/min/m2, in L/m2
The integral over time of the difference between the threshold of 2.0 L/min/m2 and the measured cardiac index, taken only where that difference is positive, during the analysis window. Under dimensional analysis the unit reduces to L/m2, a volume of undelivered flow indexed to body surface area; multiplied by body surface area it yields an absolute flow deficit in litres. Computation, handling of gaps in the record, exclusion of the cardiopulmonary bypass period and the absence of artefact filtering are as described for time below threshold. Time below threshold states how long the exposure lasted and cumulative burden states how deep it was. The two are reported together because neither is sufficient alone.
Measured: From induction of anaesthesia to 30 minutes after induction
Secondary outcomes (5)
Incidence of PiLCOs: proportion of patients with a cardiac index below 2.0 L/min/m2, in percent
The proportion of patients in whom cardiac index falls below 2.0 L/min/m2 on at least one occasion during the analysis window. A patient contributes to the numerator irrespective of how long the exposure lasts or how deep it is, so this measure describes how common the event is rather than how severe. The confidence interval is constructed by the Wilson score method.
Measured: From induction of anaesthesia to 30 minutes after induction
Time below threshold at a cardiac index of 2.2 L/min/m2, in minutes
The total duration for which cardiac index lies below 2.2 L/min/m2 during the analysis window, defined and computed exactly as for the primary outcome but at the higher threshold. Reported so that the findings do not depend on a single threshold.
Measured: From induction of anaesthesia to 30 minutes after induction
Cumulative low-output burden at a cardiac index of 2.2 L/min/m2, in L/m2
The integral over time of the difference between the threshold of 2.2 L/min/m2 and the measured cardiac index, taken only where that difference is positive, during the analysis window. Defined and computed exactly as for the primary outcome but at the higher threshold.
Measured: From induction of anaesthesia to 30 minutes after induction
Time below threshold at a cardiac index of 2.5 L/min/m2, in minutes
The total duration for which cardiac index lies below 2.5 L/min/m2 during the analysis window, defined and computed exactly as for the primary outcome but at the highest of the three thresholds.
Measured: From induction of anaesthesia to 30 minutes after induction
Cumulative low-output burden at a cardiac index of 2.5 L/min/m2, in L/m2
he integral over time of the difference between the threshold of 2.5 L/min/m2 and the measured cardiac index, taken only where that difference is positive, during the analysis window. Defined and computed exactly as for the primary outcome but at the highest of the three thresholds.
Measured: From induction of anaesthesia to 30 minutes after induction
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Sep 2026
- Study start11 Sep 2026
- Primary completion16 Oct 2026
- Study completion16 Nov 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiac Output, LowStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ataturk UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 103 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ataturk University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Muhammed E Aydin, Ataturk University
- Investigators
- Muhammed Enes Aydin, Principal Investigator, Principal investigator, Ataturk University Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07810621
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PiLCOs-2026
- Acronym
- PiLCOs
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 3 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 2 Nov 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data will not be made publicly available due to ethical and patient confidentiality considerations. De-identified data may be considered for sharing upon reasonable request and subject to approval by the study investigators and relevant institutional authorities.
Publications
Jor O, Maca J, Koutna J, Gemrotova M, Vymazal T, Litschmannova M, Sevcik P, Reimer P, Mikulova V, Trlicova M, Cerny V. Hypotension after induction of general anesthesia: occurrence, risk factors, and therapy. A prospective multicentre observational study. J Anesth. 2018 Oct;32(5):673-680. doi: 10.1007/s00540-018-2532-6. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
PubMed 30027443Giomarelli P, Biagioli B, Scolletta S. Cardiac output monitoring by pressure recording analytical method in cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Sep;26(3):515-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.05.025.
PubMed 15302045Greiwe G, Luehsen K, Hapfelmeier A, Rogge D, Kubik M, Schulte-Uentrop L, Saugel B. Cardiac output estimation by pulse wave analysis using the pressure recording analytical method and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution: A method comparison study after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Oct;37(10):920-925. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001227.
