MeniscectomyNanoNCT07823504
Needle Arthroscopy vs Conventional Arthroscopy in Knees
A study testing Needle Arthroscopy in people with Meniscectomy and Meniscal Tears, run by Panam Clinic.
Trial summary
This is a pilot randomized controlled trial will have 54 participants. The purpose of this study is to compare two surgical techniques to determine the differences in postoperative pain and early recovery in patients between 18-65 years old with simple knee pathologies including meniscal tear, chondral lesions, and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Meniscectomy, Meniscal Tears, Meniscal Repair
- What is being tested?
- Needle Arthroscopy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 54 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2027to Dec 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- • Clinical diagnosis of: Meniscal tears (Medial or Lateral) suitable for partial meniscectomy or simple repair; Chondral lesions / Chondromalacia (ICRS Grade 1-3); Loose bodies; Synovitis requiring synovectomy; Cyclops lesion (post-ACL reconstruction).
- Age: 18 to 65 years at time of surgery.
- Imaging: Pre-operative MRI performed within 6 months of the surgery date. And an X-ray showing no fractures.
- Consent: Willingness and ability to provide informed consent and attend follow-up visits.
Who cannot join
- • Instability: Concomitant ACL, PCL, or multi-ligament injury requiring reconstruction (reconstruction cannot be performed solely with NanoScope).
- Osteoarthritis: Advanced Osteoarthritis defined as Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 3 or 4 (bone-on-bone) on pre-operative weight-bearing radiographs.
- Complex Pathology: Complex meniscal tears requiring repair techniques strictly requiring standard instrumentation (e.g., large bucket-handle tears requiring inside-out/outside-in sutures).
- Infection: Active local or systemic infection.
- BMI: Body Mass Index > 40 (due to potential visualization difficulties with the 1.9mm system in deep soft tissue).
- Previous Surgery: Revision meniscal repair on the affected compartment (unless simple debridement).
Show all 15Show fewer
- Legal/WCB: Patients involved in active litigation or Workers Compensation Board (WCB) claims.
- Language: Unable to speak, read, or understand English (preventing completion of PROMs).
- Pregnancy: at the time of surgery.
- Mental Health: Conditions that preclude informed consent and follow-up (e.g. mental capacity, impaired judgment and/or memory, severe mood episodes, dementia, etc).
- Major illness: Life expectancy <1yr or unacceptably high surgery risk).
- Intra-operative exclusions:
- Final assessment of eligibility will be made intra-operatively and include:
- Arthritis: If grade 3 or 4 chondral damage (exposed bone) is discovered intra-operatively that was not evident on radiographs, the patient may be excluded from the per-protocol analysis but retained for safety analysis.
- Technique Failure (Crossover): If a patient randomized to the NanoScope Group has pathology that cannot be adequately visualized or treated with the needle system (e.g., tight compartment, excessive bleeding, or inability to access pathology), the surgeon will convert to Conventional Arthroscopy. These patients will be considered "enrolled" and analyzed in their original randomized group (Intention-to-Treat principle), but the case will be documented as a "Failure of Technique".
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing NanoScope Needle Arthroscopy Versus Conventional Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Simple Knee Pathology
This is a pilot randomized controlled trial will have 54 participants. The purpose of this study is to compare two surgical techniques to determine the differences in postoperative pain and early recovery in patients between 18-65 years old with simple knee pathologies including meniscal tear, chondral lesions, and loose bodies. Patient-reported outcomes and operative efficiency will be also compared. The two surgical techniques we are comparing are:
- NanoScope™ Needle Arthroscopy for the affected knee
- Conventional Arthroscopy for the affected knee Patients will be randomized pre-operatively but final eligibility will be confirmed intra-operatively.
