Major DepressioniTBS-TRDNCT07852065
iTBS Versus Standard 10 Hz rTMS for Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD)
A study testing iTBS and rTMS in people with Major Depression, run by Kafrelsheikh University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
This randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial compared intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS, 3-minute sessions) with standard 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS, 37-minute sessions) applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in adults with treatment-resistant… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Major Depression
- What is being tested?
- iTBS and rTMS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 182 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 30 Jun 2026to 30 Apr 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ● Adults aged 18-65 years, both sexes
- Meets DSM-5 criteria for major depressive disorder, confirmed by SCID-5
- Treatment-resistant depression: failure to achieve adequate response after ≥2 adequate antidepressant trials (adequate dose, duration, and adherence)
Who cannot join
- ● Current major depressive episode in the context of bipolar disorder
- MDD with psychotic features
- Primary psychotic disorder
- History of traumatic brain injury or brain lesions
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site
: Kafr-Elsheikh Outpatient Psychiatric Clinic, Egypt; Menoufia Outpatient Psychiatric Clinic, Egypt
Kafr ash Shaykh
About this study
Official title: A Randomised Controlled Non-Inferiority Study Comparing Efficacy of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Versus Standard 10HZ Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation In Treatment-Resistant Depression Patients
This randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial compared intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS, 3-minute sessions) with standard 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS, 37-minute sessions) applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Participants received 20 sessions over 4 weeks. The primary aim was to determine whether iTBS is non-inferior to standard rTMS in reducing depressive symptoms (HDRS-17) at Week 4, and to compare patient-reported treatment experience and acceptability between protocols.
Read the detailed description
182 adults aged 18-65 years meeting DSM-5 criteria for major depressive disorder (confirmed by SCID-5) and classified as treatment-resistant (failure of ≥2 adequate antidepressant trials) were randomised 1:1 to iTBS (600 pulses/session) or standard 10 Hz rTMS (3,000 pulses/session), both delivered to the left DLPFC at 120% resting motor threshold, 5 days/week for 4 weeks (20 sessions total). Randomisation used a computerised random-number generator with a permuted-block design. Treating research nurses were unblinded; raters and participants were blinded to allocation. The primary outcome was change in HDRS-17 from baseline to Week 4, analysed by intention-to-treat using a linear mixed-effects model, with a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 3 HDRS-17 points. Secondary outcomes included response and remission rates, CGI, GAD-7, BAI, the TMS Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire, protocol preference, and feasibility (missed sessions, early withdrawal). Follow-up continued to Week 8.
- Conditions
- Major Depression
- Being tested
- iTBS, rTMS
- Keywords
- treatment resistant depression, Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Depressive Disorder, Major, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
iTBSDevice
Device: Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS), delivered via Magnetism rapid TMS machine (UK) with figure-8 coil
rTMSDevice
Device: Standard 10 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), delivered via Magnetism rapid TMS machine (UK) with figure-8 coil
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| iTBS | Experimental | Experimental. Intermittent theta burst stimulation, 600 pulses/session (bursts of 3 pulses at 50 Hz, repeated at 5 Hz; 2-second trains, 8-second inter-train intervals, 20 trains), left DLPFC, 120% resting motor threshold, 5 days/week for 4 weeks (20 sessions), ~3 minutes active stimulation per session.
Intervention: Device: Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS), delivered via Magnetism rapid TMS machine (UK) with figure-8 coil Receives: Device: iTBS |
| Standard 10 Hz rTMS | Active comparator | Type: Active Comparator. Standard 10 Hz rTMS, 3,000 pulses/session (30 trains of 4 seconds/40 pulses, 26-second inter-train intervals), left DLPFC, 120% resting motor threshold, 5 days/week for 4 weeks (20 sessions), 37 minutes per session.
Intervention: Device: Standard 10 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), delivered via Magnetism rapid TMS machine (UK) with figure-8 coil Receives: Device: rTMS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HDRS-17) score
The HDRS-17 is a clinician-administered scale with 17 items; total scores range from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity (a worse outcome). The outcome is the change in total score from baseline to Week 4.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4 (after the 20th session)
Secondary outcomes (10)
Response rate (≥50% reduction in HDRS-17 total score from baseline)
Proportion of participants achieving a ≥50% reduction from baseline in HDRS-17 total score (0-52 range; higher score = more severe depression) at Week 4.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4
● Remission rate (HDRS-17 ≤7)
Proportion of participants with an HDRS-17 total score of 7 or less (0-52 range; higher score = more severe depression) at Week 4.
Measured: week 4
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7) score
The GAD-7 is a 7-item self-report questionnaire; total scores range from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety severity (a worse outcome).
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
● TMS Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (TMS-PSQ, 10-item, score 0-10)
Measured: week 4
● Patient protocol preference (single-item forced choice)
Measured: week 4
● Feasibility: missed sessions, early withdrawal, reasons for non-completion
Measured: throughout treatment course
TMS Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (TMS-PSQ) score
The TMS-PSQ is a validated 10-item patient-reported questionnaire; total score ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater treatment satisfaction (a better outcome).
Measured: Week 4
Patient protocol preference
Single-item forced-choice question administered at Week 4: 'If you required further TMS treatment, which protocol would you prefer?' Reported as the proportion of participants selecting each protocol.