PubMed 32398582Saugel B, Bebert EJ, Briesenick L, Hoppe P, Greiwe G, Yang D, Ma C, Mascha EJ, Sessler DI, Rogge DE. Mechanisms contributing to hypotension after anesthetic induction with sufentanil, propofol, and rocuronium: a prospective observational study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Apr;36(2):341-347. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00653-9. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
PubMed 33523352Aktas Yildirim S, Sarikaya ZT, Dogan L, Ulugol H, Gucyetmez B, Toraman F. Arterial Elastance: A Predictor of Hypotension Due to Anesthesia Induction. J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 27;12(9):3155. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093155.
PubMed 37176595
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Nov 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Post-Induction Low Cardiac Output Syndrome (PiLCOs): A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study to Identify Flow-Based Early Hypoperfusion in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgical Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07810621
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PiLCOs / PiLCOs-2026
- Keywords
- Cardiac Index, Low Cardiac Output, Hemodynamic Monitoring, Hypoperfusion, Post-Induction Hemodynamics, Perioperative Hemodynamics, PiLCOs, post-induction low cardiac output
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 103 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ataturk UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
- Study start
- 11 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hemodynamic change after induction of general anesthesia is usually judged from mean arterial pressure. Pressure, however, is a surrogate for flow, and the two can separate: cardiac output may fall while arterial pressure remains apparently adequate. The interval that follows induction of anesthesia, before surgical stimulation begins and while hemodynamic conditions are determined by anesthetic management alone, has not been characterized in terms of flow. This study is designed to define post-induction low cardiac output (PiLCOs) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
This is a prospective, observational, two-centre cohort study. Consecutive adults undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass at two tertiary cardiovascular surgery centre will be enrolled. No aspect of anesthetic or surgical management will be altered for the purposes of the study. An arterial catheter is sited before induction while the patient is awake, and cardiac index is recorded continuously at 30-second intervals by arterial waveform analysis. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, stroke volume index and cardiac index are recorded at the same resolution.
The analysis window is the 30 minutes that follow induction of anesthesia. The period of cardiopulmonary bypass is excluded from all analyses, because flow during bypass is generated by the pump rather than by the heart.
The primary outcome has two components, both defined over that window and both referenced to a cardiac index threshold of 2.0 L/min/m2. The first is the total time spent below threshold, in minutes. The second is the cumulative low-output burden, defined as the integral over time of the difference between the threshold and the measured cardiac index, taken only where that difference is positive. Dimensional analysis reduces the unit of burden to L/m2, a body-surface-indexed volume of undelivered flow, which multiplied by body surface area yields an absolute flow deficit in liters. Time below threshold describes how long the exposure lasts and cumulative burden describes how deep it is. The two together define the exposure, and neither alone is sufficient.
Secondary outcomes are the same two measures computed at cardiac index thresholds of 2.2 and 2.5 L/min/m2; the incidence of PiLCOs, defined as at least one measurement below 2.0 L/min/m2 within the window; the time-weighted average depth across the window and the median depth sustained while below threshold; the distribution of cumulative burden across the three consecutive ten-minute segments of the window; and the time from induction to the first measurement below threshold.
Exploratory analyses will examine the association between the presence and the magnitude of PiLCOs and the postoperative course, including acute kidney injury, serum lactate, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and mortality. All outcome analyses are treated as exploratory and hypothesis-generating, and no adjustment is made for multiple comparisons.
