AzTrials
AzTrials

Knee InjuriesPhase 4NCT07838948

Nalbuphine With Remimazolam Versus Nalbuphine With Propofol for Knee Arthroscopy

A Phase 4 study testing Nalbuphine, Remimazolam and Propofol in people with Knee Injuries, run by Wuhan Fourth Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study compared two combinations of medicines used for sedation and pain relief in adults undergoing knee arthroscopy for knee joint injuries. One group received nalbuphine with remimazolam, and the other received nalbuphine with propofol. The study examined pain, sedation, cognitive function, and adverse events. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Knee Injuries
What is being tested?
Nalbuphine, Remimazolam and Propofol
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
10 Apr 2025to 2 Oct 2025
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Knee joint injury diagnosed by clinical and imaging examinations, with planned knee arthroscopy.
  • Age 18 to 65 years.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II.
  • Normal preoperative cognitive function, with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score >=24.
  • No long-term preoperative use of analgesic, sedative, or antipsychotic medication.

Who cannot join

  • Psychiatric disorders, including depression, anxiety, or schizophrenia, or neurological disorders, including Parkinson disease, epilepsy, or post-stroke sequelae.
  • Allergy to nalbuphine, remimazolam, or related medications.
  • Severe hepatic or renal impairment, including cirrhosis or chronic renal failure, or uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes mellitus.
  • Considered unsuitable for participation by the investigators.
  • Serious intraoperative complications, including anesthesia accidents or massive intraoperative bleeding, or withdrawal during the study (post-enrollment exclusion or withdrawal criteria).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Wuhan Fourth Hospital

    Wuhan, Hubei, 430035

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Investigating the Effect of Subanesthetic Doses of Nalbuphine Combined With Remimazolam in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Knee Surgery for Knee Joint Injuries

This study compared two combinations of medicines used for sedation and pain relief in adults undergoing knee arthroscopy for knee joint injuries. One group received nalbuphine with remimazolam, and the other received nalbuphine with propofol. The study examined pain, sedation, cognitive function, and adverse events. A total of 100 adults aged 18 to 65 years were randomly assigned to the two groups, with 50 participants in each group. All participants underwent surgery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Pain, sedation, and cognitive function were assessed immediately after surgery and at 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery.

Read the detailed description

This single-center, randomized, parallel-group study was conducted at Wuhan Fourth Hospital. Participants were assigned using a random-number table. Both groups were managed by the same anesthesia team. Intraoperative assessments included blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, anesthesia induction time, anesthesia duration, and awakening time. Postoperative assessments included the Visual Analog Scale for pain, the Ramsay Sedation Scale, and the Mini-Mental State Examination. Adverse events assessed included hypotension, respiratory depression, bradycardia, postoperative agitation, nausea and vomiting, pruritus, chills, and diplopia. The study was approved by the Wuhan Fourth Hospital ethics committee, and participants provided written informed consent before surgery.

No primary outcome measure was prespecified before the study began. This registration is being prepared after study completion.

Conditions
Knee Injuries
Being tested
Nalbuphine, Remimazolam, Propofol
Medical subject headings
Knee Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NalbuphineDrug

    Nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg was administered intravenously at induction in both study groups.

  • RemimazolamDrug

    Remimazolam 0.2-0.3 mg/kg was administered intravenously at induction in the experimental group. If body movement occurred during the procedure, an additional intravenous dose of 0.05 mg/kg was administered as needed until completion.

  • PropofolDrug

    Propofol 1.5-2.0 mg/kg was administered intravenously at induction in the active comparator group. If body movement occurred during the procedure, an additional intravenous dose of 0.5 mg/kg was administered as needed until completion.

Study groups in NCT07838948
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Nalbuphine With RemimazolamExperimental50 participants received nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg and remimazolam 0.2-0.3 mg/kg intravenously at induction. If body movement occurred during the procedure, an additional intravenous dose of remimazolam 0.05 mg/kg was administered as needed until completion. Knee arthroscopy was performed under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.
Receives: Drug: Nalbuphine; Drug: Remimazolam
Nalbuphine With PropofolActive comparator50 participants received nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg and propofol 1.5-2.0 mg/kg intravenously at induction. If body movement occurred during the procedure, an additional intravenous dose of propofol 0.5 mg/kg was administered as needed until completion. Knee arthroscopy was performed under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.
Receives: Drug: Nalbuphine; Drug: Propofol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Postoperative pain measured by the Visual Analog Scale (retrospectively designated)

    Postoperative pain intensity assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Lower scores indicate less pain. Scores are compared between the two treatment groups at each specified assessment. No primary outcome was prespecified before the study began. This measure is designated as primary for this retrospective registration after study completion; it was not a prospectively specified primary endpoint.

