Emotional DistressiPET N=1NCT07825285
Positive Events Training to Enhance Positive Emotions in Adolescents With Elevated Depressive Symptoms: An N=1 Trial
A study testing Positive Events Training (PET) in people with Emotional Distress and Anhedonia, run by KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
Research shows that high positive emotionality is an essential ingredient in building resilience in youngsters, especially those with a vulnerability to develop depressive symptomatology. It may empower youngsters against actual depression and its various long-term adverse outcomes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 16 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Emotional Distress, Anhedonia
- What is being tested?
- Positive Events Training (PET)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- Oct 2026to Dec 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 16 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- moderate level of baseline depressive symptoms
- must be Dutch-speaking
Who cannot join
- /
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Research shows that high positive emotionality is an essential ingredient in building resilience in youngsters, especially those with a vulnerability to develop depressive symptomatology. It may empower youngsters against actual depression and its various long-term adverse outcomes. One way to achieve positive emotions is via the recollection and anticipation of specific positive events. Therefore, to cultivate positive emotions in young people, the researchers developed a user-friendly training program translated from basic research findings: Positive Event Training (PET). Through PET, adolescents learn to solidify positive memories and positive plans. This low-threshold program, delivered as a group training at secondary schools, was well received by adolescents in a previous project of our lab (Recalling and Anticipating Specific Positive Events to boost Resilience in Adolescents). In the context of the current study, the PET program, which normally consists of four 1-hour sessions, will be delivered in three individual sessions. The previous project at secondary schools showed that PET leads to heightened positive emotions particularly among youths with elevated depressive tendencies. This indicates that PET can offer increased resilience against depression, especially for vulnerable young individuals. In our current project, the researchers conduct a comprehensive, fine-grained evaluation of the PET program's effectiveness, delivered in an individual format, by collecting intensive data and detailed participant feedback.
- Conditions
- Emotional Distress, Anhedonia
- Being tested
- Positive Events Training (PET)
- Keywords
- positive emotions, anhedonia, positive affect regulation, emotional distress, autobiographical thinking
- Medical subject headings
- Anhedonia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Positive Events Training (PET)Behavioural
Behavioral: Positive Events Training (PET) Positive Event Training or PET is a group-based training program combining Memory Specificity Training (MEST; Raes, 2007) and Future Event Specificity Training (FEST; Dutch version of Hallford et al. (2020): Changing the Future: An initial test of Future Specificity Training).
Other Name:
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Positive Events Training (PET) | Experimental | Behavioral: Positive Events Training (PET) Receives: Behavioral: Positive Events Training (PET) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Daily-life positive emotions measured via daily diary items at baseline (adapted from Kirtley et al., 2022)
Mean value of four daily diary items (i.e., "How relaxed, content, enthusiast, good do you feel?"), rated on a 0 ("not at all") to 100 ("a lot") rating scale. Higher values represent, higher levels of positive emotions (min = 0, max = 100).
Measured: One month (30 days) of daily diaries (3x/day) before the start of the training: Day 1a + all consecutive days until Day 30a (= day before the start of the training)
Daily-life positive emotions measured via daily diary items at post-training (adapted from Kirtley et al., 2022)
Mean value of four daily diary items (i.e., "How relaxed, content, enthusiast, good do you feel?"), rated on a 0 ("not at all") to 100 ("a lot") rating scale. Higher values represent, higher levels of positive emotions (min = 0, max = 100).
Measured: One month (30 days) of daily diaries (3x/day) immediately after the end of the training: Day 1b = the day after the final training day + all consecutive days until Day 30b
Daily-life anhedonia measured via daily diary items at baseline (adapted from Bogaert et al., 2023)
Mean value of three daily diary items tapping into difficulties experiencing consummatory pleasure, anticipatory pleasure and motivational difficulties using a 0-100 Likert scale (0 = "not at all", 100 = "a lot"; items: "To what extent did you find it difficult to enjoy yourself?"; "To what extent did you look forward to doing enjoyable things? (reverse-scored), "Conditional: if 0-50 ("not at all - neutral"): Was this because there really weren't any enjoyable things to look forward to, or because they were there but you couldn't really look forward to them?; "How happy did you feel?" (reverse-scored)). Higher score reflects higher levels of anhedonia (min = 0, max = 100).
