Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM)NCT07827625
Mulligan Mobilization With Movement Versus Conventional Physiotherapy on Ankle Range of Motion, Mobility, Pain, and Quality of Life in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
A study testing Experimental in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM), run by Ibadat International University, Islamabad at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a major global health concern associated with chronic hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, and accumulation of advanced glycation end-products, which impair connective tissue function and commonly restrict ankle (tibiotalar) mobility. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM)
- What is being tested?
- Experimental
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 2 Mar 2026to 5 Oct 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged 50-70 years
- Both male and female
- Diabetes Mellitus > 5 years' duration
- Willing to participate and provide informed consent
- Pain rated between 3-7 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
- Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion ≤10° on goniometric assessment
Who cannot join
- History of recent lower-limb surgery, fracture, or dislocation (<6 months)
- Active diabetic foot ulcer or Charcot foot
- Any inflammatory joint disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis)
- Congenital foot deformity
- Diagnosed diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Pakistan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Ibadat International University
Islamabad, Federal, 47000
Hafsah Arshad, PhD*, 03315165234, hafsaharshad@hotmail.com
About this study
Official title: Comparative Effects of Mulligan Mobilization With Movement and Conventional Physiotherapy on Ankle Range of Motion, Mobility, Pain, and Quality of Life in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a major global health concern associated with chronic hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, and accumulation of advanced glycation end-products, which impair connective tissue function and commonly restrict ankle (tibiotalar) mobility. Reduced ankle range of motion, neuropathic pain, and gait instability significantly impair daily activities and quality of life in this population, and reduced ankle mobility is further associated with increased risk of diabetic foot ulceration. Conventional physiotherapy is widely used to address these impairments through exercise, stretching, and strengthening, but may not fully resolve mechanical joint restrictions. Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement (MWM) is a manual therapy technique in which a sustained glide is applied to the ankle during active weight-bearing movement, correcting positional faults and improving dorsiflexion range of motion. While MWM has shown benefit in non-diabetic ankle conditions, its effectiveness relative to conventional physiotherapy in patients with T2DM remains unclear.
This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of Mulligan Mobilization with Movement (Group A) versus conventional physiotherapy (Group B) on pain intensity, ankle range of motion, functional mobility, and quality of life in adults aged 50-70 years with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus of more than 5 years' duration. A total of 56 participants will be recruited using non-probability purposive sampling and randomly allocated by coin-toss method into two equal groups of 28. Both groups will receive baseline treatment (hot pack application and gentle active ankle movement) followed by their assigned protocol - Group A receiving MWM (sustained anteroposterior/posteroanterior glide to the distal tibia or fibula during active dorsiflexion or plantarflexion, 3 sets of 10 repetitions) and Group B receiving conventional physiotherapy (active/passive range-of-motion exercises, calf raises, and calf/Achilles stretching) - three sessions per week for six weeks.
Read more
Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and following the six-week intervention period. Primary outcome measures include pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), ankle range of motion (goniometer), functional mobility (Timed Up and Go test), and quality of life (SF-12 Health Survey). Data will be analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 27, with normality assessed via the Shapiro-Wilk test and within- and between-group comparisons made using parametric or non-parametric tests as appropriate.
This trial is expected to generate direct comparative evidence on whether Mulligan Mobilization with Movement offers superior outcomes to conventional physiotherapy for ankle-related impairments in patients with T2DM, helping physiotherapists select more targeted, evidence-based rehabilitation protocols for this population.