Read more
The study assessors and data analysts will be blinded to the treatment group via limited access to surgical records and post-operative imaging. If patients consent to participate they will be asked to come to research visits at baseline (pre-operatively), at 2-weeks, 6-weeks, and 3-month post-operatively to complete a set of questionnaires including a demographic form, SANE score, IKDC Subjective, and the EQ-5D VAS Pain, Pain and Medication Logbook will be completed from the day of surgery until day 14, and a Rehabilitation Log will assess "Return to Activity/Work". A clinical assessment will include: Range of motion, effusion, and joint line tenderness.
A pre-operative X-ray and MRI will be collected as standard of care. Patients will be remunerated with a maximum of $160 if they come to all research visits.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this pilot study is to compare two techniques- (1) NanoScope™ Needle Arthroscopy for the affected knee (2) Conventional Arthroscopy for the affected knee - in patients undergoing a simple knee pathology such as meniscal tear, loose bodies, and chondral lesions.
The primary research question is: "In patients undergoing knee arthroscopy for simple pathology, is there a difference in postoperative pain (VAS) and early recovery between NanoScope™ needle arthroscopy and Conventional arthroscopy?"
The primary objective: to compare patient-reported pain scores (VAS) and opioid consumption between the two study groups in the immediate postoperative period (14 days).
The secondary objectives:
- To compare functional recovery and Range of Motion (ROM) at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months postoperative.
- To compare time to Return to Activity (work and sport) between groups.
- To compare diagnostic accuracy (concordance with MRI) and operative efficiency (surgical time, turnover time).
The tertiary objective: to evaluate healthcare resource use and direct costs for NanoScope arthroscopy compared to Conventional arthroscopy in the operating room setting.
Design: This is a pilot, prospective, single-centre, randomized clinical trial comparing two groups to determine the differences in postoperative pain and early recovery: 1) NanoScope™ needle arthroscopy and 2) Conventional arthroscopy. All participants will have been diagnosed with simple intra-articular knee pathology (e.g. meniscal tear, chondral lesion, loose body) amenable to arthroscopic treatment. A total of 54 participants with 27 participants per study group will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to the two arms, blocking within surgeon with random block sizes to prevent group imbalances.
In this study, the study assessors and data analysts will be blinded to the treatment group via limited access to surgical records and post-operative imaging. Patients will be asked to wear a knee sleeve at every research visit for blinding purposes to ensure study assessors remain blinded. The knee sleeve will be provided to the participants at the start of every research visit-clinic appointments with patient's surgeon are held separately so NO knee sleeve will be utilized on the patient since surgeon is not blinded. Given the nature of the surgical procedures and the surgical openings (portals) size differences, the patient can not be kept fully blind for the entire duration of the study. So, for them to maintain blinded, the surgical staff will apply an absorbent bulky dressing and bandages on their knee right after surgery. Patients will be instructed NOT to remove these until their first follow-up visit with their surgeon (Day)14.
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients must meet ALL of the following criteria to be considered eligible:
- Confirmed diagnosis of SIMPLE intra-articular knee pathology (medial or lateral meniscal tears suitable for partial meniscectomy or simple repair, chondral lesion, or loose body amenable to arthroscopic treatment.
- 18 to </= 65 years of age (at time of surgery).
- X-ray showing: no fractures.
- MRI 6 months prior to surgery. 6) Willingness and ability to be followed for 3 months post-operatively and provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients are excluded if ANY of the following exclusion criteria are met:
- Instability: Concomitant ACL, PCL, or multi-ligament injury requiring reconstruction.
- Advanced osteoarthritis (Grade 3-4 chondral damage) bone-on-bone.
- Complex pathology: Meniscal tears requiring repair techniques strictly requiring standard instrumentation.
- Infection: Active local or systemic infection.
- Body Mass Index > 40 (due to potential visualization difficulties with the 1.9mm system in deep soft tissue).
- Previous surgery: Revision meniscal repair on the affected compartment (unless simple debridement).
- Workers Compensation Board (WCB) or Litigation Claim.
- Pregnancy (at the time of surgery).
- Mental health conditions that preclude informed consent and follow-up (e.g. mental capacity, impaired judgment and/or memory, severe mood episodes, dementia, etc).