Measured: One month (30 days) of daily diaries (3x/day) before the start of the training: Day 1a + all consecutive days until Day 30a (= day before the start of the training)
Daily-life anhedonia measured via daily diary items at post-training (adapted from Bogaert et al., 2023)
Mean value of three daily diary items tapping into difficulties experiencing consummatory pleasure, anticipatory pleasure and motivational difficulties using a 0-100 Likert scale (0 = "not at all", 100 = "a lot"; items: "To what extent did you find it difficult to enjoy yourself?"; "To what extent did you look forward to doing enjoyable things? (reverse-scored), "Conditional: if 0-50 ("not at all - neutral"): Was this because there really weren't any enjoyable things to look forward to, or because they were there but you couldn't really look forward to them?; "How happy did you feel?" (reverse-scored)). Higher score reflects higher levels of anhedonia (min = 0, max = 100).
Measured: One month (30 days) of daily diaries (3x/day) immediately after the end of the training: Day 1b = the day after the final training day + all consecutive days until Day 30b
Daily-life dampening measured via daily diary items at baseline (adapted from Gérardy et al., in preparation; simplified to better fit target group of adolescents)
Mean value of four daily life items to measure mental strategies to reduce the intensity and/or frequency of positive emotions, using a 0-100 Likert scale (0 = "not at all", 100 = "a lot"; items: "To what extent did you think, "This pleasant feeling won't last"?"; "To what extent did you think, "I don't deserve to feel good"?"; To what extent did you think, "Something might go wrong that will make my good/pleasant feeling go away"?; "To what extent did you think about how difficult it would be if your good/pleasant feeling suddenly disappeared?"). Higher score reflects higher levels of dampening (min = 0, max = 100).
Measured: One month (30 days) of daily diaries (3x/day) before the start of the training: Day 1a + all consecutive days until Day 30a (= day before the start of the training)
Daily-life dampening measured via daily diary items at post-training (adapted from Gérardy et al., in preparation; simplified to better fit target group of adolescents)
Mean value of four daily life items to measure mental strategies to reduce the intensity and/or frequency of positive emotions, using a 0-100 Likert scale (0 = "not at all", 100 = "a lot"; items: "To what extent did you think, "This pleasant feeling won't last"?"; "To what extent did you think, "I don't deserve to feel good"?"; To what extent did you think, "Something might go wrong that will make my good/pleasant feeling go away"?; "To what extent did you think about how difficult it would be if your good/pleasant feeling suddenly disappeared?"). Higher score reflects higher levels of dampening (min = 0, max = 100).
Measured: One month (30 days) of daily diaries (3x/day) immediately after the end of the training: Day 1b = the day after the final training day + all consecutive days until Day 30b
Daily-life savoring measured via daily diary items at baseline (adapted from Gérardy et al., in preparation; simplified to better fit target group of adolescents)
Mean value of two daily life items tapping into the the engagement in attending to, appreciating and enhancing positive experiences, using a 0-100 Likert scale (0 = "not at all", 100 = "a lot"; items: "To what extent did you allow the good/pleasant feeling to be there and simply let it be?", "To what extent did you try to really focus your attention on the good/pleasant feeling in order to fully experience it and truly enjoy it?"). Higher scores reflect a higher tendency to savor (min = 0, max = 100).
