Alveolar Bone PreservationNCT07814092
Use of Radiomics in the Evaluation of Bone Quality After Alveolar Ridge Preservation
A study testing Alveolar ridge preservation in people with Alveolar Bone Preservation, run by International Piezosurgery Academy at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Bone regeneration techniques using biomaterials are commonly used in dentistry. These include alveolar ridge preservation, sinus lift, and bone ridge augmentation, which are safe procedures to maintain or restore bone for future dental implants. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Alveolar Bone Preservation
- What is being tested?
- Alveolar ridge preservation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2025to 1 Aug 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age between 18 and 75 y.o.
- ASA < 3
- Single-rooted teeth with indication to extraction
- Sufficient bone height to permit standard-length implant placement (≥ 8.5 mm)
- Presence of healthy oral mucosa with at least 3 mm of keratinized tissue
- Presence of all socket walls
Show all 9Show fewer
- Buccal bone thickness < 1 mm
- Periodontal health or stability
- Informed consent signed
Who cannot join
- General contraindication to oral surgery
- Inflammatory or autoimmune diseases
- Medical history of neoplastic pathology treated with radio- and/or chemotherapy in the last five years in the head and neck district
- Medical history of antiresorptive, antiangiogenetic or high dosage corticosteroideal therapy
- Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c > 7%)
- Allergy to porcine collagen
Show all 10Show fewer
- Pregnancy
- Missing of compliance
- One or more missing post-extractive socket walls
- Extraction of adjacent teeth in the 6 months following ARP
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Italy1 site
SC Clinica di Chirurgia Maxillofacciale e Odontostomatologia
Trieste, Trieste, 34100
About this study
Official title: Use of Radiomics in the Evaluation of Bone Quality After Alveolar Ridge Preservation.
Bone regeneration techniques using biomaterials are commonly used in dentistry. These include alveolar ridge preservation, sinus lift, and bone ridge augmentation, which are safe procedures to maintain or restore bone for future dental implants. These surgical interventions utilize specific materials following well-defined guidelines. However, to truly understand how much new bone has formed, a specific tissue analysis called histomorphometry is required, which entails analyzing the bone that will be removed during implant placement.
To simplify these evaluations, new techniques are being studied. One of these is radiomics, an approach that analyzes medical images (such as radiographs or CT scans) by searching for details that cannot be seen by the naked eye. The goal is to create predictive models that assist doctors in their decision-making. This study aims to evaluate the quality of bone regeneration using radiomics, analyzing radiographic images taken 6 months after the regeneration procedure. The collected data will be compared with the histomorphometry results and used to train advanced artificial intelligence models. The ultimate objective is to create a large database that allows doctors to evaluate post-regeneration images without having to resort to invasive sampling.
Read the detailed description
In implant surgery, alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques represent a useful approach to maintain, following tooth extraction, bone volumes in case of a scheduled implant placement. Multiple ARP techniques are described in literature, and they differ from reconstruction techniques, since the aim of these techniques is to preserve the residual socket, not to recreate one or more missing bony walls. Furthermore, their use is strongly recommended in sockets with a residual buccal bone wall with a thickness lower than 1 mm, as the post-extractive socket undergoes physiological bone remodeling that starts from the inner portion of the alveolus, due to the loss of the periodontal ligament that induces the resorption of the so-called bundle bone. One of the ARP techniques requires the use of a heterologous bone substitutes to fill the entire socket, and superficially covered by a collagen resorbable membrane to avoid graft dispersion.
Following preservation, it is mandatory the execution of a CBCT exam to evaluate bone volumes prior to implant placement. This radiographic exam permits to correctly plan the insertion of the implant and can also be suggestive for the definition of the bone quality, which represents a criterium for the choice of an adequate implant design. Often, the pre-operative evaluation of bone quality does not coincide with the intra-operatory one, and still the agreement on radiographic evaluation has proven to be different on intra and inter-examiner opinion analysis.
In this sense, radiomics could represent a useful support to the dental surgeon. Radiomics is a quantitative approach to medical imaging, able to create predictive models, basing on the research of the so-called radiomic features, which are intrinsic characteristics of the image. In medical field, radiomics has been used in oncology, but without any valid use. In dentistry, only few research has been made. Specifically, in an article radiomics has been suggested to evaluate marginal bone loss around implants, whereas another one suggests the use of radiomics to create a classification of bone density.