- Unable to speak, read or understand the English language.
- Major medical illness (life expectancy <1yr or unacceptably high surgery risk).
Intra-operative exclusions:
- Arthritis: If grade 3 or 4 chondral damage (exposed bone) is discovered intra-operatively that was not evident on radiographs, the patient may be excluded from the per-protocol analysis but retained for safety analysis.
Study procedures:
- NanoScope™ Needle Arthroscopy: Local Anesthesia (1% Lidocaine with Epinephrine) at portal sites + intra-articular injection. IV Sedation or Light General Anesthesia (LMA) may be utilized based on patient anxiety and surgeon preference. A tourniquet will be applied but not inflated unless visualization is compromised by bleeding. This procedure uses very small openings in the knee made with specialized needles and a tiny 1.9mm camera system called the NanoScope™. The surgeon first examines the knee and then performs the needed treatment (e.g. meniscectomy) using small surgical instruments designed for this system. The small openings are usually closed with adhesive strips or, if needed, a single suture. If the surgeon cannot see or reach the area well enough, the procedure will be changed to a standard arthroscopy and the patient will be considered "enrolled" and analyzed in their original randomized group (Intention-to-Treat principle), but the case will be documented as a "Failure of Technique".
- Conventional Arthroscopy: General Anesthesia (LMA/ET) or Spinal Anesthesia will be utilized. A tight tourniquet is applied and inflated prior to incision as standard of care. This standard procedure uses two small openings in the knee, each about 4-5mm wide. The surgeon examines the knee and performs the required treatment using a 4.0mm standard-sized camera and surgical instruments (shavers, biters). The openings are closed with nylon sutures or adhesive strips.
Regardless of study group allocation, a standardized bulky absorbent dressing and tensor bandage will be applied to the knee to mask the difference in portal (opening) size once the surgery has been completed.
Randomization:
Patients will be randomized pre-operatively via the EmPOWER database which will allocate a random study ID for tracking and analysis. Randomization will occur prior to anesthesia induction and surgery positioning to one of two study groups. Group assignment is based on the type of surgical procedure being done to stabilize the knee. The two study groups are:
(1) NanoScope™ Needle Arthroscopy
(1) NanoScope™ Needle Arthroscopy
This timing is required to allow the nursing staff to set up the appropriate arthroscopy tower (NanoScope™ system vs Conventional tower) and sterile equipment pack, which differ significantly between groups.
Final eligibility will be confirmed via examination under anesthesia and documented on the final eligibility form. Any patient who does not meet the intra-operative criteria will be deemed 'ineligible' and treated as per the surgeon's discretion-patients will be informed about the surgeon decision after their surgery and will be contacted by the research coordinator to explain the reason behind them being ineligible for the study criteria. Demographic and baseline data for patients excluded intra-operatively will be reported as well as the reason for exclusion.
As mentioned above, if grade 3 or 4 chondral damage (exposed bone) is discovered intra-operatively that was not evident on radiographs, the patient may be excluded from the study.
After Surgery Procedures:
Patients will be instructed not to remove the bulky dressing and tensor bandages that will be applied immediately after surgery by the operating staff until their first wound check visit (Day 14) with their surgeon. Therefore, patient will remain blinded to their study group assignment while completing the daily Pain and Medication Logbook that needs to be completed from Day 0-14 since their surgery day. Since portals (openings) are from different sizes this process is crucial to keep patient blinded while completing the pain and medication logbook.
Upon discharge, patients will be provided with a set of standard of care instructions related to wound care, rehabilitation, and follow-up appointments. Patients are instructed NOT to remove the bulky dressing until their first follow-up visit (Day 14) to maintain blinding during the primary pain assessment period. The research staff will distribute and provide instructions for the Pain and Medication Logbook, once discharged patients will be responsible for documenting pain levels and medication for 14 days after their surgery. Prescription orders will not be standardized because some patients cannot tolerate certain medications.