Measured: One month (30 days) of daily diaries (3x/day) before the start of the training: Day 1a + all consecutive days until Day 30a (= day before the start of the training)
Daily-life savoring measured via daily diary items at post-training (adapted from Gérardy et al., in preparation; simplified to better fit target group of adolescents)
Mean value of two daily life items tapping into the the engagement in attending to, appreciating and enhancing positive experiences, using a 0-100 Likert scale (0 = "not at all", 100 = "a lot"; items: "To what extent did you allow the good/pleasant feeling to be there and simply let it be?", "To what extent did you try to really focus your attention on the good/pleasant feeling in order to fully experience it and truly enjoy it?"). Higher scores reflect a higher tendency to savor (min = 0, max = 100).
Measured: One month (30 days) of daily diaries (3x/day) immediately after the end of the training: Day 1b = the day after the final training day + all consecutive days until Day 30b
Daily-life emotional distress measured via daily diary items at baseline (derived from Bogaert et al., 2023)
Mean value of three daily diary items to measure anxiety, stress and depressed feelings, using a 0-100 Likert scale (0 = "not at all", 100 = "a lot"; items: "How anxious did you feel?"; "How depressed (down) did you feel?"; "How stressed did you feel?"). A higher score reflects higher levels of emotional distress (min = 0, max = 100).
Measured: One month (30 days) of daily diaries (3x/day) before the start of the training: Day 1a + all consecutive days until Day 30a (= day before the start of the training)
Daily-life emotional distress measured via daily diary items at post-training (derived from Bogaert et al., 2023)
Mean value of three daily diary items to measure anxiety, stress and depressed feelings, using a 0-100 Likert scale (0 = "not at all", 100 = "a lot"; items: "How anxious did you feel?"; "How depressed (down) did you feel?"; "How stressed did you feel?"). A higher score reflects higher levels of emotional distress (min = 0, max = 100).
Measured: One month (30 days) of daily diaries (3x/day) immediately after the end of the training: Day 1b = the day after the final training day + all consecutive days until Day 30b
Secondary outcomes (28)
Episodic future thinking features measured via the Episodic Future Thinking Test (EFT-T; Hallford et al., 2019), and single item rating scales per generated event at baseline
8 cue words in response to which a positive future event is generated, accompanied with single-item rating scales ranging from 1 (not at all) to 9 (very much). In line with the study of Hallford, Yeow, et al. (2020), participants rate the index of detail (IoD), mental imagery (MI), anticipated (AdP) and anticipatory pleasure (AyP), and perceived control (PC) and perceived likelihood of occurrence (PLO) associated with the generated future events on the EFT-T. Higher scores reflect higher levels of the feature of interest (min = 8; max = 72).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey before the start of the training (= the day before Day 1a, which is the start of the daily diary assessment phase)
Autobiographical memory features measured via the Autobiographical Memory (AM) Test (AMT; Raes, Williams, & Hermans, 2009) and single item rating scales per generated event at baseline
8 cue words in response to which a positive past event is recalled, accompanied with single-item rating scales ranging from 1 (not at all) to 9 (very much). Participants rate the index of detail (IoD), mental imagery (MI), felt and remembered pleasure (FP and RP), associated with the recalled past events on the AMT. Higher scores reflect higher levels of the feature of interest (min = 8; max = 72).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey before the start of the training (= the day before Day 1a, which is the start of the daily diary assessment phase)
Positive Affect subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Scales (PANAS; Watson et al., 1988) at baseline
Positive affect will be assessed via the Positive Affect subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Scales (PANAS; Engelen et al., 2006; Watson et al., 1988). The extent to which 10 positive feelings (e.g., "enthusiastic") were experienced is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (rarely) to 5 (very often), with higher scores reflecting higher positive affect (min = 10, max = 50).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey before the start of the training (= the day before Day 1a, which is the start of the daily diary assessment phase)