The aim of this project is to develop, through radiomics, a predictive model to evaluate bone regeneration following ARP techniques. The assessment of bone quality is performed through histomorphometric analysis, which is then related to radiographical images.
The enrolled patients must meet specific inclusion and exclusion criteria and, in order to obtain a statistical significance, a sample size of 60 cases has been purposed.
The clinical pathway for participating patients is fully aligned with standard clinical practice and consists of the following sequential phases:
- Screening and Recruitment: Patients are evaluated and recruited only if they meet all predefined inclusion criteria.
- Surgical Phase 1 (Baseline): Tooth extraction is performed immediately followed by simultaneous alveolar ridge preservation (ARP).
- Radiographic Assessment (6 Months): Six months after the preservation procedure, a Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scan is performed to evaluate the regenerated bone volume.
- Surgical Phase 2 (6 Months): During the implant surgery, a small bone biopsy is harvested (using the bone tissue that is normally removed during standard osteotomy site preparation) followed by the simultaneous placement of the dental implant (Resista OneTime). ISQ values are registered.
- Prosthetic Phase (10 Months): Four months after implant placement (allowing for proper osseointegration), the final prosthetic phase is carried out to restore the tooth. ISQ values are registered.
Follow-up
- 1 month after loading
- 6 months after loading
- 12 months after loading
Histological analysis Histological and histomorphometric evaluations will be carried out by a single investigator. To preserve tissue orientation, bone cores will be retained inside the trephine drills and rinsed with a cold 5% glucose solution (278 mOsm/L) to clear blood traces under isotonic conditions.
Fixation will be performed using a 10% buffered formalin solution (pH 7.2) for 3 days, followed by dehydration through an ascending ethanol series. After a 5-day pre-infiltration step in a 50% resin/alcohol mixture, the biopsies will be extracted from the drills and fully infiltrated with methacrylate resin.
Following a 12-day polymerization process, samples will be sectioned longitudinally with a high-precision silicon carbide disc to a thickness of approximately 50 μm, then ground and polished under running water down to 30 ± 10 μm. Sections will be mounted on glass slides and stained with acid fuchsin, toluidine blue, and Von Kossa. Once all analyses are completed, samples will be transferred to licensed medical waste companies for disposal in compliance with current legal regulations.
- Conditions
- Alveolar Bone Preservation
- Being tested
- Alveolar ridge preservation
- Keywords
- Alveolar ridge preservation, Radiomics, Post-extractive bone remodeling
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Alveolar ridge preservationProcedure or surgery
Also called Bone harvesting, Implant placement
Following a minimally traumatic tooth extraction performed on patients enrolled in the study according to the inclusion criteria, thorough alveolar debridement is carried out, and the thickness of the residual buccal bone wall is measured. Subsequently, a classic, well-documented alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) technique is performed. This procedure involves completely filling the post-extraction socket with a xenograft biomaterial, which is then covered with a resorbable collagen membrane to prevent graft dispersion and promote healing by second intention. After a 6-month healing period, a bone biopsy core is harvested using a dedicated trephine drill, immediately followed by the simultaneous placement of the dental implant. CBCT scans are performed after 6 months, and a comparison between histomorphological and radiographic outcomes is performed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Test group | Experimental | Screening and Recruitment: Patients are evaluated and recruited only if they meet all predefined inclusion criteria.
* Surgical Phase 1 (Baseline): Tooth extraction is performed immediately followed by simultaneous alveolar ridge preservation (ARP).
* Radiographic Assessment (6 Months): Six months after the preservation procedure, a Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scan is performed to evaluate the regenerated bone volume.
* Surgical Phase 2 (6 Months): During the implant surgery, a small bone biopsy is harvested (using the bone tissue that is normally removed during standard osteotomy site preparation) followed by the simultaneous placement of the dental implant.