Rehabilitation Protocol: Postoperative rehabilitation will be standardized for all patients regardless of study knee and will be provided to patients in a document outlining post-operative instructions at each stage of recovery. Generally, this protocol will consist of tissue protection, motor control, and functional optimization.
Imaging: Radiographs in this study are standard of care, an X-ray and MRI will be taken pre-operatively. X-ray of the affected knee will be obtained including weight bearing Antero-Posterior (AP), Lateral, Skyline (Merchant), and Rosenberg (PA flexion). To detect occult joint space narrowing in the notch, and to assess any development of osteoarthritis. Imaging will be performed any time before surgery. All MRI's in this study are standard of care and are used to determine eligibility at baseline.
Study Visits:
Patients will be assessed pre-operatively and then at 2-weeks (+/- 7 days), 6-weeks (+/- 2 weeks), and 3 months (+/- 2 weeks) post-operatively. This post-operative follow-up schedule does not incur added costs or visits to the patients as it is in keeping with the current practice at the trial centres and all visits fall under the standard of care follow-ups. If patients are unable to attend their planned follow-up as per the established schedule, they will be contacted by telephone, email, or paper mail, and may be asked to complete their questionnaires. Patient outcome measures include: SANE score, IKDC subjective, EQ-5D VAS pain, a pain and medication log, and a rehabilitation log to assess "Return to Activity/Work. A clinical exam including knee ROM, effusion, and joint line tenderness will also be conducted by the study assessors- adverse events and complications, and study completion/duration will be completed to document the reason and date when patient's participation in the study ends (i.e. finished the course of the study, withdrew, etc.).
All participants will be registered in Empower Health Research database (a secure study management software system), which assigns a unique identifier called a database ID number to each patient. This information will be used for analyses by the principal investigator of this study and their research staff. No personal information (i.e., name, address, telephone number, personal health records number) will be entered into this database.
Patients will be remunerated for every research visit they attend for a maximum of up to $160, the compensation schedule will be as follows:
- Informed Consent \& Baseline Visit- $40
- 2-week follow-up visit: $40
- 6-week follow-up visit: $40
- 3-month follow-up visit: $40
Patients are free to withdraw at any time for any reason.
- Conditions
- Meniscectomy, Meniscal Tears, Meniscal Repair, Chondral Lesion of the Knee, Loose Body Knee
- Being tested
- Needle Arthroscopy
- Keywords
- simple knee pathology, arthroscopy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Needle ArthroscopyProcedure or surgery
Needle Arthroscopy: Local Anesthesia (1% Lidocaine with Epinephrine) at portal sites + intra-articular injection. IV Sedation or Light General Anesthesia (LMA) may be utilized based on patient anxiety and surgeon preference. A tourniquet will be applied but not inflated unless visualization is compromised by bleeding. This procedure uses very small openings in the knee made with specialized needles and a tiny 1.9mm camera system called the NanoScope™. The surgeon first examines the knee and then performs the needed treatment (e.g. meniscectomy) using small surgical instruments designed for this system. The small openings are usually closed with adhesive strips or, if needed, a single suture.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NanoScope Needle Arthroscopy | Experimental | Local Anesthesia (1% Lidocaine with Epinephrine) at portal sites + intra-articular injection. IV Sedation or Light General Anesthesia (LMA) may be utilized based on patient anxiety and surgeon preference. A tourniquet will be applied but not inflated unless visualization is compromised by bleeding. This procedure uses very small openings in the knee made with specialized needles and a tiny 1.9mm camera system called the NanoScope™. The surgeon first examines the knee and then performs the needed treatment (e.g. meniscectomy) using small surgical instruments designed for this system. The small openings are usually closed with adhesive strips or, if needed, a single suture. Receives: Procedure: Needle Arthroscopy |