Sample size was derived from an internal pilot of 30 patients, comprising the first 15 consecutive patients enrolled at each centre. In that pilot the standard deviation of time below threshold was 8.14 min and the incidence of PiLCOs was 70.0%. Setting the half-width of the 95% confidence interval at 1.7 min for mean time below threshold requires 88 patients, and setting it at 9.5 percentage points for incidence requires 90; the larger figure was carried forward and rounded to 90, allocated as 45 patients per centre. Allowing 15% for withdrawal, protocol deviation and unusable recordings gives a planned enrollment of 103 patients. Because the study estimates the frequency and the magnitude of an event that has not previously been characterized, rather than testing a prespecified superiority hypothesis, sample size is based on the precision of estimation rather than on power.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE
Peri-operative hemodynamic management is built almost entirely around arterial pressure. International consensus recommends that mean arterial pressure be kept at or above 60-65 mmHg in patients at risk, notes that organ injury depends on both the depth and the duration of hypotension, and identifies the area beneath a pressure threshold as the metric most closely associated with injury. That framework arose from a large observational literature linking intra-operative hypotension to acute kidney injury, myocardial injury and death.
Arterial pressure, however, is not perfusion. Perfusion is determined by flow, and pressure and flow can separate, particularly where vascular tone is changing rapidly under the influence of anesthetic agents, surgical stimulation and vasoactive drugs. A recent prospective cohort in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting reported a mean of 86.4 minutes of low cardiac index across the whole operation, of which 69% occurred while the patient was normotensive, with a correlation between cardiac index and mean arterial pressure of only 0.33. Low cardiac output after cardiac surgery has itself been defined in at least 262 different ways, under which reported adult incidence ranges from 1.5% to 91%.
The interval that follows induction of anesthesia has a particular standing among these periods. It precedes surgical stimulation, it is short, and hemodynamic conditions within it are determined by anesthetic management alone. Post-induction hypotension has been characterized in detail and is conventionally measured over the first 20 minutes after induction. What happens to flow during this interval has not been described. This study sets out to characterize it.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING
This is a prospective, observational, two-centre cohort study conducted at two tertiary cardiovascular surgery centre. The study is observational in the strict sense: no aspect of anesthetic technique, monitoring, fluid or vasoactive management, or surgical conduct is altered for the purposes of the study, and the investigators take no part in clinical decisions. The study is reported in accordance with the STROBE statement.
Consecutive adults scheduled for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass are screened and enrolled. Patients are enrolled before induction of anesthesia so that baseline measurement can begin while they are awake.
HAEMODYNAMIC MONITORING AND DATA ACQUISITION
An arterial catheter is sited before induction while the patient is awake, in keeping with routine practice at both centre for this operation. Cardiac output is derived from the arterial waveform by pulse contour analysis via pressure recording analytical method and indexed to body surface area. Cardiac index is recorded continuously at 30-second intervals from before induction until the end of the operation.
Recorded at the same resolution are mean arterial pressure, systolic and diastolic pressure, heart rate, stroke volume and stroke volume index. Body surface area is computed once for each patient from height and weight.
The time of induction is recorded prospectively on the case report form as the moment at which the intravenous induction agent is given, and is cross-checked against the monitor clock. Where the two disagree, the discrepancy is documented and resolved before analysis by a prespecified rule.
THE ANALYSIS WINDOW
The analysis window is the 30 minutes that begin at induction of anesthesia. This length was chosen for two reasons. It extends beyond the 20 minutes over which post-induction hypotension is conventionally measured, so that the study can determine whether the conventional window is adequate for flow. It also ends before surgical stimulation is established in most patients, so that the exposure measured remains attributable to anesthetic management rather than to surgery.
The period of cardiopulmonary bypass is excluded from all analyses. Flow during bypass is generated by the pump rather than by the heart, so cardiac index derived from the arterial waveform has no physiological meaning in that interval. The bypass period is identified from the perfusion record and confirmed against the arterial waveform.
PRIMARY OUTCOME
The primary outcome has two components. Both are defined over the 30-minute window and both are referenced to a cardiac index threshold of 2.0 L/min/m2.
The first component is time below threshold: the total duration for which cardiac index lies below 2.0 L/min/m2, expressed in minutes.