* Prosthetic Phase (10 Months): Four months after implant placement (allowing for proper osseointegration), the final prosthetic phase is carried out to restore the tooth. Receives: Procedure: Alveolar ridge preservation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Radiomic features
The primary outcome of this study is to evaluate the existence and predictive value of radiomic features derived from pre-operative CBCT scans. These digital imaging features will be correlated and compared with histomorphometric outcomes obtained from the bone biopsy cores harvested during the simultaneous implant placement procedure
Measured: perioperatively
Secondary outcomes (2)
Histomorphometric values
The evaluated outcome measures are histomorphometric parameters-specifically the relative percentages of regenerated bone, residual graft material, and native bone expressed relative to total bone volume. Histological analysis is conducted on biopsy core samples (3 mm in diameter with variable length depending on the selected implant dimension) harvested with a trephine bur concurrently with implant placement.
Measured: periprocedural
Implant survival
Measured through radiographic evaluation and ISQ values. Expressed as millimeters of peri-implant bone loss, measured on periapical follow-up radiographs (measured from bone crest to implant-abutment junction)
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Sep 2026
- Study start1 Oct 2025
- Primary completion1 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Aug 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Alveolar Bone PreservationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- International Piezosurgery Academy
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mr. Claudio Stacchi, DDS, MSc, International Piezosurgery Academy
- Investigators
- Giulio Marchesi, DDS, MSc, PhD, Study chair, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, ItalyClaudio Stacchi, DDS, MSc, Study chair, Department of Medicine and Surgery, LUM University, Casamassima (BA)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07814092
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Units 09/2024
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Aug 2026
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Troiano G, Fanelli F, Rapani A, Zotti M, Lombardi T, Zhurakivska K, Stacchi C. Can radiomic features extracted from intra-oral radiographs predict physiological bone remodelling around dental implants? A hypothesis-generating study. J Clin Periodontol. 2023 Jul;50(7):932-941. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13797. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
PubMed 36843362Mayerhoefer ME, Materka A, Langs G, Haggstrom I, Szczypinski P, Gibbs P, Cook G. Introduction to Radiomics. J Nucl Med. 2020 Apr;61(4):488-495. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.222893. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
PubMed 32060219van Timmeren JE, Cester D, Tanadini-Lang S, Alkadhi H, Baessler B. Radiomics in medical imaging-"how-to" guide and critical reflection. Insights Imaging. 2020 Aug 12;11(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00887-2.
PubMed 32785796Stacchi C, Spinato S, Lombardi T, Bernardello F, Bertoldi C, Zaffe D, Nevins M. Minimally Invasive Management of Implant-Supported Rehabilitation in the Posterior Maxilla, Part II. Surgical Techniques and Decision Tree. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020 May/Jun;40(3):e95-e102. doi: 10.11607/prd.4498.
PubMed 32233185
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Use of Radiomics in the Evaluation of Bone Quality After Alveolar Ridge Preservation.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07814092
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Units 09/2024
- Conditions
- Alveolar Bone Preservation
- Keywords
- Alveolar ridge preservation, Radiomics, Post-extractive bone remodeling
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- International Piezosurgery AcademyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Bone regeneration techniques using biomaterials are commonly used in dentistry. These include alveolar ridge preservation, sinus lift, and bone ridge augmentation, which are safe procedures to maintain or restore bone for future dental implants. These surgical interventions utilize specific materials following well-defined guidelines. However, to truly understand how much new bone has formed, a specific tissue analysis called histomorphometry is required, which entails analyzing the bone that will be removed during implant placement.
To simplify these evaluations, new techniques are being studied. One of these is radiomics, an approach that analyzes medical images (such as radiographs or CT scans) by searching for details that cannot be seen by the naked eye. The goal is to create predictive models that assist doctors in their decision-making. This study aims to evaluate the quality of bone regeneration using radiomics, analyzing radiographic images taken 6 months after the regeneration procedure. The collected data will be compared with the histomorphometry results and used to train advanced artificial intelligence models. The ultimate objective is to create a large database that allows doctors to evaluate post-regeneration images without having to resort to invasive sampling.
Detailed description
In implant surgery, alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques represent a useful approach to maintain, following tooth extraction, bone volumes in case of a scheduled implant placement. Multiple ARP techniques are described in literature, and they differ from reconstruction techniques, since the aim of these techniques is to preserve the residual socket, not to recreate one or more missing bony walls. Furthermore, their use is strongly recommended in sockets with a residual buccal bone wall with a thickness lower than 1 mm, as the post-extractive socket undergoes physiological bone remodeling that starts from the inner portion of the alveolus, due to the loss of the periodontal ligament that induces the resorption of the so-called bundle bone. One of the ARP techniques requires the use of a heterologous bone substitutes to fill the entire socket, and superficially covered by a collagen resorbable membrane to avoid graft dispersion.