| Conventional Arthroscopy | No intervention | General Anesthesia (LMA/ET) or Spinal Anesthesia will be utilized. A tight tourniquet is applied and inflated prior to incision as standard of care. This standard procedure uses two small openings in the knee, each about 4-5mm wide. The surgeon examines the knee and performs the required treatment using a 4.0mm standard-sized camera and surgical instruments (shavers, biters). The openings are closed with nylon sutures or adhesive strips. This is the current standard of care for the included pathologies. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postoperative Pain
measured using VAS and opioid use
Measured: 14 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Sep 2026
- Study startJan 2027 (estimated)
- Primary completionMar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for MeniscectomyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Panam Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Peter MacDonald, Panam Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07823504
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NANO 07-05-2026
- Acronym
- Nano
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 16 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing NanoScope Needle Arthroscopy Versus Conventional Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Simple Knee Pathology
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07823504
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Nano / NANO 07-05-2026
- Conditions
- Meniscectomy, Meniscal Tears, Meniscal Repair, Chondral Lesion of the Knee, Loose Body Knee
- Keywords
- simple knee pathology, arthroscopy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Panam ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a pilot randomized controlled trial will have 54 participants. The purpose of this study is to compare two surgical techniques to determine the differences in postoperative pain and early recovery in patients between 18-65 years old with simple knee pathologies including meniscal tear, chondral lesions, and loose bodies. Patient-reported outcomes and operative efficiency will be also compared. The two surgical techniques we are comparing are:
- NanoScope™ Needle Arthroscopy for the affected knee
- Conventional Arthroscopy for the affected knee Patients will be randomized pre-operatively but final eligibility will be confirmed intra-operatively.
The study assessors and data analysts will be blinded to the treatment group via limited access to surgical records and post-operative imaging. If patients consent to participate they will be asked to come to research visits at baseline (pre-operatively), at 2-weeks, 6-weeks, and 3-month post-operatively to complete a set of questionnaires including a demographic form, SANE score, IKDC Subjective, and the EQ-5D VAS Pain, Pain and Medication Logbook will be completed from the day of surgery until day 14, and a Rehabilitation Log will assess "Return to Activity/Work". A clinical assessment will include: Range of motion, effusion, and joint line tenderness.
A pre-operative X-ray and MRI will be collected as standard of care. Patients will be remunerated with a maximum of $160 if they come to all research visits.
Detailed description
The purpose of this pilot study is to compare two techniques- (1) NanoScope™ Needle Arthroscopy for the affected knee (2) Conventional Arthroscopy for the affected knee - in patients undergoing a simple knee pathology such as meniscal tear, loose bodies, and chondral lesions.
The primary research question is: "In patients undergoing knee arthroscopy for simple pathology, is there a difference in postoperative pain (VAS) and early recovery between NanoScope™ needle arthroscopy and Conventional arthroscopy?"
The primary objective: to compare patient-reported pain scores (VAS) and opioid consumption between the two study groups in the immediate postoperative period (14 days).
The secondary objectives:
- To compare functional recovery and Range of Motion (ROM) at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months postoperative.
- To compare time to Return to Activity (work and sport) between groups.
- To compare diagnostic accuracy (concordance with MRI) and operative efficiency (surgical time, turnover time).
The tertiary objective: to evaluate healthcare resource use and direct costs for NanoScope arthroscopy compared to Conventional arthroscopy in the operating room setting.
Design: This is a pilot, prospective, single-centre, randomized clinical trial comparing two groups to determine the differences in postoperative pain and early recovery: 1) NanoScope™ needle arthroscopy and 2) Conventional arthroscopy. All participants will have been diagnosed with simple intra-articular knee pathology (e.g. meniscal tear, chondral lesion, loose body) amenable to arthroscopic treatment. A total of 54 participants with 27 participants per study group will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to the two arms, blocking within surgeon with random block sizes to prevent group imbalances.