The second component is cumulative low-output burden: the integral over time of the difference between the threshold and the measured cardiac index, taken only where that difference is positive. Formally, for threshold T and cardiac index CI(t), burden is the integral of the positive part of T minus CI(t) over the window.
The two components answer different questions and neither is sufficient alone. Time below threshold states how long the exposure lasted but is indifferent to its depth: one minute at 1.9 L/min/m2 and one minute at 1.0 L/min/m2 count equally. Cumulative burden states how deep the exposure was but is indifferent to its shape: a brief profound fall and a prolonged shallow one may yield the same value. Reported together they define the exposure.
The unit of burden reduces under dimensional analysis. Cardiac index is expressed in L/min/m2 and time in minutes, so their product is L/m2, a volume of undelivered flow indexed to body surface area. Multiplied by the patient's body surface area it becomes an absolute flow deficit expressed in litres, which is the quantity of blood flow that the circulation failed to deliver during the window.
Both components are computed between consecutive measurement pairs by the trapezoidal rule with linear interpolation, and threshold crossings are located exactly rather than rounded to the sampling grid. Intervals between consecutive measurements longer than the sampling period are not counted as observed time.
SECONDARY OUTCOMES
Time below threshold and cumulative burden are additionally computed at cardiac index thresholds of 2.2 and 2.5 L/min/m2 over the same window, so that the findings do not depend on a single threshold.
The incidence of PiLCOs is defined as the proportion of patients with at least one measurement below 2.0 L/min/m2 within the window.
Two measures of depth are reported. Time-weighted average depth is cumulative burden divided by the length of the window and describes the mean shortfall spread across the whole interval. Depth during exposure is the mean shortfall computed only over the time spent below threshold and describes how far below the threshold the circulation actually ran while the event was occurring.
The temporal distribution of exposure is described by the share of cumulative burden accruing within each of the three consecutive ten-minute segments of the window, and by the time from induction to the first measurement below threshold.
FLOW AND PRESSURE
A prespecified secondary analysis addresses whether pressure-based monitoring is able to detect the event. The proportion of sub-threshold exposure occurring while the patient is normotensive is quantified, a normotensive episode being defined as a cardiac index below 2.0 L/min/m2 recorded at a mean arterial pressure of 65 mmHg or above. The correlation between cardiac index and mean arterial pressure within the window is examined over the same period, and the agreement between the two in classifying a patient as exposed or unexposed is described.
EXPLORATORY ANALYSES
The association between the presence and the magnitude of PiLCOs and the postoperative course is examined for acute kidney injury, serum lactate, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and mortality. Patient-level and procedural characteristics, among them age, body-mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, comorbidity burden, induction agent dose and cardiopulmonary bypass duration, are examined as correlates of exposure.
All outcome analyses are exploratory and hypothesis-generating. The number of covariates admitted to any model is constrained by the rule of at least ten events per variable, and no adjustment is made for multiple comparisons. Associations found here are intended to inform the design of subsequent studies rather than to establish causation.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Continuous variables are summarized as mean and standard deviation where the distribution is symmetrical and as median and interquartile range where it is skewed. Distributional shape is assessed by the Shapiro-Wilk test together with bias-corrected coefficients of skewness and excess kurtosis, and uni-modality is examined using the bi-modality coefficient derived from those two moments. Confidence intervals for proportions are constructed by the Wilson score method and for means and medians by percentile bootstrap.
Groups are compared using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Effect size is reported as the Hodges-Lehmann estimate of location shift with its distribution-free confidence interval and as Cliff's delta for overlap. Associations between continuous variables are examined by Spearman rank correlation. A two-sided p value below 0.05 is taken as the threshold for statistical significance.
No value-based artifact filter is applied to the cardiac index record, and no measurement is excluded other than those flagged as invalid by the monitor itself. Removing low readings as artifact would cause systematic under-ascertainment of the very event under study.