Leuven Anhedonia Scale (LASS, 2nd version; Nelis et al., 2018) at baseline
12 items rated on a 1-5 Likert scale (1 = "This is completely incorrect for me.", 5 = "This is completely correct to me"). A higher total score reflects higher levels of anhedonia (min = 12, max = 60).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey before the start of the training (= the day before Day 1a, which is the start of the daily diary assessment phase)
Dampening measured via the Leuven Exeter Dampening Scale (LEDS, Bogaert et al., 2025) at baseline
The Leuven Exeter Dampening Scale (LEDS, Bogaert et al., 2025) consists of 13 items rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very often). A higher score reflects a higher dampening tendency (min = 13, max = 65).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey before the start of the training (= the day before Day 1a, which is the start of the daily diary assessment phase)
Savoring measured via the Savoring Subscale of the Four-Factor Model of the Abridged Ways Of Savoring Checklist (WOSC) in Response to Everyday Events (Original scale Bryant and Vernoff, 2007; Four-Factor Model Chadwick, 2012) at baseline
The 10 savoring items of the abridged Ways of Savoring Checklist for Adolescents (not yet validated in Dutch) taps into diverse savoring strategies (WOSC; Chadwick, 2012). Items (e.g., "I looked for other people to share it with") are rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (totally disagree) to 7 (totally agree). Higher scores reflect higher levels of engagement in the respective emotion regulation strategy (min = 10, max = 70).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey before the start of the training (= the day before Day 1a, which is the start of the daily diary assessment phase)
Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21; Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995) at baseline
21 items, rated on a 0-3 Likert scale (0 = "Not at all applicable", 3 = "Almost always applicable"). Higher total (subscale) scores reflect higher levels of emotional distress (depressive symptoms, anxious symptoms and stress; min = 0, max = 63).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey before the start of the training (= the day before Day 1a, which is the start of the daily diary assessment phase)
Resilience assessed via the short version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC; Campbell-Sills & Stein, 2007; Connor & Davidson, 2003; translated into Dutch by Danhof-Pont & Schrier, 2006, 2010) at baseline
Statements of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (10 items; e.g., "I am able to adapt to change") are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very often), with higher scores reflecting higher levels of resilience (min = 10, max = 50).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey before the start of the training (= the day before Day 1a, which is the start of the daily diary assessment phase)
Daily-life resilience (general) measured via daily diary item at baseline
Daily diary item rated on a 0-100 Likert (0 = not at all; 100 = a lot), with higher scores reflecting higher daily-life resilience (item: "To what extent did you feel that you were able to handle many things at the same time?", adapted from Martinez-Corts et al., 2015).
Measured: One month (30 days) of daily diaries (3x/day) before the start of the training: Day 1a + all consecutive days until Day 30a (= day before the start of the training)
Daily-life resilience (in response to stress, using positive emotions) measured via daily diary item at baseline
Daily diary item rated on a 0-100 Likert (0 = not at all; 100 = a lot), with higher scores reflecting higher daily-life resilience (item: "To what extent did you try to think of something pleasant from the past or the future to cope with that stress?", new item).
Measured: One month (30 days) of daily diaries (3x/day) before the start of the training: Day 1a + all consecutive days until Day 30a (= day before the start of the training)
Daily-life resilience (in response to stress) measured via daily diary item at baseline
Daily diary item rated on a 0-100 Likert (0 = not at all; 100 = a lot), with higher scores reflecting higher daily-life resilience (item: "To what extent were you able to cope easily with those feelings of stress?", adapted from Brogly et al., 2024).