In this study, the study assessors and data analysts will be blinded to the treatment group via limited access to surgical records and post-operative imaging. Patients will be asked to wear a knee sleeve at every research visit for blinding purposes to ensure study assessors remain blinded. The knee sleeve will be provided to the participants at the start of every research visit-clinic appointments with patient's surgeon are held separately so NO knee sleeve will be utilized on the patient since surgeon is not blinded. Given the nature of the surgical procedures and the surgical openings (portals) size differences, the patient can not be kept fully blind for the entire duration of the study. So, for them to maintain blinded, the surgical staff will apply an absorbent bulky dressing and bandages on their knee right after surgery. Patients will be instructed NOT to remove these until their first follow-up visit with their surgeon (Day)14.
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients must meet ALL of the following criteria to be considered eligible:
- Confirmed diagnosis of SIMPLE intra-articular knee pathology (medial or lateral meniscal tears suitable for partial meniscectomy or simple repair, chondral lesion, or loose body amenable to arthroscopic treatment.
- 18 to </= 65 years of age (at time of surgery).
- X-ray showing: no fractures.
- MRI 6 months prior to surgery. 6) Willingness and ability to be followed for 3 months post-operatively and provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients are excluded if ANY of the following exclusion criteria are met:
- Instability: Concomitant ACL, PCL, or multi-ligament injury requiring reconstruction.
- Advanced osteoarthritis (Grade 3-4 chondral damage) bone-on-bone.
- Complex pathology: Meniscal tears requiring repair techniques strictly requiring standard instrumentation.
- Infection: Active local or systemic infection.
- Body Mass Index > 40 (due to potential visualization difficulties with the 1.9mm system in deep soft tissue).
- Previous surgery: Revision meniscal repair on the affected compartment (unless simple debridement).
- Workers Compensation Board (WCB) or Litigation Claim.
- Pregnancy (at the time of surgery).
- Mental health conditions that preclude informed consent and follow-up (e.g. mental capacity, impaired judgment and/or memory, severe mood episodes, dementia, etc).
- Unable to speak, read or understand the English language.
- Major medical illness (life expectancy <1yr or unacceptably high surgery risk).
Intra-operative exclusions:
- Arthritis: If grade 3 or 4 chondral damage (exposed bone) is discovered intra-operatively that was not evident on radiographs, the patient may be excluded from the per-protocol analysis but retained for safety analysis.
Study procedures:
- NanoScope™ Needle Arthroscopy: Local Anesthesia (1% Lidocaine with Epinephrine) at portal sites + intra-articular injection. IV Sedation or Light General Anesthesia (LMA) may be utilized based on patient anxiety and surgeon preference. A tourniquet will be applied but not inflated unless visualization is compromised by bleeding. This procedure uses very small openings in the knee made with specialized needles and a tiny 1.9mm camera system called the NanoScope™. The surgeon first examines the knee and then performs the needed treatment (e.g. meniscectomy) using small surgical instruments designed for this system. The small openings are usually closed with adhesive strips or, if needed, a single suture. If the surgeon cannot see or reach the area well enough, the procedure will be changed to a standard arthroscopy and the patient will be considered "enrolled" and analyzed in their original randomized group (Intention-to-Treat principle), but the case will be documented as a "Failure of Technique".
- Conventional Arthroscopy: General Anesthesia (LMA/ET) or Spinal Anesthesia will be utilized. A tight tourniquet is applied and inflated prior to incision as standard of care. This standard procedure uses two small openings in the knee, each about 4-5mm wide. The surgeon examines the knee and performs the required treatment using a 4.0mm standard-sized camera and surgical instruments (shavers, biters). The openings are closed with nylon sutures or adhesive strips.
Regardless of study group allocation, a standardized bulky absorbent dressing and tensor bandage will be applied to the knee to mask the difference in portal (opening) size once the surgery has been completed.