Recording coverage within the window is quantified for each patient across the three ten-minute segments. A patient whose weighted coverage falls below a prespecified minimum is not included in the primary analysis, because the exposure cannot be estimated reliably from a sparse record.
SAMPLE SIZE
Sample size is based on the precision of estimation rather than on the power of a hypothesis test, because the study estimates the frequency and the magnitude of an event that has not previously been characterized rather than testing a prespecified superiority hypothesis.
An internal pilot of 30 patients, comprising the first 15 consecutive patients enrolled at each centre, was used to estimate variability. In that pilot the mean time below threshold was 6.59 minutes with a standard deviation of 8.14 minutes, and the incidence of PiLCOs was 70.0%.
Two precision targets were set. For mean time below threshold the half-width of the 95% confidence interval is to be no greater than 1.7 minutes, which requires 88 patients. For the incidence of PiLCOs the half-width is to be no greater than 9.5 percentage points, which requires 90 patients. The larger of the two figures was carried forward and rounded to 90, allocated as 45 patients per centre. Allowing 15% for withdrawal, protocol deviation and unusable recordings gives a planned enrollment of 103 patients.
ETHICS
The study is approved by the institutional review board at each participating centre and written informed consent is obtained from every patient before enrollment. Because the study imposes no intervention and alters no aspect of care, the risk to participants is confined to the handling of clinical data, which is stored in de-identified form.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass | – | Other: routine clinical monitoring, observed onlyConsecutive adults undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass at two tertiary cardiovascular surgery centres. All participants receive routine anaesthetic and surgical care; no aspect of management is altered for the study. An arterial catheter is sited before induction while the patient is awake, as is routine for this operation at both centres, and cardiac index is recorded continuously at 30-second intervals by arterial waveform analysis from before induction until the end of the operation. There is a single cohort and no assignment of any kind; all enrolled patients are observed under the same protocol. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adults scheduled for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass at two tertiary cardiovascular surgery centre. Patients are approached before induction of anesthesia and enrolled consecutively. Every eligible patient during the enrollment period enters the cohort and no selection is applied.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age 18 years or older.
- Scheduled for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
- Availability of perioperative cardiac output monitoring using the MostCare hemodynamic monitoring system, initiated before induction of anesthesia.
- Availability of required baseline preoperative clinical and laboratory data.
- Written informed consent obtained from the participant or a legally authorized representative.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age under 18 years.
- Coronary artery bypass grafting combined with valvular or aortic surgery.
- Preoperative mechanical circulatory support, including intra-aortic balloon pump support.
- Preoperative continuous infusion of inotropic or vasopressor agents.
- Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| routine clinical monitoring, observed onlyroutine clinical monitoring, observed only | Other | Isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass |
Primary outcome
Time below threshold: total duration with a cardiac index below 2.0 L/min/m2, in minutes
Time frame: From induction of anaesthesia to 30 minutes after induction
The total duration for which cardiac index lies below 2.0 L/min/m2 during the analysis window, expressed in minutes. Cardiac index is recorded continuously at 30-second intervals by arterial waveform analysis. Duration is computed between consecutive measurement pairs by the trapezoidal rule with linear interpolation, and threshold crossings are located exactly rather than rounded to the sampling grid. Intervals between consecutive measurements longer than the sampling period are not counted as observed time. The period of cardiopulmonary bypass is excluded.
Cumulative low-output burden: time integral of the cardiac index deficit below 2.0 L/min/m2, in L/m2
Time frame: From induction of anaesthesia to 30 minutes after induction
The integral over time of the difference between the threshold of 2.0 L/min/m2 and the measured cardiac index, taken only where that difference is positive, during the analysis window. Under dimensional analysis the unit reduces to L/m2, a volume of undelivered flow indexed to body surface area; multiplied by body surface area it yields an absolute flow deficit in litres. Computation, handling of gaps in the record, exclusion of the cardiopulmonary bypass period and the absence of artefact filtering are as described for time below threshold. Time below threshold states how long the exposure lasted and cumulative burden states how deep it was. The two are reported together because neither is sufficient alone.