Read the detailed description
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus is characterized by impaired insulin secretion and reduced insulin sensitivity resulting in chronic hyperglycemia. Pakistan ranks among the top ten countries globally for diabetes prevalence, with an estimated 7.5 million affected adults and no national diabetes management strategy. Chronic hyperglycemia drives collagen glycation and accumulation of advanced glycation end-products, causing tendon and joint-capsule stiffness, structural changes in the Achilles tendon and plantar fascia, and loss of ankle dorsiflexion; peripheral neuropathy further impairs proprioception and reinforces ankle hypomobility. Physiotherapy management, by improving available range of motion and normalizing foot and ankle biomechanics during gait, is a proposed conservative approach to these impairments. Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement (MWM) is an interactive manual therapy technique in which a sustained posterior talar glide is applied during active weight-bearing dorsiflexion, correcting talar positional faults and improving dorsiflexion range of motion. Rao and colleagues found that individuals with diabetes mellitus show markedly reduced ankle dorsiflexion compared with non-diabetic controls (peak dorsiflexion of 5.1° versus 11.5°, a roughly 41% reduction, p<0.001) along with greater passive ankle stiffness, supporting the use of a dorsiflexion cutoff to identify patients most likely to benefit from targeted intervention.
Existing literature supports MWM's benefit in non-diabetic ankle conditions (e.g., acute/subacute lateral ankle sprain, chronic stroke) and supports multi-component foot/ankle exercise programs in diabetic populations, but no identified trial has directly compared MWM to conventional physiotherapy specifically in patients with T2DM-related ankle impairment, leaving a clear evidence gap that this trial addresses.
Problem Statement Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus commonly present with reduced ankle mobility, impaired balance, pain, and decreased quality of life due to diabetes-related musculoskeletal changes. Although conventional physiotherapy is routinely used, there is limited evidence comparing its effectiveness with Mulligan Mobilization with Movement in this population, and MWM's effectiveness in individuals with T2DM remains unclear.
Study Design and Methods This is a randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants are adults aged 50-70 years with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus of more than 5 years' duration, both male and female, willing to provide informed consent, with pain rated 3-7 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion ≤10° on goniometric assessment. Individuals with recent lower-limb surgery, fracture or dislocation (<6 months), active diabetic foot ulcer or Charcot foot, inflammatory joint disease, congenital foot deformity, or diagnosed diabetic peripheral neuropathy are excluded. A total of 56 participants, calculated using the OpenEpi Sample Size Calculator based on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion as the primary outcome, will be recruited via non-probability purposive sampling and randomized by coin-toss method into two groups of 28.
Both groups receive baseline treatment (hot pack to the ankle for 10-15 minutes and gentle active ankle movement within pain-free range). Group A then receives MWM: a sustained anteroposterior or posteroanterior glide to the distal tibia/fibula during active dorsiflexion or plantarflexion, 3 sets of 10 repetitions, each repetition held 3-5 seconds, with 30-60 seconds rest between sets, 30-40 minutes per session. Group B receives conventional physiotherapy: active and passive ankle range-of-motion exercises (dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, inversion, eversion), calf raises (10 reps × 3 sets), and calf/Achilles tendon stretching, 30-40 minutes per session, 10-15 repetitions × 2-3 sets. Both groups attend 3 sessions per week for 6 weeks.
Outcome Measures Four outcome domains are assessed at baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks): pain intensity via the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS, 0-10); ankle range of motion (dorsiflexion, plantarflexion) via goniometer; functional mobility via the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test; and quality of life via the SF-12 Health Survey.
Data Analysis and Ethics Statistical analysis will be carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics version 27. The Shapiro-Wilk test will assess normality. Within-group comparisons will use the paired-samples t-test (normal data) or Wilcoxon signed-rank test (non-normal data); between-group comparisons will use the independent-samples t-test (normal data) or Mann-Whitney U test (non-normal data). A p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The trial will be conducted under Research Ethics Review Committee approval, with written informed consent obtained from all participants, voluntary participation, and the right to withdraw at any time without affecting care or academic standing.
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM)
- Being tested
- Experimental, Control
- Keywords
- Mulligan Mobilization with Movement, ankle range of motion, quality of life, pain
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ExperimentalOther
Baseline: hot pack 10-15 min + gentle active ankle movement. Followed by Mulligan Mobilization with Movement: sustained AP/PA glide to distal tibia/fibula during active dorsiflexion/plantarflexion, 3 sets × 10 reps, each rep held 3-5s, 30-60s rest between sets. 30-40 min/session. 3 sessions/week for 6 weeks.