Randomization:
Patients will be randomized pre-operatively via the EmPOWER database which will allocate a random study ID for tracking and analysis. Randomization will occur prior to anesthesia induction and surgery positioning to one of two study groups. Group assignment is based on the type of surgical procedure being done to stabilize the knee. The two study groups are:
(1) NanoScope™ Needle Arthroscopy
(1) NanoScope™ Needle Arthroscopy
This timing is required to allow the nursing staff to set up the appropriate arthroscopy tower (NanoScope™ system vs Conventional tower) and sterile equipment pack, which differ significantly between groups.
Final eligibility will be confirmed via examination under anesthesia and documented on the final eligibility form. Any patient who does not meet the intra-operative criteria will be deemed 'ineligible' and treated as per the surgeon's discretion-patients will be informed about the surgeon decision after their surgery and will be contacted by the research coordinator to explain the reason behind them being ineligible for the study criteria. Demographic and baseline data for patients excluded intra-operatively will be reported as well as the reason for exclusion.
As mentioned above, if grade 3 or 4 chondral damage (exposed bone) is discovered intra-operatively that was not evident on radiographs, the patient may be excluded from the study.
After Surgery Procedures:
Patients will be instructed not to remove the bulky dressing and tensor bandages that will be applied immediately after surgery by the operating staff until their first wound check visit (Day 14) with their surgeon. Therefore, patient will remain blinded to their study group assignment while completing the daily Pain and Medication Logbook that needs to be completed from Day 0-14 since their surgery day. Since portals (openings) are from different sizes this process is crucial to keep patient blinded while completing the pain and medication logbook.
Upon discharge, patients will be provided with a set of standard of care instructions related to wound care, rehabilitation, and follow-up appointments. Patients are instructed NOT to remove the bulky dressing until their first follow-up visit (Day 14) to maintain blinding during the primary pain assessment period. The research staff will distribute and provide instructions for the Pain and Medication Logbook, once discharged patients will be responsible for documenting pain levels and medication for 14 days after their surgery. Prescription orders will not be standardized because some patients cannot tolerate certain medications.
Rehabilitation Protocol: Postoperative rehabilitation will be standardized for all patients regardless of study knee and will be provided to patients in a document outlining post-operative instructions at each stage of recovery. Generally, this protocol will consist of tissue protection, motor control, and functional optimization.
Imaging: Radiographs in this study are standard of care, an X-ray and MRI will be taken pre-operatively. X-ray of the affected knee will be obtained including weight bearing Antero-Posterior (AP), Lateral, Skyline (Merchant), and Rosenberg (PA flexion). To detect occult joint space narrowing in the notch, and to assess any development of osteoarthritis. Imaging will be performed any time before surgery. All MRI's in this study are standard of care and are used to determine eligibility at baseline.
Study Visits:
Patients will be assessed pre-operatively and then at 2-weeks (+/- 7 days), 6-weeks (+/- 2 weeks), and 3 months (+/- 2 weeks) post-operatively. This post-operative follow-up schedule does not incur added costs or visits to the patients as it is in keeping with the current practice at the trial centres and all visits fall under the standard of care follow-ups. If patients are unable to attend their planned follow-up as per the established schedule, they will be contacted by telephone, email, or paper mail, and may be asked to complete their questionnaires. Patient outcome measures include: SANE score, IKDC subjective, EQ-5D VAS pain, a pain and medication log, and a rehabilitation log to assess "Return to Activity/Work. A clinical exam including knee ROM, effusion, and joint line tenderness will also be conducted by the study assessors- adverse events and complications, and study completion/duration will be completed to document the reason and date when patient's participation in the study ends (i.e. finished the course of the study, withdrew, etc.).
All participants will be registered in Empower Health Research database (a secure study management software system), which assigns a unique identifier called a database ID number to each patient. This information will be used for analyses by the principal investigator of this study and their research staff. No personal information (i.e., name, address, telephone number, personal health records number) will be entered into this database.