Measured: One month (30 days) of daily diaries (3x/day) before the start of the training: Day 1a + all consecutive days until Day 30a (= day before the start of the training)
Mental wellbeing measured via the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS; Ikink et al., 2012; Stewart-Brown et al., 2009) at baseline
This self-report scale comprises 7 statements (e.g., "I have been feeling relaxed") rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). Higher scores indicate higher self-reported wellbeing (min = 7, max =35).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey before the start of the training (= the day before Day 1a, which is the start of the daily diary assessment phase)
Persistent negative thinking measured via the Persistent and Intrusive Negative Thoughts Scale (PINTS; Magson et al., 2019; 5 items) at baseline
This is a 5-item scale measuring the core characteristics of repetitive negative thinking (Magson et al., 2019). The items are answered on a 5-point frequency scale ranging from never (1) to almost always (5). A higher score reflect higher levels of persisitent negative thinking (min = 5, max = 25).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey before the start of the training (= the day before Day 1a, which is the start of the daily diary assessment phase)
Common humanity measured via the "Samen mens zijn" scale (Raes & Bogaert, 2025; unpublished) at baseline
Self-report scale consisting of 5 items (e.g., "When I go through difficult things, I realize that others also experience tough moments sometimes, just like I do."), rated on a Likertscale from 1 (never or almost never) to 5 (almost always). A higher score reflects higher levels of common humanity (min = 5, max = 25).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey before the start of the training (= the day before Day 1a, which is the start of the daily diary assessment phase)
Episodic future thinking features measured via the Episodic Future Thinking Test (EFT-T; Hallford et al., 2019), and single item rating scales per generated event at post-training
8 cue words in response to which a positive future event is generated, accompanied with single-item rating scales ranging from 1 (not at all) to 9 (very much). In line with the study of Hallford, Yeow, et al. (2020), participants rate the index of detail (IoD), mental imagery (MI), anticipated (AdP) and anticipatory pleasure (AyP), and perceived control (PC) and perceived likelihood of occurrence (PLO) associated with the generated future events on the EFT-T. Higher scores reflect higher levels of the feature of interest (min = 8; max = 72).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey immediately after the end of the training (= the day after the final training session or Day 1b)
Autobiographical memory features measured via the Autobiographical Memory (AM) Test (AMT; Raes, Williams, & Hermans, 2009) and single item rating scales per generated event at post-training
8 cue words in response to which a positive past event is recalled, accompanied with single-item rating scales ranging from 1 (not at all) to 9 (very much). Participants rate the index of detail (IoD), mental imagery (MI), felt and remembered pleasure (FP and RP), associated with the recalled past events on the AMT. Higher scores reflect higher levels of the feature of interest (min = 8; max = 72).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey immediately after the end of the training (= the day after the final training session or Day 1b)
Positive Affect subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Scales (PANAS; Watson et al., 1988) at post-training
Positive affect will be assessed via the Positive Affect subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Scales (PANAS; Engelen et al., 2006; Watson et al., 1988). The extent to which 10 positive feelings (e.g., "enthusiastic") were experienced is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (rarely) to 5 (very often), with higher scores reflecting higher positive affect (min = 10, max = 50).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey immediately after the end of the training (= the day after the final training session or Day 1b)
Leuven Anhedonia Scale (LASS, 2nd version; Nelis et al., 2018) at post-training
12 items rated on a 1-5 Likert scale (1 = "This is completely incorrect for me.", 5 = "This is completely correct to me"). A higher total score reflects higher levels of anhedonia (min = 12, max = 60).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey immediately after the end of the training (= the day after the final training session or Day 1b)
Dampening measured via the Leuven Exeter Dampening Scale (LEDS, Bogaert et al., 2025) at post-training
The Leuven Exeter Dampening Scale (LEDS, Bogaert et al., 2025) consists of 13 items rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very often). A higher score reflects a higher dampening tendency (min = 13, max = 65).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey immediately after the end of the training (= the day after the final training session or Day 1b)
Savoring measured via the Savoring Subscale of the Four-Factor Model of the Abridged Ways Of Savoring Checklist (WOSC) in Response to Everyday Events (Original scale Bryant and Vernoff, 2007; Four-Factor Model Chadwick, 2012) at post-training
The 10 savoring items of the abridged Ways of Savoring Checklist for Adolescents (not yet validated in Dutch) taps into diverse savoring strategies (WOSC; Chadwick, 2012). Items (e.g., "I looked for other people to share it with") are rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (totally disagree) to 7 (totally agree). Higher scores reflect higher levels of engagement in the respective emotion regulation strategy (min = 10, max = 70).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey immediately after the end of the training (= the day after the final training session or Day 1b)
Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21; Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995) at post-training
21 items, rated on a 0-3 Likert scale (0 = "Not at all applicable", 3 = "Almost always applicable"). Higher total (subscale) scores reflect higher levels of emotional distress (depressive symptoms, anxious symptoms and stress; min = 0, max = 63).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey immediately after the end of the training (= the day after the final training session or Day 1b)
Resilience assessed via the short version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC; Campbell-Sills & Stein, 2007; Connor & Davidson, 2003; translated into Dutch by Danhof-Pont & Schrier, 2006, 2010) at post-training
Statements of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (10 items; e.g., "I am able to adapt to change") are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very often), with higher scores reflecting higher levels of resilience (min = 10, max = 50).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey immediately after the end of the training (= the day after the final training session or Day 1b)
Daily-life resilience (general) measured via daily diary item at post-training
Daily diary item rated on a 0-100 Likert (0 = not at all; 100 = a lot), with higher scores reflecting higher daily-life resilience (item: "To what extent did you feel that you were able to handle many things at the same time?", adapted from Martinez-Corts et al., 2015).