ControlOther
Same baseline treatment as Group A. Followed by Conventional Physiotherapy: active/passive ankle ROM exercises (dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, inversion, eversion), calf raises 10×3 sets, calf/Achilles stretching. 30-40 min/session, 10-15 reps × 2-3 sets. 3 sessions/week for 6 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | Baseline: hot pack 10-15 min + gentle active ankle movement. Followed by Mulligan Mobilization with Movement: sustained AP/PA glide to distal tibia/fibula during active dorsiflexion/plantarflexion, 3 sets × 10 reps, each rep held 3-5s, 30-60s rest between sets. 30-40 min/session. 3 sessions/week for 6 weeks. Receives: Other: Experimental |
| Group B | Active comparator | Same baseline treatment as Group A. Followed by Conventional Physiotherapy: active/passive ankle ROM exercises (dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, inversion, eversion), calf raises 10×3 sets, calf/Achilles stretching. 30-40 min/session, 10-15 reps × 2-3 sets. 3 sessions/week for 6 weeks. Receives: Other: Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
0-10 self-reported pain intensity scale
Measured: assessed at baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks).
Goniometer Measurement
Dorsiflexion and plantarflexion measured in degrees using a goniometer;
Measured: assessed at baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks).
Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test
Time in seconds to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, and return
Measured: assessed at baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks).
Quality of Life - SF-12
12-item self-reported questionnaire assessing physical and mental health-related quality of life
Measured: assessed at baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Sep 2026
- Study start2 Mar 2026
- Primary completion30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion5 Oct 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Parallel-group design in which 56 participants are randomized by coin-toss method into two equal groups (n=28 each), receiving Mulligan Mobilization with Movement or conventional physiotherapy, without crossover.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ibadat International University, Islamabad
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hafsah Arshad, Ibadat International University, Islamabad
- Investigators
- Hafsah Arshad, PhD, Principal investigator, Ibadat International University, Islamabad
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07827625
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IIUI/RERC/ADT/2026/02/255
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 18 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Effects of Mulligan Mobilization With Movement and Conventional Physiotherapy on Ankle Range of Motion, Mobility, Pain, and Quality of Life in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07827625
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IIUI/RERC/ADT/2026/02/255
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM)
- Keywords
- Mulligan Mobilization with Movement, ankle range of motion, quality of life, pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ibadat International University, IslamabadUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 5 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a major global health concern associated with chronic hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, and accumulation of advanced glycation end-products, which impair connective tissue function and commonly restrict ankle (tibiotalar) mobility. Reduced ankle range of motion, neuropathic pain, and gait instability significantly impair daily activities and quality of life in this population, and reduced ankle mobility is further associated with increased risk of diabetic foot ulceration. Conventional physiotherapy is widely used to address these impairments through exercise, stretching, and strengthening, but may not fully resolve mechanical joint restrictions. Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement (MWM) is a manual therapy technique in which a sustained glide is applied to the ankle during active weight-bearing movement, correcting positional faults and improving dorsiflexion range of motion. While MWM has shown benefit in non-diabetic ankle conditions, its effectiveness relative to conventional physiotherapy in patients with T2DM remains unclear.
This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of Mulligan Mobilization with Movement (Group A) versus conventional physiotherapy (Group B) on pain intensity, ankle range of motion, functional mobility, and quality of life in adults aged 50-70 years with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus of more than 5 years' duration. A total of 56 participants will be recruited using non-probability purposive sampling and randomly allocated by coin-toss method into two equal groups of 28. Both groups will receive baseline treatment (hot pack application and gentle active ankle movement) followed by their assigned protocol - Group A receiving MWM (sustained anteroposterior/posteroanterior glide to the distal tibia or fibula during active dorsiflexion or plantarflexion, 3 sets of 10 repetitions) and Group B receiving conventional physiotherapy (active/passive range-of-motion exercises, calf raises, and calf/Achilles stretching) - three sessions per week for six weeks.
Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and following the six-week intervention period. Primary outcome measures include pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), ankle range of motion (goniometer), functional mobility (Timed Up and Go test), and quality of life (SF-12 Health Survey). Data will be analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 27, with normality assessed via the Shapiro-Wilk test and within- and between-group comparisons made using parametric or non-parametric tests as appropriate.
This trial is expected to generate direct comparative evidence on whether Mulligan Mobilization with Movement offers superior outcomes to conventional physiotherapy for ankle-related impairments in patients with T2DM, helping physiotherapists select more targeted, evidence-based rehabilitation protocols for this population.
Detailed description
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus is characterized by impaired insulin secretion and reduced insulin sensitivity resulting in chronic hyperglycemia. Pakistan ranks among the top ten countries globally for diabetes prevalence, with an estimated 7.5 million affected adults and no national diabetes management strategy. Chronic hyperglycemia drives collagen glycation and accumulation of advanced glycation end-products, causing tendon and joint-capsule stiffness, structural changes in the Achilles tendon and plantar fascia, and loss of ankle dorsiflexion; peripheral neuropathy further impairs proprioception and reinforces ankle hypomobility. Physiotherapy management, by improving available range of motion and normalizing foot and ankle biomechanics during gait, is a proposed conservative approach to these impairments. Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement (MWM) is an interactive manual therapy technique in which a sustained posterior talar glide is applied during active weight-bearing dorsiflexion, correcting talar positional faults and improving dorsiflexion range of motion. Rao and colleagues found that individuals with diabetes mellitus show markedly reduced ankle dorsiflexion compared with non-diabetic controls (peak dorsiflexion of 5.1° versus 11.5°, a roughly 41% reduction, p<0.001) along with greater passive ankle stiffness, supporting the use of a dorsiflexion cutoff to identify patients most likely to benefit from targeted intervention.
Existing literature supports MWM's benefit in non-diabetic ankle conditions (e.g., acute/subacute lateral ankle sprain, chronic stroke) and supports multi-component foot/ankle exercise programs in diabetic populations, but no identified trial has directly compared MWM to conventional physiotherapy specifically in patients with T2DM-related ankle impairment, leaving a clear evidence gap that this trial addresses.
Problem Statement Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus commonly present with reduced ankle mobility, impaired balance, pain, and decreased quality of life due to diabetes-related musculoskeletal changes. Although conventional physiotherapy is routinely used, there is limited evidence comparing its effectiveness with Mulligan Mobilization with Movement in this population, and MWM's effectiveness in individuals with T2DM remains unclear.
Study Design and Methods This is a randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants are adults aged 50-70 years with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus of more than 5 years' duration, both male and female, willing to provide informed consent, with pain rated 3-7 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion ≤10° on goniometric assessment. Individuals with recent lower-limb surgery, fracture or dislocation (<6 months), active diabetic foot ulcer or Charcot foot, inflammatory joint disease, congenital foot deformity, or diagnosed diabetic peripheral neuropathy are excluded. A total of 56 participants, calculated using the OpenEpi Sample Size Calculator based on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion as the primary outcome, will be recruited via non-probability purposive sampling and randomized by coin-toss method into two groups of 28.
Both groups receive baseline treatment (hot pack to the ankle for 10-15 minutes and gentle active ankle movement within pain-free range). Group A then receives MWM: a sustained anteroposterior or posteroanterior glide to the distal tibia/fibula during active dorsiflexion or plantarflexion, 3 sets of 10 repetitions, each repetition held 3-5 seconds, with 30-60 seconds rest between sets, 30-40 minutes per session. Group B receives conventional physiotherapy: active and passive ankle range-of-motion exercises (dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, inversion, eversion), calf raises (10 reps × 3 sets), and calf/Achilles tendon stretching, 30-40 minutes per session, 10-15 repetitions × 2-3 sets. Both groups attend 3 sessions per week for 6 weeks.
Outcome Measures Four outcome domains are assessed at baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks): pain intensity via the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS, 0-10); ankle range of motion (dorsiflexion, plantarflexion) via goniometer; functional mobility via the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test; and quality of life via the SF-12 Health Survey.