Measured: 4 week
. Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) score
The CGI-S is a clinician-rated 7-point scale (1 = normal, not at all ill; 7 = among the most extremely ill patients). Higher scores indicate greater illness severity (a worse outcome).
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-C) score
The CGI-C is a clinician-rated 7-point scale (1 = very much improved; 7 = very much worse) rating change relative to baseline. Lower scores indicate greater improvement (a better outcome).
Measured: week 8
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Oct 2026
- Study start30 Jun 2026
- Primary completion31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Apr 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Major DepressionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Kafrelsheikh UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 182 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kafrelsheikh University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ahmed Nabil Ramadan Bayoumy Saad, Kafrelsheikh University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07852065
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KIFSIRB200-1044
- Acronym
- iTBS-TRD
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised Controlled Non-Inferiority Study Comparing Efficacy of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Versus Standard 10HZ Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation In Treatment-Resistant Depression Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07852065
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- iTBS-TRD / KIFSIRB200-1044
- Conditions
- Major Depression
- Keywords
- treatment resistant depression, Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 182 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Kafrelsheikh UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial compared intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS, 3-minute sessions) with standard 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS, 37-minute sessions) applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Participants received 20 sessions over 4 weeks. The primary aim was to determine whether iTBS is non-inferior to standard rTMS in reducing depressive symptoms (HDRS-17) at Week 4, and to compare patient-reported treatment experience and acceptability between protocols.
Detailed description
182 adults aged 18-65 years meeting DSM-5 criteria for major depressive disorder (confirmed by SCID-5) and classified as treatment-resistant (failure of ≥2 adequate antidepressant trials) were randomised 1:1 to iTBS (600 pulses/session) or standard 10 Hz rTMS (3,000 pulses/session), both delivered to the left DLPFC at 120% resting motor threshold, 5 days/week for 4 weeks (20 sessions total). Randomisation used a computerised random-number generator with a permuted-block design. Treating research nurses were unblinded; raters and participants were blinded to allocation. The primary outcome was change in HDRS-17 from baseline to Week 4, analysed by intention-to-treat using a linear mixed-effects model, with a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 3 HDRS-17 points. Secondary outcomes included response and remission rates, CGI, GAD-7, BAI, the TMS Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire, protocol preference, and feasibility (missed sessions, early withdrawal). Follow-up continued to Week 8.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| iTBS | Experimental | Device: iTBSExperimental. Intermittent theta burst stimulation, 600 pulses/session (bursts of 3 pulses at 50 Hz, repeated at 5 Hz; 2-second trains, 8-second inter-train intervals, 20 trains), left DLPFC, 120% resting motor threshold, 5 days/week for 4 weeks (20 sessions), ~3 minutes active stimulation per session. Intervention: Device: Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS), delivered via Magnetism rapid TMS machine (UK) with figure-8 coil |
| Standard 10 Hz rTMS | Active comparator | Device: rTMSType: Active Comparator. Standard 10 Hz rTMS, 3,000 pulses/session (30 trains of 4 seconds/40 pulses, 26-second inter-train intervals), left DLPFC, 120% resting motor threshold, 5 days/week for 4 weeks (20 sessions), 37 minutes per session. Intervention: Device: Standard 10 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), delivered via Magnetism rapid TMS machine (UK) with figure-8 coil |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- ● Adults aged 18-65 years, both sexes
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- ● Current major depressive episode in the context of bipolar disorder
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| iTBSDevice: Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS), delivered via Magnetism rapid TMS machine (UK) with figure-8 coil | Device | iTBS |
| rTMSDevice: Standard 10 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), delivered via Magnetism rapid TMS machine (UK) with figure-8 coil | Device | Standard 10 Hz rTMS |
Primary outcome
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HDRS-17) score
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 (after the 20th session)
The HDRS-17 is a clinician-administered scale with 17 items; total scores range from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity (a worse outcome). The outcome is the change in total score from baseline to Week 4.
10 secondary outcomes
Response rate (≥50% reduction in HDRS-17 total score from baseline)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
● Remission rate (HDRS-17 ≤7)
Time frame: week 4
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7) score
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
● TMS Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (TMS-PSQ, 10-item, score 0-10)
Time frame: week 4
● Patient protocol preference (single-item forced choice)
Time frame: week 4
● Feasibility: missed sessions, early withdrawal, reasons for non-completion
Time frame: throughout treatment course
TMS Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (TMS-PSQ) score
Time frame: Week 4
Patient protocol preference
Time frame: 4 week
. Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) score
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-C) score
Time frame: week 8
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Major Depression
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
RecruitingPhase 4
Biomarker-Guided Antidepressant Selection
Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, Treatment-resistant Depression (TRD)
Recruiting
Targeting Network Dysfunction in Apathy of Late-life Depression Using Digital Therapeutics
Major Depressive Disorder, Apathy
RecruitingObservational study
Student Precarity and Psychiatry
Depressive Disorder, Major, Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Acute Intermittent Hypoxia Therapy for Depression
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing iTBS and rTMS in people with Major Depression, run by Kafrelsheikh University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HDRS-17) score (time frame: Baseline and Week 4 (after the 20th session)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.