5 secondary outcomes
Incidence of PiLCOs: proportion of patients with a cardiac index below 2.0 L/min/m2, in percent
Time frame: From induction of anaesthesia to 30 minutes after induction
Time below threshold at a cardiac index of 2.2 L/min/m2, in minutes
Time frame: From induction of anaesthesia to 30 minutes after induction
Cumulative low-output burden at a cardiac index of 2.2 L/min/m2, in L/m2
Time frame: From induction of anaesthesia to 30 minutes after induction
Time below threshold at a cardiac index of 2.5 L/min/m2, in minutes
Time frame: From induction of anaesthesia to 30 minutes after induction
Cumulative low-output burden at a cardiac index of 2.5 L/min/m2, in L/m2
Time frame: From induction of anaesthesia to 30 minutes after induction
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Nov 2026.
- Background: PubMed 30027443Jor O, Maca J, Koutna J, Gemrotova M, Vymazal T, Litschmannova M, Sevcik P, Reimer P, Mikulova V, Trlicova M, Cerny V. Hypotension after induction of general anesthesia: occurrence, risk factors, and therapy. A prospective multicentre observational study. J Anesth. 2018 Oct;32(5):673-680. doi: 10.1007/s00540-018-2532-6. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
- Background: PubMed 15302045Giomarelli P, Biagioli B, Scolletta S. Cardiac output monitoring by pressure recording analytical method in cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Sep;26(3):515-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.05.025.
- Background: PubMed 32398582Greiwe G, Luehsen K, Hapfelmeier A, Rogge D, Kubik M, Schulte-Uentrop L, Saugel B. Cardiac output estimation by pulse wave analysis using the pressure recording analytical method and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution: A method comparison study after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Oct;37(10):920-925. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001227.
- Background: PubMed 33523352Saugel B, Bebert EJ, Briesenick L, Hoppe P, Greiwe G, Yang D, Ma C, Mascha EJ, Sessler DI, Rogge DE. Mechanisms contributing to hypotension after anesthetic induction with sufentanil, propofol, and rocuronium: a prospective observational study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Apr;36(2):341-347. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00653-9. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
- Background: PubMed 37176595Aktas Yildirim S, Sarikaya ZT, Dogan L, Ulugol H, Gucyetmez B, Toraman F. Arterial Elastance: A Predictor of Hypotension Due to Anesthesia Induction. J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 27;12(9):3155. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093155.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data will not be made publicly available due to ethical and patient confidentiality considerations. De-identified data may be considered for sharing upon reasonable request and subject to approval by the study investigators and relevant institutional authorities.
Related trials for Cardiac Output, Low
RecruitingObservational study
Validation of Continuous Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Monitoring in VA-ECMO Patients
Carbon Dioxide
RecruitingObservational study
Performance of Carbon Dioxide (CO2)-Derived Parameters in Predicting Low Cardiac Output Syndrome
Low Cardiac Output Syndrome Bypass Children
Recruiting
Assessment of Cardiac Function and Anesthesia Depth in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
Heart Disease
Enrolling by invitation
LBBP + CSP Versus LBBP Alone for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Heart Failure Low Output
Recruiting
Restrictive Fluid Management In Liver Transplantation (REFIL)
Liver Transplantation (LT), End-stage Liver Disease (ESLD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Muhammed Enes Aydin, Principal Investigator principal investigator
Ataturk University Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cardiac Output, Low and Coronary Arterial Disease, run by Ataturk University at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time below threshold: total duration with a cardiac index below 2.0 L/min/m2, in minutes (time frame: From induction of anaesthesia to 30 minutes after induction). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07810621, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Nov 2026.