AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart FailureTEAM-ICNCT07849361

Feasibility Study on the Implementation of a Program to Facilitate the Return Home of Patients With Heart Failure Following Hospitalization, Led by a Coordinated Multidisciplinary Team Based on the "Team-based Care" Model

A study testing Intervention Arm - TEAM-IC in people with Heart Failure, run by Sant'Innovation at 1 site in France.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Heart failure is a common heart condition that often leads to hospital stays and repeat readmissions. When patients leave the hospital, coordinating patient care between the hospital and the local healthcare team (family doctor, nurses, cardiologist) can be difficult, and gaps in this coordination can lead to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Heart Failure
What is being tested?
Intervention Arm - TEAM-IC
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
4 Oct 2026to Dec 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female, age > 18 years with no upper age limit;
  • Hospitalized for heart failure;
  • Discharge home anticipated within 7 days of enrollment;
  • Signed and dated informed consent;
  • Resident within the GHT Centre Franche-Comté and within a maximum of one hour by road from one of the two enrolling centers.

Who cannot join

  • Needfor a heart transplant or ventricular assist device;
  • Any severe valvular heart disease that could benefit from surgical intervention during the course of the study;
  • Patients with a life expectancy of less than 3 months;
  • A person subject to a legal protection measure, involuntary psychiatric care, unable to give consent, to follow instructions, or to comply with follow-up procedures;
  • Any other medical condition that would put the patient at risk or could influence the study results
  • Not affiliated with or not a beneficiary of a French social security scheme;
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Subject in the exclusion period of another study or listed in the "national register of volunteers" ("fichier national des volontaires");
  • Patient currently enrolled in an ongoing interventional clinical research study on heart failure management (risk of interference);
  • Patient already benefiting from a home discharge program other than the PRADO program.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

France1 site
  • MSP " Sant'Innovation " de Palente

    Besançon

Other trials in France

About this study

Heart failure is a common heart condition that often leads to hospital stays and repeat readmissions. When patients leave the hospital, coordinating patient care between the hospital and the local healthcare team (family doctor, nurses, cardiologist) can be difficult, and gaps in this coordination can lead to complications or unnecessary re-hospitalizations.

This study, called TEAM-IC, tests a new way of organizing the return home after a hospital stay for heart failure. In this new approach, a dedicated "care coordination nurse" based in a local primary care health center works closely with the patient's usual caregivers and with the hospital team to support the patient during the first three months after discharge. This is compared to the existing standard program (PRADO-IC) currently used in France.

Read more

Hypothesis: The investigators believe that organizing the return home around a coordinating nurse embedded in a local health center, with support tailored to each patient's level of frailty, will lead to better follow-up and better care for heart failure patients than the current standard program.

Before testing whether this approach actually improves health outcomes in a larger trial, this study first aims to find out whether such a program is realistic and workable in practice, for example, whether patients and healthcare professionals are willing to take part, whether the organization runs smoothly, and whether the study procedures can be followed as planned.

Conditions
Heart Failure
Being tested
Intervention Arm - TEAM-IC
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intervention Arm - TEAM-ICOther

    A 3-month post-discharge care pathway for heart failure patients, coordinated by a dedicated care-pathway support nurse (IAP) based in a resource primary care health center (MSP), working alongside the patient's own GP and community nurse. Before discharge, the IAP assesses frailty (SEGA-A scale) and non-adherence risk (SPUR), then stratifies patients into 3 follow-up intensity levels. The IAP registers patients on a regional hospital-community coordination platform (eTICSS), offers telemonitoring of weight, blood pressure and heart failure warning signs, and liaises with the hospital's advanced-practice nurse in cardiology. The GP and community nurse receive personalized recommendations, online training modules, and support for administrative and social care referrals. Unlike the PRADO-IC control arm, the intervention adds an upstream frailty/adherence assessment and a primary-care-based coordinating nurse linked directly to the hospital team.

Study groups in NCT07849361
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention Arm - TEAM-ICExperimentalPatients randomized to this arm receive the TEAM-IC pathway following hospitalization for heart failure. Before discharge, a care-pathway support nurse (IAP), based in a resource primary care health center (MSP), assesses frailty (SEGA-A scale), non-adherence risk (SPUR), and quality of life (KCCQ-12), then stratifies the patient into one of three follow-up intensity levels. The patient is registered on a regional care-coordination platform (eTICSS) and offered telemonitoring of weight, blood pressure, and heart failure warning signs. The patient's GP and community nurse are informed, receive personalized recommendations and access to online training modules, and are supported by the IAP for 3 months post-discharge, including help with administrative/social care referrals and a cardiology advanced-practice nurse consultation at 1 month. The GP's role as primary caregiver is not modified; the IAP provides additional coordination support alongside standard care.
Receives: Other: Intervention Arm - TEAM-IC
Control Arm - PRADONo interventionPatients randomized to this arm receive the standard PRADO-IC discharge program managed by the French national health insurance (CPAM), with no TEAM-IC coordination support. Before discharge, the IAP still assesses frailty (SEGA-A), non-adherence risk (SPUR), and quality of life (KCCQ-12), but these results do not trigger any specific follow-up actions in this arm. The patient is offered standard telemonitoring and/or advanced-practice nurse (IPA) follow-up as usually available. Home nursing visits and clinical monitoring follow the usual PRADO-IC protocol for 3 months. At month 3, the study team collects outcome data for comparison with the intervention arm: rehospitalization, non-hospitalized decompensation episodes (EPOF signs), NYHA class, BNP level, mortality, guideline-recommended drug prescriptions, KCCQ score, healthcare utilization, and satisfaction questionnaires from the patient, GP, and community nurse

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Organizational feasibility: proportion of study procedures completed as planned

    Percentage of scheduled study procedures (appointments and data collection visits) carried out as planned in the TEAM-IC care pathway, among all scheduled procedures. As this is a pilot feasibility study, no statistical hypothesis testing is planned; results will be reported descriptively to inform the design of a future full-scale trial.

    Measured: From discharge to 3 months after discharge

  2. Acceptability: inclusion rate among eligible patients

    Percentage of eligible patients who are included in the study (number of included participants divided by number of eligible patients). The numbers of potentially eligible, eligible, not contacted, refusing, and included patients will be reported in the participant flow chart. Results will be reported descriptively.

    Measured: At eligibility assessment, during the index hospitalization for heart failure

  3. Protocol adherence: completeness of collected data

    Percentage of expected data items actually collected, among all data items planned by the protocol. Results will be reported descriptively.

    Measured: From inclusion to 3 months after discharge

  4. Protocol adherence: attrition rate

    Percentage of included participants who leave the study before the end of follow-up, whether through consent withdrawal, non-adherence to the program, or loss to follow-up. Results will be reported descriptively.

    Measured: From inclusion to 3 months after discharge

  5. Adherence to the projected study timeline: actual versus planned enrollment

    Number of participants actually enrolled, expressed as a percentage of the number planned at the corresponding milestone of the study timeline. Results will be reported descriptively.

    Measured: At enrollment, during the index hospitalization for heart failure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Sep 2026
  2. Study start4 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionDec 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07849361
Sponsor's protocol ID
AAP_ResP-Ir_2024
Acronym
TEAM-IC
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
24 Sep 2026
Last updated
5 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Intervention Arm - TEAM-IC in people with Heart Failure, run by Sant'Innovation at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Organizational feasibility: proportion of study procedures completed as planned (time frame: From discharge to 3 months after discharge). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in