Patients will be remunerated for every research visit they attend for a maximum of up to $160, the compensation schedule will be as follows:
- Informed Consent \& Baseline Visit- $40
- 2-week follow-up visit: $40
- 6-week follow-up visit: $40
- 3-month follow-up visit: $40
Patients are free to withdraw at any time for any reason.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NanoScope Needle Arthroscopy | Experimental | Procedure: Needle ArthroscopyLocal Anesthesia (1% Lidocaine with Epinephrine) at portal sites + intra-articular injection. IV Sedation or Light General Anesthesia (LMA) may be utilized based on patient anxiety and surgeon preference. A tourniquet will be applied but not inflated unless visualization is compromised by bleeding. This procedure uses very small openings in the knee made with specialized needles and a tiny 1.9mm camera system called the NanoScope™. The surgeon first examines the knee and then performs the needed treatment (e.g. meniscectomy) using small surgical instruments designed for this system. The small openings are usually closed with adhesive strips or, if needed, a single suture. |
| Conventional Arthroscopy | No intervention | –General Anesthesia (LMA/ET) or Spinal Anesthesia will be utilized. A tight tourniquet is applied and inflated prior to incision as standard of care. This standard procedure uses two small openings in the knee, each about 4-5mm wide. The surgeon examines the knee and performs the required treatment using a 4.0mm standard-sized camera and surgical instruments (shavers, biters). The openings are closed with nylon sutures or adhesive strips. This is the current standard of care for the included pathologies. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- • Clinical diagnosis of: Meniscal tears (Medial or Lateral) suitable for partial meniscectomy or simple repair; Chondral lesions / Chondromalacia (ICRS Grade 1-3); Loose bodies; Synovitis requiring synovectomy; Cyclops lesion (post-ACL reconstruction).
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- • Instability: Concomitant ACL, PCL, or multi-ligament injury requiring reconstruction (reconstruction cannot be performed solely with NanoScope).
- Arthritis: If grade 3 or 4 chondral damage (exposed bone) is discovered intra-operatively that was not evident on radiographs, the patient may be excluded from the per-protocol analysis but retained for safety analysis.
- Technique Failure (Crossover): If a patient randomized to the NanoScope Group has pathology that cannot be adequately visualized or treated with the needle system (e.g., tight compartment, excessive bleeding, or inability to access pathology), the surgeon will convert to Conventional Arthroscopy. These patients will be considered "enrolled" and analyzed in their original randomized group (Intention-to-Treat principle), but the case will be documented as a "Failure of Technique".
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Needle ArthroscopyNeedle Arthroscopy: Local Anesthesia (1% Lidocaine with Epinephrine) at portal sites + intra-articular injection. IV Sedation or Light General Anesthesia (LMA) may be utilized based on patient anxiety and surgeon preference. A tourniquet will be applied but not inflated unless visualization is compromised by bleeding. This procedure uses very small openings in the knee made with specialized needles and a tiny 1.9mm camera system called the NanoScope™. The surgeon first examines the knee and then performs the needed treatment (e.g. meniscectomy) using small surgical instruments designed for this system. The small openings are usually closed with adhesive strips or, if needed, a single suture. | Procedure or surgery | NanoScope Needle Arthroscopy |
Primary outcome
Postoperative Pain
Time frame: 14 days
measured using VAS and opioid use
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Meniscectomy
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of the Degree of Regeneration After Partial Meniscectomy Based on Thin-layer MRI Image Segmentation and Reconstruction
Meniscus Regeneration, Partial Meniscectomy
Recruiting
Novel Bioactive Sleeve on Pain and PROMs
Meniscus Tear
Recruiting
Impact of Bone-Marrow Aspirate Injections in Knee Arthroscopy
Chondral Lesion of the Knee, Meniscal Injuries
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Corticosteroid Meniscectomy Randomized Trial
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Meniscus Tear
RecruitingObservational study
Surgical Outcome After Displaced Bucket-handle Meniscal Lesions - Repair Versus Partial Meniscectomy
Meniscus Rupture, Meniscus Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Needle Arthroscopy in people with Meniscectomy and Meniscal Tears, run by Panam Clinic.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postoperative Pain (time frame: 14 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2026.