Data Analysis and Ethics Statistical analysis will be carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics version 27. The Shapiro-Wilk test will assess normality. Within-group comparisons will use the paired-samples t-test (normal data) or Wilcoxon signed-rank test (non-normal data); between-group comparisons will use the independent-samples t-test (normal data) or Mann-Whitney U test (non-normal data). A p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The trial will be conducted under Research Ethics Review Committee approval, with written informed consent obtained from all participants, voluntary participation, and the right to withdraw at any time without affecting care or academic standing.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Parallel-group design in which 56 participants are randomized by coin-toss method into two equal groups (n=28 each), receiving Mulligan Mobilization with Movement or conventional physiotherapy, without crossover.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | Other: ExperimentalBaseline: hot pack 10-15 min + gentle active ankle movement. Followed by Mulligan Mobilization with Movement: sustained AP/PA glide to distal tibia/fibula during active dorsiflexion/plantarflexion, 3 sets × 10 reps, each rep held 3-5s, 30-60s rest between sets. 30-40 min/session. 3 sessions/week for 6 weeks. |
| Group B | Active comparator | Other: ControlSame baseline treatment as Group A. Followed by Conventional Physiotherapy: active/passive ankle ROM exercises (dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, inversion, eversion), calf raises 10×3 sets, calf/Achilles stretching. 30-40 min/session, 10-15 reps × 2-3 sets. 3 sessions/week for 6 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients aged 50-70 years
- Both male and female
- Diabetes Mellitus > 5 years' duration
- Willing to participate and provide informed consent
- Pain rated between 3-7 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- History of recent lower-limb surgery, fracture, or dislocation (<6 months)
- Active diabetic foot ulcer or Charcot foot
- Any inflammatory joint disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis)
- Congenital foot deformity
- Diagnosed diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ExperimentalBaseline: hot pack 10-15 min + gentle active ankle movement. Followed by Mulligan Mobilization with Movement: sustained AP/PA glide to distal tibia/fibula during active dorsiflexion/plantarflexion, 3 sets × 10 reps, each rep held 3-5s, 30-60s rest between sets. 30-40 min/session. 3 sessions/week for 6 weeks. | Other | Group A |
| ControlSame baseline treatment as Group A. Followed by Conventional Physiotherapy: active/passive ankle ROM exercises (dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, inversion, eversion), calf raises 10×3 sets, calf/Achilles stretching. 30-40 min/session, 10-15 reps × 2-3 sets. 3 sessions/week for 6 weeks. | Other | Group B |
Primary outcome
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time frame: assessed at baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks).
0-10 self-reported pain intensity scale
Goniometer Measurement
Time frame: assessed at baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks).
Dorsiflexion and plantarflexion measured in degrees using a goniometer;
Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test
Time frame: assessed at baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks).
Time in seconds to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, and return
Quality of Life - SF-12
Time frame: assessed at baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks).
12-item self-reported questionnaire assessing physical and mental health-related quality of life
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of MTHFR and DNMT3B Gene Polymorphisms Along With Periodontal Clinical Parameters in Healthy Individuals and Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Periodontitis
Periodontitis, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM)
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Personalizing A1c Using Hematologic Indices and CGM for Accurate Diabetes Diagnosis
Type 2 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Dietitian-Nutritionist vs. Day Hospital in the Metabolic Control of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes (DM)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Mitigating DKA in Type 1 Diabetes for Safe Use of SGLT Inhibitors Using Dual Continuous Ketone and Glucose Monitoring.
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) With Diabetes Mellitus (DM)
Recruiting
Changes in Person-reported Outcomes and Behavior Using the Accu-Chek SmartGuide CGM and Predict App
Diabetes (DM), Diabetes Mellitus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Hafsah Arshad, PhD principal investigator
Ibadat International University, Islamabad
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Experimental in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM), run by Ibadat International University, Islamabad at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Nazish Jahangir, Master in MSK (03125319484, Nazishjehanger@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (time frame: assessed at baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks).). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2026.