Following preservation, it is mandatory the execution of a CBCT exam to evaluate bone volumes prior to implant placement. This radiographic exam permits to correctly plan the insertion of the implant and can also be suggestive for the definition of the bone quality, which represents a criterium for the choice of an adequate implant design. Often, the pre-operative evaluation of bone quality does not coincide with the intra-operatory one, and still the agreement on radiographic evaluation has proven to be different on intra and inter-examiner opinion analysis.
In this sense, radiomics could represent a useful support to the dental surgeon. Radiomics is a quantitative approach to medical imaging, able to create predictive models, basing on the research of the so-called radiomic features, which are intrinsic characteristics of the image. In medical field, radiomics has been used in oncology, but without any valid use. In dentistry, only few research has been made. Specifically, in an article radiomics has been suggested to evaluate marginal bone loss around implants, whereas another one suggests the use of radiomics to create a classification of bone density.
The aim of this project is to develop, through radiomics, a predictive model to evaluate bone regeneration following ARP techniques. The assessment of bone quality is performed through histomorphometric analysis, which is then related to radiographical images.
The enrolled patients must meet specific inclusion and exclusion criteria and, in order to obtain a statistical significance, a sample size of 60 cases has been purposed.
The clinical pathway for participating patients is fully aligned with standard clinical practice and consists of the following sequential phases:
- Screening and Recruitment: Patients are evaluated and recruited only if they meet all predefined inclusion criteria.
- Surgical Phase 1 (Baseline): Tooth extraction is performed immediately followed by simultaneous alveolar ridge preservation (ARP).
- Radiographic Assessment (6 Months): Six months after the preservation procedure, a Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scan is performed to evaluate the regenerated bone volume.
- Surgical Phase 2 (6 Months): During the implant surgery, a small bone biopsy is harvested (using the bone tissue that is normally removed during standard osteotomy site preparation) followed by the simultaneous placement of the dental implant (Resista OneTime). ISQ values are registered.
- Prosthetic Phase (10 Months): Four months after implant placement (allowing for proper osseointegration), the final prosthetic phase is carried out to restore the tooth. ISQ values are registered.
Follow-up
- 1 month after loading
- 6 months after loading
- 12 months after loading
Histological analysis Histological and histomorphometric evaluations will be carried out by a single investigator. To preserve tissue orientation, bone cores will be retained inside the trephine drills and rinsed with a cold 5% glucose solution (278 mOsm/L) to clear blood traces under isotonic conditions.
Fixation will be performed using a 10% buffered formalin solution (pH 7.2) for 3 days, followed by dehydration through an ascending ethanol series. After a 5-day pre-infiltration step in a 50% resin/alcohol mixture, the biopsies will be extracted from the drills and fully infiltrated with methacrylate resin.
Following a 12-day polymerization process, samples will be sectioned longitudinally with a high-precision silicon carbide disc to a thickness of approximately 50 μm, then ground and polished under running water down to 30 ± 10 μm. Sections will be mounted on glass slides and stained with acid fuchsin, toluidine blue, and Von Kossa. Once all analyses are completed, samples will be transferred to licensed medical waste companies for disposal in compliance with current legal regulations.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Test group | Experimental | Procedure: Alveolar ridge preservationScreening and Recruitment: Patients are evaluated and recruited only if they meet all predefined inclusion criteria. * Surgical Phase 1 (Baseline): Tooth extraction is performed immediately followed by simultaneous alveolar ridge preservation (ARP). * Radiographic Assessment (6 Months): Six months after the preservation procedure, a Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scan is performed to evaluate the regenerated bone volume. * Surgical Phase 2 (6 Months): During the implant surgery, a small bone biopsy is harvested (using the bone tissue that is normally removed during standard osteotomy site preparation) followed by the simultaneous placement of the dental implant. * Prosthetic Phase (10 Months): Four months after implant placement (allowing for proper osseointegration), the final prosthetic phase is carried out to restore the tooth. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age between 18 and 75 y.o.