Measured: One month (30 days) of daily diaries (3x/day) immediately after the end of the training: Day 1b = the day after the final training day + all consecutive days until Day 30b
Daily-life resilience (in response to stress, using positive emotions) measured via daily diary item at post-training
Daily diary item rated on a 0-100 Likert (0 = not at all; 100 = a lot), with higher scores reflecting higher daily-life resilience (item: "To what extent did you try to think of something pleasant from the past or the future to cope with that stress?", new item).
Measured: One month (30 days) of daily diaries (3x/day) immediately after the end of the training: Day 1b = the day after the final training day + all consecutive days until Day 30b
Daily-life resilience (in response to stress) measured via daily diary item at post-training
Daily diary item rated on a 0-100 Likert (0 = not at all; 100 = a lot), with higher scores reflecting higher daily-life resilience (item: "To what extent were you able to cope easily with those feelings of stress?", adapted from Brogly et al., 2024).
Measured: One month (30 days) of daily diaries (3x/day) immediately after the end of the training: Day 1b = the day after the final training day + all consecutive days until Day 30b
Mental wellbeing measured via the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS; Ikink et al., 2012; Stewart-Brown et al., 2009) at post-training
This self-report scale comprises 7 statements (e.g., "I have been feeling relaxed") rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). Higher scores indicate higher self-reported wellbeing (min = 7, max =35).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey immediately after the end of the training (= the day after the final training session or Day 1b)
Persistent negative thinking measured via the Persistent and Intrusive Negative Thoughts Scale (PINTS; Magson et al., 2019; 5 items) at post-training
This is a 5-item scale measuring the core characteristics of repetitive negative thinking (Magson et al., 2019). The items are answered on a 5-point frequency scale ranging from never (1) to almost always (5). A higher score reflect higher levels of persisitent negative thinking (min = 5, max = 25).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey immediately after the end of the training (= the day after the final training session or Day 1b)
Common humanity measured via the "Samen mens zijn" scale (Raes & Bogaert, 2025; unpublished) at post-training
Self-report scale consisting of 5 items (e.g., "When I go through difficult things, I realize that others also experience tough moments sometimes, just like I do."), rated on a Likertscale from 1 (never or almost never) to 5 (almost always). A higher score reflects higher levels of common humanity (min = 5, max = 25).
Measured: Single timepoint, participants are invited to complete the survey immediately after the end of the training (= the day after the final training session or Day 1b)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Sep 2026
- Study startOct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Emotional DistressStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- single-case experimental design
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- KU Leuven
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Filip Raes, KU Leuven
- Investigators
- Filip Raes, Principal investigator, KU Leuven
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07825285
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- G-2026-11398-R2(MIN)
- Other IDs
- G051625N
- Acronym
- iPET N=1
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 2 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 17 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Data can only be accessed by the involved researchers. Anonymized data can be made available at the end of the study, in line with the data management plan and taking into account the faculties' requirements and ethical principles.