AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteoporosisNCT07836868

Metabolic Determinants of DXA-Measured Bone Mineral Density

An observational study of Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Density, run by Mardin Artuklu University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This retrospective observational study will examine bone mineral density measurements and their metabolic and clinical determinants in adults aged 40 years and older. Existing medical records of approximately 300 patients who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine and femoral neck will be… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Osteoporosis, Bone Mineral Density
How many people
750 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Jul 2026to 1 Nov 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adults aged 40 years and older who underwent lumbar spine and femoral neck DXA examination at Mardin Training and Research Hospital will be identified from existing hospital records. Patients with eligible DXA measurements and available clinical and laboratory data will be included. The study population may include individuals with normal bone mineral density, osteopenia, or osteoporosis. No healthy control group will be recruited separately.

Who may be able to join

  • Adults aged 40 years or older
  • Lumbar spine (L1-L4) and femoral neck DXA measurements performed during the same assessment
  • Available T-score and bone mineral density data from the DXA examination
  • Available clinical and laboratory data required for the study analyses

Who cannot join

  • Metal implant or prosthesis affecting lumbar spine or femoral neck DXA measurements
  • Unreliable lumbar spine measurement due to marked artifact, surgical material, vertebral compression fracture, or extensive degenerative changes
  • Fewer than two lumbar vertebrae suitable for analysis
  • Active malignancy
  • Stage 4 or higher chronic kidney disease
  • Metabolic bone disease that may substantially affect bone mineral density
  • Long-term systemic glucocorticoid use
  • Missing or uninterpretable DXA data

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Mardin Training and Research Hospital

    Mardin, 47100

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Bone Mineral Density Parameters Measured by DXA and Their Metabolic Determinants

This retrospective observational study will examine bone mineral density measurements and their metabolic and clinical determinants in adults aged 40 years and older. Existing medical records of approximately 300 patients who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine and femoral neck will be reviewed.

The researchers will examine the relationships between DXA measurements and available clinical and laboratory findings. Differences between lumbar spine and femoral neck T-scores, bone mineral density discordance, fracture history, and FRAX fracture risk will also be evaluated. No additional examination, laboratory test, treatment, or intervention will be performed as part of the study.

Read the detailed description

Background: Bone mineral density measured at the lumbar spine and femoral neck may differ because these regions have different bone structures and may be affected differently by aging, metabolic factors, and degenerative changes. These differences may influence the diagnosis of osteoporosis and the assessment of fracture risk.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the metabolic and clinical factors associated with bone mineral density parameters measured by DXA. It will also evaluate lumbar spine-femoral neck T-score differences, bone mineral density discordance, fragility fractures, and FRAX fracture risk.

Method: This retrospective observational study will include adults aged 40 years and older who underwent DXA examination of the lumbar spine and femoral neck. Existing hospital records, DXA results, laboratory findings, and clinical information will be reviewed. The study will examine lumbar vertebral and femoral neck T-scores, the T-score difference between these regions, and concordant or discordant bone mineral density categories. Available metabolic and clinical variables will be analyzed. Previous and newly recorded fragility fractures and FRAX risk estimates will also be evaluated. No new tests or interventions will be performed.

Keywords
bone mineral density, Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, Spine-Hip Discordance, Fragility Fracture, Metabolic Determinants, FRAX
Medical subject headings
Osteoporosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07836868
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Adults Undergoing DXA AssessmentAdults aged 40 years and older who underwent DXA examination of the lumbar spine and femoral neck will be included. Existing DXA measurements, clinical information, laboratory findings, fracture records, and FRAX estimates will be reviewed retrospectively. No treatment, examination, or intervention will be assigned as part of the study.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Lumbar Spine-Femoral Neck T-Score Gradient

    The lumbar spine-femoral neck T-score gradient will be calculated by subtracting the femoral neck T-score from the mean lumbar spine T-score obtained from eligible L1-L4 vertebrae. T-scores represent the number of standard deviations by which bone mineral density differs from the young-adult reference mean. T-scores and the calculated gradient do not have predefined minimum or maximum values. Higher positive gradient values indicate a relatively higher lumbar spine T-score compared with the femoral neck, while more negative values indicate a relatively lower lumbar spine T-score. The relationships between the gradient and metabolic and clinical variables will be evaluated.

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Lumbar Spine-Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Discordance

    Lumbar spine and femoral neck T-scores will be classified as normal (T-score ≥ -1.0), osteopenic (T-score < -1.0 and > -2.5), or osteoporotic (T-score ≤ -2.5). Participants will be classified as concordant when the lumbar spine and femoral neck are in the same diagnostic category and discordant when they are in different diagnostic categories. This is a categorical outcome reported as concordant or discordant and is not a numerical scale; therefore, it has no minimum or maximum score, and higher values do not represent a better or worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Prevalent Fragility Fracture

    The presence of a fragility fracture before or at the time of the index DXA examination will be identified from medical records, radiology reports, and available imaging. Vertebral, hip, distal radius, and proximal humerus fractures caused by low-energy trauma will be included.

    Measured: Before or at the index DXA examination

  3. Incident Fragility Fracture

    New fragility fractures occurring after the index DXA examination will be identified from medical records, radiology reports, and available imaging. Vertebral, hip, distal radius, and proximal humerus fractures caused by low-energy trauma will be included.

    Measured: From the index DXA examination to the date of record review, up to 10 years

  4. FRAX 10-Year Major Osteoporotic Fracture Probability

    The 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture will be calculated using the Turkey-specific Fracture Risk Assessment Tool model, with femoral neck bone mineral density and available clinical risk factors. Major osteoporotic fracture includes clinical vertebral, hip, forearm, or proximal humerus fracture. The probability is reported from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating a greater 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture.

    Measured: Baseline

  5. FRAX 10-Year Hip Fracture Probability

    The 10-year probability of hip fracture will be calculated using the Turkey-specific Fracture Risk Assessment Tool model, with femoral neck bone mineral density and available clinical risk factors. The probability is reported from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating a greater 10-year risk of hip fracture.

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Sep 2026
  2. Study start1 Jul 2026
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
750 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07836868
Sponsor's protocol ID
MTRH-PMR-TYY2
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
12 Sep 2026
Last updated
23 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Leslie WD, Lix LM, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E, Kanis JA. Spine-hip discordance and fracture risk assessment: a physician-friendly FRAX enhancement. Osteoporos Int. 2011 Mar;22(3):839-47. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1461-5. Epub 2010 Oct 20.

    PubMed 20959961
  • Leslie WD, Kovacs CS, Olszynski WP, Towheed T, Kaiser SM, Prior JC, Josse RG, Jamal SA, Kreiger N, Goltzman D; CaMos Research Group. Spine-hip T-score difference predicts major osteoporotic fracture risk independent of FRAX((R)): a population-based report from CAMOS. J Clin Densitom. 2011 Jul-Sep;14(3):286-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.04.011. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

    PubMed 21723768
  • Woodson G. Dual X-ray absorptiometry T-score concordance and discordance between the hip and spine measurement sites. J Clin Densitom. 2000 Winter;3(4):319-24. doi: 10.1385/jcd:3:4:319.

    PubMed 11175911

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Density, run by Mardin Artuklu University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Lumbar Spine-Femoral Neck T-Score Gradient (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07836868, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in