- ASA < 3
- Single-rooted teeth with indication to extraction
- Sufficient bone height to permit standard-length implant placement (≥ 8.5 mm)
- Presence of healthy oral mucosa with at least 3 mm of keratinized tissue
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- General contraindication to oral surgery
- Inflammatory or autoimmune diseases
- Medical history of neoplastic pathology treated with radio- and/or chemotherapy in the last five years in the head and neck district
- Medical history of antiresorptive, antiangiogenetic or high dosage corticosteroideal therapy
- Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c > 7%)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Alveolar ridge preservationAlso: Bone harvesting, Implant placementFollowing a minimally traumatic tooth extraction performed on patients enrolled in the study according to the inclusion criteria, thorough alveolar debridement is carried out, and the thickness of the residual buccal bone wall is measured. Subsequently, a classic, well-documented alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) technique is performed. This procedure involves completely filling the post-extraction socket with a xenograft biomaterial, which is then covered with a resorbable collagen membrane to prevent graft dispersion and promote healing by second intention. After a 6-month healing period, a bone biopsy core is harvested using a dedicated trephine drill, immediately followed by the simultaneous placement of the dental implant. CBCT scans are performed after 6 months, and a comparison between histomorphological and radiographic outcomes is performed. | Procedure or surgery | Test group |
Primary outcome
Radiomic features
Time frame: perioperatively
The primary outcome of this study is to evaluate the existence and predictive value of radiomic features derived from pre-operative CBCT scans. These digital imaging features will be correlated and compared with histomorphometric outcomes obtained from the bone biopsy cores harvested during the simultaneous implant placement procedure
2 secondary outcomes
Histomorphometric values
Time frame: periprocedural
Implant survival
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 36843362Troiano G, Fanelli F, Rapani A, Zotti M, Lombardi T, Zhurakivska K, Stacchi C. Can radiomic features extracted from intra-oral radiographs predict physiological bone remodelling around dental implants? A hypothesis-generating study. J Clin Periodontol. 2023 Jul;50(7):932-941. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13797. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 32060219Mayerhoefer ME, Materka A, Langs G, Haggstrom I, Szczypinski P, Gibbs P, Cook G. Introduction to Radiomics. J Nucl Med. 2020 Apr;61(4):488-495. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.222893. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
- Results publication: PubMed 32785796van Timmeren JE, Cester D, Tanadini-Lang S, Alkadhi H, Baessler B. Radiomics in medical imaging-"how-to" guide and critical reflection. Insights Imaging. 2020 Aug 12;11(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00887-2.
- Results publication: PubMed 32233185Stacchi C, Spinato S, Lombardi T, Bernardello F, Bertoldi C, Zaffe D, Nevins M. Minimally Invasive Management of Implant-Supported Rehabilitation in the Posterior Maxilla, Part II. Surgical Techniques and Decision Tree. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020 May/Jun;40(3):e95-e102. doi: 10.11607/prd.4498.
Related trials for Alveolar Bone Preservation
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Ascorbic Acid-Loaded I-PRF With Partially Demineralized Dentin Graft on Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Post-Extraction Bone Healing Dental Implant Site Development Tooth Loss, Alveolar Bone Regeneration Following Odontectomy
Recruiting
Effect of Collagen Membrane on Ridge Preservation
Dehiscence, Tooth Extraction
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Alveolar Ridge Preservation (ARP) Study Using Alloplastic Biomaterial and a Resorbable Synthetic Membrane. A Digital Workflow (CBCT/Scanner) Evaluates Hard and Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes at 4 Months, Validating Support for the Gingival Phenotype and Buccal Bone Plate.
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, Bone Substitutes
Not yet recruiting
Bone and Soft Tissue Healing After Socket Preservation With NOVAMag or Permamem Membranes
Alveolar Bone Loss, Tooth Loss / Rehabilitation
Recruiting
Different Approaches for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Alveolar Ridge Resorption
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Giulio Marchesi, DDS, MSc, PhD study chair
Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Italy
Claudio Stacchi, DDS, MSc study chair
Department of Medicine and Surgery, LUM University, Casamassima (BA)
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Alveolar ridge preservation in people with Alveolar Bone Preservation, run by International Piezosurgery Academy at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Radiomic features (time frame: perioperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07814092, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.