    Measured: Immediately after surgery and at 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Postoperative sedation measured by the Ramsay Sedation Scale

    Sedation assessed with the Ramsay Sedation Scale, ranging from 1 to 6. Higher scores indicate deeper sedation. Scores are compared between the treatment groups at each assessment. Outcome classification is assigned for this retrospective registration; no primary outcome hierarchy was prespecified before study initiation.

    Measured: Immediately after surgery and at 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery

  2. Postoperative Mini-Mental State Examination score

    Cognitive performance assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), with scores ranging from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better performance. Scores are compared between the treatment groups at each assessment. Outcome classification is assigned for this retrospective registration; no primary outcome hierarchy was prespecified before study initiation.

    Measured: Immediately after surgery and at 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery

  3. Incidence of postoperative agitation

    Percentage of participants with postoperative agitation recorded during postoperative observation. The manuscript does not specify a grading scale or severity threshold. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Measured: From the end of surgery through 24 hours after surgery

  4. Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting

    Percentage of participants with postoperative nausea and vomiting recorded during postoperative observation. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Measured: From the end of surgery through 24 hours after surgery

  5. Incidence of intraoperative hypotension

    Percentage of participants with systolic blood pressure below 90 mmHg or a decrease greater than 20% from baseline during surgery. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Measured: During surgery

  6. Incidence of intraoperative respiratory depression

    Percentage of participants with oxygen saturation below 90% or respiratory rate below 8 breaths per minute during surgery. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Measured: During surgery

  7. Incidence of bradycardia

    Percentage of participants with heart rate below 50 beats per minute. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Measured: During the perioperative observation period, through 24 hours after surgery

  8. Incidence of pruritus, chills, and diplopia

    The percentage of participants experiencing each of the following events is assessed separately: pruritus, chills, and diplopia. This is not a composite endpoint. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Measured: During the perioperative observation period, through 24 hours after surgery

  9. Intraoperative blood pressure

    Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure measured in mmHg during surgery are compared separately between treatment groups. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Measured: During surgery

  10. Intraoperative heart rate

    Heart rate measured in beats per minute during surgery and compared between treatment groups. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Measured: During surgery

  11. Intraoperative respiratory rate

    Respiratory rate measured in breaths per minute during surgery and compared between treatment groups. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Measured: During surgery

  12. Intraoperative oxygen saturation

    Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), expressed as a percentage, recorded during surgery and compared between treatment groups. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Measured: During surgery

  13. Anesthesia induction time

    Time required for anesthesia induction, recorded in minutes and compared between treatment groups. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Measured: During anesthesia induction on the day of surgery

  14. Duration of anesthesia

    Duration of anesthesia, recorded in minutes and compared between treatment groups. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Measured: During anesthesia on the day of surgery

  15. Awakening time

    Time to awakening after anesthesia, recorded in minutes and compared between treatment groups. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Measured: During recovery from anesthesia on the day of surgery

  16. Postoperative cognitive impairment based on the manuscript MMSE threshold

    Percentage of participants with a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 24 or less, the threshold described in the manuscript as suggesting cognitive dysfunction. MMSE scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better performance. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Measured: Immediately after surgery and at 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Sep 2026
  2. Study start10 Apr 2025
  3. Primary completion2 Oct 2025
  4. Study completion2 Oct 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants were assigned in a 1:1 ratio using a random-number table to nalbuphine with remimazolam or nalbuphine with propofol.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07838948
Sponsor's protocol ID
KY2025-073-02
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
19 Sep 2026
Last updated
24 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Nalbuphine, Remimazolam and Propofol in people with Knee Injuries, run by Wuhan Fourth Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Postoperative pain measured by the Visual Analog Scale (retrospectively designated) (time frame: Immediately after surgery and at 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in